Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) ± daratumumab (DARA) in patients (pts) with transplant-eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): A multicenter, randomized, phase III study (PERSEUS).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8055-TPS8055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Annemiek Broijl ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Mario Boccadoro ◽  
Hermann Einsele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Line Of Therapy

TPS8055 Background: DARA, a human, CD38-targeting, IgGκ monoclonal antibody, is approved in many countries for use as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), and in combination with standard-of-care regimens in RRMM and transplant-ineligible NDMM. Given the initial safety and efficacy observed with DARA plus VRd (D-VRd) in the safety run-in cohort of the ongoing phase 2 GRIFFIN study in TE NDMM pts, the phase 3 PERSEUS study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-VRd versus VRd alone in TE NDMM. Methods: This is an ongoing multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study of D-VRd versus VRd alone in TE NDMM pts. Approximately 690 pts across Europe will be stratified by ISS stage and cytogenetic risk (high risk defined as presence of del17p, t[4;14], or t[14;16]) and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. All pts will receive VRd (V: 1.3 mg/m2 SC Days 1, 4, 8, 11; R: 25 mg PO Days 1-21; d: 40 mg PO Days 1-4, 9-12) for 4 pre-transplant induction and 2 post-transplant consolidation cycles (all 28-d cycles), followed by R (10 mg PO Days 1-28) maintenance until progressive disease (PD). Pts in the DARA group will also receive subcutaneous DARA (1,800 mg co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; Halozyme]) QW in Cycles 1-2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W in maintenance Cycles 7+ until PD. After induction, pts will undergo melphalan 200 mg/m2 conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Pts in the DARA group who achieve sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10–5 threshold; assessed by NGS) for 12 months after ≥24 months of maintenance will stop DARA but continue R maintenance until PD; upon loss of CR or MRD-negative status, pts will restart DARA treatment. All pts will receive preinfusion medications. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include MRD-negative rate, overall response rate, PFS on next line of therapy, overall survival, time to and duration of response, health-related quality of life, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, stem cell yield after mobilization, time to engraftment post-ASCT, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03710603.

Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) ± daratumumab (DARA) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) for whom transplant is not planned as initial therapy: A multicenter, randomized, phase III study (CEPHEUS).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8056-TPS8056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Zweegman ◽  
Saad Zafar Usmani ◽  
Katherine Chastain ◽  
Jodi Carey ◽  
Karen Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Threshold ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Negative Rate ◽  
Line Of Therapy

TPS8056 Background: DARA is a human, anti-CD38 IgGκ monoclonal antibody that significantly reduced the risk of progression/death with a manageable safety profile across several phase 3 studies in relapsed/refractory MM and NDMM. DARA + VRd (D-VRd) demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in the safety run-in cohort of the ongoing phase 2 GRIFFIN study that included transplant-eligible NDMM pts. To determine whether D-VRd demonstrates efficacy and tolerability in NDMM pts for whom transplant is not intended as initial therapy, the phase 3 CEPHEUS study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-VRd vs VRd alone in this pt population. Methods: This is an ongoing multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study of D-VRd vs VRd alone in pts with NDMM for whom transplant is not intended as initial therapy. Approximately 360 pts will be stratified by ISS stage and age/transplant eligibility (age < 70 years and transplant-ineligible, or age < 70 years and refusal to transplant, or age ≥70 years) and will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. All pts will receive eight 21-day cycles of VRd (V: 1.3 mg/m2 SC Days 1, 4, 8, 11; R: 25 mg PO Days 1-14; d: 20 mg PO/IV Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12), followed by 28-day cycles of Rd (R: 25 mg PO Days 1-21; d: 40 mg PO/IV Days 1, 8, 15, 22) until progressive disease (PD). Patients in the DARA group will also receive subcutaneous DARA (1,800 mg co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; Halozyme]) weekly in Cycles 1-2, every 3 weeks in Cycles 3-8, and every 4 weeks in Cycles 9+ until PD. All pts will receive preinfusion medications. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate at 10–5 sensitivity threshold by NGS is the primary endpoint. MRD will be evaluated at suspected complete response or better. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), MRD-negative rate at 1-year, durable MRD negativity, overall response rate, time to and duration of response, PFS on next line of therapy, overall survival, clinical efficacy in high-risk molecular subgroups, health-related quality of life, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03652064.

ELOQUENT-2: A phase III, randomized, open-label trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Len/Dex) with or without elotuzumab (Elo) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RR MM) (CA204-004).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8112-TPS8112
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Paul Gerard Guy Richardson ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Jesùs F. San-Miguel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Duration Of Response

TPS8112 Background: MM remains incurable and patients (pts) typically relapse or become refractory to current treatments. Novel regimens are needed to improve pt outcomes. Elo is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting the cell surface glycoprotein CS1, which is highly expressed on >95% of MM cells. Len/Dex is approved for treatment of relapsed MM and an objective response rate (ORR) of ~60% was reported in phase III trials of this combination in RR MM. In a phase II study (N=73) of Elo (10 or 20 mg/kg) in combination with Len/Dex in pts with RR MM, the 10 mg/kg group (n=36) demonstrated an ORR of 92% and median progression-free survival (PFS) that was not reached after a median follow-up of 14.1 months. Encouraging activity was seen in patients with high-risk cytogenetics and/or stage 2-3 disease. Based on these data, a randomized, open-label phase III trial has been initiated to determine if the addition of Elo to Len/Dex will improve PFS in patients with RR MM compared with Len/Dex alone. Methods: Pts (N=640) with RR MM and 1-3 prior therapies are eligible, including pts with mild or moderate renal impairment. Pts are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 28-day cycles of Len 25 mg PO (days 1-21) and Dex 40 mg PO (days 1, 8, 15 and 22) with or without Elo. Elo dose and schedule is 10 mg/kg IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22 in the first 2 cycles and on days 1 and 15 in subsequent cycles. Dex 8 mg IV + 28 mg PO is used during the weeks with Elo. Treatment will continue until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent. Patients will be followed for tumor response every 4 weeks until progressive disease and then survival every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is PFS (90% power for a hazard ratio [experimental to control arm] of 0.74) and the secondary endpoints are ORR and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints are safety, time to response, duration of response, time to subsequent therapy, health-related quality of life, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of Elo. Potential biomarkers will also be assessed. As of January 10th, 2012, 107 pts were enrolled and 68 pts were treated. NCT01239797.

DREAMM-9: Phase III study of belantamab mafodotin plus VRd versus VRd alone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TI NDMM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8556-TPS8556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Zafar Usmani ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Wojt Janowski ◽  
Hang Quach ◽  
Sarah West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

TPS8556 Background: Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is the standard of care for transplant-eligible and TI NDMM, but relapse is usually inevitable. The median progression-free survival (PFS) is ~3 years for patients with TI NDMM, and with each relapse, the duration of response (DoR) diminishes, highlighting the need for novel, effective, targeted agents. Single-agent belantamab mafodotin is a first-in-class B-cell maturation antigen–binding, humanized, afucosylated, monoclonal immunoconjugate, showing deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma ( Lancet Oncol2020). Preclinical work suggests belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib or lenalidomide enhances anti-myeloma activity. Therefore, studying clinical activity of belantamab mafodotin in combination with these agents is warranted. Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is a two-part, open-label study to determine efficacy and safety of single-agent belantamab mafodotin with VRd vs. VRd alone in patients with TI NDMM. Patients aged ≥18 years with ECOG status 0–2 and adequate organ system functions will be eligible. Part 1 (dose selection) will evaluate safety/tolerability of belantamab mafodotin with VRd administered by single (Day 1) or split dosing (Days 1 and 8) in ≤5 cohorts (n = 12/cohort): 1.9 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg split and single, and 3.4 mg/kg split and single. Six more patients may be added to cohort(s) most likely to be selected as recommended Phase III dose (RP3D). Dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events (AEs) will be assessed, and belantamab mafodotin RP3D determined through modified toxicity probability interval criteria. Part 2 (randomized Phase III) will determine efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin at RP3D with VRd vs. VRd alone (n = 750) in two arms randomized 1:1. Dual primary endpoints will be rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and PFS. Secondary endpoints will be response rates (overall response, complete response, very good partial response or better, sustained MRD negativity), DoR, time to progression, and overall survival. Safety assessment will include AEs, serious AEs and ocular findings. In both parts, belantamab mafodotin will be given with VRd for eight induction cycles and then with Rd for maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (209664). Drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. Clinical trial information: NCT04091126 .

Subcutaneous daratumumab in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously treated with intravenous daratumumab: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study (LYNX).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8553-TPS8553
Author(s):  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Susan Wroblewski ◽  
Ming Qi ◽  
Thomas Renaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response

TPS8553 Background: The intravenous (IV) formulation of daratumumab (DARA), a human CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody, is approved in many countries for use as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and in combination with standard-of-care regimens in RRMM or newly diagnosed MM. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of DARA is under investigation in several ongoing studies. In the phase 3 COLUMBA study, DARA SC was shown to be non-inferior to DARA IV, demonstrating similar efficacy and pharmacokinetics, with a significantly decreased rate of infusion-related reactions and reduced administration time. The phase 2 LYNX (MMY2065) study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment with DARA. Methods: In this ongoing, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study, ~230 patients (pts) with prior exposure to DARA will be randomized 1:1 to receive carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) ± DARA. Pts must have received 1 to 2 prior lines of therapy (at least one of which included DARA IV), with DARA-based therapy completed ≥3 months prior to randomization. Eligible pts have achieved a partial response or better (IMWG criteria) to DARA-based therapy, with a duration of response of ≥4 months. Pts must not have discontinued DARA due to a related adverse event or received prior treatment with carfilzomib. Pts will receive 20 mg/m2 carfilzomib IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, escalated to 70 mg/m2 on Days 8 and 15; carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 will be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle thereafter. Dexamethasone 40 mg will be administered (IV or PO) QW for Cycles 1-9 and then on Days 1, 8 and 15 from Cycle 10 onwards. Pts in the D-Kd group will also receive DARA SC (1,800 mg co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; Halozyme]) QW in Cycles 1-2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter. The primary endpoint is the rate of pts achieving a very good partial response or better. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, rate of pts achieving complete response or better, progression-free survival, overall survival, overall minimal residual disease-negativity rate, time to next treatment, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03871829 .

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) Study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Pathway Inhibition

TPS158 Background: Despite activity of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibition in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, approximately one-third of patients demonstrate progressive disease as best response to anti-PD1 monotherapy. Preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic interactions between FOLFOX, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1. We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC subset may be more effectively targeted by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Methods: Initially a three-arm study, the mFOLFOX6/bev arm was closed to new enrollment on 6-4-20 due to emerging data; the redesigned COMMIT is a prospective phase III open-label trial that will randomize (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H pts (N=211) to either atezo monotherapy or mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by site investigator. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, -180819, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

Assessment of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) cohort by agent in the phase 3 ASCENT study of patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1077-1077
Author(s):  
Joyce O'Shaughnessy ◽  
Kevin Punie ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Filipa Lynce ◽  
Sara M. Tolaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Agent ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

1077 Background: In pts with pretreated mTNBC, standard-of-care chemotherapy is associated with low objective response rates (ORRs) and short median progression-free survival (PFS). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received accelerated FDA approval for treatment of pts with mTNBC who have received ≥2 prior therapies for metastatic disease. The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts with relapsed/refractory mTNBC demonstrated a significant survival benefit of SG over TPC (median PFS: 5.6 vs 1.7 mo, HR 0.41, P< 0.0001; median overall survival [OS]: 12.1 vs 6.7 mo, HR 0.48, P< 0.0001) with a tolerable safety profile. Here we summarize efficacy results for SG vs each TPC agent in ASCENT to examine how each TPC agent performed individually. Methods: Pts had mTNBC refractory to or progressing after ≥2 prior standard chemotherapy regimens. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or single-agent TPC (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in brain metastases-negative (BMNeg) pts. Secondary endpoints were ORR per RECIST 1.1, duration of response, OS, and safety. Outcomes for each of the agents in the TPC arm were analyzed and compared with SG. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 were BMNeg. Among pts in the TPC cohort (n = 233), eribulin was the most commonly chosen chemotherapy (n = 126), followed by vinorelbine (n = 47), capecitabine (n = 31), and gemcitabine (n = 29). Treatment with eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine resulted in shorter median PFS vs SG (2.1, 1.6, 1.6, and 2.7 vs 5.6 mo, respectively); similar results were observed for median OS (6.9, 5.9, 5.2, and 8.4 vs 12.1 mo), ORR (5%, 4%, 6%, and 3% vs 35%), and clinical benefit rate (CBR; 8%, 6%, 10%, and 14% vs 45%). Key grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with TPC overall vs SG included neutropenia (33% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), and anemia (5% vs 8%). Key grade ≥3 TRAEs with eribulin vs SG included neutropenia (30% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), anemia (2% vs 8%), and peripheral neuropathy (2% vs none), respectively. The safety profiles of vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine combined were consistent with that of TPC overall and with eribulin. One treatment-related death was reported for the TPC arm (eribulin) and none with SG. Conclusions: The efficacy benefit observed with SG vs TPC in pts with mTNBC was retained when evaluating each TPC chemotherapy agent individually. These results confirm that SG should be considered as a new standard of care in pts with pretreated mTNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455 .

scholarly journals Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: extended follow-up of POLLUX, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study

Leukemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1875-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Darrell J. White ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
Gordon Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract In POLLUX, daratumumab (D) plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 63% and increased the overall response rate (ORR) versus Rd in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Updated efficacy and safety after >3 years of follow-up are presented. Patients (N = 569) with ≥1 prior line received Rd (lenalidomide, 25 mg, on Days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone, 40 mg, weekly) ± daratumumab at the approved dosing schedule. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by next-generation sequencing. After 44.3 months median follow-up, D-Rd prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat population (median 44.5 vs 17.5 months; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35–0.55; P < 0.0001) and in patient subgroups. D-Rd demonstrated higher ORR (92.9 vs 76.4%; P < 0.0001) and deeper responses, including complete response or better (56.6 vs 23.2%; P < 0.0001) and MRD negativity (10–5; 30.4 vs 5.3%; P < 0.0001). Median time to next therapy was prolonged with D-Rd (50.6 vs 23.1 months; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31–0.50; P < 0.0001). Median PFS on subsequent line of therapy (PFS2) was not reached with D-Rd versus 31.7 months with Rd (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42–0.68; P < 0.0001). No new safety concerns were reported. These data support using D-Rd in patients with RRMM after first relapse.

SELECT: Randomized phase III study of docetaxel (D) or pemetrexed (P) with or without cetuximab (C) in recurrent or progressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7502-7502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward S. Kim ◽  
Marcus A. Neubauer ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Lee Steven Schwartzberg ◽  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staining Intensity ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Independent Review ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

7502 Background: SELECT investigated whether the addition of C to standard chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with recurrent or progressive NSCLC after failure of platinum-based therapy. Methods: SELECT was a multicenter, open label, randomized phase III trial. Per investigator choice, pts received either P (500 mg/m2) or D (75 mg/m2) on day 1 and then were randomized within each group to chemotherapy plus C (400/250 mg/m2) (initial/weekly) or chemotherapy alone. Therapy was given for up to six 3-week cycles; pts randomized to C continued weekly monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was PFS for PC vs. P as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by IRC, and safety. Preplanned subgroup analyses for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) staining intensity by immunohistochemistry and histology were performed. Results for PC vs. P only are presented. Results: Between Jan 2005 and Feb 2010, 938 total pts were randomized. Baseline demographics were comparable between PC (n=301) and P (n=304): median age 64 years; male 60%; Caucasian 88%; KPS 80-100/60-70 84%/16%; squamous/non-squamous 24%/76%. Median PFS (months) PC: 2.89 and P: 2.76 (hazard ratio [HR] =1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.87-1.21]; p=0.76). Median OS (months) PC: 6.93 and P: 7.79 (HR=1.01 [95% CI=0.86-1.20]; p=0.86). ORR PC: 6.6% and P: 4.3% (odds ratio =1.59 [95% CI=0.78-3.26]; p=0.20). Median DOR (months) PC: 4.17 and P: 6.93 (HR=1.58 [95% CI=0.74-3.36]; p=0.24). There were no statistical differences in efficacy based on histology or EGFR staining intensity. More drug-related AEs/SAEs were observed in the PC arm, with differences mainly attributable to skin toxicities, GI (diarrhea/stomatitis), and hypomagnesemia. Conclusions: The addition of C to P did not improve efficacy in this pt population. Further biomarker analyses are planned. The safety profiles for C and P were consistent with existing data and no new safety signals were observed.

Planned survival analysis from KEYNOTE-045: Phase 3, open-label study of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer (UC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4501-4501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean F. Bajorin ◽  
Ronald De Wit ◽  
David J. Vaughn ◽  
Yves Fradet ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Combined Positive Score ◽  
Ecog Ps

4501 Background: Second-line chemotherapies (chemo) for advanced UC have limited clinical benefit (OS, 7-9 mo). Data from the open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 study (NCT02256436) showed significantly longer OS with pembro v chemo (median, 10.3 v 7.4 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P = 0.002) in recurrent, advanced UC. Data from a planned survival analysis are presented. Methods: Pts had histologically or cytologically confirmed UC, progression after platinum, ECOG PS 0-2, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), and ≤2 lines of systemic therapy. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or investigator’s choice of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Q3W, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W, or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 Q3W. Primary efficacy end points were OS and PFS (RECIST v1.1, blinded central review). ORR (RECIST v1.1, blinded central review) was a secondary end point. Results: 542 pts were enrolled (pembro, 270; chemo, 272). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between arms. As of Jan 18, 2017, median follow-up was 18.5 mo (range, 14.2-26.5). Median OS was significantly longer with pembro v chemo (10.3 v 7.4 mo; HR, 0.70; P < 0.001), and significance was maintained regardless of PD-L1 expression as measured by combined positive score (HR: CPS < 1%, 0.84; CPS ≥1%, 0.59; CPS < 10%, 0.76; CPS ≥10%, 0.57). OS benefit with pembro v chemo was seen regardless of age, ECOG PS, prior therapy, liver metastases, histology, and choice of chemo. The 18-mo OS rate (95% CI) was 36.1% (30.1%-42.0%) with pembro v 20.5% (15.2%-25.8%) with chemo (KM estimate). PFS was not different between arms. ORR was higher with pembro v chemo (21.1% v 11.0%), and median (range) duration of response was longer (not reached [1.6+-20.7+ mo] v 4.4 mo [1.4+-20.3]). 69% (pembro) v 36% (chemo) of responses lasted ≥12 mo. Fewer pts experienced a treatment-related AE with pembro v chemo (any grade, 61.3% v 90.2%; grade ≥3, 16.5% v 49.8%). Conclusions: The OS benefit and superior safety profile of pembro over chemo are maintained with longer follow-up. Combined, these results support the potential of pembro as a new standard of care for patients with UC who previously received platinum. Clinical trial information: NCT02256436.

Intergroup study EORTC-1333-GUCG: A randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing enzalutamide vs. a combination of Ra223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients metastatic to bone (PEACE III).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS390-TPS390
Author(s):  
Bertrand F. Tombal ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott ◽  
Sandrine Marreaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Favourable Safety Profile ◽  
Health Related

TPS390 Background: α-emitting radiopharmaceutical Ra-223 reduces the risk of death by 30% vs placebo in phase 3 ALSYMPCA (Parker et al. NEJM 2013). Ra-223’s favourable safety profile and lack of significant toxicity support combining it with other agents. The ALSYMPCA trial was developed to add Ra-223 on the contemporary standard of care that did not include last generation AR pathway inhibitors enzalutamide, one of the modern reference treatments for asymptomatic or moderately symptomatic metastatic CRPC (Gillessen et al. Eur Urol. 2017). In addition Ra-223 is registered in symptomatic prostate cancer (PCa), a very late stage of modern patient disease. There is thus a good rationale to combine Ra-223 to modern AR pathway inhibitors and to initiate the treatment in asymptomatic or moderately symptomatic patients. Methods: The EORTC 1333-GUCG study will run in 51 sites (21 activated) across 7 European countries, 4 sites in US and 12 sites in Canada. The study is an intergroup initiative between EORTC (Coordinating Group), UNICANCER; Cancer Trials Ireland (Ireland), ACCRU (The United States), and CUOG (Canada). A total of 560 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive enzalutamide 160 mg q.d. p.o. or enzalutamide at the same dose and Ra223 at 55 kBq/kg i.v. monthly for 6 months. Patients will be stratified by country, pain (BPI 0-1 vs BPI 2-3), prior docetaxel use (no vs yes) and use of bone targeting agents (no vs yes). The main inclusion criteria require asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (defined as no opioids and BPI-SF question 3 < 4), metastatic to bone with ≥ 2 bone metastases with or without additional lymph node metastases. Visceral metastases are not allowed. The primary endpoint is radiological progression-free survival (rPFS1), according to PCWG3. Secondary endpoints include: overall survival, PCa specific survival, 1st symptomatic skeletal event (SSE), time to initiation of next systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, time to pain progression, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and BPI). Clinical trial information: NCT02194842.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document