Gls-010, a novel anti-PD-1 mAb in Chinese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Results from a multicenter, open-label and single-arm phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6032-6032
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Wu ◽  
Lingfang Xia ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Jianqing Zhu ◽  
Ke Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Favorable Result ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response

6032 Background: GLS-010 is a novel fully human anti-PD-1 mAb. Previous Phase I study exhibited favorable result of tolerance, preliminary efficacy and 240mg fixed dose q2w was selected as Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D). This Phase II clinical trial is aimed to further evaluate the safety and anti-tumor activity of GLS-010 in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Methods: PD-L1 positive (combined positive score (CPS) ≥1) patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who had received one or more lines of chemotherapy were enrolled and received GLS-010 240mg every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1, secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR) and safety. Results: From May 16th 2019 to December 24th 2019, 44 pts were enrolled and treated in the study. As of December 24th 2019,the median line of prior systemic chemotherapy was 2(range: 1~4), and 59% (26/44) of pts had received ≥2 previous lines of chemotherapy. The median number of GLS-010 doses was 1.5(range: 1~4). 25 pts received response evaluation per investigator review. With a median follow-up of 2.9 months, 7 of 25 evaluable pts achieved a partial response (PR). The ORR was 28% (95% CI, 12.07-49.39), with 7 pts achieving a PR ( 3 of 7 confirmed), 3 pts achieving stable disease (SD) and 15 pts with progressive disease (PD), 1 of which was assessed as dissociated response with treatment ongoing. Median duration of response had not been reached yet. 33 of 44 patients (75%) experienced one or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) per NCI CTCAE v4.03, most of which were grade 1 or 2. The most common TRAEs were Anaemia (15/44), and 73.3% of them were grade 1 or 2. The most common ≥grade 3 TRAE included Anaemia (4/44). As data cut off, only 1 pt discontinued treatment due to adverse event. Conclusions: GLS-010 showed impressive therapeutic activity and manageable safety profile in Chinese recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients. Current evidence support further development of GLS-010 in this and more indications. This trial is still ongoing, and we are looking forward to further results. Clinical trial information: NCT03972722.

GLS-010, a novel anti-PD-1 mAb in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Preliminary result of a phase II clinical trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14072-e14072
Author(s):  
Yuqin Song ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Ningjing Lin ◽  
Chen Zhang ◽  
Mingzhi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Favorable Result ◽  
Phase 2

e14072 Background: GLS-010 is a novel fully human anti-PD-1 mAb. Previous Phase 1 study exhibited favorable result of tolerance, preliminary efficacy and 240mg fixed dose q2w was selected as Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D). This Phase 2 clinical trial is aimed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of GLS-010 in Chinese patients(pts) with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin’s Lymphoma( r/r cHL). Here we reported the preliminary result. Methods: All pts enrolled received GLS-010 240mg every 2 weeks. Tumor response was assessed by Lugona 2014 every 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.03. Results: Until Jan 30th 2019, 39 pts were enrolled in this ongoing study. The median dosing number was 4 (range: 1~12). 17 pts received response evaluation. Of 17 evaluable subjects, an objective response was reported in 15 patients (88.3%), including 4(23.5%) pts with a complete response(CR) and 11 pts(64.7% )with a partial response(PR), 1 patient(5.9%) with stable disease(SD)and 1 remaining patient(5.9%) with unconfirmed progressive disease(PD)(observed stable disease(SD) in the first assessment).The most common treatment related AEs included Neutrophil count decreased (10/32), White blood cell count decreased (7/32), Fever (6/32), Alanine aminotransferase increased (4/32), etc. Treatment–related grade 3-5 AEs include Neutrophil count decreased (2/6), Interstitial lung disease (1/6), Influenza like illness (1/6). Conclusions: GLS-010 showed impressive therapeutic activity and an acceptable safety profile in Chinese r/r cHL patients. Current evidence support further development of GLS-010 in this and more indications. Clinical trial information: NCT03655483.

scholarly journals Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib in Patients With Advanced Cervical Cancer (CLAP): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (34) ◽  
pp. 4095-4106
Author(s):  
Chunyan Lan ◽  
Jingxian Shen ◽  
Yin Wang ◽  
Jundong Li ◽  
Zhimin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Camrelizumab is an antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in patients with advanced cervical cancer. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after at least one line of systemic therapy. Patients received camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once per day. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigators per RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and received treatment. Median age was 51.0 years (range, 33-67 years), and 57.8% of patients had previously received two or more lines of chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Ten patients (22.2%) had received bevacizumab. Median follow-up was 11.3 months (range, 1.0-15.5 months). ORR was 55.6% (95% CI, 40.0% to 70.4%), with two complete and 23 partial responses. Median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 months to not estimable). Median duration of response and median OS were not reached. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 71.1% of patients, and the most common AEs were hypertension (24.4%), anemia (20.0%), and fatigue (15.6%). The most common potential immune-related AEs included grade 1-2 hypothyroidism (22.2%) and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (8.9%). CONCLUSION Camrelizumab plus apatinib had promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicities in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our findings.

scholarly journals Anlotinib in Chinese Patients With Recurrent Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Chunyan Song ◽  
Zhong Zheng ◽  
Lingfang Xia ◽  
Yanqiong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

ObjectiveThis phase II, single-arm, prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in Chinese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (CC).MethodsPatients with histologically proven recurrent or metastatic advanced CC were enrolled at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Patients received 12 mg of oral anlotinib daily before breakfast for 2 weeks of each 3-week (21 days) cycle separated by a 1-week interval. Anlotinib was administered orally until disease progression, patient withdrawal, intolerant toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and the secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsBetween September 2018 and November 2019, 41 patients were recruited. The median age was 53 years old. The histological results revealed that 82.9% of the recruited patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 14.6% had adenocarcinoma, and 2.4% had other types. At the data cutoff date, six patients were still being treated, and 35 patients had discontinued treatment. Forty (40/41, 97.5%) patients were evaluated for treatment response. The median PFS and OS was 3.2 and 9.9 months, respectively, in patients who received anlotinib treatment. The ORR was 24.4%. In addition, 34.2% (14/41) of patients were confirmed to have stable disease, and 39.0% (16/41) of patients were confirmed to have progressive disease. The DCR was 58.5%. Ten patients (10/41) had a confirmed response during the follow-up period. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2. High-grade AEs (grade 3) included urinary leukocyte positivity (9.8%), hematuria (4.9%), and hypertension (2.4%).ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in Chinese patients with recurrent or metastatic CC. Anlotinib produced durable clinical responses with manageable safety in these patients.

Dual immune checkpoint blockade in advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, a phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16201-e16201
Author(s):  
Susan Combs Scott ◽  
Ana De Jesus-Acosta ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Benjamin Philip Levy ◽  
Valsamo Anagnostou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Well Differentiated

e16201 Background: Limited systemic treatment options are available for progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET), also called carcinoid tumors. Given emerging evidence for immunotherapy response in high grade NET including small cell lung cancer, we sought to determine the efficacy of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated NET in an open label phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients had well-differentiated, nonfunctional NET of lung, pancreas, or GI origin that had progressed within the past 12 months after at least one line of prior therapy. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Using a Simon’s 2-stage design, the study planned to accrue up to 56 patients. Based on published response rates to everolimus of 5%, we hypothesized that this regimen would be considered promising if the true ORR is > 15%. Results: Nine patients were enrolled prior to study closure due to funding, including 6 patients with NET of lung origin, 2 pancreatic, and 1 small bowel (Table). Median age was 71 years. All patients had distant metastatic disease at enrollment, with an average of 2 prior lines of therapy. Four of 9 patients achieved the primary endpoint of confirmed objective response, all of whom have ongoing response with a median duration of 15.4 months. Five of 9 patients, including all 4 responders, experienced immune-related toxicity requiring treatment modification or discontinuation. The trial did not accrue the target of 56 patients, however, objective response in 4 of 9 patients (ORR 44.4%, 90% CI: 16.9-74.9%) excluded the response rate target (15%). Conclusions: The impressive ORR of 44% with a median duration of response exceeding 15 months in this small clinical trial warrants further study of combination CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in previously treated well-differentiated NET. Our ongoing immunologic and genomic correlative analysis in responders and non-responders will help inform future study of immunotherapy in this patient population in need of new systemic therapy approaches. Clinical trial information: NCT03420521. [Table: see text]

Recombinant humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (JS001) in patients with refractory/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Interim results of an open-label phase II clinical study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6017-6017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fenghua Wang ◽  
Xiao-Li Wei ◽  
Ji Feng Feng ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Nong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Dna Copy Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Ebv Dna

6017 Background: Metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients progressed afterstandardtherapy have limited treatment options. Toripalimab, also known as JS001, a humanized IgG4 antibody specific for human PD-1, has been approved for 2nd line treatment of metastatic melanoma in China. Here we report the results from a phase IIstudy in metastatic NPC patients treated with toripalimab.(Clinical trial ID: NCT02915432). Methods: This multi-center, open-label, phase II registration study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of toripalimab in metastaticNPC patients who have failed systemic treatment. Toripalimabis given at 3 mg/kg IV Q2W until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.Tumor PD-L1 expression, plasma EBV DNA level and other biomarkerswill be correlatedwith clinical response. Results: Enrollment of 190chemo-refractory metastatic NPCpatients was completed by Feb 2019 from 17 participating centers. The median age was 46 years, with 89.5% patients received at least 2 lines of prior systemic therapies. Treatment related adverse events (TRAE)occurred in 92% patients, which were mostly grade 1 or 2.Common TRAE includedanemia, hypothyroidism, AST increased, proteinuria, pyrexia, cough, constipation, ALT increased, hypoalbuminemia and pruritus.Grade 3 or higherTRAEoccurred in 25% patients.By the cut-off date of Jan 7 2019, among 135 evaluable patients, 3 complete responses, 31 partial responses and 40 stable diseaseswere observed for an objective response rate (ORR) of 25.2% and a disease control rate of 54.8%. PD-L1 expression results were obtained from 125 patients and 45.6% (57/125) were PD-L1+.PD-L1+ patientsachieved slightly higherORR than PD-L1- patients, 29.8% versus 22.1%. In addition, an average drop of 47-fold plasma EBV DNA copy number was observed in responding patients, which typically proceeded the radiographic identification of clinical benefit. Conclusions: Toripalimab has demonstrated a manageable safety profileand encouraging clinical activity in the largest check-point blockade study in NPC to date. A change in plasma EBV DNA copy number might serve as a predictive marker for favorable clinical response. Patients will be continuously monitored for additional safety and survival readouts. Clinical trial information: NCT02915432.

scholarly journals RaPiDS (GOG-3028): randomized Phase II study of balstilimab alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in cervical cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M O’Malley ◽  
Leslie M Randall ◽  
Camille Gunderson Jackson ◽  
Robert L Coleman ◽  
John L Hays ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Investigational Agents

Balstilimab (anti-programmed death 1) and zalifrelimab (anti-CTLA-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors that have emerged as promising investigational agents for the treatment of cervical cancer, particularly in the setting of previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of RaPiDS (NCT03894215), a two-arm Phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of balstilimab administered alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is objective response rate, and key secondary objectives include safety, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life outcomes.

scholarly journals Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 Checkpoint Blockade Using Balstilimab and Zalifrelimab Combination as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Open-Label Phase II Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. O'Malley ◽  
Maryna Neffa ◽  
Bradley J. Monk ◽  
Tamar Melkadze ◽  
Marilyn Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE Balstilimab (antiprogrammed death-1) and zalifrelimab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors emerging as promising investigational agents for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. This phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03495882 ) evaluated the combination of balstilimab plus zalifrelimab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer who relapsed after prior platinum-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were intravenously dosed with balstilimab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and zalifrelimab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks, for up to 24 months. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST version 1.1, assessed by independent central review). Secondary end points included duration of response, safety and tolerability, and survival. RESULTS In total, 155 women (median age, 50 years [range 24-76 years]) were enrolled and treated with balstilimab plus zalifrelimab; 125 patients had measurable disease at baseline and one prior line of platinum-based therapy in the advanced setting, and these patients constituted the efficacy-evaluable population. The median follow-up was 21 months. The confirmed ORR was 25.6% (95% CI, 18.8 to 33.9), including 10 complete responders and 22 partial responders, with median duration of response not reached (86.5%, 75.5%, and 64.2% at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively). The ORRs were 32.8% and 9.1% in patients with programmed death ligand-1–positive and programmed death ligand-1–negative tumors, respectively. For patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the ORR was 32.6%. The overall disease control rate was 52% (95% CI, 43.3 to 60.6). Hypothyroidism (14.2%) and hyperthyroidism (7.1%) were the most common immune-mediated adverse events. CONCLUSION Promising and durable clinical activity, with favorable tolerability, was seen in this largest trial to date evaluating dual programmed death-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 blockade in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Further investigation of the balstilimab and zalifrelimab combination in this setting is continuing.

A phase II trial of LEE011 in combination with everolimus in the treatment of advanced well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of foregut origin.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS546-TPS546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitya Prabhakar Raj ◽  
Virginia Kelly ◽  
Jennifer A. Chan ◽  
A. Dasari ◽  
Marinela Capanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Drug Combination ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Well Differentiated

TPS546 Background: Changes in the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor pathway are believed to contribute to the development of well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs). In the pre-clinical setting, loss or downregulation of proteins that normally inhibit the cyclin dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6 have contributed to NET development. Separately, rigorous investigation of everolimus in WDNETs has demonstrated a survival benefit in this patient (pt) population. Pre-clinical data suggests that the Cdk4/Cdk6 inhibitor LEE011 is synergistically active with everolimus. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEE011 in combination with everolimus in pts with advanced WDNETs of foregut origin (thymic, bronchopulmonary, gastric, duodenal, pancreatic). Methods: This study is a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label phase II clinical trial using a Simon two stage optimal design. Main inclusion criteria include: adult patients with WDNET of foregut origin, low to intermediate grade, unresectable and/or metastatic, disease progression ≤ 12 months prior to enrollment, ECOG 0-1. Between 15 and 43 patients will be enrolled from three sites across the US. LEE011 300mg daily, 3 weeks on and 1 week off, in combination with everolimus 2.5mg daily (final dosing based on phase 1b clinical trial performed in metastatic breast cancer; LEE011X2106) will be administered orally until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, or pt withdrawal. All enrolled pts will be followed by telephone contact for overall survival until death or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint, progression free survival, will be assessed based on radiographic review by RECISTv1.1. Main secondary endpoints include establishing the safety of this drug combination in this patient population, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and overall survival. Correlative objectives include exploring the effect of this drug combination on biomarkers related to the Rb pathway and/or WDNET pathogenesis. This trial began enrollment in 2/27/2017, with 10 patients enrolled to date. Clinical trial information: NCT03070301.

Anlotinib and irinotecan for advanced Ewing sarcoma after failure of standard therapy: A multicenter, two-cohort, single-arm, open label, phase Ib/II trial (NCT03416517).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11012-11012
Author(s):  
Jie Xu ◽  
Lu Xie ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Xiaodong Tang ◽  
Rongli Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Initial Level ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

11012 Background: Both protracted irinotecan and anti-angiogenesis therapy have shown promising results in Ewing sarcoma. We did this phase Ib/II trial to first define the proper dose of irinotecan in combination with anlotinib in Ewing sarcoma and then evaluate efficacy. Methods: Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory Ewing sarcoma were enrolled and sub-classified into cohort A (≥16y) or cohort B ( < 16y). In the dose-defining phase Ib portion, anlotinib was given at a fixed dose of 12mg D1-14every 21 days, while the de-escalated 3+3 design was used to detect the recommended dose of irinotecan in each cohort from an initial level of 20mg/m2/d dx5x2. Recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was defined as the highest dose at which no more than 30% patients experience a DLT in the first two courses. In the next dose-expanding phase II portion, the primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR12w). A conventional two-stage study design model was used. Results: 41 patients were enrolled with 29 in cohort A and 12 in cohort B. For cohort A, first 5 patients were treated at initial level in phase Ib portion, two of whom subsequently experienced delayed diarrhea as dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Additional six patients were then treated at a lower dose of 15mg/m2. Since no more DLT was recorded, it was used as RP2D. 23/24 patients in cohort A phase II were available for response evaluation at 12 weeks, with one complete response (CR), 14 partial response (PR) (including one CMR who has a negative PET/CT scan but still abnormal lesions in MR scan), 2 stable disease (SD) and 6 progressive disease (PD). ORR12wwas 62.5%. For cohort B, no DLT was noticed in the first six patients treated at the initial level which was used as RP2D later. Finally, 12 patients were included in cohort B. ORR12wwas 83.3% with two CR, 8 PR (including one CMR) and two PD. Although effective, cohort B were closed because of slow enrollment. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea, abdominal pain and neutropenia. The genotype of UGT1A1*1 and UGT1A1*28 were not associated with the risk of diarrhea. Conclusions: The combination of irinotecan and anlotinib demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with promising evidence of clinical efficacy in advanced Ewing sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03416517.

Trial in progress: Phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy and atezolizumab in the management of recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5596-TPS5596
Author(s):  
Kamran A. Ahmed ◽  
Youngchul Kim ◽  
Sachin M. Apte ◽  
Hye Sook Chon ◽  
Jing-Yi Chern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation ◽  
Hypofractionated Radiation

TPS5596 Background: There is no consistent recommendation for management of metastatic cervical cancer beyond first line therapy with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Pembrolizumab is now approved for PD-L1 positive or MSI-H/dMMR metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. Numerous pre-clinical studies have provided evidence to combine radiation therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition to improve response rates. The evidence is strongest for short course, hypofractionated radiation regimens. We hypothesize treatment with atezolizumab with hypofractionated radiation therapy will improve objective response rate (ORR) compared with atezolizumab alone in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Methods: The study is designed as a prospective, single arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with 24 Gy in 3 fractions to patients with ≥ 2 metastatic sites followed 1 week later by atezolizumab (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks) for patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Dose reductions will not be allowed. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the ORR by Immune-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) criteria following SBRT and atezolizumab. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, local control, and adverse events. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers (i.e. PD-L1, mutation burden, TCR repertoire etc.) for association with clinical benefit. A total of 26 patients will be enrolled. An interim analysis will be performed to assess efficacy after 13 patients become evaluable.This study is open with 2 patients enrolled at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03614949.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document