Hyperprogressive disease in patients with recurrent high grade gliomas treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or other therapies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13575-e13575
Author(s):  
Laura Donovan ◽  
Samuel Gedailovich ◽  
Adela Joanta-Gomez ◽  
Jessica Schulte ◽  
Teri Nguyen Kreisl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

e13575 Background: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) has been described in solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). HPD is defined as a ≥2-fold increase in tumor growth rate (TGR) following initiation of ICI. HPD has not been explored in patients with high grade gliomas (HGG) on ICI or standard cytotoxic regimens. In advanced cancer patients receiving ICI, MDM2/4 amplification or EGFR alterations, both found in HGG, correlated with HPD. We compared the rate of HPD in recurrent HGG patients receiving ICIs to those treated with non-immunotherapy agents. Methods: Patients with HGG on ICIs for 1st or 2nd recurrence were compared to a control group receiving other therapies at 1st recurrence. Patients with prior or concurrent bevacizumab or anti-VEGFR were excluded due to pseudoresponse and decreased enhancement with these drugs. HPD was calculated by comparing TGR immediately before and after treatment. Results: 49 patients met inclusion criteria (27 ICI, 25 control). 25/27 patients treated with ICIs and 20/22 patients in the control group had complete imaging and were eligible for analysis. In the ICI group, 60% were men (15/25) and 88% (22/25) had a diagnosis of GBM. 68% were treated at first progression (17/25). Controls were 80% male (16/20) and all had a diagnosis of GBM. 30% (6/20) were 65 years or older at diagnosis in the control group compared to 28% (7/25) in the ICI group. In total, 7/25 patients met criteria for HPD in the ICI group (28%) compared to 4/20 patients in the control group (20%). 10/25 patients (5/7 with HPD) in the ICI group and 8/20 patients (2/4 with HPD) in the control group had next generation sequencing of their tumors. EGFR alterations and MDM2/4 amplifications were not associated with HPD whereas PTEN mutations were more common in the HPD group (71% HPD vs. 33.3% no HPD). Conclusions: HPD is observed in patients with HGG treated with ICI at comparable rates to those with other cancers, but was also observed in 20% of patients receiving other therapies. While the numbers are small, PTEN mutations may be associated with HPD in patients with HGG. In contrast to other solid tumors, EGFR alterations and MDM2/4 amplifications were not associated with HPD in HGG.

scholarly journals PATH-17. HYPERPROGRESSIVE DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS TREATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS OR CYTOTOXIC THERAPIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi146-vi146
Author(s):  
Laura Donovan ◽  
Samuel Gedailovich ◽  
Adela Joanta-Gomez ◽  
Andrew Lassman ◽  
Fabio Iwamoto
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Before And After ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

Abstract BACKGROUND Hyperprogressive disease (HPD), defined as a ≥ 2-fold increase in tumor growth rate (TGR) compared to baseline following initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has been described in solid tumors but is not well explored high grade gliomas (HGG). We investigated the rate of HPD in HGG patients receiving ICIs for first or second recurrence compared to those treated with non-immunotherapy agents. METHODS Patients with HGG receiving ICIs for 1st or 2nd recurrence compared to a controls receiving other therapies at first progression. Prior or concurrent bevacizumab or anti-VEGFR were exclusionary due to pseudoresponse and decreased enhancement with these drugs. HPD was calculated by comparing TGR immediately before and after treatment. RESULTS 49 patients met inclusion criteria (27 ICI, 25 control). 25/27 patients receiving ICIs and 20/22 patients in the control group were evaluable in the analysis. The ICI group included 60% men (15/25) and 80% (20/25) had a diagnosis of primary GBM. 68% were treated at first progression (17/25). Controls were 80% male (16/20) and all had a diagnosis of primary GBM. 28% (7/25) of patients met criteria for HPD in the ICI group compared to 4/20 controls (20%). Median OS in patients with primary GBM was 26mo in the ICI group vs. 15.9mo in controls. Median survival past progression in patients with primary GBM receiving ICI for 1st recurrence (13/25) was 12mo vs. 10.6mo in controls. 40% of patients in both groups had next generation sequencing (5/7 with HPD in ICI and 2/4 in control). EGFR alterations and MDM2/4 amplifications were not associated with HPD whereas PTEN mutations were more common in HPD (71% vs. 33.3%). CONCLUSION HPD is observed in patients with HGG treated with ICI at comparable rates to those with other cancers, but was also observed in 20% of patients receiving other therapies.

scholarly journals Assessing Response of High-Grade Gliomas to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Dexter G. Stallworth ◽  
Sepideh Mokhtari ◽  
Nam D. Tran ◽  
John A. Arrington
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
High Grade ◽  
High Grade Gliomas

Abstract 15395: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cancer Are Associated With Increased Venous Thromboembolism Events

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Gong ◽  
Zsofia Drobni ◽  
Raza Alvi ◽  
Sean Murphy ◽  
Sarah Hartmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Immune Activation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Massachusetts General Hospital ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) lead to immune activation, increased inflammation and cancer cell death. Both immune activation and inflammation are critical pathobiological drivers for venous thromboembolism (VTE). There are no robust data testing the effect of ICIs on the risk of developing VTE. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 2854 patients who received ICIs at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. VTE events, defined as a composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), were identified by individual chart review and were blindly adjudicated using standard criteria. A case-crossover design was applied with an “at-risk period” defined as the two-year period after and the “control period” as the two years prior to treatment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using Poisson’s regression. Results: Immune checkpoint inhibitor use increased VTE risk by 1.84-fold from 4.85 per 100-person years to 8.91 per 100 person-years (IRR 1.84, 95% confidence interval: 1.54 - 2.19, p <0.001). Of the individual components, there was a 2.44-fold increase in DVT risk (2.30 to 5.58 per 100 person-years) and 1.68-fold increase in PE risk (2.96 to 5.00 per 100 person-years). Comparing patients with and without a VTE event, those with a VTE event after ICI initiation had a higher rate of prior VTE, lung cancer, urothelial cancer, and a higher platelet count and white blood cell count at baseline. At 6 months post ICI initiation, 165 (8.6%) patients had a VTE event and of these patients 136 (7.1%) had no prior VTE. Conclusions: Patients with cancer treated with ICIs are at increased risk of developing VTE. Whether prophylaxis for VTE among patients starting an ICI reduces this risk is unclear.

scholarly journals Immune Thrombocytopenia Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Solid Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolin Liu ◽  
Xiuju Liang ◽  
Jing Liang ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Jun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cancer Case ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its receptor programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), represent promising therapeutic strategies for advanced human malignancies. However, a subgroup of patients experiences various autoimmune toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), that occur as a result of on-target and off-tumor autoimmune responses. Although irAEs are generally confirmed to be less severe than toxicities caused by conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy, uncommon irAEs, such as immune thrombocytopenia, may occur with a very low incidence and sometimes be severe or fatal. This review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis of immune thrombocytopenia occurring in advanced cancer patients induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in those with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. We also first present one patient with non-small cell lung cancer who received the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and developed severe thrombocytopenia.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor–associated hypercalcaemia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Izzedine ◽  
Thibaud Chazal ◽  
Rimda Wanchoo ◽  
Kenar D Jhaveri
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Endocrine Disease ◽  
Oncological Patients ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have recently become a cornerstone for the treatment of different advanced cancers. These drugs have the ability to reactivate the immune system against tumour cells but can also trigger a myriad of side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although there are numerous reports of CPI-related endocrinopathies, hypercalcaemia as a suspected irAE is not well documented. The mechanisms of CPI hypercalcaemia are not clearly established. However, in our review, four distinct causes emerged: endocrine disease-related, sarcoid-like granuloma, humoral hypercalcaemia due to parathyroid-related hormone and hyperprogressive disease following CPI initiation. Prompt recognition of hypercalcaemia and the institution of therapy can be lifesaving, affording the opportunity to address the underlying aetiology. In this review we discuss the incidence, diagnosis and management of immune-related hypercalcaemia in oncological patients receiving CPI agents.

Optimizing Sequence of PD-L1 Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors and Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-302
Author(s):  
Côme Tholomier ◽  
Gautier Marcq ◽  
Surashri Shinde-Jadhav ◽  
Mina Ayoub ◽  
Jia Min Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rate Of Response

BACKGROUND: New bladder preserving strategies are needed for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Combined therapy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and radiation was shown to have synergistic antitumoral effects in preclinical studies. OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate whether the sequence of administration of this combined therapy impacts antitumoral response. METHODS: We developed an in-vivo syngeneic MIBC mouse model where murine bladder cancer cells (MB49) were injected subcutaneously in the right flank of C57BL/6 mice. Mice were then randomized to the following treatments: control, anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) alone, radiation alone (XRT) consisting of 6.25 Gy x2 fractions, concurrent anti-PD-L1 with XRT, neoadjuvant anti-PD-L1 followed by XRT, or XRT followed by adjuvant anti-PD-L1 therapy. Tumor growth, survival, and rate of response were analyzed. RESULTS: Total of 60 mice were randomized. One-way analysis of variance showed statistically significant difference in tumor growth rate across the treatment arms (p = 0.029). Importantly, timing of immunotherapy (neoadjuvant, concurrent, or adjuvant) did not alter either tumor growth or survival (p > 0.05). The rate of response was also similar in each combination arm (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combining anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy and radiation therapy offers optimal antitumoral responses. Timing of immunotherapy (neoadjuvant, concurrent, or adjuvant) does not appear to affect outcomes. Whether the toxicity profile differs across various sequential deliveries of combination therapy requires further evaluation.

scholarly journals Hyperprogressive disease in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. xi25
Author(s):  
P. Ayala de Miguel ◽  
J. López Gallego ◽  
I. Gorospe García ◽  
A. Illán Varella ◽  
P.R. Rivera Vargas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

scholarly journals Immunotherapy by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Nuclear Medicine Imaging: Current and Future Applications

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Decazes ◽  
Pierre Bohn
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Medicine ◽  
Radionuclide Imaging ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Nuclear Medicine Imaging ◽  
Therapeutic Evaluation

Immunotherapy by using immune checkpoint inhibitors is a revolutionary development in oncology. Medical imaging is also impacted by this new therapy, particularly nuclear medicine imaging (also called radionuclide imaging), which uses radioactive tracers to visualize metabolic functions. Our aim was to review the current applications of nuclear medicine imaging in immunotherapy, along with their limitations, and the perspectives offered by this imaging modality. Method: Articles describing the use of radionuclide imaging in immunotherapy were researched using PubMed by April 2019 and analyzed. Results: More than 5000 articles were analyzed, and nearly 100 of them were retained. Radionuclide imaging, notably 18F-FDG PET/CT, already has a major role in many cancers for pre-therapeutic and therapeutic evaluation, diagnoses of adverse effects, called immune-related adverse events (IrAE), and end-of-treatment evaluations. However, these current applications can be hindered by immunotherapy, notably due to atypical response patterns such as pseudoprogression, which is defined as an increase in the size of lesions, or the visualization of new lesions, followed by a response, and hyperprogression, which is an accelerated tumor growth rate after starting treatment. To overcome these difficulties, new opportunities are offered, particularly therapeutic evaluation criteria adapted to immunotherapy and immuno-PET allowing us to predict responses to immunotherapy. Moreover, some new technological solutions are also promising, such as radiomic analyses and body composition on associated anatomical images. However, more research has to be done, notably for the diagnosis of hyperprogression and pseudoprogression. Conclusion: Immunotherapy, by its major impact on cancer and by the new patterns generated on images, is revolutionary in the field of medical images. Nuclear medicine imaging is already established and will be able to help meet new challenges through its plasticity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document