Evaluating progression-free survival in black and white women with triple-negative breast cancer in pooled clinical trials from a synthetic control database (SCD) and real-world electronic medical records (EMR).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13102-e13102
Author(s):  
Mark Layton Watson ◽  
Kevin Holcomb ◽  
Lisa Newman ◽  
Janna Andrews ◽  
Lisa Ensign ◽  
...  

e13102 Background: Previous studies have shown a lower survival rate in Black women with breast cancer compared with other ethnic groups, largely explained by the increased incidence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study we further explore relative survival by race within a TNBC population. By using pooled clinical trial data, we seek to control for variation in patient assessment on outcomes. We further use a real-world electronic medical records (EMR) data source to compare the representativeness of pooled trial findings to patients receiving care not on trial. Methods: Phase II and III open-label breast cancer studies having completed their primary analysis were selected from the Medidata Enterprise Data Store (MEDS), comprised of over 19,000 historical clinical trials, for de-identified aggregate analyses. The Synthetic Control Database (SCD) for this study contains 749 patients with TNBC enrolled in second line and higher treatment trials between 2010 and 2017. De-identified Oncology EMR data was sourced from the Guardian Research Network (GRN) of integrated delivery systems from 2010 to 2018, and contained 1877 patients. Baseline characteristics were assessed between pooled trial and real-world data cohorts. Patients were stratified by race. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. We conducted further analysis to assess the impact of additional factors that may influence the aggressive progression of TNBC response in Black women and TNBC disparity. Factors included, but were not limited to: age, stage at diagnosis, baseline benign neutropenia, Body Mass Index (BMI) and genetic factors (BRCA). Results: The TNBC SCD population was 73.0% White, 6.8% Black, and 20.2% Non-White Non-Black (NWNB). The real-world distribution, by contrast was 79%, 10%, and 11%, respectively, with patients predominantly stage 2 at diagnosis. Median BMI at diagnosis was 28.6, 32.6 and 27.1. Unadjusted progression-free survival (PFS) was directionally lower in Black patients in a Kaplan-Meier assessment with a Median PFS of 105 days vs 144 days for all others. Conclusions: A representative pool of cross trial TNBC patients demonstrated lower PFS in Black patients compared to their non-Black counterparts. Based on these findings, further investigation to explore potential biological and treatment factors associated with racial disparity in TNBC is warranted.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E Skinner ◽  
Amin Haiderali ◽  
Min Huang ◽  
Lee S Schwartzberg

Aim: This study examined treatment patterns and effectiveness outcomes of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) from US community oncology centers. Materials & methods: Eligible patients were females, aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with mTNBC between 1 January 2010 and 31 January 2016. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used. Results: Sample comprised 608 patients with average age of 57.5 years and 505/608 patients (83.1%) received systemic treatment. Overall survival (OS) from first-line treatment found that African–American patients had shorter OS than White (9.3 vs 13.7 months; hazard ratio: 1.35; p = 0.006). Conclusion: More than 15% of women with mTNBC were not treated, indicating a high unmet need. Overall prognosis remains poor, which highlights the opportunity for newer therapies to improve progression-free survival and OS.


2020 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
S.A. Lyalkin ◽  
◽  
L.A. Syvak ◽  
N.O. Verevkina ◽  
◽  
...  

The objective: was to evaluate the efficacy of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and methods. Open randomized study was performed including 122 patients with metastatic TNBC. The efficacy and safety of the first line chemotherapy of regimens АТ (n=59) – group 1, patients received doxorubicine 60 мг/м2 and paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and ТР (n=63) – group 2, patients received paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and carboplatin AUC 5 were evaluated. Results. The median duration of response was 9.5 months (4.5–13.25 months) in patients received AT regimen and 8.5 months (4.7–12.25 months), in TP regimen; no statistically significant differences were observed, р=0.836. The median progression free survival was 7 months (95% CI 5–26 months) in group 1 and 7.5 months (95% CI 6–35 months) in group 2, p=0.85. Both chemotherapy regimens (AT and TP) had mild or moderate toxicity profiles (grade 1 or 2 in most patients). No significant difference in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was higher in patients of group 2 (TP regimen): 42.8% versus 27% (р<0.05). Conclusions. Both regimens of chemotherapy (AT and TP) are appropriate to use in the first line setting in patients with metastatic TNBC. Key words: metastatic triple negative breast cancer, chemotherapy, progression free survival, chemotherapy toxicity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 678-688
Author(s):  
Katie Mycock ◽  
Lin Zhan ◽  
Gavin Taylor-Stokes ◽  
Gary Milligan ◽  
Debanjali Mitra

Background: Palbociclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor used in combination with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). Palbociclib was the first CDK 4/6 inhibitor approved for HR+/HER2− ABC/MBC treatment in Canada in combination with letrozole (P+L) as an initial endocrine-based therapy (approved March 2016), or with fulvestrant (P+F) following disease progression after prior endocrine therapy (approved May 2017). The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study (NCT03159195) collected real-world outcomes data for palbociclib-treated patients in several countries, including Canada. Methods: This retrospective chart review included women with HR+/HER2− ABC/MBC receiving P+L or P+F in Canada. Physicians reviewed medical records for up to 14 patients, abstracting demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. Progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were estimated via Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Thirty-three physicians examined medical records for 247 patients (P+L, n = 214; P+F, n = 33). Median follow-up was 8.8 months for P+L and 7.0 months for P+F. Most patients were initiated on palbociclib 125 mg/d (P+L, 90.2%; P+F, 84.8%). Doses were reduced in 16.6% of P+L and 14.3% of P+F patients initiating palbociclib at 125 mg/d. The PFR for P+L was 90.3% at 12 months and 78.2% at 18 months; corresponding SRs were 95.6% and 93.0%. For P+F, 6-month PFR was 91.0%; 12-month SR was 100.0%. Conclusions: Dose reduction rates were low and PFR and SR were high in this Canadian real-world assessment of P+L and P+F treatments, suggesting that palbociclib combinations are well tolerated and effective.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wilkie ◽  
M. Alexandra Schickli ◽  
Michael J. Berger ◽  
Maryam Lustberg ◽  
Raquel Reinbolt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Liye Wang ◽  
Qianyi Lu ◽  
Kuikui Jiang ◽  
Ruoxi Hong ◽  
Shusen Wang ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF<sup>V600E</sup>) gene mutation has been identified in a variety of malignancies, but no evidence of the efficacy of vemurafenib treatment in BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> mutant breast cancer (BC) has been reported. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We reported a 60-year-old woman with confirmed triple-negative BC with BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> mutation. Progression-free survival (PFS) for first-line chemotherapy was 7 months. The patient received vemurafenib and albumin-bound paclitaxel as second-line therapy, exhibiting regression of some pulmonary metastatic lesions with concomitant progression of other lesions, and achieved 4.4 months of PFS. Genetic testing of the progressed pulmonary lesion revealed the BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> mutation, and acquired new mutations and AR amplification. The patient ultimately died of multiple organ failure and achieved 12 months of overall survival. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> mutation may be a potential prognostic factor and therapeutic target for BC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 719-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Bonotto ◽  
Lorenzo Gerratana ◽  
Donatella Iacono ◽  
Alessandro Marco Minisini ◽  
Karim Rihawi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12552-e12552
Author(s):  
Maryam B. Lustberg ◽  
Amanda Luff ◽  
Gregory S. Young ◽  
Rachel M. Layman ◽  
Ewa Mrozek ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9105-9105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Menefee ◽  
Yutao Gong ◽  
Pallavi Shruti Mishra-Kalyani ◽  
Rajeshwari Sridhara ◽  
Bindu Kanapuru ◽  
...  

9105 Background: Docetaxel is a common comparator arm to test novel therapies in post-platinum mNSCLC trials. The advent of Real World Evidence (RWE) has renewed interest in the use of synthetic control arms (control arms from previously conducted randomized trials) to improve accrual to trials and increase patient access of promising experimental agents. We reviewed legacy second-line (2L) mNSCLC trials to assess the impact of switching docetaxel control arms from one trial to another and compare to an experimental regimen. Methods: We identified 5 contemporary 2L trials that enrolled 2013 patients receiving an experimental therapy vs. docetaxel: 5 immunoncology head-to-head trials (one with 2 arms) and one anti-VEGF add-on trial. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were produced for docetaxel controls. We calculated OS and PFS hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each synthetic trial. A pooled doc arm was also compared with each experimental agent. Results: See Table. Conclusions: Both individual and pooled docetaxel switching of control arms approximated the original OS HR and 95% CI. Methods such as bootstrapped sampling and propensity score matching will be performed in an effort to more closely approximate the original trial characteristics. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 631-631
Author(s):  
Stephan Bernhardt ◽  
Marcus Hubbe ◽  
Michael Rink ◽  
Lothar Bergmann ◽  
Martin Boegemann ◽  
...  

631 Background: Sunitinib remains an important treatment option for mRCC, but the effect of comorbidities/comedications on sunitinib treatment outcomes have not been fully explored. Methods: Data were collated from STAR-TOR, an ongoing real-world registry. Cutoff date for analysis was 19 June 2019. This subgroup analysis assessed the presence or absence of hypertension (HTN), and the use or non-use of statins and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), determined at the time of entry to the registry. Treatment endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). OS and PFS were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods. Differences within subgroups were tested using Log-rank test for OS and PFS, and Fisher’s exact test for ORR. Results: 557 sunitinib-treated pts were analyzed; 366 had HTN and 191 did not, 130 used statins and 427 did not, and 165 used PPIs and 392 did not. Median (m) OS (95% confidence intervals) was similar in pts with and without HTN (25.4 [21.1, 31.5] vs 21.5 [15.2, 28.0] months; p = 0.215). mPFS (8.0 [6.5, 9.9] vs 6.3 [5.4, 8.2] months; p = 0.140) and ORR (31.2% vs 30.9%; p = 1.000) were also similar in pts with and without HTN. mOS was similar in pts who used statins vs those who did not (27.8 [20.2, 35.4] vs 24.0 [19.4, 27.3] months; p = 0.884), while mPFS was significantly longer in pts who used statins (9.4 [6.5, 13.6] vs 6.9 [5.7, 8.2] months; p = 0.044). ORR was 37.8% vs 29.0% in pts who did and did not use statins (p = 0.072). mOS was significantly shorter in pts who used PPIs vs those who did not (20.2 [14.9, 28.3] vs 25.7 [22.7, 33.0] months; p = 0.021). mPFS (5.8 [4.6, 8.2] vs 8.0 [6.5, 9.8] months; p = 0.091) and ORR (26.6% vs 33.0%; p = 0.177) were similar in pts who did and did not use PPIs. Conclusions: In sunitinib-treated pts with mRCC in a real-world registry, mPFS was significantly longer and there was a trend toward better ORR in pts who used statins, whereas mOS was significantly shorter and there was a trend toward shorter mPFS in pts who used PPIs. Common comedications may affect sunitinib treatment outcomes in pts with mRCC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document