A phase III, randomized, open-label, study (CONTACT-02) of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second novel hormone therapy (NHT) in patients (pts) with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS190-TPS190
Author(s):  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Arun Azad ◽  
Joan Carles ◽  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Cancer Aggressiveness

TPS190 Background: Cabozantinib inhibits multiple tyrosine kinases, including MET, VEGFR, RET, and TAM kinases (Tyro3, AXL, MER), involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis, and whose mutations and expression are associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Targeting these kinases with cabozantinib may promote an immune permissive tumor environment and may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the ongoing phase 1b COSMIC-021 study of pts with solid tumors, cabozantinib plus the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, showed preliminary meaningful clinical activity in soft tissue disease and a tolerable safety profile for 44 pts with mCRPC (Agarwal et al., ASCO 2020; abstract 5564). We present the study design of a phase 3 trial of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second NHT in pts with mCRPC. Methods: This randomized, open-label, controlled phase 3 study (NCT04446117) evaluates the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second NHT (abiraterone or enzalutamide) in pts with mCRPC who previously received one NHT to treat metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC), non-metastatic CRPC (M0 CRPC), or mCRPC. Additional eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, measurable visceral disease or measurable extrapelvic adenopathy per RECIST 1.1 by investigator, prostate specific antigen progression and/or soft-tissue disease progression, ECOG 0 or 1, and age ≥18 years. Key exclusion criteria include prior nonhormonal therapy for mCRPC and uncontrolled significant illness. Eligible pts (N = 580) are randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib (40 mg PO QD) + atezolizumab (1200 mg IV Q3W) vs abiraterone (1000 mg PO QD) + prednisone (5 mg PO BID) or enzalutamide (160 mg PO QD). Designated NHT will differ from previous NHT taken. Randomization is stratified by: liver metastasis (yes, no), prior docetaxel treatment for mCSPC (yes, no), and disease stage for which the first NHT was given (mCSPC, M0 CRPC, mCRPC). Treatment will continue until there is no longer clinical benefit as determined by the treating investigator, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The multiple primary endpoints are progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC) and overall survival. Additional endpoints include objective response rate per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC, safety, correlation of biomarkers with outcomes, quality of life and pharmacokinetics. Patient enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04446117.

scholarly journals A phase 3 randomised study of enzalutamide plus leuprolide and enzalutamide monotherapy in high-risk non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with rising PSA after local therapy: EMBARK study design

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e046588
Author(s):  
Stephen J Freedland ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Martin Gleave ◽  
Brad Rosbrook ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Definitive Therapy

IntroductionLimited data from controlled clinical trials are available for men who experience biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for prostate cancer. In the absence of overt metastases, patients with non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). There is no standard-of-care consensus on optimal ADT timing, although most men are treated prior to metastases, especially those with high-risk features (Gleason score 8–10 or prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) <9–12 months). Given data that ADT plus novel hormonal agents improve survival in men with metastatic CSPC, there is a desire to evaluate these agents earlier in the disease course. The main objective of EMBARK is the comparative assessment of enzalutamide plus leuprolide (luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)) or enzalutamide monotherapy versus monotherapy LHRHa to improve metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with high-risk nmCSPC PSA recurrence after definitive therapy.Methods and analysisEMBARK is a randomised, phase 3 study of high-risk patients with nmCSPC, a PSADT of ≤9 months and a screening PSA of ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir after radiotherapy (RT) or ≥1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without postoperative RT. Men (n=1050) are randomised 1:1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus LHRHa or placebo plus LHRHa (double-blind arms) or enzalutamide monotherapy (open-label arm). Treatment is suspended at week 37 if PSA concentrations are <0.2 ng/mL and reinstated if levels rise to ≥2.0 ng/mL with RP or ≥5.0 ng/mL without RP. Patients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL at week 37 continue until treatment discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is MFS comparing enzalutamide plus LHRHa versus placebo plus LHRHa.Ethics and disseminationThe study is conducted under the guiding principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT02319837.

Design of the AFFINITY study: A randomized phase III study of a novel clusterin inhibitor, custirsen, plus cabazitaxel/prednisone (CbzP) versus CbzP alone as second-line chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5103-TPS5103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz M. Beer ◽  
Brent A. Blumenstein ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
Cindy Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Score ◽  
Open Label

TPS5103 Background: Custirsen enhances chemotherapeutic activity via inhibition of clusterin expression. Clusterin is a cytoprotective, antiapoptotic chaperone upregulated by anticancer therapies that confers treatment resistance. In a phase 2 study, mCRPC patients who had progressed within 6 mos of completing first-line docetaxel (DOC)/prednisone (P) and who were retreated with DOC/P and custirsen had a median overall survival of 15.8 mos. Lowering of serum clusterin level during second-line treatment was associated with significantly longer survival. CbzP has recently shown a survival advantage in patients with prostate cancer that has progressed after DOC therapy. The AFFINITY study was designed to evaluate in a larger study whether adding custirsen to CbzP will further improve survival in this patient population. Methods: AFFINITY was initiated in August 2012. Eligible patients in this phase 3, international, multicenter, open-label trial must have received ≥225 mg/m2 of DOC; have progressive disease as defined by RECIST 1.1, bone scan progression, and/or serum prostate-specific antigen level; have metastatic disease of the chest/abdomen/pelvis/bone; have adequate renal and liver function; and have a Karnofsky score ≥70%. Patients may have received up to 1 DOC regimen as well as abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Approximately 630 patients will receive 21d cycles of Cbz (25 mg/m2IV q21d) + P (10 mg PO/d), either alone or with custirsen 640 mg IV given for 3 loading doses and then weekly until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 10 cycles. The primary efficacy measure is overall survival. The secondary measure is proportion of patients alive without disease progression at Day 140 post-randomization. All efficacy analyses are intent to treat. Adverse events of all patients who receive ≥1 dose of custirsen or Cbz will be included in the safety analysis. This study is sponsored by Teva BPP R&D, Inc., in collaboration with OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT01578655.

CA045-001: A phase III, randomized, open label study of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab (NIVO) versus NIVO monotherapy in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MEL).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9601-TPS9601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Adi Diab ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
James M.G. Larkin ◽  
Shahneen Kaur Sandhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study

TPS9601 Background: Standard of care for pts with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic MEL includes checkpoint inhibitors. Bempegaldesleukin is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist designed to provide sustained signaling through the IL-2 βγ receptor to activate and proliferate effector CD8+ T and NK cells over T-regulatory cells in the tumor (Hurwitz ME et al. ASCO GU 2017). In the dose-expansion phase of the phase 1/2 PIVOT-02 trial, bempegaldesleukin + NIVO was well tolerated at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; bempegaldesleukin 0.006 mg/kg IV Q3W + NIVO 360 mg IV Q3W), and previously untreated pts with MEL receiving the RP2D achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 20/38 (53%) and a complete response of 9/38 (24%) by independent radiology review (Diab A et al. SITC 2018). Presented is the design of the first phase 3 trial in the bempegaldesleukin + NIVO development program in pts with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic MEL. Methods: This phase 3, randomized, open-label study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of bempegaldesleukin + NIVO (NCT03635983). Eligible pts are ≥12 y with histologically confirmed stage III (unresectable) or stage IV MEL and ECOG PS ≤1 or Lansky PS ≥80% (minors 12-17 y). Pts are ineligible if they have active brain or leptomeningeal metastases, uveal MEL, or a recurrence within 6 mo of completing adjuvant treatment with any approved agent. Pts will be stratified by PD-L1 status (measured using PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx), BRAF mutation status, and lactate dehydrogenase level, and will be randomized to receive bempegaldesleukin 0.006 mg/kg IV Q3W + NIVO 360 mg IV Q3W or NIVO 360 mg IV Q3W up to 24 mo, or until progression or unacceptable toxicity (N ~ 764). Primary endpoints are ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include ORR and PFS by investigator, ORR and PFS by BICR in biomarker population, OS in biomarker population, and safety. Additional endpoints include pharmacokinetics and quality-of-life assessment. Clinical trial information: NCT03635983.

TRYbeCA-1: A randomized, phase III study of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NCT03665441).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4666-TPS4666
Author(s):  
Pascal Hammel ◽  
Rossana Berardi ◽  
Geert-Yan Creemers ◽  
Antonio Cubillo ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3

TPS4666 Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma are currently limited. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. We have recently reported the outcome of a randomized Phase 2b study inpatients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment(NCT02195180). Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. The results of this Phase 2b study provided a rationale for initiating this confirmatory Phase 3 pivotal trial (TRYbeCA-1). Methods: TRYbeCA-1 is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (N = ~500) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed only one prior line of systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and have measurable disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/Abraxane or irinotecan-based therapy (FOLFIRI [FOLinic acid-Fluorouracil-IRInotecan regimen] or irinotecan liposome injection/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1; stage III-IV disease; documented evidence of disease progression; available tumor tissue; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and objective response rate, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. A hazard ratio in OS of 0.725 is being targeted which represents a conservative estimate based on the Phase 2b data and is viewed as being highly clinically relevant. An IDMC is established to review safety at regular intervals andto review efficacy data at the planned interim and final analyses. IDMC last reviewed the trial in October 2019 and suggested the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03665441 .

A phase III study of futibatinib (TAS-120) versus gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cis) chemotherapy as first-line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with advanced (adv) cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) harboring fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene rearrangements (FOENIX-CCA3).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS600-TPS600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
John A. Bridgewater ◽  
Chigusa Morizane ◽  
Rachna T. Shroff ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Gene Rearrangements ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Fgfr2 Gene ◽  
Ectopic Mineralization

TPS600 Background: Pts with adv CCA have poor survival outcomes, and chemotherapy offers limited survival benefit (5-year survival rates, 5–10%; median overall survival [OS], 8–12 months). FGFR2 gene rearrangements are known to be early drivers of oncogenesis in ~15% of pts with intrahepatic (i) CCA. Futibatinib, an oral, highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor has shown antitumor activity against a broad spectrum of FGFR-deregulated tumors in preclinical studies. In a previous study, futibatinib demonstrated clinical activity and tolerability in heavily pretreated pts with adv CCA harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements. This phase 3 trial (FOENIX-CCA3) is designed to evaluate futibatinib vs gem-cis as 1L therapy for pts with adv iCCA harboring FGFR2 rearrangements. Methods: FOENIX-CCA3 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study that will be conducted in pts with metastatic or unresectable iCCA harboring FGFR2 rearrangements (assessed at screening by a central laboratory). Pts must have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and should not have received previous systemic anticancer therapy for adv disease (adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy ≥6 mo prior to randomization is permissible). Pts with clinically-significant alterations in calcium-phosphorus homeostasis or ectopic mineralization/calcification will be excluded. Approximately 216 pts will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive 20 mg futibatinib once daily until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria are met or gem-cis (on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) for 8 cycles or until disease progression, whichever occurs first. Pts will be stratified by prior surgical excision (yes vs no), geographic region, and locally adv vs metastatic disease. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate and disease control rate based on ICR, OS, PFS per investigator assessment, and safety. The anticipated start date is in April, 2020.

Study evaluating metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment using 177Lu-PNT2002 PSMA therapy after second-line hormonal treatment (SPLASH).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5087-TPS5087
Author(s):  
Kim N. Chi ◽  
Ur Metser ◽  
Johannes Czernin ◽  
Jeremie Calais ◽  
Vikas Prasad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hormonal Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Psma Pet ◽  
To Receive

TPS5087 Background: Treatment options with minimal toxicity and novel mechanisms of action are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes from mCRPC. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) represents a new treatment for patients with PSMA-avid mCRPC. 177Lu-PNT2002 (also known as [Lu-177]-PSMA-I&T) is a PSMA-targeting agent and studies have shown demonstrable promising initial data. This trial seeks to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of 177Lu-PNT2002 for men with progressive mCRPC after androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) therapy. Methods: This is a multi-center, open-label, phase III study. All patients must be at least 18 years of age, have documented progressive mCRPC at time of screening, high PSMA expression by PSMA PET/CT per blinded independent central review (BICR), chemotherapy naïve for CRPC and unfit or unwilling to receive chemotherapy. The study will commence with a 25-patient dosimetry lead-in. In the dosimetry phase, patients will receive up to four cycles of 177Lu-PNT2002 at 6.8 GBq every 8 weeks. In the randomization phase, approximately 390 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 177Lu-PNT2002 (Arm A) versus enzalutamide or abiraterone (with prednisone or dexamethasone) (Arm B). Patients randomized to Arm B have an option to crossover to 177Lu-PNT2002 treatment after BICR-assessed radiologic progression. The primary endpoint is Radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by BICR using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 (soft tissue) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) (bone) criteria. Key secondary endpoints include objective response rate, duration of response, PSA response, and overall survival. The study is powered at 90% to test the alternative hypothesis of a hazard ratio (HR) ≤ 0.66 at an α of 0.025. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04647526. Clinical trial information: NCT04647526.

IMbrave150: Updated overall survival (OS) data from a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sorafenib (sor) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 267-267
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Peter R. Galle ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase Iii Study

267 Background: Atezo + bev has been approved globally for pts with unresectable HCC who have not received prior systemic therapy, based on results from IMbrave150 (NCT03434379). At a median of 8.6 mo follow-up, both coprimary endpoints were met, with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements observed with atezo + bev vs sor for OS (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42, 0.79]; P<0.001) and independently-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; per RECIST 1.1; HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.47, 0.76]; P<0.001) (Finn, et al. N Engl J Med 2020). Here, we report an updated OS analysis for IMbrave150. Methods: The global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III study IMbrave150 enrolled 501 systemic treatment–naive pts with unresectable HCC, ≥1 measurable untreated lesion (RECIST 1.1), Child-Pugh class A liver function and ECOG PS 0/1. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezo 1200 mg IV q3w + bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w or sor 400 mg bid until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit per investigator. This post hoc, descriptive OS analysis was conducted with 12 mo of additional follow up from the primary analysis. Results: 501 pts were enrolled, including 336 to atezo + bev and 165 to sor. At the clinical cut-off date of Aug 31, 2020, median follow-up was 15.6 mo and 280 OS events were observed. Median OS was 19.2 mo with atezo + bev vs 13.4 mo with sor (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52, 0.85]; P=0.0009). Survival at 18 mo was 52% with atezo + bev and 40% with sor. Survival benefit with atezo + bev over sor was generally consistent across subgroups and with the primary analysis. The updated objective response rate (ORR; 29.8% per RECIST 1.1) with atezo + bev was in line with the primary analysis, with more pts achieving complete response (CR; 7.7%) than previously reported. Additional response data are in Table. Safety was aligned with the primary analysis, with no new signals identified. Conclusions: IMbrave150 showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit and safety with 12 mo of additional follow-up. The combination provides the longest survival seen in a front-line Phase III study in advanced HCC, confirming atezo + bev as a standard of care for previously untreated, unresectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03434379. [Table: see text]

Previous enzalutamide therapy and response to subsequent taxane therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 227-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Gizzi ◽  
Giulia Baciarello ◽  
Aude Flechon ◽  
Philippe Beuzeboc ◽  
Antoine Angelergues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
The Impact

227 Background: Cross-resistance between taxanes and androgen receptor axis targeted agents is a matter of debate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Preclinical data about response to taxanes after prior enzalutamide suggest some level of cross-resistance (van Soest et al, Eur J Cancer 2013) though this was not confirmed in other models (Al Nakouzi N, Eur Urol 2014). The first objective of this study was to assess the impact of previous enzalutamide therapy on the efficacy of subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy. The second objective was to investigate the prognosis of patients when chemotherapy was initiated in enzalutamide-pretreated patients. Methods: Data from 96 enzalutamide- and placebo-treated patients enrolled in the Prevail phase III trial were retrospectively collected from 14 centers in France. Changes in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, progression free survival (PFS) and RECIST criteria v 1.1 were used to determine the activity of docetaxel (n=89) or cabazitaxel (n=7) treatment. The Halabi model was used to predict survival probabilities for the enzalutamide- or placebo-pretreated patients when chemotherapy was initiated (Halabi et al, J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: Overall, 96 patients were included in this analysis (58 in the placebo arm vs. 38 in enzalutamide arm). PSA response to taxanes (defined as a decline of ≥50% from baseline) was marginally lower in enzalutamide-vs. placebo-pretreated patients (34% vs. 53%, p=0.10). PSA response in enzalutamide-pretreated patients was not different from that observed with docetaxel given every 3 weeks in TAX 327 trial (Tannock et al, NEJM 2004) (45%, p=0.20, binomial test). Median PFS and objective response rates were similar between the two groups (4.8m vs 6.7 m;p=0.14 and 45% vs 43%;p=0.83 respectively). Halabi score was well-balanced between the two groups (p=0.30). Conclusions: Taxanes retain efficacy in enzalutamide-pretreated mCRPC. At the time of first-line taxane-based chemotherapy initiation, the prognosis of enzalutamide-treated patients according to the Halabi score was not different from that of enzalutamide-naïve patients.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study: Efficacy and safety of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy I-131-1095 (1095) plus enzalutamide (enza) in 18F-DCFPyL PSMA scan avid, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-abiraterone (abi) progression (ARROW).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5596-TPS5596
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
David Laidley ◽  
Frederic Pouliot ◽  
Stephan Probst ◽  
Robert Sabbagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radioligand Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Modified Recist

TPS5596 Background: PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in normal human prostate epithelium at low levels, but highly upregulated in metastatic prostate cancer (PC). 18F-DCFPyL is a novel PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent that has shown highly promising diagnostic performance for detection of metastatic disease, with potential to identify disease amenable to theranostic targeting. 1095 is a novel PSMA-targeted small molecule that binds to the extracellular domain of PSMA selectively with high affinity. The complex is internalized, allowing the beta emitter, I-131, to kill PC cells. Methods: ARROW is an open-label, randomized (2:1) trial of enza plus 1095 or enza alone in pts with progressive mCRPC who previously received abi. ~120 pts (80: 1095 + enza; 40: enza alone) will be treated at ~40 sites in the US and Canada. Eligible male pts must be at least 18 yo with metastatic disease documented by bone scan or soft tissue lesions measurable per RECIST 1.1 on CT/MRI, be PSMA-avid as determined by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, have evidence of biochemical or radiographic progression on abi, and be ineligible for or refuse to receive chemotherapy. Pts will receive enza (prescribed per approved labeling) with or without 1095 (100 mCi dose, followed by up to 3 additional dose(s) administered at least 8 weeks apart, as determined by dosimetry evaluation and occurrence of dose-limiting events). The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of 1095 plus enza compared to enza alone, based on PSA response (confirmed PSA decline ≥50%) rate according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. Additional objectives include objective response rate based on PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the first occurrence of radiographic progression (PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1), unequivocal clinical progression, or death from any cause, duration of response, overall survival, and the safety and tolerability of 1095 radioligand therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03939689 .

TRYbeCA-1: A randomized, phase III study of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NCT03665441).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS783-TPS783
Author(s):  
Pascal Hammel ◽  
Rossana Berardi ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Jaime Feliu ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3

TPS783 Background: Second-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma are currently limited. Eryaspase, asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in red blood cells (RBCs) is an investigational product under development. Following infusion, asparagine and glutamine are actively transported into RBCs where they are hydrolyzed by the encapsulated ASNase. We have recently reported the outcome of a randomized Phase 2b study inpatients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose disease progressed following first-line treatment. Eryaspase in combination with gemcitabine monotherapy or FOLFOX combination therapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The safety profile of eryaspase was acceptable. The results of this Phase 2b study provided a rationale for initiating this confirmatory Phase 3 pivotal trial (TRYbeCA-1). Methods: TRYbeCA-1 is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (N = ~500) of eryaspase combined with chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed only one prior line of systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and have measurable disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine/Abraxane or irinotecan-based therapy (FOLFIRI [FOLinic acid-Fluorouracil-IRInotecan regimen] or irinotecan liposome injection/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) with or without eryaspase, administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of each 4-week cycle. Key eligibility criteria include performance status 0 or 1; stage III-IV disease; documented evidence of disease progression; available tumor tissue; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and objective response rate, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and biomarker research. A hazard ratio in OS of 0.725 is being targeted which represents a conservative estimate based on the Phase 2b data and is viewed as being highly clinically relevant. An IDMC will be established to review safety at regular intervals andto review efficacy data at the planned interim and final analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT03665441.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document