Use of surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in very elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A national cancer database (NCDB) analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20058-e20058
Author(s):  
Michael Kharouta ◽  
William Grubb ◽  
Tarun Kanti Podder ◽  
Tithi Biswas

e20058 Background: SBRT treatment for very elderly ( > 80 years) patients with early stage NSCLC has been reported to be well tolerated with good short term efficacy. Using a large hospital based registry, we report a comparison of patterns of practice, outcomes, and prognostic factors for very elderly patients undergoing any treatment for early-stage NSCLC. Methods: The NCDB was queried for patients with clinical Stage I-IIA NSCLC with age ≥ 80 years diagnosed from 2001-2015 treated with surgery or SBRT alone. Patients were excluded if they received chemotherapy /immunotherapy or non-standard SBRT doses (i.e. > 5 fractions of RT, < 30 Gy or > 70 Gy total dose). Survival analyses were performed with propensity-matching, Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards regression, and log rank testing. Results: 26039 patients met search criteria, median age 83 (80-90) years. 17141 (65.8%) patients underwent surgery, and 8898 (34.2%) underwent SBRT. Median follow up was 31 months. Median survival was 52 and 35 months for surgery and SBRT. Of patients receiving SBRT, 2044 (23%) had a contraindication to primary surgery due to patient risk factors. Age, clinical stage, tumor size, surgery type, CDCC score, BED, bronchial involvement, and type of treatment facility were predictive of median survival. BED > 154 Gy was associated with greater median survival (p < 0.01). Lobectomy was associated with greater median survival vs sub-lobar resection/pneumonectomy (p < 0.0001). For stage I tumors, surgery was associated with better median survival (56 vs. 35 months, p < 0.0001), but for stage IIA patients both modalities had similar median survival (30 vs 29 months, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Surgery remains the predominant treatment modality for early stage NSCLC in this very elderly population, and is associated with good outcomes for patients with stage I tumors. For elderly patients who are poor surgical candidates due to medical co-morbidities SBRT is associated with reasonable median survival. With limited information on patient comorbidities, more robust studies are needed to determine the effects of patient selection on treatment outcomes in this population.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8534-8534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jair Bar ◽  
Damien Urban ◽  
Efrat Ofek ◽  
Aliza Ackerstein ◽  
Ilanit Redinsky ◽  
...  

8534 Background: Resected NSCLC clinical stage I or II harbor a 5 year survival of only 30-50%. Immunotherapy might be more effective in low-burden disease. We hypothesized that neo-adjuvant immunotherapy is a feasible, safe and effective treatment (Tx) for early stage NSCLC. Methods: MK3475-223 is an ongoing phase I study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in stage I-II NSCLC. All Pembro Txs are 200mg q 3 weeks (wks). Objectives: determine safety; recommended phase 2 dose/schedule; pathological & radiological response. Doses-schedule limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as significant surgical complications (bleeding, delayed wound healing, ARDS, prolonged air-leak) or a significant delay of surgery. The doses-schedule escalation cohorts were (i) single pembro dose 3 wk prior to surgery; (ii) 2 pembro doses, 2 wks later surgery; (iii) 2 pembro doses, 1 wk later surgery. Expansion cohort received the doses-schedule of cohort (iii). Percentages of remaining viable tumor in the post-Tx were assessed, 10% or less was considered amajor pathological response (MPR). IHC for pre-Tx PDL1 was done. Efficacy was evaluated for the patients who had received 2 doses of pembrolizumab. Results: No DLT occurred in the dose-schedule escalation cohorts. 10 patients received 2 cycles of neo-adjuvant pembrolizumab. 4 patients achieved a MPR (4/10 who received 2 cycles of pembro; 40%; 95% C.I. 16.7-68.8%). No correlation is seen between the levels of PDL1 pre-Tx and the pathologic response. Size of the tumor and N status was also not in any apparent correlation with MPR (data not shown). Interestingly, all of the MPR cases had a relatively long interval from 1st Tx till surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT02938624. Conclusions: Neo-adjuvant pembro is safe and feasible. A promising sign of efficacy is seen. Achieving MPR might require a longer 1st-Tx-surgery interval. Predictive biomarkers for response might be different from those in advanced disease. Recruitment and correlative studies are ongoing.[Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145
Author(s):  
Maria Wilczynska ◽  
Angel Garcia-Alonso

AbstractIntroduction: Surgery is the treatment of choice in stage I and II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the management of patients who are medically unfit to tolerate surgical intervention or who refuse surgery, radiotherapy is an acceptable alternative. We have performed a retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of radical radiotherapy in patients with early stage NSCLC treated over a period of 4 years.Methods: Thirty nine patients treated with radiotherapy of radical intent were identified. All patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy with a total dose of 55Gy in 20 fractions.Results: The median survival of all cases was 29 months. The one and two-year survival was respectively 61 % and 41%. The median survival of patients ≥75 years was 28 months, and age was the only prognostic factor identified in this analysis that affected survival.Conclusions: The presented survival results are consistent with those from other series published in the literature. At present, radical radiotherapy is often offered to patients with medically inoperable stage I and II NSCLC or those who decline surgery. But there is emerging evidence that some new techniques like stereotactic radiotherapy could be also used in the operable, early stage NSCLC.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
Thomas Ian Barron ◽  
Linda Sharp ◽  
Kathleen Bennett ◽  
Kala Visvanathan

521 Background: Recent observational studies have associated aspirin (ASP) use with large reductions in breast cancer (BC) mortality. However, these studies have provided limited information on dose or duration of ASP use, key issues relevant to translation of the results into clinical practice. Methods: Linked National Cancer Registry Ireland and prescription refill data (General Medical Services Ireland, GMS) were used to identify women aged 50-80 with incident stage I-III BC (2001-2006). ASP use was defined as high or low by the median number of ASP days’ supply (85 days) in the 90 days pre-diagnosis. Full capture of ASP use is expected as the GMS provides all medications, including ASP, without charge. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ASP use and (i) all-cause and (ii) BC-specific mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, stage, grade, ER, PR, HER-2 status, comorbidity and other drug exposures. Analyses were stratified by tumor stage and nodal status. Results: 2714 women with stage I-III BC were identified (median follow-up = 3.3 years), of whom 642 (23.7%) used ASP in the 90 days pre diagnosis. High and low ASP exposure groups were strongly predictive of post-diagnosis ASP exposure levels (High: mean post diagnosis exposure duration – 83% of follow-up; dose – 75mg/day in 91% of women. Low: mean post-diagnosis exposure duration – 58% of follow-up; dose – 75mg/day in 80% of women). Women with any ASP use had a non-significant reduction in all-cause (HR 0.85 95%CI 0.68, 1.06) and BC-specific (HR 0.86 95%CI 0.65, 1.15) mortality, compared to ASP unexposed women. However, in the dose response analysis high ASP exposure was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause (HR 0.70 95% CI 0.51, 0.95) and BC-specific (HR 0.63 95% CI 0.42, 0.96) mortality. No reduction was observed for low ASP exposure. The benefits of ASP exposure were greater in early stage, node negative disease. Conclusions: Only high ASP exposure was associated with a significant reduction in all cause and BC-specific mortality. These findings may explain inconsistent results from previous studies. Our findings can inform future clinical trials.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 736-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendall H. Backstrand ◽  
Andrea K. Ng ◽  
Ronald W. Takvorian ◽  
Ellen L. Jones ◽  
David C. Fisher ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of mantle radiation therapy alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1988 and June 2000, 87 selected patients with pathologic stage (PS) IA to IIA or clinical stage (CS) IA Hodgkin’s disease were entered onto a single-arm prospective trial of treatment with mantle irradiation alone. Eighty-three of 87 patients had ≥ 1 year of follow-up after completion of mantle irradiation and were included for analysis in this study. Thirty-seven patients had PS IA, 40 had PS IIA, and six had CS IA disease. Histologic distribution was as follows: nodular sclerosis (n = 64), lymphocyte predominant (n = 15), mixed cellularity (n = 3), and unclassified (n = 1). Median follow-up time was 61 months. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial rates of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival were 86% and 100%, respectively. Eleven of 83 patients relapsed at a median time of 27 months. Nine of the 11 relapses contained at least a component below the diaphragm. All 11 patients who developed recurrent disease were alive without evidence of Hodgkin’s disease at the time of last follow-up. The 5-year FFTF in the 43 stage I patients was 92% compared with 78% in the 40 stage II patients (P = .04). Significant differences in FFTF were not seen by histology (P = .26) or by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer H-5F eligibility (P = .25). CONCLUSION: Mantle irradiation alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease is associated with disease control rates comparable to those seen with extended field irradiation. The FFTF is especially favorable among stage I patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baiqiang Dong ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Xuan Zhu ◽  
Yuanyuan Chen ◽  
Yujin Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The optimal treatment for elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains inconclusive. Previous studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides encouraging local control though higher incidence of toxicity in elderly than younger populations. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of SBRT and surgical treatment in elderly patients with clinical stage I-II NSCLC. Methods This retrospective analysis included 205 patients aged ≥70 years with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent SBRT or surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China) from January 2012 to December 2017. A propensity score matching analysis was performed between the two groups. In addition, we compared outcomes and related toxicity in both study arms. Results Each group included 35 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 50.1 (0.8–74.4) months for surgery and 35.5 (11.5–71.4) months for SBRT. The rate of cancer-specific survival was similar between the two treatment arms (p = 0.958). In patients who underwent surgery, the corresponding 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.3 and 81.7%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.3 and 74.9%, respectively. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year locoregional control in patients who underwent surgery were 90.0 and 80.0%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.1 and 84.1%, respectively. Notably, the observed differences in progression-free survival were not statistically significant (p = 0.934). In the surgery group, grade 1–2 complications were observed in eleven patients (31%). One patient died due to perioperative infection within 30 days following surgery. There was no grade 3–5 toxicity observed in the SBRT group. Conclusions The outcomes of surgery and SBRT in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC were similar.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3128-3135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert M. Noordijk ◽  
Patrice Carde ◽  
Noëlle Dupouy ◽  
Anton Hagenbeek ◽  
Augustinus D.G. Krol ◽  
...  

Purpose In early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI) and combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy produce high disease control rates but also considerable late toxicity. The aim of this study was to reduce this toxicity using a combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) without jeopardizing disease control. Patients and Methods Patients with stage I or II HL were stratified into two groups, favorable and unfavorable, based on the following four prognostic factors: age, symptoms, number of involved areas, and mediastinal-thoracic ratio. The experimental therapy consisted of six cycles of epirubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and prednisone (EBVP) followed by IF-RT. It was randomly compared, in favorable patients, to STNI and, in unfavorable patients, to six cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (MOPP/ABV hybrid) and IF-RT. Results Median follow-up time of the 722 patients included was 9 years. In 333 favorable patients, the 10-year event-free survival rates (EFS) were 88% in the EBVP arm and 78% in the STNI arm (P = .0113), with similar 10-year overall survival (OS) rates (92% v 92%, respectively; P = .79). In 389 unfavorable patients, the 10-year EFS rate was 88% in the MOPP/ABV arm compared with 68% in the EBVP arm (P < .001), leading to 10-year OS rates of 87% and 79%, respectively (P = .0175). Conclusion A treatment strategy for early-stage HL based on prognostic factors leads to high OS rates in both favorable and unfavorable patients. In favorable patients, the combination of EBVP and IF-RT can replace STNI as standard treatment. In unfavorable patients, EBVP is significantly less efficient than MOPP/ABV.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali A. Mokdad ◽  
Rebecca M. Minter ◽  
Hong Zhu ◽  
Mathew M. Augustine ◽  
Matthew R. Porembka ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare overall survival between patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by resection and those who received upfront resection (UR)—as well as a subgroup of UR patients who also received adjuvant therapy—for early-stage resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods Adult patients with resected, clinical stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2012. Patients who underwent NAT followed by curative-intent resection were matched by propensity score with patients whose tumors were resected upfront. Overall survival was compared by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Early postoperative and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. Results We identified 15,237 patients with clinical stage I or II resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. From the NAT group, 2,005 patients (95%) were matched with 6,015 patients who underwent UR. The NAT group was associated with improved survival compared with UR (median survival, 26 months v 21 months, respectively; stratified log-rank P < .01; hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.78). Patients in the UR group had higher pathologic T stage (pT3 and T4: 86% v 73%; P < .01), higher positive lymph nodes (73% v 48%; P < .01), and higher positive resection margin (24% v 17%; P < .01). Compared with a subset of UR patients who received adjuvant therapy, NAT patients had a better survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.89). Conclusion NAT followed by resection has a significant survival benefit compared with UR in early-stage, resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. These findings support the use of NAT, particularly as a patient selection tool, in the management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 5049-5049
Author(s):  
Angel Ruedas ◽  
Pablo Guisado ◽  
Beatriz Aguado ◽  
Ricardo Perez ◽  
Joaquin Martinez ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5049 Background. Treatment of frail or elderly patients with relapsing symptomatic/active Multiple Myeloma (MM) is very difficult due to concomitant diseases, impaired bone marrow reserve, systemic toxicity, relatively decreased renal function and general problems of old age. Dexamethasone and new agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and bendamustine) have been used in this setting, in most cases with doses adapted to the clinical situation. Aims. To retrospectively analyze the management of frail and/or very elderly MM patients with relapsed and active disease treated with reduced doses of the aforementioned agents in five hospitals in Madrid, Spain. Methods. The files of this group of MM patients were studied. The most common treatment has been the combination of low doses of lenalidomide (len) and of dexamethasone (dex), whereas treatment with reduced doses of other agents has been anecdotal; therefore we analyzed the results of len/dex combinations. Len and dex have been used in lower than standard doses, adapted to the individual initial situation of the patients and tailored according to effect and toxicity throughout treatment. There was no specific protocol and the management of the patients has depended exclusively on the practice and criteria of the treating physicians. Patient risk was stratified following the Salmon and Durie (S&D) score and the International Staging System (ISS). Response was assessed with the IMWG criteria. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Ramon y Cajal, as coordinating center. Results. 38 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 79 years (range 68–90). 30 pts (79%) were older than 75 years and 10 pts had over 85 years. More than half of the patients (21) had two or more comorbidities. Patients had previously received 1 to 5 (m=1. 8) different treatment modalities, including steroids, melphalan (25), bortezomib (20), thalidomide (6) (or their combinations), and others or even APBSCT (3). 23 pts (60%) had IgG (m=4087 mg/dl, range 868–13000); 13 (34%) IgA (m=2115, range 355–4930) and 2 (5%) only light chains. 22 had κ and 15 λ light chains. 19 (50%) had BJ proteinuria. Mean Hemoglobin level was 10. 7 gr/dl (7. 5–14. 1) and mean creatinine level 1. 3 mg/dl (0. 4–12. 9); 28 (74%) had bone disease. 3 pts had S&D stage I, 22 stage II, and another 13 stage III. 13 pts had ISS stage I, 17 had stage II and 7 stage III. Patients received between 1 and 30 cycles of len/dex (m= 8). Median initial Len dose was 10 mg, the majority between 5 and 15mg, although 4 received 25 mg that were rapidly reduced. Mean initial dex dose was 20mg/day for 4 days. 4 pts (10. 5%) achieved Complete Remission (CR) (3 with negative IF), 27 (71%) Partial Remission (PR) (5 with VGPR) and 2 (5%) a significant, but lesser than 50%, reduction of the M-component (Stable Disease, Std). Altogether, overall response (CR+PR+Std) occurred in 33 pts (86%). The best response occurred after 2 to 9 cycles (m=4) of len/dex. Treatment was stopped in 15 patients due to neurological (4) or hematological (1) toxicity, pulmonary embolism (1), unrelated causes (4) and after achieving a plateau response (5). Time to next treatment was 1–30 months, (m=8 mo). 7 pts relapsed after 3–21 months (m=7). 10 patients died, 5 of related (disease progression, cardiac amyloidosis, renal progression to ESRF) and 5 of unrelated (cancer, sepsis, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure) causes. Grade III-IV bone marrow toxicity occurred in 9 pts and neurological toxicity (PNP) in 5 (all of them had previously been treated with bortezomib or thalidomide). Conclusions. Personalized low doses of len/dex have been the most common treatment for frail/very elderly patients with relapsed MM in our centers and it is an active and tolerable option in this setting. The haematological toxicity was expectable and manageable, but prior treatments with bortezomib or thalidomide were associated with limiting neurotoxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7216-7216
Author(s):  
C. Lu ◽  
I. Wistuba ◽  
X. Zhou ◽  
B. N. Bekele ◽  
J. B. Putnam ◽  
...  

7216 Background: Promoter hypermethylation is an epigenetic mechanism of gene silencing commonly observed in malignancies. Prior studies suggest that hypermethylation of DAP kinase and p16, genes involved in apoptosis and cell cycle regulation, respectively, are associated with poorer survival in NSCLC patients. In this study we investigate the prognostic role of DAP kinase and p16 promoter hypermethylation in a large cohort of early-stage NSCLC patients. Methods: Pathologic stage I and II NSCLC patients who underwent complete surgical resection between 1/97 and 12/01 at our institution and did not receive adjuvant therapy were identified. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were retrieved, and p16 and DAP kinase promoter methylation status was determined by methylation specific PCR. Two-sided statistical analyses were performed to determine associations between methylation status, clinicopathologic characteristics, and survival. Results: DAP kinase and p16 methylation status was observed in 36.3% (97 of 267) and 36.4% (95 of 261) cases, respectively. Subject characteristics: 55% female, 77% former/current smokers, 81% stage I, 19% stage II, 61% adenocarcinoma, 29% squamous carcinoma, 63% performance status (PS) 0, 37% PS 1,93% < 5% weight loss. Recurrent NSCLC and death occurred in 21.3% and 38% of cases, respectively. No significant associations were observed between DAP kinase methylation status and subject characteristics. P16 methylation was associated with moderate/high grade (p = 0.03). A higher frequency of p16 methylation was observed in ever vs never smokers (39% vs 28%, p = 0.17). Preliminary analyses do not demonstrate significant associations between methylation status and overall survival (p16 p = 0.13; DAP kinase p = 0.56) or disease-free survival (p16 p = 0.36; DAP kinase p = 0.71). Conclusions: In this relatively large cohort of early-stage NSCLC patients, we did not detect significant associations between p16 and DAP kinase promoter methylation and clinical outcome. Further subset analyses stratified by gender and histology will be performed. The prognostic role of these biomarkers in NSCLC remains unclear. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document