Camrelizumab plus famitinib malate in patients with advanced renal cell cancer and unresectable urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5085-5085
Author(s):  
Yuan-Yuan Qu ◽  
Hongqian Guo ◽  
Hong Luo ◽  
Qing Zou ◽  
Ninazeng Xing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Antitumour Activity ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Genitourinary Cancers ◽  
Grade 3

5085 Background: Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) is a humanised anti-PD-1 antibody. Famitinib malate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against VEGFR-2, PDGFR, c-kit, and FGFR. This is an ongoing, open label, multi-center Phase II study to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with famitinib malate in patients (pts) with genitourinary cancers and gynecologic cancers. Here we just report genitourinary cancers results. Methods: Eligible pts were aged 18 or older, who had advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma with their primary tumour resected or unresectable urothelial carcinoma, had an ECOG performance status of 0-1and measurable disease. Previous system treatments were allowed (excluding prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or famitinib treatment). Famitinib 20 mg was administered orally once daily with SHR-1210 200 mg given intravenously every 3 weeks. We assessed antitumour activity and safety in all pts who received at least one dose treatment. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: From 23 Jan 2019 to 24 Jun2019, 35 pts were enrolled (25 with RCC, 10 with UC). Median previous treatment line was 1 (range, 1-4), and 50.0% of pts had received ≥2 prior therapies in RCC, all pts received one or more-line therapies in UC. At the data cut-off date (Dec 31, 2019), after at least 6 months follow-up, 22 (63%) pts were still receiving study treatment. The most common reason for discontinuing treatments was disease progression (n = 10). 16 pts achieved a confirmed response, all were partial response, with 8 additional > 24 weeks stable disease. the ORR was 52.0% (13/25, 95% CI 31.3% to 72.2%) in RCC and 30.0% (3/10) in UC, the disease control rate was 84.0% (21/25) in RCC and 70.0% in UC. 13/16 confirmed PR pts were still on treatment, the median duration of response is not reached. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were hypertension (17.1%), proteinuria (11.4%), platelet count decreased (8.6%), hand-foot syndrome (8.6%) and anemia (5.7%). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 7 pts (20%) of 35 pts, 1 pt (2.9%) with grade 3 enteritis. Conclusions: The camrelizumab with famitinib combination appeared to show encouraging activity in pts with heavy-treated RCC and UC, and the safety profile of the combination seemed to be manageable and consistent with that of each drug alone. This combination represented a novel potential treatment option for these settings and warranted further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03827837 .

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e002990
Author(s):  
Michael J Wagner ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sandip P Patel ◽  
Chris Ryan ◽  
Ashish Sangal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeAngiosarcoma is a rare aggressive endothelial cell cancer with high mortality. Isolated reports suggest immune checkpoint inhibition efficacy in angiosarcoma, but no prospective studies have been published. We report results for angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing rare cancer study.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) for metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, and toxicity. A two-stage design was used.ResultsOverall, there were 16 evaluable patients. Median age was 68 years (range, 25–81); median number of prior lines of therapy, 2. Nine patients had cutaneous and seven non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR was 25% (4/16). Sixty per cent of patients (3/5) with primary cutaneous scalp or face tumors attained a confirmed response. Six-month PFS was 38%. Altogether, 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE) (at least possibly related to drug) (25% grade 3–4 AE); 68.8%, an immune-related AE (irAE) (2 (12.5%), grade 3 or 4 irAEs (alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase and diarrhea)). There were no grade 5 toxicities. One of seven patients in whom tumor mutation burden (TMB) was assessed showed a high TMB (24 mutations/mb); that patient achieved a partial response (PR). Two of three patients with PDL1 immunohistochemistry assessed had high PDL1 expression; one achieved a PR.ConclusionThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma, with three of five patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.Trial registration numberNCT02834013.

scholarly journals Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib in Patients With Advanced Cervical Cancer (CLAP): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (34) ◽  
pp. 4095-4106
Author(s):  
Chunyan Lan ◽  
Jingxian Shen ◽  
Yin Wang ◽  
Jundong Li ◽  
Zhimin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Camrelizumab is an antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in patients with advanced cervical cancer. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after at least one line of systemic therapy. Patients received camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once per day. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigators per RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and received treatment. Median age was 51.0 years (range, 33-67 years), and 57.8% of patients had previously received two or more lines of chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Ten patients (22.2%) had received bevacizumab. Median follow-up was 11.3 months (range, 1.0-15.5 months). ORR was 55.6% (95% CI, 40.0% to 70.4%), with two complete and 23 partial responses. Median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 months to not estimable). Median duration of response and median OS were not reached. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 71.1% of patients, and the most common AEs were hypertension (24.4%), anemia (20.0%), and fatigue (15.6%). The most common potential immune-related AEs included grade 1-2 hypothyroidism (22.2%) and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (8.9%). CONCLUSION Camrelizumab plus apatinib had promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicities in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our findings.

Phase II trial of surufatinib plus toripalimab for disease progression after first-line chemotherapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16040-e16040
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Feng Ye ◽  
Yanqiao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

e16040 Background: Surufatinib is a novel small-molecule kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFRs, FGFR and CSF-1R, simultaneous targeting of angiogenesis through VEGFRs/FGFR1 and modulating tumor immune microenvironment through CSF-1R may be a uniquely potent strategy to enhance antitumor activity. Toripalimab is a monoclonal humanized IgG4 PD-1 antibody. Encouraging efficacy of surufatinib plus toripalimab treating patients with advanced solid tumors was reported at 2020 AACR. This is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in various solid tumors. Here we report the results of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma who have failed first-line of systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. Surufatinib 250 mg once a day (QD) will be orally administrated and toripalimab 240 mg will be intravenously administered every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Dec 31, 2020, a total of 21 gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled. The median age was 58 years old, and 81% of the patients were male. Median duration of treatment was 3 months (surufatinib, 3 months; toripalimab, 3 months). Among 15 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation, 2 patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR), with 3 additional unconfirmed PR. And there were 6 in stable disease (SD), 3 in progressive disease (PD) and one not evaluable per RECIST v1.1. There were 5 in PR, 7 in SD and 2 in PD per irRECIST, respectively. The confirmed and unconfirmed ORR were 13.3% (95% CI: 1.7%-40.5%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 11.8%-61.6%), respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) was 73.3% (95% CI: 44.9%-92.2%) per RECIST v1.1. Median PFS was 3.71 months (95% CI: 1.41-unknown). 14.3% (3/21) of patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of ≥ Grade 3. The most common TRAEs of ≥ Grade 3 were herpes zoster (4.8%), lymphopenia (4.8%), lymphocyte count decreased (4.8%), white blood cell count decreased (4.8%), liver injury (4.8%) and anaemia (4.8%). 4.8% (1/21) of patients had serious TRAEs. One patient died due to unknown reasons. Conclusions: Surufatinib plus toripalimab appeared to show encouraging activity in advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with manageable safety profile. Such combination could be a promising strategy for advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT04169672.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Sunitinib-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (27) ◽  
pp. 4469-4474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo ◽  
Giacomo Cartenì ◽  
Riccardo Autorino ◽  
Gianni Bruni ◽  
Marianna Tudini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose No previous prospective trials have been reported with sorafenib in patients with sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC). We conducted a multicenter study to determine the activity and tolerability of sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib progression in MRCC. Patients and Methods Between January 2006 and September 2008, 52 patients were enrolled onto this single-arm phase II study. All patients received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (complete or partial response) evaluated every 8 weeks by use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; secondary end points were toxicity, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results All patients were included in response and safety analyses. Partial responses were observed in 9.6% of patients (five of 52 patients; 95% CI, 5% to 17%) after two cycles. Grade 1 to 2 fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, rash, and neutropenia were the most common side effects, noted in 16 (30.8%), 19 (36.5%), 20 (38.5%), 19 (36.5%), and 20 patients (38.5%), respectively. The most common grade 3 toxicity was diarrhea, noted in six patients (11.5%). Median TTP was 16 weeks (range, 8 to 40 weeks), and median OS was 32 weeks (range, 16 to 64 weeks). Conclusion Although well tolerated, sorafenib shows limited efficacy in sunitinib-refractory MRCC. Further randomized trials comparing sorafenib with other drugs that target different biologic pathways are needed to define the best second-line treatment option in these patients.

Surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma: Results from a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16199-e16199
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Xianjun Yu ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Xing Zhang ◽  
Ying Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

e16199 Background: Patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment option after first-line treatment. Surufatinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor of VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1 and CSF-1R, has been approved in patients with advanced or metastatic extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in China. Toripalimab is a monoclonal humanized IgG4 PD-1 antibody. Surufatinib modulates tumor immune microenvironment and has shown promising antitumor activity in combination with toripalimab in solid tumors, including neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Herein, we reported the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in a cohort of advanced NEC patients. Methods: The multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II clinical trial enrolled advanced NEC patients refractory to first-line chemotherapy, and received surufatinib 250 mg once a day orally plus toripalimab 240 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Results: Twenty-one patients enrolled and received combination therapy. At data cut-off (December 31, 2020), the average treatment cycles were 5.1±3.69 for surufatinib and 5.0±3.68 for toripalimab. Among 20 tumor evaluable patients, 4 patients achieved confirmed PR and 10 patients achieved stable disease. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) are 20 % (95%CI: 5.7%-43.7%) and 70% (95%CI: 45.7%-88.1%) respectively. The median PFS is 3.94 months (95%CI: 1.31- unknown). OS is not mature till data cut-off. Adverse events (AEs) reported as related to treatment (TRAE) occurred in 100% of patients, of which Grade≥3 TRAEs occurred in 33.3% of patients. The reported Grade≥3 TRAEs were hypertension in 2 (9.5%) patients, and upper abdominal pain, oral mucositis, neutrophil count decreased, leukocyte count decreased, dermatitis, anemia and backache in 1 (4.8%) patient each. Immune related Grade ≥3 AEs, Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase increased and dermatitis, occurred in 2 (9.5%) patients, respectively. TRAE caused surufatinib or toripalimab interruption occurred in 6 (28.6%) and 4 (19%) patients respectively. There were neither serious AEs nor AEs inducing treatment discontinuations or deaths. Conclusions: As there is no standard second-line treatment, this combination of surufatinib and toripalimab might offer a new promising choice to treat NEC as second-line treatment due to good efficacy and manageable treatment related toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT04169672.

Phase II Trial of PS-341 in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer: A University of Chicago Phase II Consortium Study

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy B. Davis ◽  
David A. Taber ◽  
Rafat H. Ansari ◽  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Christopher George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Proteasome Inhibition ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeDetermine response rate, time to disease progression, and toxicity of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in patients with stage IV renal cell cancer.Patients and MethodsPS-341 1.5 mg/m2was administered intravenously twice weekly for 2 weeks every 21 days. Dose escalation to 1.7 mg/m2ensued in the absence of grade 3 to 4 toxicities. Re-evaluation took place after three cycles. To assess proteasome inhibition, patients were randomly assigned to tumor core biopsy either before the first dose or after the third cycle of PS-341. Additionally, whole blood was collected at the same time intervals.ResultsTwenty-three patients were enrolled; 21 were assessable for response. Two patients were never treated (one patient refused treatment and one had insufficient tumor for biopsy). Eighteen patients completed at least three cycles of therapy; three patients experienced disease progression after two cycles. Grade 4 toxicities were arthralgia, diarrhea, and vomiting. Grade 3 toxicities included thrombocytopenia with one hemorrhage, anemia, febrile neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicity, pain, fatigue, neuropathy (one sensory, one mixed sensorimotor), and electrolyte disturbances. Grade 1 to 2 neuropathy occurred in seven patients. One case of thrombosis and one case of pleural effusion occurred. Only one objective response was seen. Proteasome activity was measured by specific chymotryptic activity (SpA) and chymotryptic/tryptic activity (ChT:T). After PS-341, there was a decrease in mean whole blood SpA and ChT:T (P = .07 and .11, respectively).ConclusionEvidence is lacking for clinically significant activity of PS-341 in metastatic renal cell cancer. Insufficient biopsy and whole blood sample numbers preclude conclusions regarding proteasome inhibition within tumor. Further evaluation in this disease setting is not recommended.

A phase II study of anlotinib combined with STUPP regimen in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
Peijing Li ◽  
Yuan yuan Yuan Chen ◽  
Shuzhen Lai ◽  
Fagui Jiang ◽  
Xiaohui Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

2039 Background: STUPP regimen is now the standard treatment for newly diagnosed GBM, while the effectiveness is limited. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with the STUPP regimen in treating these patients. Methods: This is a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial (NCT04119674). Thirty-three patients (17 males and 16 females) were enrolled from 8 hospitals in China between January 2019 and February 2021. Inclusion criterion included 1) newly diagnosed histologically confirmed glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), 2) 2-6 weeks (wks) after surgery with healed incision, 3) 18-70 years old, 4) KPS≥60, 5) at least one measurable lesion according to RANO criteria, 6) radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, immunotherapy or biotherapy naïve. All patients received 54-60 Gy radiation (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction, five days per week) concurrently with temozolomide (TMZ, 75mg/m2, orally, QD) and anlotinib (8mg, orally, QD, d1-14/3wks). Adjuvant therapy started four weeks after RT completion, including six cycles of TMZ (150-200mg/m², orally, d1-5/4wks) and eight cycles of anlotinib (8mg, orally, QD, d1-14/3wks). Patients who completed adjuvant therapy were administrated anlotinib continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Safety assessment was done in patients who received at least one dose of study agent. Results: The median age is 52 (range 32-69) years. Analyses included data collected through February 6, 2021. The median treatment duration was 6.5 months. The median PFS was not reached, and the median overall survival (OS) was 17.4 months [95%CI 11.6-23.2]. The 1-year PFS and OS rate was 84.0% and 100.0%, respectively. Tumor response occurred in 21 patients, 63.6% (21/33) objective response (CR/PR), and 24.2% (8/33) patients had stable disease (SD).The clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the proportion of patients who achieved durable disease control (CR/PR/SD) more than six months, was 57.6% (19/33). Hypertension (6.1%) was the most common ≥grade 3 adverse event. No treatment related death occurred in this study through the last follow-up. Overall, toxicities are mild and manageable. Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with the STUPP regimen is efficacious and well-tolerated in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04119674.

Sunitinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: preliminary results from a phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4603-4603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Bang ◽  
Y. Kang ◽  
W. Kang ◽  
N. Boku ◽  
H. Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3

4603 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, approved internationally for the treatment of advanced RCC and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GIST. We investigated the safety and activity of SU monotherapy in pts with previously-treated gastric cancer. Preliminary results from this open-label, multicenter, phase II study are reported. Methods: Eligibility criteria included measurable stage IV disease; 1 prior chemotherapy regimen; and ECOG PS =1. Pts took SU 50 mg/day for 4 wks followed by 2 wks off treatment in 6-wk cycles. A Simon 2-stage design was used with a target accrual of 38 pts in the first stage, expanding to 63 pts if =2 partial responses (PRs) were observed. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Ctrough parameters were also monitored. Results: As of Sept 15 2006, 38 evaluable pts (median age 56 years [range 29–78]; 2–3 metastatic sites [63%]; prior treatment with 5-FU ± platinum [P] [24%], capecitabine ± P [13%], TS-1 ± P [26%], other [37%]) have received a median of 2 SU cycles (range 1–3). Of 21 pts evaluable for efficacy, 1 PR has been confirmed and 8 pts had stable disease (SD), 4 with SD for =2 cycles. The most commonly reported AEs were typically grade 1/2 in severity and included stomatitis, skin discoloration, fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea and vomiting. Grade 3/4 toxicities included HFS (10.5%), fatigue (7.9%), anorexia (7.9%) and mucosal inflammation (5.3%). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (29%) and anemia (11%). 7 pts experienced serious SU- related AEs requiring dose modifications in 3 pts and treatment discontinuation in 1 pt. Preliminary PK investigations indicate that concentrations seen in gastric pts are similar to those seen in other pts treated with SU. Conclusions: These initial findings show that SU is generally well tolerated and may have single-agent antitumor activity in pre-treated gastric cancer pts. Further trials with SU in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens are planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

795 A multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A843-A843
Author(s):  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sandip Patel ◽  
Christopher Ryan ◽  
Ashish Sangal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Light Exposure ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundAngiosarcoma is a rare cancer of endothelial cells that can be aggressive and carries a high mortality. A subset of angiosarcomas are characterized by high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and UV light exposure DNA mutational signature. Isolated case reports have suggested clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in angiosarcoma; no prospective studies of immune checkpoint inhibition in angiosarcoma have been reported. We report efficacy analysis results for patients with advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing phase II study for rare cancers (NCT02834013).MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg IV q6weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg IV q2weeks) for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint is objective response rate as assessed by RECIST v1.1, including measurable cutaneous disease that can be followed by photography. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, stable disease at six months, and toxicity. A two-stage design is used with six patients in the first stage and an additional ten patients in the second stage.ResultsAt data cutoff, 16 patients with angiosarcoma were enrolled. Median age was 68 years (25-81 years). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (0-5). 9 patients had cutaneous primary tumors of any cutaneous site, 7 had non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR for all patients was 25% (4/16, table 1, figure 1). Subgroup analysis revealed that 60% (3/5) of patients with primary cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face had a confirmed objective response. 6-month PFS was 38%. 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE), and 25% experienced a grade 3-4 AE. 68.8% experienced an immune related AE (irAE), and 2 (12.5%) developed grade 3 or 4 irAEs. Grade 3-4 irAEs were ALT and AST increase and diarrhea. There were no grade 5 toxicities.ConclusionsThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab was well tolerated and had an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma regardless of primary site, with 3 of 5 patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.AcknowledgementsFunding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grant awards CA180888, CA180819, CA180868; and in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyTrial RegistrationNCT02834013Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the NCI CIRB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document