Aspirin as adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer: Rationale and progress of the Add-Aspirin trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3624-TPS3624
Author(s):  
Ruth E Langley ◽  
Richard H. Wilson ◽  
Fay Helen Cafferty ◽  
Nalinie Joharatnam ◽  
Janet Shirley Graham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations ◽  
The Impact

TPS3624 Background: There is now a body of evidence indicating a potential role for aspirin in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. In cardiovascular trials, effects on incidence of cancer metastases and short-term mortality suggest further possible roles in the treatment setting, supported by observational studies of aspirin use after cancer diagnosis. In the prevention setting, aspirin use has been limited by toxicity concerns, particularly of serious bleeding. In the adjuvant setting, benefits associated with reducing recurrence and subsequent treatment may outweigh these risks. The Add-Aspirin trial will investigate this, and will also consider possible mechanisms of action for aspirin effects, including the impact of PIK3CA mutations, where there are currently several theories and conflicting data. Methods: Add-Aspirin (ISRCTN74358648) is an international, phase III, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial recruiting patients who have undergone surgery and relevant adjuvant treatment for stage II or III CRC, as well as those with completely resected CRC liver metastases. Parallel randomised cohorts will address the question in breast, gastro-oesophageal and prostate cancer. Participants take aspirin 100mg daily for an 8-week run-in, to assess adherence and toxicity, and those suitable to proceed are randomised (1:1:1) to aspirin 100mg, aspirin 300mg or placebo daily for at least 5 years. A number of measures – including blood pressure control and PPI use where relevant - are in place to reduce bleeding risk. The primary outcome is disease-free survival (target hazard ratio = 0.8, n = 2600 in 5 years) with a long term analysis of survival planned across the tumour groups. Translational work includes a sub-study monitoring urinary thromboxane B2 as a marker of platelet activation in a subgroup (n = 500) to investigate mechanisms of action. Add-Aspirin opened in 2015 and recruited 1505 CRC patients during the first 3 years from 137 UK centres. 1282 (85%) proceeded to randomisation. A pre-planned feasibility analysis of run-in data (n = 2253 across all 4 tumour groups) provided reassuring data on safety, tolerability and adherence, and recruitment continues with centres in India and Republic of Ireland recently joining. Clinical trial information: 74358648.

scholarly journals Efficacy of aspirin for stage III colorectal cancer: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (JCOG1503C, EPISODE-III trial)

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 985-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Miyamoto ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Yuya Sato ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Abstract Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection. However, the prognosis of stage III colorectal cancer is still poor even after curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Several observational studies suggested that the anti-tumor effect of aspirin. Therefore, we planned a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial, which commenced in Japan in March 2018, to confirm the superiority of aspirin over placebo added to adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) for stage III colorectal cancer patients after curative resection. A total of 880 patients will be accrued from 20 Japanese institutions within 3 years. The primary endpoint is DFS and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, relapse-free survival, relative dose intensity, adverse events, and serious adverse events. This trial has been registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031180009 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/detail/589).

Randomized, Controlled Trial of Irinotecan Plus Infusional, Bolus, or Oral Fluoropyrimidines in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the BICC-C Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (30) ◽  
pp. 4779-4786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
Edith Mitchell ◽  
Rafal Wierzbicki ◽  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
First Line Treatment

PurposeThis phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of the following three different irinotecan-containing regimens in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: irinotecan plus infusional fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI), irinotecan plus bolus FU/LV (mIFL), and irinotecan plus oral capecitabine (CapeIRI).Patients and MethodsA total of 430 previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI (n = 144), mIFL (n = 141), or CapeIRI (n = 145). Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with celecoxib or placebo. After a protocol amendment, an additional 117 patients were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI+Bev; n = 57) or mILF plus bevacizumab (mIFL+Bev; n = 60), whereas the CapeIRI arm was discontinued. The primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary end points of overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity.ResultsMedian PFS was 7.6 months for FOLFIRI, 5.9 months for mIFL (P = .004 for the comparison with FOLFIRI), and 5.8 months for CapeIRI (P = .015). Median OS was 23.1 months for FOLFIRI, 17.6 months for mIFL (P = .09), and 18.9 months for CapeIRI (P = .27). CapeIRI was associated with higher rates of severe vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration. After the amendment to add bevacizumab, the median survival time has not yet been reached for FOLFIRI+Bev and was 19.2 months for mIFL+Bev (P = .007). FOLFIRI+Bev was associated with a higher rate of ≥ grade 3 hypertension than mIFL+Bev.ConclusionFOLFIRI and FOLFIRI+Bev offered superior activity to their comparators and were comparably safe. An infusional schedule of FU should be the preferred irinotecan-based regimen in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Aspirin as secondary prevention in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (ASAC trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheraz Yaqub ◽  
Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth ◽  
Jon-Helge Angelsen ◽  
Claus Wilki Fristrup ◽  
Jon Erik Grønbech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Western World ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is one the most common cancers in the western world with increasing incidence. Approximately 50% of the patients develop liver metastases. Resection of liver metastases is the treatment of choice although almost half of the resected patients get recurrence in the liver. Methods The ASAC trial is a Scandinavian, multicentre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether adjuvant treatment with low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)) can improve disease-free survival in patients treated for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Up to 800 patients operated for CRCLM will be randomized to Arm#1 ASA 160 mg once daily or Arm#2 Placebo, for a period of 3 years or until disease recurrence. The patients will be recruited at all major hepatobiliary surgical units in Norway, Sweden and Denmark and have follow-up according to standard of care and the National Guidelines. Discussion The ASAC trial will be the first clinical interventional trial to assess the potential beneficial role of ASA in recurrence of CRCLM and survival. ASA is an inexpensive, well-tolerated and easily accessible drug that will be highly potential as adjuvant drug in secondary prevention of CRCLM if the study shows a beneficial effect. We will also determine the effect of ASA as adjuvant treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life and the cost-effectiveness. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03326791. Registered on 31 October 2017.

Everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET): Updated results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial (RADIANT-3).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 158-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Shah ◽  
T. Ito ◽  
C. Lombard-Bohas ◽  
E. M. Wolin ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Patient Subgroups

158 Background: There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with advanced pNET. Systemic therapies for advanced pNET are limited both by toxicity and efficacy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor activity in 2 phase II studies, leading to further investigation in the largest phase III randomized controlled trial completed in pNET patients. Methods: Patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d orally + best supportive care (BSC; n = 207) or placebo + BSC (n = 203). Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were permitted as BSC during the study. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). At progression (RECIST), patients could be unblinded and those randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results: Compared with placebo, everolimus reduced the risk of progression by 65% and increased median PFS by more than 6 months, from 4.6 to 11.0 months (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45; p < 0.0001), by investigator review (primary endpoint). Median PFS by central review was consistent (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.44; p < 0.001] in favor of everolimus. Eighteen-month PFS estimates were 34% for everolimus (95% CI: 26-43) vs 9% (95% CI: 4-16) for placebo. Everolimus demonstrated a significant PFS benefit across all patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics and prior SSA use. Prior SSA use was 49% in the everolimus arm and 50% in the placebo arm. Updated analyses of the impact of concomitant SSA will be reported. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and infections (primarily upper respiratory); most were grade 1 or 2. Stomatitis (6.9% vs 0%), anemia (6% vs 0%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs 2%) were the most common grade 3-4 events. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups. Treatment resulted in a significant 6.4-month prolongation in median PFS. Everolimus had an acceptable and predictable safety profile. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing Adjuvant Interferon Alfa and Isotretinoin With Interferon Alfa Alone in Stage IIA and IIB Melanoma: European Cooperative Adjuvant Melanoma Treatment Study Group

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8655-8663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Richtig ◽  
H. Peter Soyer ◽  
Martin Posch ◽  
Ulrike Mossbacher ◽  
Peter Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Melanoma Treatment ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose The combination of interferon alfa (IFNα) and isotretinoin has shown a direct antiproliferative effect on human melanoma cell lines, but it remained unclear whether this combination is more effective than IFNα alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. We evaluated safety and efficacy of IFNα and isotretinoin compared with IFNα alone as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary malignant melanoma stage IIA and IIB. Patients and Methods In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 407 melanoma patients in stage IIA (301 patients) and IIB (106 patients) were randomly assigned to either IFNα and isotretinoin (isotretinoin group; 206 patients) or IFNα and placebo (placebo group; 201 patients) after excision of the primary tumor. IFNα was administered three times a week at a dose of 3 million units subcutaneously for 24 months. Isotretinoin at a dose of 20 mg for patients ≤ 73 kg, 30 mg for patients greater than 73 kg, or placebo daily for 24 months. Results A scheduled interim analysis revealed no significant differences in survival rates, with the isotretinoin group and the placebo group showing 5-year disease-free survival rates of 55% (95% CI, 46% to 65%) and 67% (95% CI, 59% to 75%), respectively, and overall 5-year survival rates of 76% (95% CI, 67% to 84%) and 81% (95% CI, 74% to 88%), respectively. The trial was stopped for futility. Conclusion The addition of isotretinoin to an adjuvant treatment of low-dose IFNα in patients with stage IIA and IIB melanoma had no significant effect on disease-free or overall survival and is therefore not recommended.

scholarly journals 310 The effect of pretreatment with G-CSF prior to dendritic cell collection during the phase IIb trial of an autologous DC-based vaccine for advanced, resectable melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A337-A337
Author(s):  
Anne O’Shea ◽  
Robert Chick ◽  
Guy Clifton ◽  
Timothy Vreeland ◽  
Lexy Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cell ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumor Lysate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundWe have completed a prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine given to prevent recurrences in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma. During the trial, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered to some patients to mobilize dendritic cells (DCs) precursors prior to harvest, allowing for similar DC yield with reduced blood draws. This study examines the impact of DC collection methods on vaccine effectiveness.MethodsTLPLDC is produced by loading tumor lysate into pre-prepared yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) and exposing them to autologous DCs. DC precursors were isolated either by collection of 50–70 mL of blood following pre-administration of 300µg of G-CSF 24–48 hrs prior, or collection of 120 mL of peripheral blood without G-CSF pretreatment based on patient and provider preference. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive TLPLDC or placebo (DCs exposed to empty YCWPs). 1–1.5 × 106 cells/dose were injected intradermally at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months. Differences in disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by log rank.ResultsOf 144 patients randomized, 103 received TLPLDC and 41 received placebo. Within the TLPLDC group, 57 received pretreatment with G-CSF (TLPLDC+G-CSF) and 46 did not (TLPLDC–G-CSF). There were no significant clinicopathologic or treatment differences between the three treatment arms. 36-month DFS was significantly better in TLPLDC–G-CSF vs. TLPLDC+G-CSF or placebo (51.8% vs. 23.4% and 27.1% respectively, p=0.027) (figure 1). TLPLDC–G-CSF had correspondingly improved OS (92.9% vs. 62.8% and 72.3% respectively, p=0.022) (figure 2). Subgroup analysis revealed TLPLDC–G-CSF had increased DFS over TLPLDC+G-CSF or placebo in Stage IV (68.6% vs. 18.8% and 0.0% respectively, p=0.058). Similarly, the DFS survival benefit of TLPLDC–G-CSF was enhanced in patients who received prior immunotherapy (IO) (61.9% vs. 11.5% and 35.7% respectively, p=0.007) or checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) (48.5% vs. 10.6% and 37.5% respectively, p=0.039).Abstract 310 Figure 1DFS at 36 monthsAbstract 310 Figure 2OS at 36 monthsConclusionsTLPLDC vaccine created without G-CSF pretreatment significantly improved 36-month DFS and OS compared to TLPLDC+G-CSF or placebo in stage III/IV (resected) melanoma patients. On further subgroup analysis, the increases in OS and DFS were more profound in patients who received additional immune therapies to include CPI. Ongoing evaluation will determine if G-CSF mobilization leads to collection of phenotypically different DCs. Based on these results, we are planning a phase III trial of TLPLDC–G-CSF + CPI vs. placebo + CPI in advanced melanoma post-resection.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT02301611Ethics ApprovalThis study was reviewed and approved by the IRB or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) of each participating center prior to study initiation.

scholarly journals Aspirin as secondary prevention in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (ASAC trial): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheraz Yaqub ◽  
Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth ◽  
Jon-Helge Angelsen ◽  
Claus Wilki Fristrup ◽  
Jon Erik Grønbech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Western World ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer is one the most common cancers in the western world with increasing incidence. Approximately 50% of the patients develop liver metastases. Resection of liver metastases is treatment of choice although almost half of the resected patients get recurrence in the liver.Methods: The ASAC trial is a Scandinavian, multi-centre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether adjuvant treatment with low-dose Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)) can improve disease-free survival in patients treated for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Up to 800 patients operated for CRCLM will be randomized to Arm#1 ASA 160 mg once daily or Arm#2 Placebo, for a period of 3 years or until disease recurrence. The patients will be recruited at all major hepatobiliary surgical units in Norway, Sweden and Denmark and have follow-up according to standard of care and the National Guidelines.Discussion: The ASAC trial will be the first clinical interventional trial to assess the potential beneficial role of ASA in recurrence of CRCLM and survival. ASA is an inexpensive, well tolerated, and easily accessible drug that will be highly potential as adjuvant drug in secondary prevention of CRCLM if the study shows a beneficial effect. We will also determine the effect of ASA as adjuvant treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life and the cost-effectiveness.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03326791. Registered 31 October 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03326791?term=asac&draw=2&rank=1

Hepatectomy Followed by mFOLFOX6 Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Liver-Only Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (JCOG0603): A Phase II or III Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.01032
Author(s):  
Yukihide Kanemitsu ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Tetsuya Hamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Randomized Controlled

PURPOSE Adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy is controversial in liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine if adjuvant modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) is superior to hepatectomy alone for liver-only metastasis from CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase II or III trial (JCOG0603), patients age 20-75 years with confirmed CRC and an unlimited number of liver metastatic lesions were randomly assigned to hepatectomy alone or 12 courses of adjuvant mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy. The primary end point of phase III was disease-free survival (DFS) in intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS Between March 2007 and January 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned to hepatectomy alone (149 patients) or hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy (151 patients). At the third interim analysis of phase III with median follow-up of 53.6 months, the trial was terminated early according to the protocol because DFS was significantly longer in patients treated with hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy. With median follow-up of 59.2 months, the updated 5-year DFS was 38.7% (95% CI, 30.4 to 46.8) for hepatectomy alone compared with 49.8% (95% CI, 41.0 to 58.0) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.92; one-sided P = .006). However, the updated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 83.1% (95% CI, 74.9 to 88.9) with hepatectomy alone and 71.2% (95% CI, 61.7 to 78.8) with hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy. In the chemotherapy arm, the most common grade 3 or higher severe adverse event was neutropenia (50% of patients), followed by sensory neuropathy (10%) and allergic reaction (4%). One patient died of unknown cause after three courses of mFOLFOX6 administration. CONCLUSION DFS did not correlate with OS for liver-only metastatic CRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 improves DFS among patients treated with hepatectomy for CRC liver metastasis. It remains unclear whether chemotherapy improves OS.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational, phase II trial immunotherapy with L-BLP25 (tecemotide) in patients with colorectal carcinoma following R0/R1 hepatic metastasectomy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3124-TPS3124
Author(s):  
Stefan Kasper ◽  
Friedrich Overkamp ◽  
Markus Hermann Moehler ◽  
Frank Kullmann ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

TPS3124^ Background: 15-20% of all patients (pts) diagnosed with colorectal cancer (crc) develop metastases (mets) surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment available. Current 5-year survival rate following R0 resection of liver mets lies between 28-39%, recurrence occurs in up to 70% of pts. To date, adjuvant chemotherapy has not significantly improved clinical outcomes. The primary objective of the ongoing LICC trial (L-BLP25 In Colorectal Cancer) is to determine whether L-BLP25, an active MUC1-specific cancer immunotherapy, extends recurrence-free survival (RFS) time over placebo in crc pts following R0/R1 resection of liver mets known to highly express MUC1 glycoprotein. Phase III data from L-BLP25 in NSCLC will be reported at this meeting. Methods: This is a multinational, phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a sample size of 159 pts from 20 centers in 3 countries. Pts must have stage IV cr adenocarcinoma limited to liver mets. Following curative-intent complete resection of the primary tumor and of all synchronous/metachronous mets, eligible pts are randomized 2:1 to receive either L-BLP25 or placebo. L-BLP25 arm receives a single dose of 300 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide (CPA) 3 d before 1st L-BLP25 dose, then primary treatment with sc L-BLP25 930 μg weekly for 8 weeks, followed by sc L-BLP25 930 μg maintenance doses at 6-week (year 1 and 2) and 12-week (year 3) intervals until recurrence. Control arm: CPA is replaced by saline solution and L-BLP25 by placebo. Primary endpoint (PE) is RFS time. Secondary endpoints: Overall survival (OS), safety, tolerance, RFS/OS in MUC-1 positive cancers. Exploratory immune response analyses are planned. Study start was in Q3 2011. 19 centers were initialized and 36 patients recruited, no SUSARs occurred. Study recruitment will end Q3 2013: follow-up until Q3 2017. PE assessment is in Q3 2016. Interim analyses are not planned.No major practical issues were identified during setup and early conduct of the study. Clinical trial information: 2011-000218-20.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document