Matching insurance claims data with EMR molecular status data in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: Understanding real-world molecular testing and prevalence rates at the site and investigator level.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20568-e20568
Author(s):  
Michael Gregory Cushion ◽  
Bhavani Krishnan ◽  
Jeff Paul Hodge ◽  
Jaya Chandra Balusu ◽  
Joseph Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Insurance Claims Data ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e20568 Background: Many targeted therapy clinical trials require a somatic gene mutation/alteration for eligibility. We assessed the feasibility of leveraging Real-World Data (RWD) to enrol NSCLC patients into clinical trials. Methods: US insurance claims data were extracted to identify lung cancer patients. These data were matched with EMR data also containing NSCLC patients’ details regarding the occurrence and results of molecular testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, JAK2, HER2 and RET somatic alterations, achieving a level of granular detail beyond that available in each individual dataset. A one-year extraction period was applied, with no gender or age restrictions. Results: Results for the matched dataset are summarised in the table below - the overall patient record match was 89.6%. Conclusions: The observed prevalence correlated reasonably well with literature reported prevalence for the molecular biomarkers associated commercially available targeted therapies in NSCLC (EGFR, ALK, ROS1). The sample size for the remaining biomarkers was too small to draw conclusions, though the presence of data correlating to these is of interest, considering that there are no currently approved targeted therapies in NSCLC tailored to these predictive biomarkers. This approach could be expanded upon to recruit patients into targeted therapy clinical trials as the dataset is fully linkable to sites and investigators. With the emergence of broad genomic profiling, the availability of molecular data to support clinical trial enrolment is also expected to grow.[Table: see text]

Biomarker utilization in non-small cell lung cancer, are we treating after testing?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9609-9609
Author(s):  
Elias Makhoul ◽  
Jong Taek Kim ◽  
Wenjuan Zhang ◽  
Jean Raphael Lopategui ◽  
Ani Sarkis Balmanoukian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

9609 Background: Targeted therapy in EGFR and ALK mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been the standard of care for nearly a decade with subsequent FDA approvals for ROS1 and BRAF V600 mutated NSCLC occurring in 2016 and 2017. However, recent studies have shown suboptimal utilization of genomic profiling results in these patients. In 1 recent study of community oncologists, ~70% of EGFR/ALK+ patients received appropriate targeted therapy, while patients with other gene mutations (including BRAF and ROS1) only received targeted therapy ~30% of the time. Left unanswered was what patients were receiving instead and why. Additionally, it is unknown if this finding is generalizable to the academic setting. We aimed to investigate whether in our patient population, NSCLC patients with actionable mutations received associated FDA approved therapies and if not why. Methods: The pathology database was queried for all NSCLC with molecular testing (including qPCR, FISH and NGS) from 2009 to 2019. Patients with sensitizing EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF mutations that were detected after the first FDA approval for their respective targeted therapies were included for analysis with those lost to follow up subsequently excluded. Basic demographic and clinical variables were collected as well as treatment records. Results: 2160 NSCLC patients were evaluated (2160 EGFR, 1417 ALK, 810 ROS1, 589 BRAF). 468 patients were identified with targetable mutations (411 EGFR, 46 ALK, 5 ROS1, 6 BRAF). No patient had more than 1 targetable mutation. Of those patients, 248 were at an advanced stage and had clinical follow up (202 EGFR, 37 ALK, 4 ROS1, 5 BRAF). Of those patients 197/202 (97.5%), 33/37 (89.2%), 3/4 (75%) and 1/5 (20%) received EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF targeted therapy respectively. Across biomarkers 14/248 patients (5.6%) did not receive subsequent targeted therapy. 10 patients (5 EGFR, 3 ALK, 1 ROS1 and 1 BRAF) passed away before targeted therapy could be initiated. Physician choice and missed findings accounted for the remaining four cases. Conclusions: The vast majority of advanced NSCLC patients analyzed in this study received appropriate targeted therapy matched to genomic findings. The main reason (~4% of total cases) that patients did not receive therapy was due to rapidly progressive disease and death before it could be initiated. These findings are at odds with those published from the community setting. This may be due to multiple factors, including clinician education, ease of access to targeted therapies across patient populations and incomplete data in the previous study populations.

Advances in Treatment of Lung Cancer With Targeted Therapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T. Cagle ◽  
Lucian R. Chirieac
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Molecular Abnormalities ◽  
Pathologic Features

Context.—Ongoing preclinical investigations and clinical trials involving new targeted therapies promise to improve survival for patients with lung cancer. Targeted therapeutic agents, based on genetic mutations and signaling pathways altered in lung cancer, have added significantly to our armamentarium for lung cancer treatment while minimizing drug toxicity. To date, 4 targeted therapies have been approved for treatment of lung cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration: gefitinib in 2002, erlotinib in 2003, bevacizumab in 2006, and crizotinib in 2011. Objective.—To review targeted therapies in lung cancer, the molecular biomarkers that identify patients likely to benefit from these targeted therapies, the basic molecular biology principles, selected molecular diagnostic techniques, and pathologic features correlated with molecular abnormalities in lung cancer. To review new molecular abnormalities described in lung cancer that are predictive for response to novel promising targeted agents in various phases of clinical trials. Data Sources.—Review of the literature covering the molecular abnormalities of lung cancer with a focus on the molecular diagnostics and targeted therapy. Special emphasis is placed on summarizing evolving technologies useful in the diagnosis and characterization of lung cancer. Conclusions.—Molecular testing of lung cancer expands the expertise of the pathologist, who will identify the tumor markers that are predictive of sensitivity or resistance to various targeted therapies and allow patients with cancer to be selected for highly effective and less toxic therapies.

Impact of rapid multigene assays with short turnaround time (TAT) on the development of precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9094-9094
Author(s):  
Shingo Matsumoto ◽  
Takaya Ikeda ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoh ◽  
Akira Sugimoto ◽  
Terufumi Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
Genomic Screening ◽  
Nsclc Patients

9094 Background: A variety of oncogene drivers have been identified in NSCLC and molecularly-stratified precision medicine has led to improved survival in advanced NSCLC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing is utilized to detect actionable gene alterations; however, the TAT of NGS is often too long to translate into clinical decision making. Thus, rapid multi-gene testing alternatives are needed. Methods: A lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia) capturing clinical outcome was established in 2013 to identify patients with oncogene drivers and to support the development of novel targeted therapies. Since February 2013 to May 2019 (LC-SCRUM-Asia 1st-phase), single gene testing and/or a targeted NGS assay, Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCA), were used for the genomic screening. Since June 2019 to December 2020 (2nd-phase), a multi-gene PCR assay (Amoy 9-in-1 test) and a rapid NGS assay (Genexus/Oncomine Precision Assay [OPA]) were also implemented as rapid multi-gene testing. Results: A total of 10667 Japanese NSCLC patients, including 6826 in the 1st-phase and 3841 in the 2nd-phase, were enrolled in the LC-SCRUM-Asia. Success rate for OCA: 93%, for 9-in-1 test: 98%, for Genexus/OPA: 96%. Median TAT for OCA: 21 days, for 9-in-1 test: 3 days, for Genexus/OPA: 4 days. The frequencies of genetic alterations detected in the 1st-/2nd-phase were EGFR: 17/24%, KRAS: 15/16%, HER2 ex20ins: 4/3%, ALK fusions: 3/3%, RET fusions: 3/2%, ROS1 fusions: 3/2%, MET ex14skip: 2/2%, BRAF V600E: 1/1%, NRG1 fusions: 0/0.2% and NTRK3 fusions: 0.05/0.04%. Overall percent agreement of 9-in-1 test compared with OCA for EGFR/KRAS/HER2/BRAF/MET/ALK/ROS1/RET/NTRK3 alterations was 98%, and that of OPA compared with OCA was 95%. The rate of patients who received targeted therapies as 1st-line treatment was significantly elevated in the 2nd-phase compared with the 1st-phase (510/3841 [13%] vs. 567/6826 [8%], p < 0.001). Through the genomic screening, 1410 (37%) and 1269 (18%) candidate patients for clinical trials of KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET or TRK-targeted drugs were identified in the 2nd-phase and in the 1st-phase, respectively. The rate of patients who were actually enrolled into the genotype-matched clinical trials were also significantly higher in the 2nd-phase than in the 1st-phase (222 [6%] vs. 186 [3%], p < 0.001). In 1st-line treatments for advanced NSCLC patients, the median progression-free survival was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.7−9.4) in the 2nd-phase (n = 1839) versus 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.9−6.3) in the 1st-phase (n = 4262) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the 9-in-1 test and Genexus/OPA had short TATs (3−4 days), high success rates (96−98%) and good concordance (95−98%) compared with another NGS assay (OCA). These rapid multi-gene assays highly contributed to enabling precision medicine and the development of targeted therapies for advanced NSCLC.

Implementing quality indicators using health insurance claims data linked to the hospital-based cancer registry.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Fumiaki Nakamura ◽  
Masato Masuda ◽  
Norihiro Teramoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Mizumoto ◽  
Eiji Mekata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Insurance Claims Data ◽  
Health Insurance Claims Data ◽  
Health Insurance Claims

94 Background: To establish systematic monitoring of cancer care quality, we measured the quality of cancer care in several facilities through chart reviews by tumor registrars. However, this method required both extensive effort of and skills in registrars. To explore less-labor–intensive methods of measuring care quality, we assessed quality measurement using health insurance claims data linked to the Hospital Based Cancer Registry (HBCR). Methods: We previously developed 206 quality indicators (QIs) to assess cancer care processes in collaboration with clinical experts. Ten of these (stomach cancer, 1; colorectal cancer, 1; lung cancer, 2; breast cancer, 3; liver cancer, 1; and supportive care, 2) could be used for analyzing HBCR health insurance claims data. Patients treated at 7 designated cancer hospitals in Japan in 2010 were included. Their characteristics and tumor stages were obtained from HBCR, and processes of care administered to the patients in 2010–2011 were obtained from health insurance claims data. We calculated a score for each QI based on the proportion of patients receiving care among those eligible for QI. Results: Data of 4,785 patients were analyzed (stomach cancer, 1,181; patients with colorectal cancer, 1,077; lung cancer, 1,091; breast cancer, 1,184; and liver cancer, 252). Quality scores of essential laboratory tests were high; 91% patients underwent the HER2 test for invasive breast cancer and 95% underwent the liver function test using indocyanine green clearance before liver cancer surgery. However, indicator scores for adjuvant chemotherapy were relatively lower at only 59% for stomach cancer patients, 57% for colorectal cancer patients, and 56% for lung cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The supportive care scores had even more scope for improvement as only 43% patients received antiemetics for highly emetic chemotherapy and 66% patients received laxatives along with narcotics. Conclusions: These QIs can be implemented for health insurance claims data linked to HBCR and used to identify the potential target area for improvement. In future, such electronic systems will enable rapid cycles of quality measurement and feedback.

scholarly journals THER-01. Targeted therapy and intracranial metastatic disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii12-iii12
Author(s):  
Anders Erickson ◽  
Steven Habbous ◽  
Frances Wright ◽  
Aisha Lofters ◽  
Katarzyna Jerzak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Intracranial Metastatic Disease ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Abstract Background Targeted therapies have been hypothesized to prolong survival in the management of patients with intracranial metastatic disease (IMD), but, paradoxically, to increase IMD incidence by improving systemic disease control and prolonging survival from the primary tumor. The real-world benefits of targeted therapy in management of patients with IMD are unclear, as clinical trials have excluded patients with IMD and lacked endpoints reporting intracranial outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all patients in Ontario, Canada, diagnosed with IMD from 2005 to 2018 with primary diagnoses of breast cancer, lung or bronchus cancer, or melanoma, and control patients matched by primary disease without IMD. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) between patient sub-cohorts divided by primary disease and stratified by targeted therapy receipt or IMD status. Results Post-IMD targeted therapy was associated with prolonged OS in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (HR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33–0.5), EGFR-positive lung cancer (HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.23–0.34), and BRAF-positive melanoma (HR 0.2; 95% CI, 0.14–0.29), compared to those who did not receive post-IMD targeted therapy. Presence of IMD was associated with shorter OS in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (HR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.56–2.08) and metastatic EGFR-positive lung cancer (HR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08–1.39) but not metastatic BRAF-positive melanoma (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.77–1.61), compared to those without IMD. Conclusions Our findings show that real-world use of targeted therapies was associated with prolonged OS in patients with IMD in the setting of HER2-positive breast cancer, EGFR-positive lung cancer, and BRAF-positive melanoma. Inclusion of patients with IMD in clinical trials and use of endpoints that interrogate IMD will be critical to determine the role of targeted therapies in the management of patients with IMD.

The Ethics of Postmarketing Observational Studies of Drug Safety Under Section 505(o)(3) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Drug Safety ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Data Access ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Privacy Concerns ◽  
Insurance Claims Data ◽  
Access To Data

In 2007, Congress granted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) new powers to order pharmaceutical companies to conduct drug safety studies and clinical trials in the postmarketing period after drugs are approved. The methodologies include observational studies that examine patients' insurance claims data and clinical records to infer whether drugs are safe in actual clinical practice. Such studies offer a valuable tool for improving drug safety, but they raise ethical and privacy concerns because they would entail widespread use of patients' health information in commercial research by drug manufacturers. This is the first article to explore the ethics of these section 505(o)(3) observational studies, so named after the section of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that authorizes them.Data access problems threaten to make the FDA's section 505(o)(3) study requirements unenforceable. Under existing federal privacy regulations, it appears highly unlikely that pharmaceutical companies will have reliable access to crucial data resources, such as insurance claims data and healthcare records, to use in these studies. State privacy laws present another potential barrier to data access. If pharmaceutical companies do manage to gain access to the needed data, this will raise serious privacy concerns because section 505(o)(3) observational studies do not appear to be covered by any of the major federal regulations that afford ethical and privacy protections to persons whose data are used in research.If the FDA's program of section 505(o)(3) observational studies fails because of the above problems, this failure will have a number of bad consequences: the public will be exposed to avoidable drug safety risks; taxpayers may be forced to bear the costs of having the FDA conduct drug safety investigations that would have been funded by drug manufacturers if data had been available; and, perhaps most troubling, the FDA may be forced to order postmarketing clinical trials to answer questions that could have been answered using observational studies. Problems with access to data for section 505(o)(3) studies thus could directly imperil human research subjects by forcing a needless over-reliance on risky postmarketing drug safety trials.This Article concludes by describing a promising new legal pathway for resolving these problems. Congress has provided the FDA a new set of powers that if skillfully exercised will allow the agency: (1) to facilitate pharmaceutical companies' appropriate access to data for use in section 505(o)(3) observational studies, (2) to impose strict ethical and privacy protections for persons whose data are used in these studies, and (3) to mobilize private-sector funding to generate much-needed evidence of the safety of FDA-approved drugs.

Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysms in Germany using health insurance claims data

VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstanze Stoberock ◽  
Henrik Christian Rieß ◽  
Eike Sebastian Debus ◽  
Thea Schwaneberg ◽  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Real World ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Insurance Claims Data ◽  
Health Insurance Claims Data ◽  
Health Insurance Claims

Abstract. Background: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has emerged as standard of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Real-world evidence is limited to compare this technology to open repair (OAR). Major gaps exist related to short-term and long-term outcomes, particularly in respect of gender differences. Materials and methods: Health insurance claims data from Germany’s third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, was used to investigate invasive in-hospital treatment of intact (iAAA) and ruptured AAA (rAAA). Patients operated between October 2008 and April 2015 were included in the study. Results: A total of 5,509 patients (4,966 iAAA and 543 rAAA) underwent EVAR or OAR with a median follow-up of 2.44 years. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics of DAK-G patients were assessed. In total, 84.6 % of the iAAA and 79.9 % of the rAAA were male. Concerning iAAA repair, the median age (74 vs. 73 years, p < .001) compared to men was higher in females, but their EVAR-rate (66.8 % vs. 71.1 %, p = .018) was lower. Besides higher age of female patients (80 vs. 75 years, p < .001), no further statistically significant differences were seen following rAAA repair. In-hospital mortality was slightly lower in males compared to females following iAAA (2.3 % vs. 3.1 %, p = .159) and rAAA (37.3 % vs. 43.1 %, p = .273) repair. Concerning iAAA repair, a higher rate of female patients was transferred to another hospital (3.7 % vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.008) or discharged to rehabilitation (6.0 % vs. 2.7 %, p < .001) compared to male patients. Conclusions: In this large German claims data cohort, women are generally older and more often transferred to another hospital or discharged to rehab following iAAA repair. Nonetheless, no significantly increased risk of in-hospital or late death appeared for women in multivariate analyses. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of recent gender-specific treatment strategies on overall outcome under real-world settings.

Liquid biopsy: Safety and efficacy in a tool for molecular profiling of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21506-e21506
Author(s):  
Saleha Rizwan ◽  
Zachary Otaibi ◽  
Herman Lo ◽  
Talal Khan ◽  
Rodney E. Wegner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e21506 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer with a broad spectrum of targeted therapies already available or in clinical trials. Among the NSCLC patients, 23% to 25% harbor a mutation in a gene associated with approved or emerging targeted therapy. These therapies have changed the therapeutic landscape of NSCLC with significantly improved clinical outcomes in advanced metastatic NSCLC patients. It is imperative to test for these gene alterations in order to identify patients who could potentially benefit from these efficacious targeted therapies and to avoid therapies unlikely to provide clinical benefit. A major limitation in obtaining molecular testing occurs when minimally invasive techniques are used to obtain tissue sample resulting in insufficient yield for testing. In such cases, the utilization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), commonly known as liquid biopsy, has proven very beneficial. In a study utilizing ctDNA, increased detection rates were found when using ctDNA in addition to tissue testing and a > 98.2% concordance rate was found. We report results of 40 NSCLC patients from our institute who had liquid biopsy with or without tissue profiling done. Methods: We molecularly profiled 40 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients using both tissue and liquid biopsies. Tissue was assayed using the John Hopkins university molecular panel and liquid biopsies were performed by Biocept. Results: 14 out of 40 (35%) patients had insufficient or no tissue for molecular testing. Concordant results were found in 17 out of the 26 (65.4%) patients who had both tissue and liquid molecular testing done. Liquid Biopsy detected additional mutations in 5 (19.2%) patients which were not picked up on tissue and led to change in management in 4 patients. 12 out of 40 (30%) patients had repeat liquid biopsies done at progression of disease with new mutations detected on 4 patients revealing resistance to current treatment and change in treatment. Conclusions: Liquid Biopsy reveals high concordance rates with tissue genotyping and increases rate of detection of targetable mutations in NSCLC. It offers a safe and effective alternative when additional tissue is needed to identify genetic mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document