A comprehensive meta-analysis of endocrine immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and outcomes in head and neck cancer and lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14096-e14096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Jeyce Gomes-Lima ◽  
John Kwagyan ◽  
Fred King ◽  
Stephen J Fernandez ◽  
Kenneth D Burman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grade 3

e14096 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have emerged as an effective treatment for a variety of cancers. However, important immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can occur. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of endocrine irAEs in patients with head and neck cancer and lung cancer that have used a ICPi and outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed within PubMed and EMBASE databases. Search terms included “durvalumab”, “atezolizumab”, “nivolumab”, “pembrolizumab”, “ipilimumab”, “head & neck cancer”, “lung cancer”. Studies published before September 2018 were included. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) phase III written in English. Data were extracted about patient characteristics, interventions, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and endocrine irAEs. A summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and a scatter plot was generated. Results: Twelve RCTs comprising 7060 patients were reviewed; 3815 used an ICPi (treatment arm). The mean follow-up time of 12.2 months ± 7.1 SD. The survival rate of the treatment arm was enhanced (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80), compared to the alternate arm. Similarly, the PFS of the treatment arm was improved (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81) but with a higher incidence of endocrine irAEs. The most common endocrine irAE reported was hypothyroidism;193 patients in the treatment arm vs. 29 in the alternate arm (p < 0.001); grade 3/4 AE was observed in 10 patients vs. 1 patient, respectively. Other endocrine irAEs were reported in 168 patients in the treatment arm vs. 26 patients in the alternate arm (p < 0.001); grade 3/4 AE was observed in 28 patients vs. 3 patients, respectively. A significant positive correlation between endocrine irAEs and OS was observed (p = 0.019). Conclusions: ICPi are a powerful tool in the treatment of cancer. The prevalence of endocrine irAEs in this meta-analysis was 9%. There is evidence of improved overall survival in patients who developed endocrine irAEs. Further studies are needed to correlate the development of irAEs and OS advantage.

Effect of immunotherapy on survival outcomes in prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17030-e17030
Author(s):  
Vinod solipuram ◽  
Kishor Pokharel ◽  
Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu ◽  
Harideep Samanapally
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grade 3

e17030 Background: Prostate cancer is one of the leading cancers in men with an estimated 191,930 new cases in 2020 in the USA alone. Treatment options for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have evolved in recent years. Immunotherapy involving vaccines like sipuleucel-T, PROSTVAC and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been evaluated in these patients. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the effect of immunotherapy in mCRPC. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library without language limitations from inception to January 3, 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS), prostate specific antigen (PSA) reduction ≥ 50% and incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. The analysis of OS, PFS was done using random effects hazard ratio (HR) by generic inverse variance method and analysis of PSA reduction ≥ 50% and grade 3-4 adverse events was done using random effects risk ratio (RR) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: 12 RCTs comprising 4109 patients were included in the analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.89; 95% CI (0.81, 0.97)) and PFS (HR 0.83; 95% CI (0.76, 0.92)) in the immunotherapy arm compared to placebo or standard treatment arms with moderate quality of evidence. Patients in the immunotherapy group had significant reduction in PSA ≥ 50% (RR 1.71; 95% CI (1.09, 2.68)) but also had statistically significant increased risk of grade 3-4 adverse events (RR (1.25; 95% CI (1.02, 1.54)) when compared to placebo and the standard treatment group. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of vaccine therapy in prostate cancer leads to significant improvement in OS (HR 0.83; 95% CI (0.74, 0.93)) and PFS (HR 0.80; 95% CI (0.67, 0.95)) compared to placebo and standard treatment. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors was not associated with statistically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.98; 95% CI (0.88, 1.09)) but is associated with improvement in PFS (HR 0.87; 95%CI (0.81, 0.94)). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that immunotherapy led to significant improvement in OS, PFS and PSA reduction of ≥ 50%. However, there is an increased incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events with the use of immunotherapy when compared to other standard therapies and placebo. The improvement in overall survival is limited to the use of vaccine therapy and not to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Careful use of selective forms of immunotherapy in mCRPC can lead to greater improvement in survival.

scholarly journals 803 Immune-related adverse events correlate with improved outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A840-A840
Author(s):  
Lindsey Shantzer ◽  
Sean Dougherty ◽  
Wendy Novicoff ◽  
John Melson ◽  
Daniel Reed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the backbone of treatment for most driver-mutation negative, advanced non-small cell lung cancers. ICIs have been approved both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for front line management. While ICIs are generally regarded as well-tolerated, an unintended activation of the immune system can result in a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can limit their use in severe cases. In patients with NSCLC treated with ICI monotherapy, the occurrence of an irAE and the development of multisystem irAEs have been associated with improved clinical outcomes, suggesting irAE occurrence could have prognostic implications.1–4 However, in patients treated with combination immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, the correlation between irAEs and survival has not been completely elucidated.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with a combination of ICI plus chemotherapy between 2015 and 2021 to evaluate for a correlation between irAE occurrence and overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into two groups: those who experienced at least one irAE and those who did not experience an irAE. To account for immortal time bias, we conducted landmark analyses at 12 and 24 weeks. We additionally investigated the impact of multisystem irAEs on clinical outcomes and described the profile of irAEs observed at our institution.ResultsAmong the 94 evaluable patients identified in our population, 43.6% experienced at least one irAE. Of those patients who experienced an irAE, 26 (63.4%) experienced a single irAE, 9 (22.0%) experienced 2 irAEs, and 6 (14.6%) experienced 3 or more irAEs. The most commonly observed irAEs were dermatitis followed by pneumonitis and colitis. In our cohort, patients with at least one irAE had significantly longer median OS (16.8 mos vs 9.8 mos) compared to those who did not experience an irAE (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43–0.76, p=0.011) (figure 1). Landmark survival analyses at 12 and 24 weeks continued to support significant differences in median OS based on presence or absence of an irAE (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24–0.46, and HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21–0.60 respectively). Among patients with at least one irAE, the subset of patients who experienced multiple irAEs had further improved median OS compared to those with a single irAE.ConclusionsIn patients with advanced NSCLC treated with combination ICI plus chemotherapy, the occurrence of an irAE is associated with improved overall survival.ReferencesTeraoka S, Fujimoto D, Morimoto T, et al. Early Immune-related adverse events and association with outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with Nivolumab: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 2017;12(12):1798–1805. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.022.Ricciuti B, Genova C, De Giglio A, et al. Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: long-term outcomes from a multi-institutional analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 2019;145(2):479–485. doi:10.1007/s00432-018-2805-3.Toi Y, Sugawara S, Kawashima Y, et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. The Oncologist. 2018;23(11):1358–1365. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0384.Shankar B, Zhang J, Naqash AR, et al. Multisystem immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020;6(12):1952–1956. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5012Ethics ApprovalThis research study obtained ethics approval by the institutional review board at the University of Virginia, IRB# 19083.Abstract 803 Figure 1Overall Survival by presence or absence of an irAE in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in advanced head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-555
Author(s):  
Lingrong Tang ◽  
Tingting Liu ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Jun Dang ◽  
Guang Li
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Aim: We assessed the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors relative to other systemic therapies in previously treated recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: Relative treatment effects were assessed from eligible randomized controlled trials using Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: Among 15 trials evaluating 14 treatments, nivolumab achieved the best overall survival (OS) benefit; zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel provided the best progression-free survival benefit and objective response rate. Buparlisib + paclitaxel and zalutumumab were associated with the best OS rate at 6 and 12 months, respectively; nivolumab yielded the best OS rate at 18–24 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab was the most favorable treatment. Zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel had better efficiency, and might be a better selection for patients with programmed death-ligand 1-low/negative tumors than other treatments.

scholarly journals Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination with Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3629
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Ling Chen ◽  
Yu-Kang Tu ◽  
Hsiu-Mei Chang ◽  
Tai-Huang Lee ◽  
Kuan-Li Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Extensive Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) have a very short survival time even if they receive standard cytotoxic chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum (EP). Several randomized controlled trials have shown that patients with ED-SCLC who received a combination of EP plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had superior survival compared with those who received EP alone. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to provide a ranking of ICIs for our primary endpoints in terms of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), as well as our secondary endpoint in terms of adverse events. The fractional polynomial model was used to evaluate the adjusted hazard ratios for the survival indicators (OS and PFS). Treatment rank was estimated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), as well as the probability of being best (Prbest) reference. EP plus nivolumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab had significant benefits compared with EP alone in terms of OS (Hazard Ratio HR = 0.67, 95% Confidence Interval CI = 0.46–0.98 for nivolumab, HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54–0.91 for atezolizumab, HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59–0.90 for durvalumab) but no significant differences were observed for pembrolizumab or ipilimumab. The probability of nivolumab being ranked first among all treatment arms was highest (SCURA = 78.7%, Prbest = 46.7%). All EP plus ICI combinations had a longer PFS compared with EP alone (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.46–0.92 for nivolumab, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96 for atezolizumab, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65–0.94 for durvalumab, HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.61–0.92 for pembrolizumab), and nivolumab was ranked first in terms of PFS (SCURA = 85.0%, Prbest = 66.8%). In addition, nivolumab had the highest probability of grade 3–4 adverse events (SUCRA = 84.8%) in our study. We found that nivolumab had the best PFS and OS in all combinations of ICIs and EP, but nivolumab also had the highest probability of grade 3–4 adverse events in our network meta-analysis. Further head-to head large-scale phase III randomized controlled studies are needed to verify our conclusions.

scholarly journals Comparative risk of serious and fatal treatment-related adverse events caused by 19 immune checkpoint inhibitors used in cancer treatment: a network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592094092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Liu ◽  
Bo Jin ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Shuiyu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Combinatorial Therapy ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Comparative Risk ◽  
Grade 3

Background: This network meta-analysis assessed the comparative risk of grade 3–5 and grade 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or in combination with other modalities, for cancer treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and recent predominant oncology congresses were searched for relevant phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As outcomes, grade 3–5, and grade 5 TRAE outcomes were reported as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: In 67 RCTs involving 36,422 patients and 19 ICIs, the incidence of grade 3–5 and grade 5 TRAEs was 17.9% and 0.8% with ICI monotherapy and 46.3% and 1.4%, respectively, with combinatorial therapy. Pneumonitis was the most common cause of grade 5 TRAEs following either monotherapy (16.3%) or combinatorial therapy (11.4%). Regarding grade 3–5 TRAEs, atezolizumab + chemotherapy (CT) and antiangiogenic therapy (AT) (atezolizumab + CAT), pembrolizumab + CT, ipilimumab + CT, and atezolizumab + CT were more toxic than any ICI monotherapy, pembrolizumab or nivolumab + radiotherapy (RT), and ICIs dual therapy (durvalumab + tremelimumab and nivolumab + ipilimumab). Tremelimumab, ipilimumab, durvalumab, and pembrolizumab were, however, associated with higher grade 5 TRAEs than combinatorial treatments. Atezolizumab + CAT was the most toxic and nivolumab + RT was the least toxic of combinatorial treatments; among monotherapies, tremelimumab and avelumab were the most and least toxic, respectively. The toxicity ranking changed with type of grade 3–5 TRAEs. Conclusions: Compared with combinatorial therapy, ICI monotherapy caused lower grade 3–5 TRAEs, but some monotherapies resulted in a higher incidence of fatal TRAEs. Atezolizumab + CAT and nivolumab + RT were the most and least toxic of combinatorial treatments, respectively, and tremelimumab and avelumab were the most and least toxic of the monotherapies, respectively.

scholarly journals Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Zexi Xu ◽  
Jia Feng ◽  
Yiming Weng ◽  
Yao Jin ◽  
Min Peng
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT) have emerged as a breakthrough therapy in the treatment of various cancers. The combination has a strong rationale, but data on their efficacy and safety are still limited. Hence, we comprehensively searched the database and performed this study to elucidate the clinical manifestations of this combined strategy. Methods. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared ICI plus RT with placebo plus RT or ICI alone for the treatment of advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prostate cancer. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity. Results. Three trials involving 1584 patients were included. ICI plus RT was significantly associated with improvement of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.94, P = 0.004 ), PFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.56–0.72, P < 0.00001 ), and DCR (relative risk [RR] = 1.38; 95% CI 1.03–1.84, P = 0.03 ). A significant predictor for PFS with the combination of ICI and RT was age, as a significant improvement in PFS (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.37–0.64, P < 0.00001 ) was observed in NSCLC patients aged under 65 years. In safety analyses, patients receiving ICI plus RT had a significantly higher incidence of dyspnea (RR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.16–5.08, P = 0.02 ) and pneumonitis of grade 3 or higher (RR = 2.78; 95% CI 1.32–5.85, P = 0.007 ). Conclusion. The combination of ICI and RT was associated with improved OS, PFS, and DCR. Patients under 65 years will be the dominant beneficiaries. However, the incidence of dyspnea and pneumonia of grade 3 or higher also increased, which deserves our vigilance.

scholarly journals Association of Immune Related Adverse Events With Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overall Survival in Cancers: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Fan ◽  
Wenhui Xie ◽  
Hong Huang ◽  
Yunxia Wang ◽  
Guangtao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Cancer Types

ObjectivesImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought impressive benefits to cancer patients, however often accompanied with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We aimed to investigate the association of irAEs with efficacy and overall survival in cancer patients treated by ICIs, and further quantify the association by stratifying subgroups.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from database inception to 29 August 2019 were systematically searched. Articles reporting association of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) with irAEs in cancer patients treated with approved ICIs were included. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated for ORR, and hazard ratios (HR) were used for PFS and OS.ResultsA total of 52 articles comprising 9,156 patients were included. Pooled data demonstrated a statistically significant greater probability of achieving objective tumor response for patients with irAEs compared to those without (OR 3.91, 95% CI 3.05–5.02). In overall meta-analysis, patients who developed irAEs presented a prolonged PFS (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.46–0.62) and OS (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.41–0.59). More specifically, irAEs in certain cancer types (NSCLC and melanoma) and organs (skin and endocrine) were robustly associated with better clinical outcomes, while this association needs further verification regarding other tumors. High grade toxicities (G3–5) were not associated with a significantly favorable PFS or OS. Additionally, the association between irAEs and clinical benefit seemed to be more definite in patients receiving PD-(L)1 blockade than CTLA-4 blockade. Pooled data from landmark analyses displayed consistent results.ConclusionsThe occurrence of irAEs predicted improved tumor response and better survival in overall cancer patients treated with ICIs. Notably, the association stayed robust in certain cancer types (NSCLC and melanoma) and organ-specific irAEs (skin and endocrine).

Treatment-related adverse events of combination immune checkpoint inhibitors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15060-e15060
Author(s):  
Robin Park ◽  
Laércio Lopes da Silva ◽  
Ivy Riano ◽  
Cagney Cristancho ◽  
Anwaar Saeed
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Related Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Event Data ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Grade 3

e15060 Background: Despite increasing clinical experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the recent publication of clinical practice guidelines for managing treatment-related adverse events, precise and nuanced checkpoint inhibitor data in the setting of combination therapy is lacking. Herein we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment-related adverse event data from clinical trials evaluating combination immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Studies published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database from conception to September 28, 2019 were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were eligible for inclusion if combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was evaluated in advanced unresectable cancer and treatment-related adverse event data were available. For comparison of severity of adverse events in combination versus monotherapy, only the studies containing monotherapy arms as a control population were included, while all were included for calculation of pooled incidence of selected adverse events. Pooled risk ratio (RR) was used for the comparison of combination versus monotherapy and the logit transformed proportion for calculation of pooled incidence. Between-study risk of bias was evaluated using the Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Subgroup analysis was conducted by combination regimen, cancer type, and dosing regimen. Results: A total of 18 studies comprising 2767 patients across 10 cancer types were included in the final analysis. Combination ICI was associated with a slightly higher risk of all-grade adverse events (RR 1.07 [95% CI 1.03-1.11]) and markedly greater risk of grade 3 or higher adverse events (RR 2.21 [95% CI 1.57-3.10]) compared to monotherapy ICI. Subgroup analyses showed significant differences in risk of grade 3 or higher adverse events between treatment type (PD-1+CTLA-4 and PD-L1+CTLA-4), among cancer types, and among dosing regimens (N1I3, N3I1 and D20T1). Incidence of all-grade adverse events was 0.905 [95% CI 0.842-0.945] and grade 3 or higher events/all-grade adverse events was 0.396 [95% CI 0.315-0.483]. The most common all-grade TRAEs were diarrhea/colitis, fatigue/asthenia, nausea/vomiting, rash, and pruritis. Conclusions: Combination ICI therapy has a significantly different treatment-related adverse event profile compared to monotherapy.

scholarly journals Immune-related pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001170
Author(s):  
Xinru Chen ◽  
Zhonghan Zhang ◽  
Xue Hou ◽  
Yaxiong Zhang ◽  
Ting Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically revolutionized lung cancer treatment, providing unprecedented clinical benefits. However, immune-related pneumonitis (IRP) caused by ICIs has aroused widespread concern due to its high rate of discontinuation and mortality. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the risks of IRP among different regimens for advanced lung cancer.MethodsPhase II and III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were searched from electronic databases. The rates of grade 1–5 IRP and grade 3–5 IRP were systematically extracted. An NMA was conducted among chemotherapy, ICIs monotherapy, dual ICIs combination, and ICIs+chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis was also compared based on specific types of ICIs.ResultsTwenty-five RCTs involving 17,310 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with chemotherapy, ICI-based regimens were associated with an increased risk of grade 1–5 IRP and grade 3–5 IRP. Compared with ICIs+chemotherapy, ICIs monotherapy (grade 1–5: OR 2.14, 95% credible interval 1.12 to 4.80; grade 3–5: 3.03, 1.491 to 6.69) and dual ICIs combination (grade 1–5: 3.86, 1.69 to 9.89; grade 3–5: 5.12, 2.01 to 13.68) were associated with a higher risk of grade 1–5 IRP and grade 3–5 IRP. No significant difference was found between dual ICIs combination and ICIs monotherapy in grade 1–5 IRP (1.85, 0.91 to 3.37) or in grade 3–5 IRP (1.65, 0.81 to 3.37). Besides, compared with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (2.56, 1.12 to 6.60), a lower risk of grade 1–5 IRP was observed in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors.ConclusionCompared with chemotherapy, using ICIs is associated with an increased risk of IRP. ICIs+chemotherapy is associated with a lower risk of IRP compared with dual ICIs combination and ICIs monotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of 1–5 grade IRP compared with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document