Does a longer waiting period after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy improve the oncological prognosis of rectal cancer?: Three-year follow-up results of the GRECCAR-6 randomized multicenter trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 483-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremie H. Lefevre ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Marine Cachanado ◽  
Eric Rullier ◽  
Philippe Rouanet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lower Rectum ◽  
Waiting Period ◽  
The Impact

483 Background: There are controversial data on the impact of a long waiting period between radiochemotherapy (RCT) and resection for rectal cancer on the rate of complete pathological response (pCR = ypT0N0). The impact on the oncological prognosis is also unknown. We present the 3 years survival results of the GRECCAR6 trial. Methods: The GRECCAR6 trial was a phase III, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial. Patients with cT3/T4 or TxN+ tumours assessed by radiological examination (MRI and/or endo-ultrasound) of the mid or lower rectum who had received RCT (45-50 Gy with intravenous 5-FU or capecitabine) were included and randomized between 7 weeks or 11 weeks of waiting period. Primary endpoint was the pCR rate. Secondary endpoints were overall, disease-free survival and rate of recurrences. Results: A total of 265 patients from 24 participating centres were enrolled between October 2012 and February 2015. Among them, 253 patients underwent surgery with mesorectal excision. The rate of pCR was 17% (43/253). Mean follow-up from surgical resection was 32±8 months. 25 deaths occurred with a 89% OS at 3 years. DFS was 67.7% at 3 years due to 77 deaths or recurrences. 3-years local and distant recurrences rates were 9.2% and 24.9%, respectively. The group of randomization had no impact on the OS (p = 0.9486) and the DFS (p = 0.8672). Distant (p = 0.8589) and local (p = 0.5780) recurrences were also not influenced by the waiting period. Patients with a pCR had an excellent prognosis with an overall survival of 94.5% versus 87.9% for the remaining patients at 3 years (p = 0.232) and a DFS of 89.6% versus 63.4% (p = 0.0025). On multivariate analysis, DFS was influenced by low rectal tumors (OR=1.74; [1.03; 2.94], p = 0.037), R1 resection (OR = 2.03; [1.18; 3.50], p = 0.011), ypT3-T4 (OR = 2.4; [1.12; 5.19], p = 0.0245) and N+ (OR = 2.85; [1.76; 4.61], p < 0.001). Conclusions: Waiting 4 weeks longer after radiochemotherapy has no influence on the oncological outcomes of T3/T4 rectal cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT01648894.

Effect of Interval (7 or 11 weeks) Between Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy and Surgery on Complete Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (GRECCAR-6)

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (31) ◽  
pp. 3773-3780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémie H. Lefevre ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Salma Kotti ◽  
Eric Rullier ◽  
Philippe Rouanet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lower Rectum ◽  
End Point ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose A pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) of a rectal tumor after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is associated with an excellent prognosis. Several retrospective studies have investigated the effect of increasing the delay after RCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the interval between the end of RCT and surgery on the pCR rate. Methods GRECCAR6 was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group controlled trial. Patients with cT3/T4 or Tx N+ tumors of the mid or lower rectum who had received RCT (45 to 50 Gy with fluorouracil or capecitabine) were included. Patients were randomly included in the 7-week or the 11-week (11w) group. Primary end point was the pCR rate defined as a ypT0N0 specimen (NCT01648894). Results A total of 265 patients from 24 centers were enrolled between October 2012 and February 2015. The majority of the tumors were cT3 (82%). After RCT, surgery was not performed in nine patients (3.4%) because of the occurrence of distant metastasis (n = 5) or other reasons. Two patients underwent local resection of the tumor scar. A total of 47 (18.6%) specimens were classified as ypT0 (four had invaded lymph nodes [8.5%]). The primary end point (ypT0N0) was not different (7 weeks: 20 of 133, 15.0% v 11w: 23 of 132, 17.4%; P = .5983). Morbidity was significantly increased in the 11w group (44.5% v 32%; P = .0404) as a result of increased medical complications (32.8% v 19.2%; P = .0137). The 11w group had a worse quality of mesorectal resection (complete mesorectum [I] 78.7% v 90%; P = .0156). Conclusion Waiting 11 weeks after RCT did not increase the rate of pCR after surgical resection. A longer waiting period may be associated with higher morbidity and more difficult surgical resection.

Impact of PSMA PET/CT on SRT planning: Preliminary results from the randomized phase III trial NCT03582774.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Jeremie Calais ◽  
Wesley R Armstrong ◽  
Amar Upadhyaya Kishan ◽  
Kiara M Booker ◽  
David Elashoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Volume Delineation ◽  
Psma Pet ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
The Impact

30 Background: The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the success rate of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy with and without planning based on prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 clinical imaging trial powered for clinical outcome at 5 years. UCLA is the leading central site in which PSMA PET, clinical follow-up and data management are being done. UCSF was a participating site in which PSMA PET imaging can be done. SRT can be performed anywhere, patients are followed remotely by the UCLA investigators. Patients scheduled for SRT for recurrence after primary prostatectomy and with PSA ≥ 0.1ng/ml at time of enrollment were eligible. Patients were randomized to proceed with standard SRT allowing for any conventional imaging aside from PSMA PET/CT (control arm) or undergo a 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan prior to SRT planning (investigational arm). The primary endpoint is the success rate of SRT at 5 years in patients who undergo SRT. We report here the preliminary results of a secondary endpoint: the impact of PSMA PET on SRT planning by comparing the pre-randomization RT plans prospectively obtained on surveys before randomization to the actually delivered RT plans obtained after follow-up. Results: Enrollment of the trial was complete. 193 patients were enrolled from 09.06.2018 to 08.17.2020. 7/90 patients (9%) in the control arm dropped-out the study because they underwent a PSMA PET at another institution, while 1/103 (1%) patients of the intervention arm dropped-out due to COVID-19 related complications. After a median follow-up of 13.3 months (last follow-up date 09/01/2020), delivered RT plans were obtained in 60/83 (72%) and 70/102 (69%) of patients of the control and the PSMA arms, respectively. Median PSA at enrollment was 0.32 ng/ml (IQR 0.17-1.35) and 0.22 ng/ml (IQR 0.14-0.50) in the control and PSMA arms, respectively. There was a change between the intended pre-randomization RT plan and the actually delivered RT plan in 17/60 (28%) and 40/70 (57%) of the patients in the control and PSMA arms, respectively (p = 0.002). SRT was aborted in favor of systemic therapy and/or metastasis directed RT for extra-pelvic M1 disease in 2/60 (3%) and 12/70 (17%) of the control and PSMA arms, respectively (p = 0.17). Dose prescription and/or target volume delineation was changed in 2/60 (3%) and 1/70 (26%) in the control and PSMA arms, respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this prospective randomized phase 3 study, PSMA PET had an impact on the SRT plan in more than half of the patients. Long-term follow-up will show if the impact of PSMA PET on SRT planning translates into improved outcome or not. Clinical trial information: NCT03582774.

Aspirin as adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer: Rationale and progress of the Add-Aspirin trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3624-TPS3624
Author(s):  
Ruth E Langley ◽  
Richard H. Wilson ◽  
Fay Helen Cafferty ◽  
Nalinie Joharatnam ◽  
Janet Shirley Graham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations ◽  
The Impact

TPS3624 Background: There is now a body of evidence indicating a potential role for aspirin in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. In cardiovascular trials, effects on incidence of cancer metastases and short-term mortality suggest further possible roles in the treatment setting, supported by observational studies of aspirin use after cancer diagnosis. In the prevention setting, aspirin use has been limited by toxicity concerns, particularly of serious bleeding. In the adjuvant setting, benefits associated with reducing recurrence and subsequent treatment may outweigh these risks. The Add-Aspirin trial will investigate this, and will also consider possible mechanisms of action for aspirin effects, including the impact of PIK3CA mutations, where there are currently several theories and conflicting data. Methods: Add-Aspirin (ISRCTN74358648) is an international, phase III, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial recruiting patients who have undergone surgery and relevant adjuvant treatment for stage II or III CRC, as well as those with completely resected CRC liver metastases. Parallel randomised cohorts will address the question in breast, gastro-oesophageal and prostate cancer. Participants take aspirin 100mg daily for an 8-week run-in, to assess adherence and toxicity, and those suitable to proceed are randomised (1:1:1) to aspirin 100mg, aspirin 300mg or placebo daily for at least 5 years. A number of measures – including blood pressure control and PPI use where relevant - are in place to reduce bleeding risk. The primary outcome is disease-free survival (target hazard ratio = 0.8, n = 2600 in 5 years) with a long term analysis of survival planned across the tumour groups. Translational work includes a sub-study monitoring urinary thromboxane B2 as a marker of platelet activation in a subgroup (n = 500) to investigate mechanisms of action. Add-Aspirin opened in 2015 and recruited 1505 CRC patients during the first 3 years from 137 UK centres. 1282 (85%) proceeded to randomisation. A pre-planned feasibility analysis of run-in data (n = 2253 across all 4 tumour groups) provided reassuring data on safety, tolerability and adherence, and recruitment continues with centres in India and Republic of Ireland recently joining. Clinical trial information: 74358648.

Everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET): Updated results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial (RADIANT-3).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 158-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Shah ◽  
T. Ito ◽  
C. Lombard-Bohas ◽  
E. M. Wolin ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Patient Subgroups

158 Background: There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with advanced pNET. Systemic therapies for advanced pNET are limited both by toxicity and efficacy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor activity in 2 phase II studies, leading to further investigation in the largest phase III randomized controlled trial completed in pNET patients. Methods: Patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d orally + best supportive care (BSC; n = 207) or placebo + BSC (n = 203). Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were permitted as BSC during the study. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). At progression (RECIST), patients could be unblinded and those randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results: Compared with placebo, everolimus reduced the risk of progression by 65% and increased median PFS by more than 6 months, from 4.6 to 11.0 months (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45; p < 0.0001), by investigator review (primary endpoint). Median PFS by central review was consistent (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.44; p < 0.001] in favor of everolimus. Eighteen-month PFS estimates were 34% for everolimus (95% CI: 26-43) vs 9% (95% CI: 4-16) for placebo. Everolimus demonstrated a significant PFS benefit across all patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics and prior SSA use. Prior SSA use was 49% in the everolimus arm and 50% in the placebo arm. Updated analyses of the impact of concomitant SSA will be reported. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and infections (primarily upper respiratory); most were grade 1 or 2. Stomatitis (6.9% vs 0%), anemia (6% vs 0%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs 2%) were the most common grade 3-4 events. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups. Treatment resulted in a significant 6.4-month prolongation in median PFS. Everolimus had an acceptable and predictable safety profile. [Table: see text]

A secondary analysis of PSA response in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9902: A phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with androgen suppression and radiation for high-risk prostate cancer (CaP).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5078-5078
Author(s):  
Stephen Andrew Mihalcik ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Seth A. Rosenthal ◽  
Glenn J. Bubley ◽  
Kenneth J. Pienta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Suppression

5078 Background: RTOG 9902 was a randomized controlled trial of the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT; paclitaxel, oral etoposide, and estramustine x4 cycles) to 24 mo of androgen suppression (AS) and radiation (RT) for patients (pts) with high-risk CaP., beginning with an initial 4 mo of AS; RT began after 2 mo. 9902 accrued 397 pts and closed early due to excess toxicity. At a median follow-up of 9.2 years, there was no benefit to CT, but it is hypothesized that a subset analysis by post-RT PSA identifies pts that benefit from treatment intensification with CT. Methods: Post-RT PSA status was dichotomized at > 0.2 ng/mL within 1 mo of RT. Landmark analysis redefined starting times for disease-free survival (DFS), time to distant metastasis (TDM) and overall survival (OS) at 16 weeks post-RT (36 weeks post-randomization) when CT was planned to complete. Pts were excluded if they did not get RT or assigned CT, or experienced DFS events/lost to follow-up < 36 wks post-randomization. Hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and PSA-by-treatment interaction were estimated by Cox or competing-risks regression. Results: 333 pts were analyzed: 190 without and 143 with CT. 37% of pts had a post-RT PSA ≤0.2, 34% > 0.2, and 29% no recorded PSA in the defined interval. CT was associated with improved DFS for pts with PSA > 0.2 (HR 0.59, 0.38-0.91), but not for those with PSA ≤0.2 (HR 0.94, 0.60-1.46; interaction p = 0.13). This association, for those with PSA > 0.2, persisted in those pts who received the full course of CT and trended in the same direction for pts receiving 1-3 cycles. CT was associated with a trend toward improved TDM in the PSA > 0.2 group (HR 0.56, 0.23-1.35) and not in the PSA≤0.2 group (HR 1.31, 0.36-4.70), based on 32 pts with metastases. OS did not show the same pattern (PSA > 0.2: HR 0.98, 0.55-1.77; PSA≤0.2: HR 0.57, 0.29-1.13). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that men with high-risk CaP and suboptimal response to AS+RT, as identified by post-RT PSA > 0.2, may benefit from adjuvant CT. Prospective trials using contemporary CT (e.g. docetaxel) will help optimize treatment for these men. NRG-GU002, recently activated, is addressing this issue.

BiovaxID™ Vaccine Therapy of Follicular Lymphoma in First Remission: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase II Trial and Status of a Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2441-2441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Santos ◽  
Lee Stern ◽  
Laura Katz ◽  
Thelma Watson ◽  
Gause Barry
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Malignant B-cells in Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma expresses a clonal idiotype immunoglobulin which can serve as the basis for a patient-specific anti-idiotype vaccine. In a previous single-arm Phase II study by Bendandi, et al (Nature Med5:1171–1177, 1999), we evaluated the ability of tumor-specific idiotype (Id) conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) administered concurrently with granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) adjuvant to induce complete remissions and molecular remissions in treated patients. The vaccine formulation induced a tumor-specific cytotoxic CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell response in patients in first complete remission after standard chemotherapy, as well as achieved molecular remissions in 8 of 11 of these patients. Data available at the time of this abstract for the 20-patient cohort, indicates a median follow-up of 9.167 years. 9 patients (45 %) remain in continuous first CR at their most recent follow-up (either in 2004 or 2005), and overall survival is 95%. The data further indicates the median disease free survival for the cohort is 96.5 months (8.04 years). To date there have been no additional reported mortalities in this cohort. As of August 2005, we report the progress of the Phase III clinical trial for this vaccine, opened in January 2000 by the NCI to evaluate the impact of this hybridoma-based Id vaccine on disease-free survival in a group of up to 375 previously untreated patients who have attained a CR or CRu from PACE [Prednisone, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (ProMACE without methotrexate)] chemotherapy, and who are randomized to receive either vaccine or control. To date, 187 patients have been accrued onto the study. Of those patients, 145 (77.5%) achieved a CR or Cru and are being followed in this ongoing clinical trial.

Improved Outcome with Pulses of Vincristine and Steroids in Continuation Therapy of Children with Average Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Final Report of the EORTC Randomized Phase III Trial 58951

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 11-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara De Moerloose ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Yves Bertrand ◽  
Francoise Mazingue ◽  
Alain Robert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Childhood All ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Continuation Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: An overview of trials dating back to the ‘70s and ‘80s has shown that addition of vincristine (VCR)+prednisone/prednisolone pulses to continuation therapy of childhood ALL, i.e. 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) + methotrexate (MTX), improved disease-free survival (DFS) (Lancet, 1996). However, a recent randomized intergroup trial (IGT) has shown that, when given to intermediate risk (age&lt;1 or &gt;=6 yrs or WBC&gt;20×109/L) patients (pts) treated according to the BFM protocol, VCR+dexamethasone (DEX) pulses in continuation therapy failed to improve DFS and overall survival (Lancet, 2007). Methods: In 12/1998, EORTC CLG started the randomized phase III 58951 trial addressing 3 questions: R1) the value of DEX vs PRED in induction; R2) the value of prolonged (24 injections) vs conventional (12 injections) duration of L-asparaginase (ASPA) courses during consolidation and late intensification; R3) for average risk (AR) pts only: the value of 6 (VCR+corticosteroid) pulses every 10 weeks during continuation therapy. The corticoid of the pulses was that assigned to the patient at R1: DEX (6 mg/sm/d) or prednisolone (PRED) (60 mg/sm/d) during 7 days. AR pts were defined by being neither low risk (hyperploidy &gt; 50 or DNI&gt;1.16, and WBC&lt;10×109/L and no extramedullary involvement) nor very high risk (Leukemia 2000). A total of 81 pts from the EORTC 58951 trial were included in the IGT study. Randomization was done centrally, and the main endpoint was DFS; secondary endpoints were OS and toxicity. Intent-to-treat analysis was used. Results: Between 6.1999 and 11.2004, 411 pts, ALL (N=384) and NHL (N=27), were randomized for the pulse question. In the Pulses group, 101 vs 101 pts were randomized for PRED vs DEX. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, there were 19 vs 34 DFS events for the Pulses vs No Pulses comparison: BM (10 vs 16), CNS only (1 vs 4), other isolated (2 vs 3), BM+CNS (2 vs 5), BM+other (4 vs 4), death in CR (0 vs 2). The 6-year DFS rate from randomization was 90.6% (SE 2.1%) in the Pulses group and 82.8% (SE 2.8%) in the No Pulses group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.94, 2-sided logrank p=0.027). The impact of pulses on DFS was similar in the PRED group (HR=0.56) and the DEX group (HR=0.59). In girls the treatment difference seemed to be more pronounced (HR=0.25, 99% CI 0.04–1.25; p=0.015) than in boys (HR=0.71, 99% CI 0.30–1.66; p=0.30), and also in those having been randomized to receive conventional duration of ASPA courses (HR=0.46, 99% CI 0.18–1.19; p=0.03) than in prolonged ASPA arm (HR=0.87, 99% CI 0.23–3.29; p=0.78). Grade 3–4 hepatic toxicity was lower in the Pulses group (30% vs 40%); incidence of grade 2–3 osteonecrosis was 4.4% (Pulses) vs 2% (No Pulses) and pancreatitis rate was 4.9% (Pulses) vs 2.9% (No Pulses). Conclusion: VCR+corticosteroid pulses, at long follow-up (median=6.3 yrs), significantly improved the DFS, particularly in pts having received conventional duration of ASPA. Pulses did not increase toxic effects. In future, for AR pts treated according to the BFM protocol, pulses should become a standard component of therapy.

Hepatectomy Followed by mFOLFOX6 Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Liver-Only Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (JCOG0603): A Phase II or III Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.01032
Author(s):  
Yukihide Kanemitsu ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Tetsuya Hamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Randomized Controlled

PURPOSE Adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy is controversial in liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine if adjuvant modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) is superior to hepatectomy alone for liver-only metastasis from CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase II or III trial (JCOG0603), patients age 20-75 years with confirmed CRC and an unlimited number of liver metastatic lesions were randomly assigned to hepatectomy alone or 12 courses of adjuvant mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy. The primary end point of phase III was disease-free survival (DFS) in intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS Between March 2007 and January 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned to hepatectomy alone (149 patients) or hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy (151 patients). At the third interim analysis of phase III with median follow-up of 53.6 months, the trial was terminated early according to the protocol because DFS was significantly longer in patients treated with hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy. With median follow-up of 59.2 months, the updated 5-year DFS was 38.7% (95% CI, 30.4 to 46.8) for hepatectomy alone compared with 49.8% (95% CI, 41.0 to 58.0) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.92; one-sided P = .006). However, the updated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 83.1% (95% CI, 74.9 to 88.9) with hepatectomy alone and 71.2% (95% CI, 61.7 to 78.8) with hepatectomy followed by chemotherapy. In the chemotherapy arm, the most common grade 3 or higher severe adverse event was neutropenia (50% of patients), followed by sensory neuropathy (10%) and allergic reaction (4%). One patient died of unknown cause after three courses of mFOLFOX6 administration. CONCLUSION DFS did not correlate with OS for liver-only metastatic CRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 improves DFS among patients treated with hepatectomy for CRC liver metastasis. It remains unclear whether chemotherapy improves OS.

APACT: phase III, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) for surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4000-4000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Tempero ◽  
Michele Reni ◽  
Hanno Riess ◽  
Uwe Pelzer ◽  
Eileen Mary O'Reilly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

4000 Background: In metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC), nab-P/G demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) vs G. APACT assessed efficacy & safety of nab-P/G vs G in surgically resected PC. Methods: Treatment (tx)-naive patients (pts) with histologically confirmed PC, macroscopic complete resection, ECOG PS 0/1, & CA19-9 < 100 U/mL were eligible. Stratification factors: resection status (R0/R1), lymph node status (LN+/−), & geographic region. Tx was initiated ≤ 12 wks postsurgery. Pts received nab-P 125 mg/m2 + G 1000 mg/m2 or G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of six 28-day cycles. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) by independent reviewer (IR); IRs received baseline clinical data & scans. Secondary endpoints were OS & safety. ≈438 DFS events were needed for 90% power to detect an HR for disease recurrence or death of 0.73 with nab-P/G vs G at a 2-sided significance level of 0.05. Results: 866 pts were randomized. Median age was 64 y (range, 34 - 86); most pts had ECOG PS 0 (60%), LN+ (72%), & R0 (76%). 69% of pts completed 6 tx cycles ( nab-P/G, 66%; G, 71%). Median follow up for OS was 38.5 mo. Median IR-assessed DFS (439 events) was 19.4 mo ( nab-P/G) vs 18.8 mo (G) (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 - 1.063; stratified log-rank P = 0.1824). Investigator-assessed DFS (571 events) was 16.6 mo ( nab-P/G) vs 13.7 mo (G) (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 - 0.965; nominal P = 0.0168). Interim OS (427 events) was 40.5 mo ( nab-P/G) vs 36.2 mo (G) (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 - 0.996; nominal P = 0.045). Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 86% vs 68% of pts with nab-P/G vs G. The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic & nonhematologic TEAEs with nab-P/G vs G were neutropenia (49% vs 43%) & fatigue (10% vs 3%). TEAEs led to death in 2 pts in each arm. Conclusions: IR DFS with nab-P/G was not significantly longer vs G; median DFS with G was longer than historical data. DFS by investigator (sensitivity analysis) and interim OS were improved with nab-P/G vs G (HR 0.82 for both). Adjuvant nab-P/G may be an option for pts who are ineligible for FOLFIRINOX. Additional OS follow-up may better support nab-P/G as an option in the adjuvant setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01964430.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document