TALAPRO-1: An open-label, response rate phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in men with DNA damage repair (DDR) defects and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who previously received taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) and progressed on greater than or equal to one novel hormonal therapy (NHT).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS342-TPS342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Kurt Miller ◽  
Hsiang-Chun Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Tissue Response ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Efficacy Analysis

TPS342 Background: There are no approved therapies for mCRPC that has progressed on taxane and NHT. Preclinical studies showed that DDR-positive prostate tumors may be sensitized to PARP inhibition. TALA inhibits PARP, causing cell death in BRCA1/2-mutated cells. Methods: This study (NCT03148795) is enrolling patients (pts) (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease per RECIST v1.1, progressive mCRPC, DDR likely to sensitize to PARP inhibition, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and no brain metastases, who received 1-2 CT regimens (including ≥ 1 taxane-based CT) and progressed on ≥ 1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate). Prior use of PARP inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, or platinum-based CT ≤ 6 mos before study or progression on a platinum-based CT at any time are excluded. Pts will receive TALA 1 mg/d orally (pts with moderate renal impairment, 0.75 mg/d) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. TALA should not be discontinued based on increased prostate specific antigen (PSA) or circulating tumor cell (CTC) count alone. Primary endpoint is best objective response (OR) rate (complete/partial soft tissue response; exact 2-sided 95% confidence interval). Responses must be confirmed ≥ 4 wks later by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging with no evidence of bone progression ≥ 6 wks later per PCWG3 criteria. Secondary endpoints include time to OR, duration of response, PSA decrease ≥ 50%, CTC count conversion (to CTC = 0 and < 5 per 7.5 mL of blood), time to PSA progression, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pt-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics of TALA. Efficacy will be assessed every 8 wks for the first 24 wks, then every 12 wks thereafter. An initial safety and efficacy analysis will be performed on 20 pts after ≥ 8 wks of treatment. An interim efficacy analysis is planned when 60 pts have completed ≥ 6 mos of treatment. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Previously presented at ESMO 2018, FPN 859TiP, De Bono JS et al. Reused with permission. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795.

TALAPRO-1: Phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in patients (pts) with DNA damage repair alterations (DDRm) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Consuelo Buttigliero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease

93 Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) show antitumor activity in mCRPC/DDRm pts treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT). TALAPRO-1 is an open-label study evaluating TALA (a potent PARP inhibitor/trapper) in men with mCRPC/DDRm. We report a planned interim analysis (IA; Dec 2019). Updated results at a Sep 4 2020 cut-off, available in November 2020, will be presented at the meeting. Methods: TALAPRO-1 (NCT03148795) is enrolling pts (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease, progressive mCRPC, and DDRm likely to sensitize to PARPi ( ATM, ATR, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), who received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) for metastatic disease and progressed on ≥1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate) given for mCRPC. DDRm are defined as known/likely pathogenic variants or homozygous deletions. Pts receive oral TALA 1 mg/day (moderate renal impairment 0.75 mg/day) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: time to objective response; response duration; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50%; circulating tumor cell (CTC) count conversion (to CTC = 0 and <5 per 7.5 mL blood); time to PSA progression; radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS); overall survival; safety. A planned efficacy/safety IA was done when 60 pts with DDRm and measurable disease completed ≥6 months of TALA/no longer followed. Radiographic responses are based on investigator assessments. Results: 113 pts received TALA (cut-off Dec 12 2019); 75 pts were evaluable for IA, with DDRm, had measurable disease, received ≥16 weeks’ treatment, and were assessed for ORR (54.7% BRCA1/2, 4.0% PALB2, 22.7% ATM; 18.7% other DDRm).All pts evaluable for IA had prior docetaxel; 45.3% cabazitaxel. Confirmed ORR, rPFS, and composite response (investigator-assessed) in pts who received TALA for ≥16 weeks are in the table. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events: anemia (42.5%); nausea (32.7%). Conclusions: TALA monotherapy has encouraging antitumor activity in docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC pts with BRCA1/2 alterations and was generally well tolerated. Funding: Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795. [Table: see text]

A phase III, randomized, open-label, study (CONTACT-02) of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second novel hormone therapy (NHT) in patients (pts) with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS190-TPS190
Author(s):  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Arun Azad ◽  
Joan Carles ◽  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Cancer Aggressiveness

TPS190 Background: Cabozantinib inhibits multiple tyrosine kinases, including MET, VEGFR, RET, and TAM kinases (Tyro3, AXL, MER), involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis, and whose mutations and expression are associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Targeting these kinases with cabozantinib may promote an immune permissive tumor environment and may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the ongoing phase 1b COSMIC-021 study of pts with solid tumors, cabozantinib plus the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, showed preliminary meaningful clinical activity in soft tissue disease and a tolerable safety profile for 44 pts with mCRPC (Agarwal et al., ASCO 2020; abstract 5564). We present the study design of a phase 3 trial of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second NHT in pts with mCRPC. Methods: This randomized, open-label, controlled phase 3 study (NCT04446117) evaluates the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second NHT (abiraterone or enzalutamide) in pts with mCRPC who previously received one NHT to treat metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC), non-metastatic CRPC (M0 CRPC), or mCRPC. Additional eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, measurable visceral disease or measurable extrapelvic adenopathy per RECIST 1.1 by investigator, prostate specific antigen progression and/or soft-tissue disease progression, ECOG 0 or 1, and age ≥18 years. Key exclusion criteria include prior nonhormonal therapy for mCRPC and uncontrolled significant illness. Eligible pts (N = 580) are randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib (40 mg PO QD) + atezolizumab (1200 mg IV Q3W) vs abiraterone (1000 mg PO QD) + prednisone (5 mg PO BID) or enzalutamide (160 mg PO QD). Designated NHT will differ from previous NHT taken. Randomization is stratified by: liver metastasis (yes, no), prior docetaxel treatment for mCSPC (yes, no), and disease stage for which the first NHT was given (mCSPC, M0 CRPC, mCRPC). Treatment will continue until there is no longer clinical benefit as determined by the treating investigator, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The multiple primary endpoints are progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC) and overall survival. Additional endpoints include objective response rate per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC, safety, correlation of biomarkers with outcomes, quality of life and pharmacokinetics. Patient enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04446117.

A non-comparative phase II study of bendamustine hydrochloride in patients with pretreated soft tissue sarcoma (German Sarcoma Group-AIO 001)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9525-9525
Author(s):  
F. Mayer ◽  
J. Schleicher ◽  
J. Huober ◽  
I. Meisinger ◽  
J. Pintoffl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Adult Type ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Clinically Significant

9525 Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of bendamustine hydrochloride, a nucleoside analogue with alkylating activity, in patients with adult type soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who have failed anthracyline-based chemotherapy. Methods: Pts with a ECOG performance status 0–2, measurable disease and adequate organ functions were eligible. All patients had inoperable locally advanced or metastatic disease and had progressive disease during or after first-line chemotherapy prior to study entry. Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 100 mg/sqm on day 1 and 2 every four weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles with tumour assessment every two cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate as defined by RECIST. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. A two-stage design was used (1st step: 14 pts, at least 1 PR in order to succeed with 2nd step; p0 = 5%, p1 = 25%, alpha = beta = 0.1). Results: 32 patients, median age 56 yrs (range, 18–74) with STS were recruited (3 pts not evaluable for efficacy analysis). In general the drug was well tolerated. Grade 3 toxicity was granulocytopenia in 9% and febrile neutropenia/fever in 3% of pts. No toxic death was seen in a total of 89 cycles administered. A single pt experienced a clinically significant allergic reaction (3%). Anti-tumour activity: 1 confirmed partial response (3%). A further 10 patients had progression arrest by cycle two (34%). Conclusions: The confirmed objective response rate is low. However, the incidence of progression arrest in pretreated adult type STS is in the range of other agents considered active in STS. The observed toxicity profile is favorable. Further investigation in STS appears warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

TALAPRO-1: A phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in men with DNA damage repair mutations (DDRmut) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)—First interim analysis (IA).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 119-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Consuelo Buttigliero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

119 Background: Phase 2 and 3 studies with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated antitumor activity in patients (pts) with mCRPC with DDRmut who were previously treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT). We report the first IA of a Phase 2 study of TALA, a potent inhibitor and trapper of PARP. Methods: TALAPRO-1 (NCT03148795) is enrolling pts (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease, progressive mCRPC, and DDRmut likely to sensitize to PARPi (including ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), who received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) and progressed on ≥1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate). Pts receive oral TALA 1 mg/d (moderate renal impairment, 0.75 mg/d) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR; blinded independent review). Secondary endpoints are time to OR, duration of response, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50%, circulating tumor cell (CTC) count conversion (to CTC = 0 and <5 per 7.5 mL of blood), time to PSA progression, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival, safety, pt-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. A planned IA of safety and efficacy was performed after 20 pts with BRCA1/2 mutations were on treatment for ≥8 wks. Results: 81 pts received TALA as of June 5, 2019; 43 pts enrolled by Feb 12, 2019 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (20 BRCA1/2, 2 PALB2, 14 ATM, 7 other). All had received docetaxel and 49% prior cabazitaxel. Overall ORR (95% CI) was 25.6% (13.5–41.2), ORRBRCA1/2 50.0% (27.2–72.8), ORRATM 7.1% (0.2–33.9). Overall median (95% CI) rPFS was 5.6 months (mo) (3.5–8.2), rPFSBRCA1/2 8.2 mo (5.6–NE), rPFSATM 3.5 mo (1.7–8.1). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥20%) were anemia, nausea, asthenia, decreased appetite, constipation, and platelet count decreased. Conclusions: TALA monotherapy demonstrates encouraging antitumor activity in docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC pts, especially those with BRCA1/2mut, and was generally well tolerated. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795.

CheckMate 9KD cohort A1 final analysis: Nivolumab (NIVO) + rucaparib for post-chemotherapy (CT) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5044-5044
Author(s):  
Russell Kent Pachynski ◽  
Margitta Retz ◽  
Jeffrey C. Goh ◽  
Mauricio Burotto ◽  
Gwenaelle Gravis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Immune Priming

5044 Background: CheckMate 9KD is a phase 2 trial of NIVO (anti-PD-1) combined with either rucaparib, docetaxel, or enzalutamide for mCRPC. PARP inhibitors, like rucaparib, increase cellular DNA damage, particularly in tumors with DNA repair defects, leading to genomic instability and cell death. This DNA damage promotes immune priming and adaptive PD-L1 upregulation. Consequently, dual PD-(L)1 and PARP inhibition is a plausible therapeutic strategy for mCRPC. We report final results for cohort A1 (NIVO + rucaparib for post-CT mCRPC) of CheckMate 9KD. Methods: Cohort A1 enrolled patients (pts) with post-CT mCRPC (1–2 prior taxane regimens), ongoing ADT, ≤ 2 prior novel hormonal therapies (abiraterone, enzalutamide, etc) for mCRPC, and no prior PARP inhibitor treatment. Pts received NIVO 480 mg Q4W + rucaparib 600 mg BID until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (NIVO dosing limited to 2 yrs). Coprimary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) per PCWG3 criteria and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR; ≥ 50% PSA reduction) in all treated pts and pts with homologous recombination deficiency positive (HRD+) tumors, determined before enrollment. Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of 88 treated pts, median age 66 yrs (range, 46–85), 34.1% had visceral metastases and 65.9% had measurable disease. Median follow-up was 11.9 mo. Pts had a median of 4.5 NIVO doses and 3.8 mo of rucaparib. The table summarizes primary and key secondary efficacy results, and shows better outcomes for HRD+ vs HRD–/not evaluable (NE) tumors. In pts with BRCA2 mutations, confirmed ORR was 37.5% (3/8 pts) and confirmed PSA-RR was 45.5% (5/11 pts). Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 93.2% of pts, most commonly nausea (40.9%) and fatigue (33.0%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 54.5% of pts, most commonly anemia (20.5%) and neutropenia (10.2%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 27.3% of pts. One pt had a stroke, considered related to rucaparib by the investigator, after 28 days on rucaparib and 2 NIVO doses and died 2 months later due to post-thrombolysis hematoma. Conclusions: NIVO + rucaparib is active in pts with HRD+ post-CT mCRPC, although the trial design and short follow-up limit assessment of benefits of the combination vs individual components. Pts with HRD– tumors did not appear to benefit from either drug. No new safety signals were observed with NIVO + rucaparib. Additional biomarker analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03338790. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase II Multicenter Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone Therapy in Patients With Docetaxel-Treated Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1496-1501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Danila ◽  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
Johann S. de Bono ◽  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
Samuel R. Denmeade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Castration Resistant

Purpose Persistence of ligand-mediated androgen receptor signaling has been documented in castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs). Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a potent and selective inhibitor of CYP17, which is required for androgen biosynthesis in the testes, adrenal glands, and prostate tissue. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of AA in combination with prednisone to reduce the symptoms of secondary hyperaldosteronism that can occur with AA monotherapy. Patients and Methods Fifty-eight men with progressive metastatic CRPC who experienced treatment failure with docetaxel-based chemotherapy received AA (1,000 mg daily) with prednisone (5 mg twice daily). Twenty-seven (47%) patients had received prior ketoconazole. The primary outcome was ≥ 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, with objective response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) numbers. Safety was also evaluated. Results A ≥ 50% decline in PSA was confirmed in 22 (36%) patients, including 14 (45%) of 31 ketoconazole-naïve and seven (26%) of 27 ketoconazole-pretreated patients. Partial responses were seen in four (18%) of 22 patients with RECIST-evaluable target lesions. Improved ECOG PS was seen in 28% of patients. Median time to PSA progression was 169 days (95% CI, 82 to 200 days). CTC conversions with treatment from ≥ 5 to < 5 were noted in 10 (34%) of 29 patients. The majority of AA-related adverse events were grade 1 to 2, and no AA-related grade 4 events were seen. Conclusion AA plus prednisone was well tolerated, with encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated CRPC patients. The incidence of mineralocorticoid-related toxicities (hypertension or hypokalemia) was reduced by adding low-dose prednisone. The combination of AA plus prednisone is recommended for phase III investigations.

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and prior diethylstilbestrol (DES) therapy: Preliminary results.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Diogo Assed Bastos ◽  
Marcos Tobias Machado ◽  
Renato Panhoca ◽  
Giovani Thomaz Pioner ◽  
Gustavo Werutsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Psa Response

235 Background: AAP is approved for patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC, but the population with previous use of DES was not studied before. DES is a commonly used hormone therapy for mCRPC in second and plus lines, especially in developing countries, due to lack of access to novel and efficacious therapies. The objective of this trial is to describe the efficacy and safety of AAP after DES treatment in patients who are chemotherapy-naïve, potentially affecting chemotherapy onset. This is the first and only prospective trial to show this data. Methods: This phase 2 multicenter, open-label single-arm study evaluated 46 patients receiving AA (1000 mg daily) + low-dose prednisone (P; 10 mg daily) and androgen deprivation therapy in patients with DES–refractory mCRPC enrolled from Oct 2014 to Oct 2015. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen progression (PSAP) by Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) criteria. Secondary endpoints included PSA response (≥50% reduction), overall survival, and safety. Results: At baseline, median age was 69 years, median PSA was 40 ng/mL, there were no visceral metastases, 98% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1, and 44% had Gleason scores ≥7. Thirty two subjects (71.1%) had PSAP. PSA response was achieved by 47% of patients at week 12 and 56% at any time. Three patients remain on study drug and 4 are in follow-up. AA treatment continued until PSAP, clinical progression, consent withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. The median duration of study treatment was 8.6 months. The median time to PSAP was 7.4 months (95% CI = 5.6-9.4) and the median overall survival was 25.6 months (95% CI = 15.7-NE). Treatment-related adverse events included hypertension (19.6%), hyperglycemia (19.6%), fatigue (17.4%), and hypokalemia (4.5%); most grade 1-2. Conclusions: The present study confirmed that AAP provides PSA responses even in heavily treated patients, showing clinical benefit post-DES in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients. It also confirmed tolerability of AAP, with an easily manageable toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02217566.

Phase II study of niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and biallelic DNA-repair gene defects (DRD): Preliminary results of GALAHAD.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 202-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Raymond Smith ◽  
Shahneen Kaur Sandhu ◽  
William Kevin Kelly ◽  
Howard I. Scher ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Repair Gene ◽  
Dna Repair Gene ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

202 Background: New therapies are needed for patients (pts) with mCRPC progressing after androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and taxane therapies. Niraparib is a once daily highly selective inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1 and 2). Methods: GALAHAD is an ongoing open label Ph 2 study assessing niraparib (300 mg daily) in pts with DRD progressing on/after ARSIs and taxane chemotherapy. Using a validated plasma assay, DRD status was defined as pathogenic mutations (including homozygous deletions) of BRCA1/2, ATM, FANCA, PALB2, CHEK2, BRIP1 or HDAC2. Composite response rate (RR) was defined as an objective response by RECIST 1.1 for measurable disease, circulating tumor cell (CTC) conversion to < 5/7.5 mL blood or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥50% (PSA50). Here, preliminary data on RR and adverse events (AEs) are reported in pts with biallelic DRD. Results: As of 10 Sep 2018, 123 pts with mCRPC and DRD were enrolled, of whom 39 had biallelic DRD (23 BRCA1/2). The median follow-up was 5.7 mo (2.0–23.7). Table depicts RRs for pts with biallelic DRD by BRCA status. Composite and objective RRs were 65% and 38% in pts with biallelic BRCA1/2, respectively. 3/8 pts (38% [2/5 BRCA1/2 and 1/3 non-BRCA]) with measurable visceral metastases showed objective response. Among the 20 biallelic responders, the duration of treatment (tx) has exceeded 4 mo in 13 pts and 6 mo in 8 pts; 14 pts remain on tx. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic AEs were anemia (25%) and thrombocytopenia (15%) (manageable by dose reduction/interruption). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were asthenia (6%) and hypertension (5%). Conclusions: These results suggest niraparib has compelling activity as monotherapy for pts with treatment-resistant mCRPC, particularly those with biallelic BRCA1/2 identified by a blood assay. Clinical trial information: NCT02854436. [Table: see text]

A multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study: Efficacy and safety of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy I-131-1095 (1095) plus enzalutamide (enza) in 18F-DCFPyL PSMA scan avid, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-abiraterone (abi) progression (ARROW).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5596-TPS5596
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
David Laidley ◽  
Frederic Pouliot ◽  
Stephan Probst ◽  
Robert Sabbagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radioligand Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Modified Recist

TPS5596 Background: PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in normal human prostate epithelium at low levels, but highly upregulated in metastatic prostate cancer (PC). 18F-DCFPyL is a novel PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent that has shown highly promising diagnostic performance for detection of metastatic disease, with potential to identify disease amenable to theranostic targeting. 1095 is a novel PSMA-targeted small molecule that binds to the extracellular domain of PSMA selectively with high affinity. The complex is internalized, allowing the beta emitter, I-131, to kill PC cells. Methods: ARROW is an open-label, randomized (2:1) trial of enza plus 1095 or enza alone in pts with progressive mCRPC who previously received abi. ~120 pts (80: 1095 + enza; 40: enza alone) will be treated at ~40 sites in the US and Canada. Eligible male pts must be at least 18 yo with metastatic disease documented by bone scan or soft tissue lesions measurable per RECIST 1.1 on CT/MRI, be PSMA-avid as determined by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, have evidence of biochemical or radiographic progression on abi, and be ineligible for or refuse to receive chemotherapy. Pts will receive enza (prescribed per approved labeling) with or without 1095 (100 mCi dose, followed by up to 3 additional dose(s) administered at least 8 weeks apart, as determined by dosimetry evaluation and occurrence of dose-limiting events). The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of 1095 plus enza compared to enza alone, based on PSA response (confirmed PSA decline ≥50%) rate according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Additional objectives include objective response rate based on PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the first occurrence of radiographic progression (PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1), unequivocal clinical progression, or death from any cause, duration of response, overall survival, and the safety and tolerability of 1095 radioligand therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03939689 .

A multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study: Efficacy and safety of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy I-131-1095 (1095) plus enzalutamide (enza) in 18F-DCFPyL PSMA scan avid, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-abiraterone (abi) progression (ARROW).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS260-TPS260
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
David Laidley ◽  
Frederic Pouliot ◽  
Stephan Probst ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radioligand Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Modified Recist

TPS260 Background: PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in normal human prostate epithelium at low levels, but highly upregulated in metastatic prostate cancer (PC). 18F-DCFPyL is a novel PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent that has shown highly promising diagnostic performance for detection of metastatic disease, with potential to identify disease amenable to theranostic targeting. 1095 is a novel PSMA-targeted small molecule that binds to the extracellular domain of PSMA selectively with high affinity. The complex is internalized, allowing the beta emitter, I-131, to kill PC cells. Methods: ARROW is an open-label, randomized (2:1) trial of enza plus 1095 or enza alone in pts with progressive mCRPC who previously received abi. ~120 pts (80: 1095 + enza; 40: enza alone) will be treated at ~40 sites in the US and Canada. Eligible male pts must be at least 18 yo with metastatic disease documented by bone scan or soft tissue lesions measurable per RECIST 1.1 on CT/MRI, be PSMA-avid as determined by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, have evidence of biochemical or radiographic progression on abi, and be ineligible for or refuse to receive chemotherapy. Pts will receive enza (prescribed per approved labeling) with or without 1095 (100 mCi dose, followed by up to 3 additional dose(s) administered at least 8 weeks apart, as determined by dosimetry evaluation and occurrence of dose-limiting events). The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of 1095 plus enza compared to enza alone, based on PSA response (confirmed PSA decline ≥50%) rate according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Additional objectives include objective response rate based on PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the first occurrence of radiographic progression (PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1), unequivocal clinical progression, or death from any cause, duration of response, overall survival, and the safety and tolerability of 1095 radioligand therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03939689.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document