CheckMate 9KD cohort A1 final analysis: Nivolumab (NIVO) + rucaparib for post-chemotherapy (CT) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5044-5044
Author(s):  
Russell Kent Pachynski ◽  
Margitta Retz ◽  
Jeffrey C. Goh ◽  
Mauricio Burotto ◽  
Gwenaelle Gravis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Immune Priming

5044 Background: CheckMate 9KD is a phase 2 trial of NIVO (anti-PD-1) combined with either rucaparib, docetaxel, or enzalutamide for mCRPC. PARP inhibitors, like rucaparib, increase cellular DNA damage, particularly in tumors with DNA repair defects, leading to genomic instability and cell death. This DNA damage promotes immune priming and adaptive PD-L1 upregulation. Consequently, dual PD-(L)1 and PARP inhibition is a plausible therapeutic strategy for mCRPC. We report final results for cohort A1 (NIVO + rucaparib for post-CT mCRPC) of CheckMate 9KD. Methods: Cohort A1 enrolled patients (pts) with post-CT mCRPC (1–2 prior taxane regimens), ongoing ADT, ≤ 2 prior novel hormonal therapies (abiraterone, enzalutamide, etc) for mCRPC, and no prior PARP inhibitor treatment. Pts received NIVO 480 mg Q4W + rucaparib 600 mg BID until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (NIVO dosing limited to 2 yrs). Coprimary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) per PCWG3 criteria and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR; ≥ 50% PSA reduction) in all treated pts and pts with homologous recombination deficiency positive (HRD+) tumors, determined before enrollment. Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of 88 treated pts, median age 66 yrs (range, 46–85), 34.1% had visceral metastases and 65.9% had measurable disease. Median follow-up was 11.9 mo. Pts had a median of 4.5 NIVO doses and 3.8 mo of rucaparib. The table summarizes primary and key secondary efficacy results, and shows better outcomes for HRD+ vs HRD–/not evaluable (NE) tumors. In pts with BRCA2 mutations, confirmed ORR was 37.5% (3/8 pts) and confirmed PSA-RR was 45.5% (5/11 pts). Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 93.2% of pts, most commonly nausea (40.9%) and fatigue (33.0%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 54.5% of pts, most commonly anemia (20.5%) and neutropenia (10.2%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 27.3% of pts. One pt had a stroke, considered related to rucaparib by the investigator, after 28 days on rucaparib and 2 NIVO doses and died 2 months later due to post-thrombolysis hematoma. Conclusions: NIVO + rucaparib is active in pts with HRD+ post-CT mCRPC, although the trial design and short follow-up limit assessment of benefits of the combination vs individual components. Pts with HRD– tumors did not appear to benefit from either drug. No new safety signals were observed with NIVO + rucaparib. Additional biomarker analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03338790. [Table: see text]

TALAPRO-1: Phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in patients (pts) with DNA damage repair alterations (DDRm) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Consuelo Buttigliero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease

93 Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) show antitumor activity in mCRPC/DDRm pts treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT). TALAPRO-1 is an open-label study evaluating TALA (a potent PARP inhibitor/trapper) in men with mCRPC/DDRm. We report a planned interim analysis (IA; Dec 2019). Updated results at a Sep 4 2020 cut-off, available in November 2020, will be presented at the meeting. Methods: TALAPRO-1 (NCT03148795) is enrolling pts (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease, progressive mCRPC, and DDRm likely to sensitize to PARPi ( ATM, ATR, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), who received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) for metastatic disease and progressed on ≥1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate) given for mCRPC. DDRm are defined as known/likely pathogenic variants or homozygous deletions. Pts receive oral TALA 1 mg/day (moderate renal impairment 0.75 mg/day) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: time to objective response; response duration; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50%; circulating tumor cell (CTC) count conversion (to CTC = 0 and <5 per 7.5 mL blood); time to PSA progression; radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS); overall survival; safety. A planned efficacy/safety IA was done when 60 pts with DDRm and measurable disease completed ≥6 months of TALA/no longer followed. Radiographic responses are based on investigator assessments. Results: 113 pts received TALA (cut-off Dec 12 2019); 75 pts were evaluable for IA, with DDRm, had measurable disease, received ≥16 weeks’ treatment, and were assessed for ORR (54.7% BRCA1/2, 4.0% PALB2, 22.7% ATM; 18.7% other DDRm).All pts evaluable for IA had prior docetaxel; 45.3% cabazitaxel. Confirmed ORR, rPFS, and composite response (investigator-assessed) in pts who received TALA for ≥16 weeks are in the table. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events: anemia (42.5%); nausea (32.7%). Conclusions: TALA monotherapy has encouraging antitumor activity in docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC pts with BRCA1/2 alterations and was generally well tolerated. Funding: Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795. [Table: see text]

Phase 1b/2 keynote-365 trial: Pembrolizumab (pembro) combination therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5089-TPS5089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
Haiyan Wu ◽  
Charles Schloss
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
End Points ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS5089 Background: Approved treatments for mCRPC (eg, enzalutamide and docetaxel) may increase programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and facilitate neoantigen release. In phase 1b and 1/2 trials, pembro, an anti–PD-1 antibody, has produced antitumor responses in previously treated mCRPC as monotherapy and in combination with enzalutamide. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, has shown activity in mCRPC with DNA-repair defects. The nonrandomized, multicohort, open-label KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) will evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembro with olaparib (cohort A), docetaxel + prednisone (cohort B), or enzalutamide (cohort C) in mCRPC. Methods: Cohort allocation depends upon prior treatment: cohort A requires prior docetaxel (treatment with 1 other chemotherapy and ≤2 second-generation hormonal manipulations is allowed); cohort B requires prior abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide (but not both); cohort C requires prior abiraterone acetate. Additional eligibility criteria include confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma, disease progression (PD) ≤6 months before screening, ongoing androgen deprivation (serum testosterone < 50 ng/dL), and provision of nonirradiated tumor sample. Pembro 200 mg will be given every 3 weeks (Q3W) with either olaparib 400 mg twice daily (cohort A), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W + prednisone 5 mg twice daily (cohort B), or enzalutamide 160 mg once daily (cohort C). Pembro treatment will continue for up to 35 cycles or until PD or unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Patients in cohort B may receive a maximum of 10 cycles of docetaxel + prednisone. Patients who discontinue 1 of 2 drugs in a combination because of a treatment-related AE may continue to receive the other drug until PD. Response will be evaluated by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels Q3W and by imaging Q9W for the first year and Q12W thereafter. Primary end points are safety and PSA response rate (decline of ≥50% from baseline twice ≥3 weeks apart). Secondary end points include time to PSA progression, progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall response rate. Enrollment will continue until 70 patients are enrolled for each cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573.

A phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of proxalutamide (GT0918) in subjects with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Tie Zhou ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Zhongquan Sun ◽  
Qinggui Meng ◽  
Dalin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Psa Progression

108 Background: GT0918 is a 2nd generation of AR antagonist and capability to down-regulate AR level. This study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, Ph II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC, and to determine the optimal dose for Ph III study. Methods: Patients with historically confirmed mCRPC who progressed after/intolerant to/reluctant to receive Docetaxel and previously treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were excluded. All the patients received up to 6 cycles or, unacceptable toxicity, or loss of clinical benefit as recommended by PCWG3. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression (TTPP), objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Results: As of June 30, 2019, 108 treated with GT0918 at three dose levels: 100 mg (n =37), 200 mg (n = 35) and 300 mg (n = 36), the median age of patients was 70.0 years (range 63-77), 88% of patients had stage IV disease at the initial diagnosis and 69.4% had Gleason score ≥ 8. The median duration of disease was 2.88 years. All received prior endocrine therapy, 35.2% received prior chemotherapy, 29.6% received Docetaxel. The median PSA at baseline was 35.285ng/ml, PSA response rate (≥50 % reduction from baseline) was 41.9%. The median time to PSA progression was not reached. There was no significant difference among three arms. Of 19 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 15.8% (all were PR) assessed by IRC with RECIST v 1.1, with 20.0% (1/5), 22.2% (2/9), 0 (0/5) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. The DCR assessed by IRC was 78.9% (CR 0+PR15.8%+SD 63.2%). Of 26 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 19.2% assessed by investigators (CR 3.8%+PR 15.4%), with 11.1% (1/9), 20.0% (2/10), 28.6% (2/7) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. Overall, AEs were experienced by most of patients (94.4 %, n=102). AEs leading to drug interruption were reported in 13 patients (12.0%), 9 (8.3%)of them were suspected to be drug related. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6 patients (5.6%), 3(2.8%) were possibly related to GT0918. 14 patients (13.0%) experienced Grade 3 and 4 AEs. 17 patients (15.7%)experienced SAE, 5(4.6%) of them were suspected to be related to study drug. Most of AEs were mild or moderate. The common suspected AE (≥10%) were asthenia (17.6%, n=19), anemia (14.8%, n=16), AST increased (14.8%, n=16), ALT increased (13.0%, n=14), decreased appetite (13.0%, N=14), white blood cell count decreased (12.0%, n=13), proteinuria (12.0%, n=13). Conclusions: GT0918 showed a manageable safety profile. This study provided preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC. 200mg/day is recommended dose for Ph III trial. Clinical trial information: CTR20170177.

Results of a phase II study of capecitabine-based doublets in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11538-e11538
Author(s):  
Ying Fan ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Yuqian Liao ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Peng Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

e11538 Background: It is extremely important to identify proper cytotoxic agents for TNBC which had limited choices except chemotherapy. Capecitabine are well established as a major chemotherapeutic agent in metastatic setting. The efficacy of capecitabine-based chemotherapy has not been prospectively studied in TNBC and data remains scant. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of capecitabine-based doublets in the treatment of metastatic TNBC. Methods: Eligible metastatic TNBC women with measurable diseases were recruited to receive either TX regimen (docetaxel 75mg/m2 iv d1 plus capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid, d1-14,q3w) or NX regimen (vinorelbine 25mg/m2 iv d1, 8 plus capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid, d1-14, q3w) at the discretion of physicians for up to 6 cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate and secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results: 45 mTNBC patients, 27 in TX and 18 in NX were recruited, mostly (73.3%) as 1st line and the remaining as the 2nd line. The total objective response rate was 20.0% and clinical benefit rate was 62.2%. After a median follow-up of 28 months, PFS was 5.2 months (95%CI, 4.1-6.3mons) and OS was 18.2months (95%CI, 8.7-27.7mons). Almost half of the patients (22/45) progressed during treatment or within one month of the treatment discontinuation. PFS was significantly longer if patients got CR/PR (9.6 vs 4.3mons, P=0.015). When comparing two doublets, the response rate was numerically but not statistically lower in TX group than in NX group (14.8% vs 27.8%, P=0.449). Similarly, no difference was found in either PFS (4.9 vs 5.2 mons, P=0.483) or OS (21.5 vs 18.3 mons, P=0.964) between two regimens. Conclusions: Although the overall survival seems to be reasonable, efficacy of capecitabine-contained TX or NX regimen was relatively poor in terms of tumor remission and progression free survival in mTNBC patients, suggesting capecitabine may have limited potency in this subtype. These two combinations may be considered to be acceptable but may not be recommended as prior choice for mTNBC patients.

Prospective evaluation of low-dose ketoconazole plus hydrocortisone (HC) in chemotherapy-pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 227-227
Author(s):  
Ernest N. Lo ◽  
Laurel A. Beckett ◽  
Chong-xian Pan ◽  
Daniel Robles ◽  
Jennifer Marie Suga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Grade 3

227 Background: Ketoconazole (keto), a known CYP17 inhibitor, is a traditional systemic treatment for CRPC. However, most of the published data has been in the pre-chemo setting; its efficacy in the post-chemo setting has not been as widely reported. Chemo-naive patients treated with attenuated doses of keto (200-300 mg TID) had prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate (> 50% decline) ranges from 21%-62% and treatment was well tolerated. We hypothesized that low dose keto would likewise possess efficacy and tolerability in the CRPC post-chemo state. Methods: CRPC patients with ECOG PS 0-3, adequate end organ function, who had received at least one chemo were treated with low-dose keto (200 mg PO TID) and HC (20 mg PO q AM and 10 mg PO q PM) until progression, as defined by either RECIST or PSA rise > 50% from nadir or baseline. Primary endpoint was PSA response rate (> 50% reduction from baseline). A Simon minimax design was used. PSA response of > 25% was to be considered promising for further study (versus null rate of < 5%); 25 patients were required. Secondary endpoints included PSA response > 30%, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of stable disease, and evaluation of adverse events (AE). Results: 29 patients were accrued: median age was 71 (range 55-86) and median pretreatment PSA was 76 ng/mL (range 7-11,420 ng/ml); all had prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy. 28 patients were evaluable for response; all were evaluable for toxicity. PSA response of >50% was seen in 48% of patients and 59% of patients had a PSA response of > 30%. Median PFS was 138 days; median duration of stable disease was 123 days. 12 patients had grade 3 or 4 toxicity on treatment. Of the 17 grade 3 AEs, only 3 were considered ‘probably’ or ‘possibly’ related to treatment, while none of the 2 grade 4 AEs were considered related to treatment. Conclusions: In docetaxel pre-treated CRPC patients, low-dose keto + HC is a well-tolerated, relatively inexpensive and clinically active treatment option. PSA response with low-dose keto appears comparable to that of abiraterone in this patient context. A prospective randomized study of available post-chemo options is needed to assess comparative efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT00895310.

A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel with ribavirin in patients with progressive castration resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel alone.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14010-e14010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Kosaka ◽  
Takahiro Maeda ◽  
Toshiaki Shinojima ◽  
Hirohiko Nagata ◽  
Ryuichi Mizuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

e14010 Background: We have previously reported a novel cell reprogramming approach, named drug efficacy reprogramming, as a new model for identifying candidate antitumor drugs targeting cancer stemness related gene network and identified ribavirin as a candidate drug for overcoming docertaxel resistant castration resistant prostate cancer.This non-randamized and open-labelled pilot clinical study explored the safety and efficacy of ribavirin, anti-virus drug, in combination with docetaxel in patients with progressive CRPC. Methods: In this clinical study, patients received intravenous docetaxel 60-70 mg/mm2 on day 1 of 3-6 weeks cycles plus Ribavirin 600 mg twice daily. The primary endopoint was safety, PSA response and objective response rate. Secondary end ponts included health-related quality of life overall survival.Patients with progressive CRPC based on PSA and/or radiographic criteria, PS 0-1, normal renal and hepatic function were eligible. Results:Five patients were enrolled in this study. Medium age was 73. Median serum PSA concentration was 53.1 ng/ml (range: 5.1-370.5).The median cycle and total dose of docetaxel received before the study was 31 cycles and 3625 mg, respectively. 80% of patients who had disease progression during docetaxel treatment. The median time from last docetaxel dose to disease progression before the participation was 1.5 months.Safety: Medium number of treatment cycles were 7 (range: 3-8) cycles. Grade 3/4 adverse events requiring dose modification were not observed. Grade 3 anemia and neutropenia were seen in two patients. Common adverse events were less than Grade 2. Efiicacy: 3 (60%) had some degree of PSA decline and 2 (40%) had a decline of ≧30 %. Median follow-up was 10.0 month. Median progression free survival was 6 month. Conclusions: This combination was well tolerated with promising response rate, justifying further investigation in docetaxel resistant CRPC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000012521.

Updated analysis of progression-free survival with first subsequent therapy (PFS2) and safety in the SPARTAN study of apalutamide (APA) in patients (pts) with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jay Small ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Boris A. Hadaschik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Significant Benefit ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival

144 Background: In the phase 3 SPARTAN study, compared with placebo (PBO), APA, a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, decreased the risk of distant metastasis or death by 72% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28; p < 0.0001) in men with high-risk nmCRPC. After 1 year of additional follow-up, PFS2 and safety were reevaluated to ensure maintenance of benefit against potential harm. Methods: Pts with nmCRPC and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤ 10 mos were randomized 2:1 to APA (240 mg QD) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or PBO + ADT. All pts who developed distant metastasis, determined by blinded independent central review, were eligible to receive subsequent therapy including open-label treatment with abiraterone acetate + prednisone, provided by the sponsor. The exploratory PFS2 end point (time from randomization to disease progression on subsequent anticancer therapy or death) was evaluated, as was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Median treatment duration with APA was 25.7 mos; with PBO, 11.5 mos (original analysis, mos: APA, 19.2; PBO, 11.2). Pts randomized to APA continued to show significant benefit in PFS2 (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.39-0.63; p < 0.0001) vs PBO (APA median time to PFS2 not reached vs PBO 39.3 mos). At a median follow-up of 32 mos, 51.3% of pts receiving APA, 8% of the 75 pts who crossed over from PBO to APA, and 99.7% of remaining PBO pts had discontinued study treatment. Rates of discontinuations due to progressive disease and AEs were 27.3% and 12.7%, respectively, in the APA group and 73.4% and 8.4% in the PBO group. There was no substantial change in the incidence of TEAEs in the APA group at the 1-year update. With regard to drug specific TEAEs, there were no grade 4 or 5 events; grade 3 TEAEs consisted of rash, 5.2%; falls, 2.4%; fractures, 3.1%; hypothyroidism, 0%; and seizures, 0%. Conclusions: APA was previously shown to result in an improvement in metastasis-free survival and symptomatic progression. With a median APA treatment duration of 25.7 mos, APA continues to show significant benefit in PFS2, and its safety profile remains unchanged. Clinical trial information: NCT01946204.

Pamiparib, an investigational PARP inhibitor, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a circulating tumor cell (CTC) homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype or BRCA defects: A trial in progress.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5086-TPS5086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Mitchell Gross ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Marcia Cruz-Correa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

TPS5086 Background: Men with mCRPC who have a BRCA1/2 mutation ( BRCA1/2mut) or mutations in other genes resulting in HRD have a poor prognosis. A novel liquid biopsy test (EPIC Sciences) identifies CTCs with an HRD phenotype. Preliminary studies showed that these men may respond to treatment with a PARP inhibitor. Pamiparib, an investigational PARP1/2 inhibitor, has shown brain penetration and potent PARP–DNA complex trapping in nonclinical studies. In early phase clinical studies (NCT02361723; NCT03333915), pamiparib was generally well tolerated and showed preliminary antitumor activity; 60 mg orally twice daily (BID) was established as the recommended investigational dose. Methods: This open-label, global, phase 2 study (NCT03712930) evaluates the antitumor activity and safety/tolerability of pamiparib in mCRPC patients (pts) with CTC-HRD, assessed by the CTC-HRD assay, or deleterious germline/somatic mutations in BRCA1/2. Patients must have progressed on/after ≥1 androgen receptor-targeted therapy, received ≥1 taxane-based therapy, and have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression per PCWG3 criteria. Four cohorts of pts will receive pamiparib 60 mg BID in 28-day cycles. Cohort 1 will include ~50 pts with CTC-HRD+ +/- BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with measurable metastatic disease; Cohort 2 will include ~30 pts with CTC-HRD+ +/- BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with bone-only disease; Cohorts 3 & 4 will include ~20 pts with CTC-HRD-/unk + BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with measurable metastatic disease (Cohort 3), or bone-only disease (Cohort 4). Disease status will be assessed every 8 wks for 24 wks, then every 12 wks; PSA levels will be tested every 4 wks. Co-primary endpoints are radiographic ORR assessed by IRC (pts with measurable disease) and confirmed PSA response rate per PCWG3 criteria (pts +/- measurable disease). Secondary endpoints include ORR, time to PSA response/progression, duration of PSA response, time to symptomatic skeletal event, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. As of 05 December 2018, this study is actively enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03712930.

TALAPRO-1: A phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in men with DNA damage repair mutations (DDRmut) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)—First interim analysis (IA).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 119-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Consuelo Buttigliero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

119 Background: Phase 2 and 3 studies with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated antitumor activity in patients (pts) with mCRPC with DDRmut who were previously treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT). We report the first IA of a Phase 2 study of TALA, a potent inhibitor and trapper of PARP. Methods: TALAPRO-1 (NCT03148795) is enrolling pts (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease, progressive mCRPC, and DDRmut likely to sensitize to PARPi (including ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), who received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) and progressed on ≥1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate). Pts receive oral TALA 1 mg/d (moderate renal impairment, 0.75 mg/d) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR; blinded independent review). Secondary endpoints are time to OR, duration of response, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50%, circulating tumor cell (CTC) count conversion (to CTC = 0 and <5 per 7.5 mL of blood), time to PSA progression, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival, safety, pt-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. A planned IA of safety and efficacy was performed after 20 pts with BRCA1/2 mutations were on treatment for ≥8 wks. Results: 81 pts received TALA as of June 5, 2019; 43 pts enrolled by Feb 12, 2019 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (20 BRCA1/2, 2 PALB2, 14 ATM, 7 other). All had received docetaxel and 49% prior cabazitaxel. Overall ORR (95% CI) was 25.6% (13.5–41.2), ORRBRCA1/2 50.0% (27.2–72.8), ORRATM 7.1% (0.2–33.9). Overall median (95% CI) rPFS was 5.6 months (mo) (3.5–8.2), rPFSBRCA1/2 8.2 mo (5.6–NE), rPFSATM 3.5 mo (1.7–8.1). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥20%) were anemia, nausea, asthenia, decreased appetite, constipation, and platelet count decreased. Conclusions: TALA monotherapy demonstrates encouraging antitumor activity in docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC pts, especially those with BRCA1/2mut, and was generally well tolerated. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795.

Randomized phase II study of olaparib with or without cediranib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Rana R. McKay ◽  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
Nancy B. Davis ◽  
Paul Monk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Tumor Biopsy

111 Background: Cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51 and increases sensitivity of tumors to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in vitro. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, demonstrates clinical efficacy in men with DNA repair deficient, mCRPC. We therefore performed a randomized phase 2 trial comparing olaparib with or without cediranib in men with mCRPC. Methods: Men with a minimum of one prior line of systemic therapy for mCRPC were randomized 1:1 to receive cediranib 30mg po daily plus olaparib 200mg po BID (Arm A) or olaparib 300mg BID alone (Arm B). At radiographic progression, patients (pts) in Arm B could crossover to Arm A. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and PSA50 decline rate (PSA50). Tumor biopsy specimens were obtained for biomarker analyses pre- and on-treatment. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 90 pts enrolled are summarized below. The median rPFS was 11.1 versus 4.0 months in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (Hazard Ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.317, 0.928, p=0.026). Trends toward a higher ORR (19% and 12%), Disease Control Rate (Stable Disease + Partial Response) (77% and 64%,) and PSA50 (29% and 17%) were observed in Arm A compared to Arm B, respectively. Thirteen pts in Arm B crossed over to Arm A. One pt had a PR after crossover. Grade 3/4 adverse events (G3/4 AEs), irrespective of attribution, occurred in 77% and 58% of Arm A and Arm B pts, respectively. G3/4 AEs occurring in >10% of pts were hypertension (32%), fatigue (23%) and diarrhea (11%) in Arm A, and anemia (16%) and lymphopenia (11%) in Arm B. Conclusions: The cediranib/olaparib combination significantly improves rPFS in unselected, mCRPC pts. AEs were manageable. Analyses of mutation status in homologous recombination DNA repair genes are pending and will be key in interpreting the data. Clinical trial information: NCT02893917. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document