Outcomes and utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT) for stage II colon cancer (CC-II) in elderly population.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 701-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Barzi ◽  
Xiayu Jiao ◽  
Joel W Hay ◽  
Sarmad Sadeghi

701 Background: The use of AT in elderly patients (pts) with CC-II is controversial. We used Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) linkage with Medicare claims to explore the patterns of AT and survival in pts with CC-II diagnosed between 2004-2010. Methods: Colon cancer was identified using ICD-O-3 codes. TNM staging information was used to classify pts as stage II and its subgroups. We restricted our cohort to pts who had surgery within 4 months (mos) of the diagnosis using ICD-9 codes: 45.7x and 45.8x and excluded pts who died within 3 mos after the surgery as well as those who were enrolled on a health maintenance organization. We searched Medpar, outpatient facility, or carrier claims in the 4 mos after surgery to identify pts who received AT using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes, HCPCS, and revenue center codes. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between demographics and clinical characteristics of pts in each group and receipt of AT. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. We performed a flexible parametric survival analysis to estimate the 3-year overall survival benefit for AT while controlling for demographics and clinical characteristics. Results: A total of 15,310 pts were included in our study. Among those, 14% (n=2,168ss received AT of which 718 (33%) received oxaliplatin containing regimen. Pts and tumor characteristics are reported in the table. After adjusting for pts and tumor characteristics, probability of survival at 3 years was 72.9% for pts who received AT and 74.2% for those who did not, HR=1.06 (95% CI, 0.96-1.17), with P-value: 0.229. The AT use was declining over time. Conclusions: Although AT is used in healthier and higher risk elderly pts with colon cancer, it was not associated with significantly improved overall survival. [Table: see text]

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6648-6648
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Barzi ◽  
Xiayu Jiao ◽  
Joel W Hay ◽  
Sarmad Sadeghi

6648 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for stage II colon cancer remains a controversial topic. We used Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) linkage with Medicare claims to explore the benefits of AC and cost of care in pts with CC-II diagnosed between 2004-2010. Methods: Colon cancer was identified using ICD-O-3 codes. TNM staging was used to classify pts as stage II. Cohort was restricted to pts who had surgery within 4months (mos) of the diagnosis and excluded pts who died within 3mos after the surgery as well as those who were enrolledon a health maintenance organization. We searched claims in the 4mos after surgery to identify pts who received AC using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes, HCPCS, and revenue center codes. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Cost of care from payer’s perspective (Medicare) starting from surgery service to death or 3 years after surgery was captured from claims data. Results: A total of 16948 pts with CC-II diagnosed 2004-2010 were included in this analysis. Among those 14% received AC and 33% of them oxaliplatin. After adjusting for pts and tumor characteristics, probabilityof survival at 3years was 72.9% for pts who received AC and 74.2% for those who did not, HR=1.06 (95% CI, 0.96-1.17), with P-value: 0.229. The cost of care for the AC was significantly higher than the no-AC group (median $254,116 vs. $91,086). The biggest difference in between two groups was cost of outpatient and physician services. Costs for AC group was higher in years 1, 2, and 3 as seen in table. Conclusions: AC for CC-II is has a low value in elderly pts and should be avoided. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3509-3509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Roth ◽  
Antonio Fabio Di Narzo ◽  
Sabine Tejpar ◽  
Fred Bosman ◽  
Vlad Calin Popovici ◽  
...  

3509 Background: Prognosis prediction for resected primary colon cancer is currently based on the tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) staging system. Gene expression based risk scores have been proposed, but need to be validated and integrated with clinical and TNM variables. We performed an independent assessment of the individual recurrence signatures developed for commercial use by Veridex and Genomic Health. Methods: The Veridex (aVDS) and Genomic Health (aGHS) risk scores were applied to existing gene expression data of 580 stage III and 108 stage II tumors from the PETACC-3 trial. Association of the scores with relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients was assessed singularly, and in a combination with TNM and other clinico-pathological variables, by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models and logrank methods. Results: Both risk scores were significantly associated with RFS in univariate and multivariate models (Table) for the stage III cohort. The scores contributed different and additive prognostic information, and reached highest effect sizes (approximate p-value 0.001 and HR per interquartile range 1.4 each) in a combined model (Table) that includes both scores as well as T-stage, N-stage and MSI status as significant factors. Analysis in the stage II cohort gave similar effect estimates. Conclusions: This study confirms in an independent colon cancer patient cohort that gene expression based risk scores improve current prognostic models. The best prognostic model was obtained by using clinico-pathological variables and both gene-expression risk-scores. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
Leyla Bojanini Molina ◽  
Joel E Michalek ◽  
Qianqian Liu ◽  
Adolfo Enrique Diaz Duque

Background Hepatosplenic T-Cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is an aggressive type of lymphoma with extremely low incidence. It has a high fatality rate with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of <10% (Am J Surg Pathol, PMID: 26872013). Although there is no therapy that has proven to produce sustained remission, recent studies suggest improvement in outcomes with allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) (Leukemia, PMID: 25234166). Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes have been previously reported; however, documentation of outcomes in minorities such as Hispanics (HI) are lacking. Given the growth of the HI population in the US it is imperative to understand the difference in outcomes and patterns of care (CA Cancer J Clin, PMID: 30285281). The present study aims to fill this gap in the literature; therefore, the present population-based study evaluates the impact of ethnicity in clinical outcomes for HSTCL. Material and Methods We retrospectively searched for cases of HSTCL recorded in the Texas Cancer Registry. Inclusion criteria included and established pathologic diagnosis of HSTCL using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology Third Edition (ICD-O-3) code list. Patients were divided between HI and non-Hispanics (NH). Demographic, socioeconomic, clinical and survival outcomes were recorded. Statistical analysis included Fisher's Exact test, Pearson's Chi-square test, T-test or Wilcoxon test. Survival analysis was calculation in years from date of primary diagnosis to date of death or last date of follow up. Survival distributions were described with Kaplan-Meier curves, and long rank testing was used to assess significance of variation in median survival with ethnicity. All statistical testing was two-sided with a significance level of 5%. The R language [R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria] was used throughout. Results From 2006-2016, a total of 25 patients were diagnosed with HSTCL; 23 (92%) were NH and 2 (7%) were HI [<0.0001]. The median age at diagnosis was 46 for HI and 48 for NH. It was predominantly seen in males for both HI and NH. The patients mostly self-identified as white (HI: n=2, Nh: n=16), and there were 7 (30%) NH patients that self-identified as black. For HI, one patient was in the bracket of poverty indicator of 10-19.9% and the other one was in the 20-100%; for the NH patients the bracket that prevailed was 10-19.9% [p-value 0.56]. Both HI patients had private insurance (PI); insurance status on NH patients included 7 (33.3%) with PI, 5 (23.8%) with Medicare, and 7 (33.3%) was unknown [p-value 0.64]. The majority of HI and NH patients were located in the metropolitan, non-border area. Stage at diagnosis for NH was mostly III-IV; one HI had a stage III-IV HSTCL and the other was unstaged [p-value 1.0]. From a therapeutic standpoint, the majority of HI and NH patients received chemotherapy, with 13 patients (HI: n=2, NH: n=11) receiving multiple agents as first-line therapy [p-value 0.84]. From the two groups, only 3 (13%) NH patients underwent allo-SCT [p-value 0.014]. The majority of HI and NH did not undergo radiation (Figure 1A). The median overall survival was 0.5 years in HI and 0.6 in NH. The survival probability at 2 years for HI and NH was 0.5 (CI=0.16, 1) and 0.29 (CI=0.15, 0.56) respectively; at 5 years for HI was 0.5 (CI 0.16, 1) and for NH was 0.23 (CI=0.10, 0.51) (Figure 1B). The overall survival probability at 10 years was not statistically different for HI vs NH [p-value 0.53] (Figure 1C). Conclusions Survival analysis shows that HSTCL is usually fatal with a median overall survival of less than a year, and no difference in survival probability at 10 years for both HI and NH. The majority of patients in our study were non-Hispanic white males. A significant finding was that NH patients had access to allo-SCT as opposed to the HI patients. No statistically significant difference in survival was noted depending on the insurance or poverty levels. No other demographics or sociocultural variables seemed to have an impact in outcomes. The main limitation of our study is our sample size that limits generalizability and power of our statistical analysis. Further studies using multiple cancer registries are warranted to assess the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in HI with HSTCL. Disclosures Diaz Duque: ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Hutchinson Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Lv ◽  
Yuqi Liang ◽  
Huaxi Liu ◽  
Delong Mo

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3285-3285
Author(s):  
Ayman Saad ◽  
Mohammed Almubarak ◽  
Abraham Kanate ◽  
Aaron Cumpston ◽  
Kathy Watkins ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Peripheral allogeneic SCT is used to treat different types of hematologic malignancies. The target CD34 stem cell dose is 2 -5 x 106/Kg. The dose of CD3+ cells in the infusate is not taken into account except in T-depleted transplant. T-cell dose in peripheral blood stem cell collections is at least 10-fold more than that in a bone marrow harvest. Regulatory T cells (CD4+, CD25+), which comprises 5–10% of CD4 + T cells have been correlated with less incidence of aGVHD. In our study we are trying to determine the impact of T-cell dosing on the overall survival and incidence of aGVHD after peripheral allogeneic SCT in a group of patients with hematological malignancy. Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients who underwent peripheral allogeneic SCT for hematological malignancy in our institution between January 2003 and April 2006. The median duration of follow up after SCT was 12.6 months (range 0.2–53). Duration of follow up was compromised only in a subset of patients who had early mortality following SCT. Proportional hazard model was used to define the cutoff value of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cell dose that separate 2 groups of patients with highest statistically significant difference in terms of incidence of aGVHD. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis was used for correlate the overall survival (calculated from date of transplant) among these groups subdivided in terms of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cell doses. Results: The 66 patients (6 females, and 60 males) with median age of 48 years (range: 19–63 years) had different malignancies; 6 ALL, 34 AML, 1 biphenotypic leukemia, 1 CLL, 11 CML, 5 Hodgkin lymphoma, 8 NHL. The SCT was from matched related donors in 39 patients, and from matched unrelated donors in 27 patients. The incidence of aGVHD (grade 2–4) was statistically significantly less among those who received CD3 dose < 33.5 × 107/kg IBW (P value: 0.04), tended to be less among those who received CD4 dose < 32.6 × 107/kg IBW (P value: 0.06), and was statistically significantly less among those who received CD8 dose < 6.2 × 107/kg IBW (P value: 0.04). Survival analysis showed no statistically significantly difference in the overall survival (OS) among all patients groups. Median OS was 10.5 months for those who received CD3 dose ≤ 33.5 ×107/kg IBW and 17 months for those who received > 33.5 ×107/kg IBW (P value: 0.35). Median OS was 12 months for those who received CD4 dose ≤ 32.6 ×107/kg IBW and 16.3 months for those who received > 32.6 ×107/kg IBW (P value: 0.8). Median OS was 6 months for those who received CD8 dose ≤ 6.2 ×107/kg IBW and 14.4 months for those who received > 6.2 ×107/kg IBW (P value: 0.13). Conclusions: In our series, CD3 dose less than 33.5 ×107/kg IBW and CD8 dose less than 6.2 ×107/kg IBW were associated with statistically significant reduced risk of grade 2–4 acute GVHD following peripheral allogeneic SCT. Overall survival was not statistically different among these groups of patients. These data suggest that, in addition to considering CD34 dose required for engraftment in allogeneic transplant, the CD3 dose and its subsets CD8 and CD4 may need to be considered to try to minimize the risk of acute GVHD without compromising survival after transplant.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3508-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Allegra ◽  
G. A. Yothers ◽  
M. J. O'Connell ◽  
S. Sharif ◽  
N. J. Petrelli ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 625-625
Author(s):  
M. Omaira ◽  
M. Mozayen ◽  
K. Katato

625 Background: Surgical resection of local colon cancer is the only curative treatment, at the same time adjuvant chemotherapy is clearly shown to be beneficial as the standard of care for node positive disease (stage III) colon cancer. However the role of chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer treatment is still conflicting. We aim to compare the overall survival rate of stage II colon cancer patient's with and without chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 1990-2006. Patients with stage II colon cancer were included. Patient's characteristics including age, gender, common site of involvement, histology patterns, overall survival rate and treatment with chemotherapy were recorded. Results: A total of 138 consecutive patients were identified from 1990-2006. The median age was 68 (21-91) year, males (44%), African Americans (47.6%). The most common sites of the primary tumor were sigmoid and cecum (22.4%) each. Adenocarcinoma being the most common pathology. Majority of the patients (86.2%) were found to have T 3 tumors. Of the patients that received chemotherapy (29/44) 66% had an overall survival rate of three years or more, whereas (53/94) 57% of the patients who did not receive chemotherapy had a survival rate of three years or more. The difference of survival rates between the two groups of patients was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The role of chemotherapy in stage II colon ancer is still controversial. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups who did and did not receive chemotherapy; thus more studies are warranted to explore the factors that predict the survival of stage II colon cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548
Author(s):  
Brandon Matthew Meyers ◽  
Humaid Obaid Al-Shamsi ◽  
Alvaro Tell Figueredo

3548 Background: Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery in the early stages of the disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage III disease, but the magnitude of benefit in stage II colon cancer is less clear. A previous Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) found improved disease-free, but not overall survival (Figueredo et al., 2008). An updated SR/MA was performed to determine the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Methods: Relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were independently searched by all authors, using the same search strategy employed in the original study (1/1988 to 9/2012). Randomized trials containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy versus observation were included. Pooled results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) whenever possible, or risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using a random effects model. Results: Seven studies were identified, and included in the final SR/MA. Six of the 7 studies were included in the disease-free survival analysis (n=4587). Adjuvant 5FU was associated with better disease-free survival (RR 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.94)). All 7 studies (n=5353) were included in the overall survival analysis showing an improvement with adjuvant 5FU (HR 0.87 (95%CI 0.78-0.97)). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 0% for all analyses). Conclusions: In stage II colon cancer, adjuvant 5FU chemotherapy statistically improves both disease-free and overall survival. Our SR/MA demonstrates, for the first time, an overall survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3395-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Figueredo ◽  
Manya L. Charette ◽  
Jean Maroun ◽  
Melissa C. Brouwers ◽  
Lisa Zuraw

Purpose To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? Methods A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation. Results Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P = .07). Conclusion There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.


Epidemiology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Jacobs ◽  
Emily White ◽  
Noel S. Weiss ◽  
Susan R. Heckbert ◽  
Andrea LaCroix ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document