Survival outcomes and risk group validation from SWOG S0925, a randomized phase II study of androgen deprivation (AD) +/- cixutumumab, in new metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Risa Liang Wong ◽  
Mai T. Duong ◽  
Catherine Tangen ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Heather H. Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Castration Resistance ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Improve Rate

106 Background: Cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor I receptor, did not improve rate of undetectable PSA at 28 weeks when combined with AD in the randomized phase II SWOG S0925 trial for patients with new mHSPC. We now present mature radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses, along with pre-specified secondary and exploratory endpoints. Methods: We used Kaplan-Meier curves to analyze OS, rPFS, and castration resistance-free survival by treatment arm, disease volume (as per CHAARTED), and risk (as per LATITUDE). We explored differences in survival by treatment arm via covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for disease volume and risk. Results: The trial enrolled 210 patients, 105 per treatment arm. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. No difference was seen between treatment arms in OS (HR 1.01 [0.70-1.45]; p=0.97), rPFS (HR 1.17 [0.85-1.60]; p=0.35), or castration resistance-free survival (HR 1.02 [0.75-1.41]; p=0.88). At baseline, 105/198 (53.0%) patients had high risk and 119/210 (56.7%) had high volume disease. 17.3% of high volume patients were classified as low risk and 15.9% of low volume patients were classified as high risk; together, 16.7% of patients had discordant classification of high or low category for risk and volume. Adjusting for risk or volume yielded no differences in OS between arms. Inferior survival was observed in high risk (HR 1.89 [1.29-2.80]; p=0.001) and high volume (HR 2.75 [1.84-4.10]; p<0.0001) disease. Disease volume was a better fit to survival data than risk (AIC 878.3 vs. 889.2). Compared to patients achieving undetectable PSA at 28 weeks, inferior survival was observed in patients whose PSA was >0.2 to ≤4.0 ng/mL (HR 3.72 [1.99-6.95]; p<0.0001) or >4.0 ng/mL (HR 7.13 [4.24-11.9]; p<0.0001). Conclusions: In new mHSPC, adding cixutumumab to AD did not improve survival measures. Baseline risk and disease volume carried prognostic value for this distinct trial population, though disease volume was a better predictor of survival. PSA treatment response was a strong intermediate endpoint for survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01120236.

scholarly journals Preoperative or Perioperative Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and Capecitabine (GASTRODOC Regimen) in Patients with Locally-Advanced Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Phase-II Trial

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2790
Author(s):  
Manlio Monti ◽  
Paolo Morgagni ◽  
Oriana Nanni ◽  
Massimo Framarini ◽  
Luca Saragoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage Cytology ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Resectable Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lavage Cytology

Docetaxel associated with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FLOT) has been reported as the best perioperative treatment for gastric cancer. However, there is still some debate about the most appropriate number and timing of chemotherapy cycles. In this randomized multicenter phase II study, patients with resectable gastric cancer were staged through laparoscopy and peritoneal lavage cytology, and randomly assigned (1:1) to either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arm A) or two preoperative + two postoperative cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOC) chemotherapy (arm B). The primary endpoint was to assess the percentage of patients receiving all the planned preoperative or perioperative chemotherapeutic cycles. Ninety-one patients were enrolled between September 2010 and August 2016. The treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Thirty-three (71.7%) and 24 (53.3%) patients completed the planned cycles in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.066), reporting an odds ratio for early interruption of treatment of 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–1.07). Resection was curative in 39 (88.6%) arm A patients and 35 (83.3%) arm B patients. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 51.2% (95% CI: 34.2–65.8) in arm A and 40.3% (95% CI: 28.9–55.2) in arm B (p = 0.300). Five-year survival was 58.5% (95% CI: 41.3–72.2) and 53.9% (95% CI: 35.5–69.3) (p = 0.883) in arms A and B, respectively. The planned treatment was more frequently completed and was more active, albeit not significantly, in the neoadjuvant arm than in the perioperative group.

Phase II study of dexamethasone, ascorbic acid, thalidomide and arsenic trioxide (DATA) in high risk previously untreated (PU) and relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17535-17535 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Baz ◽  
M. Kelly ◽  
J. Reed ◽  
M. Karam ◽  
B. Faiman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ascorbic Acid ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival

17535 Background: The combination of Thalidomide (T) and Dexamethasone (D) is often used first line in patients with MM. Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is active and well tolerated in patients with RR MM. ATO, D and T have non-overlapping toxicity. We therefore initiated a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with high risk PU MM (serum B2 microglobulin>5.5, chromosome 13 or 14 abnormalities by FISH or the presence of peripheral plasma cells) and RR MM. Methods: On week 1, ATO was given at a dose of 0.25mg/kg IV on days 1–5. On weeks 2–12, ATO was given at the same dose twice weekly. On weeks 13–16, the patients did not receive treatment. Ascorbic acid 1000mg IV was given after each ATO infusion. D was given at a dose of 20mg orally on days 1–4 of a 28 days cycle, and T was started at a dose of 50mg daily and increased as tolerated to a dose of 100mg daily. A similar 16 weeks consolidation course was given. Maintenance included ATO 0.25mg/kg on days 1,8,15 and 22 every 12 weeks in addition to the above schedule for D, T and Ascorbic acid. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled (3 with PU and 13 RR), 13 are evaluable for response. The median age was 57 years and 62% were males. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimen is 2 (range 0–6), 7 patients had received a prior T containing regimen, and 2 patients had received an ATO-containing regimen. Seven, seven and two patients had SWOG stages 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The mean serum B2 microglobulin was 7.1-mg/dL (s.d. 4.4). After a median follow up of 9.5 months (range 1–12), 9 patients progressed and 5 died. The median progression free survival was 9.4 months. The median progression free survival for responder has not been reached. Four patients had a PR (31%), 8 had stable disease (62%), and 1 had progressive disease. No patient had a QT>500 or a cardiac arrhythmia. Grade 3 leukopenia, anemia, neuropathy and renal failure occurred in 3, 2, 1 and 1 patients respectively. Three patients had a venous thromboembolic event (2 DVT and 1 PE). Conclusions: The addition of T to the combination of ATO, Ascorbic acid and D is safe, well tolerated and results in 30% PR and 61% stable disease in patients with poor risk MM. [Table: see text]

Randomized phase II trial of two dose schedules of carboplatin/paclitaxel/cetuximab in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7586-7586 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Saleh ◽  
M. A. Socinski ◽  
D. Trent ◽  
T. Dobbs ◽  
L. M. Zehngebot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Epidermal Growth

7586 Background: Cetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on both normal and tumor cells, has been investigated in advanced NSCLC as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. This ongoing randomized phase II open-label trial evaluates cetuximab in combination with carboplatin (Cb) and paclitaxel (Pac) when given in two dose schedules to patients (pts) with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Cetuximab treatment was identical in both arms: 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter. Beginning on day 8, a schedule of Cb AUC=6 IV and Pac 225 mg/m2 IV given on a 3-week cycle was compared with a schedule of Cb AUC=6 IV q4 weeks and Pac 100 mg/m2 IV given weekly for 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Pts who achieve CR, PR, or SD after 4 cycles may continue weekly cetuximab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to estimate median progression-free survival (PFS) and the PFS rate at 6 months. Secondary objectives included response rate. Results: The study has completed accrual, with 168 pts randomized and 165 treated. Data are available for 164 pts and confirmed responses for 155 pts. Conclusions: Cetuximab combined with Cb and Pac in both dose schedules demonstrated activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in pts with NSCLC. Final PFS and overall survival data are pending. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

SAPPHIRE: A randomized phase II study of mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab versus 5-FU/LV + panitumumab after 6 cycles of frontline mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab in patients with colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 729-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Nakamura ◽  
Yoshinori Munemoto ◽  
Masazumi Takahashi ◽  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Hiroaki Kuroda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Term Administration ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

729 Background: FOLFOX therapy, an infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with leucovorin in combination with oxaliplatin (OXA), is a common first-line chemotherapy regimen for unresectable, advanced or recurrent colorectal carcinoma (CRC). However, long-term administration of OXA is associated with peripheral neuropathy (PN); decreasing treatment length of OXA may be beneficial without reducing its efficacy. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve pts aged ≥20 yrs with RAS wild-type advanced/recurrent CRC were enrolled to receive 6 cycles of panitumumab (Pmab) + mFOLFOX6 once every 2 wks. Pts who completed 6 cycles of Pmab + mFOLFOX6 and confirmed no progressive disease were subsequently randomized 1:1 to continue to receive Pmab + mFOLFOX6 (arm 1) or Pmab + 5-FU/LV (arm 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 9 mos after randomization. The threshold PFS rate was defined as 30%, and the expected rate was set at 50%, with a 90% power and a 1-sided alpha value of 0.10. In the primary analysis, a binomial test was conducted separately for each arm. This study was designed as a phase II randomized screening comparison study which does not use direct comparison for the primary analysis. Results: Of 164 enrolled pts who received initial Pmab + mFOLFOX6 treatment, 56 were randomized to arm 1 and 57 to arm 2. PFS rates at 9 mos after randomization were significantly higher than the defined threshold at 44.6% (80% CI, 36.4–53.2) in arm 1 and 47.4% (39.1–55.8) in arm 2. Median PFS after randomization was 9.1 (8.6–11.2) and 9.3 (6.0–13.0) mos, respectively. Grade ≥2 PNs occurred in 6 (10.7%) and 1 (1.8%) pts in arms 1 and 2, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 14 (25.0%) pts in arm 1 and in 9 (16.7%) pts in arm 2. Conclusions: The results of this trial suggest that Pmab + 5-FU/LV after 6 fixed-cycles of Pmab + mFOLFOX6 may be a treatment option in pts with RAS wild type chemotherapy-naïve advanced/recurrent CRC. Pts treated with Pmab + 5-FU/LV had a lower occurrence of grade ≥2 PNs compared with Pmab + mFOLFOX6. Clinical trial information: NCT02337946.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of second-line palliative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus raltitrexed and paclitaxel alone in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4054-4054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoying Zhao ◽  
Weijian Guo ◽  
Zhiyu Chen ◽  
Xiaowei Zhang ◽  
Xiaodong Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
P 75 ◽  
Grade 3

4054 Background: Paclitaxel is a microtubule stabilizing agent that has been the standard second line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. This study was designed to find out the clinical outcome of paclitaxel plus raltitrexed regimen as second line treatment in MGC patients. Methods: In an open, randomized, multi centers phase II clinical trial , 148 patients were randomly assigned and treated with either RP (raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 d1 and paclitaxel 135mg/m2 d1,3w) or P (paclitaxel 135mg/m2 d1,3w) as second-line palliative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is PFS, secondary endpoint is ORR, OS and safety. Results: In 148 randomly assigned and treated patients (RP = 73; P = 75), the majority of patients were males (94 vs. 54). Progression free survival has a tendency to be prolonged with RP versus P (2.7m vs. 1.7m, p = 0.148). Overall survival also has a tendency to be prolonged with RP versus P (10.2m vs. 6.1m, p = 0.140). Overall response rate was equal with RP versus P (6.8% vs.4.0%, p = 0.72). DCR in the RP group was 56.2%, P group was 36.0%. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36.2% (RP) v 28.2% (P) of patients. Frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicities for RP v P were: neutropenia (11.0% v 4.0%), anemia (1.4% v 4.0%), thrombocytopenia (1.4% v 5.3%), and all grade peripheral neurotoxicity (12.3% v 17.3%),all grade elevated aminotransferase (27.4% v 14.1%). Subgroup analysis shows if the disease combined with ascites or peritoneal involved , OS of RP regimen is more longer (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Second-line palliative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus raltitrexed provides a tendency to prolong PFS and OS, and the patients with ascites or peritoneal involved may get benifits from combined chemotherapy, which needs to be confirmed by larger sample studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02072317.

scholarly journals Treatment of Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer with Either Oxaliplatin, Gemcitabine, and Capecitabine or Cisplatin and Gemcitabine—A Randomized Phase II Trial

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1975
Author(s):  
Alice Markussen ◽  
Lars Henrik Jensen ◽  
Laura Vittrup Diness ◽  
Finn Ole Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

This study is an investigator-initiated randomized phase II trial focusing on the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer with either oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 in a two-week cycle with capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice-daily continuously or cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 in a three-week cycle. One-hundred patients were included. Forty-seven patients received oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, and capecitabine with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.7 months (95% CI 3.0–7.8) and a median overall survival (mOS) of 8.7 months (95% CI 6.5–11.2). Forty-nine patients received cisplatin and gemcitabine with a mPFS of 7.3 months (95% CI 6.0–8.7) and a mOS of 12.0 months (95% CI 8.3–16.7). This trial confirms a mOS of 12 months with cisplatin and gemcitabine, as found in earlier trials. With a superior tumor control rate of 79% vs. 60% (p = 0.045), a difference in the mPFS of 1.6 months (HR = 0.721, p = 0.1), and a difference in the mOS of 3.3 months (HR = 0.731, p = 0.1), cisplatin and gemcitabine should still be considered the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.

PARTNER: A randomized phase II study of docetaxel/cisplatin (doc/cis) chemotherapy with or without panitumumab (pmab) as first-line treatment (tx) for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6029-6029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Gabriela Kornek ◽  
Rita Axelrod ◽  
Douglas Adkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

6029 Background: PARTNER was a multicenter, randomized phase II estimation study evaluating 1stEline tx of R/M SCCHN with doc/cis ± pmab. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to doc/cis with pmab (Arm 1) or doc/cis alone (Arm 2). Arm 1 received 9 mg/kg pmab on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and all pts received 1stEline doc/cis both at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 for up to 6 cycles. In Arm 1, pts could receive pmab monotherapy upon completion of 6 cycles of doc/cis until disease progression (PD). In Arm 2, pts could receive pmab as 2ndEline monotherapy upon PD. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. HPV status was determined using p16 INK IHC. No formal hypothesis was tested. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. Of 103 pts, HPV status was evaluable in 66 (64%); 29% were HPV positive. Efficacy results are shown (Table). Worst grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were 73% in Arm 1 vs 56% in Arm 2. Conclusions: Median PFS was increased in both arms over historical doublet cytotoxic chemotherapy. PFS and ORR were higher in the pmab arm in the overall population, in the HPV positive (n=19) group, and in the HPV negative (n=47) group. There was an increase in grade 3/4 AEs with this regimen. The crossover design, with 57% of Arm 2 pts receiving pmab as 2ndEline monotherapy, confounds interpretation of OS. Clinical trial information: NCT00454779. [Table: see text]

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics associate with treatment response and radiological progression-free survival (rPFS): Analyses from a randomized phase II trial in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5508-5508
Author(s):  
Jane Goodall ◽  
Zoe June Assaf ◽  
Zhen Shi ◽  
George Seed ◽  
Liangxuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiological Progression ◽  
Cell Free Dna ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Free Dna ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

5508 Background: ctDNA can inform on prognosis, treatment response and survival. We evaluated ctDNA in serial plasma samples from patients enrolled in A.MARTIN (NCT01485861), a randomized phase II study of abiraterone with or without ipatasertib in patients with mCRPC. Methods: Blood was collected in cell-free DNA Streck tubes from 216 patients at 3 time points; baseline, C3D1 and end of treatment. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma using a Circulating DNA Kit (Qiagen) on a QIASymphony machine (Qiagen). 25ng of extracted cfDNA was used in library preparation, constructed with a custom designed, 58 gene, QIAseq Targeted DNA panel (Qiagen) enriched for PI3K/AR pathway genes. Samples were sequenced to mean depth of 3394x on a NextSeq500 machine. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses combine patients across the 3 study arms, and reported p-values are unadjusted. Results: Baseline (BL) ctDNA positivity correlated with radiological progression-free survival (rPFS; HR: 1.8 [95% CI 1.3-2.6], p < 0.01); this association with rPFS was maintained in a multivariate cox model with > 5 baseline clinical variables (HR: 1.6 [95% CI 1.1-2.4]; p = 0.011). Patients with a C3D1 reduction in ctDNA had superior rPFS compared to patients with a C3D1 increase in ctDNA (HR: 2 [95% CI 1.3-3.2], p < 0.01). The rate of ctDNA clearance at C3D1 was higher in the Ipatasertib 400mg arm compared to placebo (56.3% versus 24.4%, p < 0.01). We find that changes in ctDNA associated with best confirmed overall response (p = 0.024); CR patients had the greatest reduction in ctDNA (mean of -23.4%), followed by PR (-16.3%), then SD (-4.1%), and lastly PD patients (-1.3%). Changes in ctDNA levels correlated with SLD changes (rs = 0.289, p = 0.05), and also PSA changes (rs = 0.33, p < 0.01). Changes in ctDNA were associated with rPFS in a multivariate cox analysis that included PSA change (p < 0.01), as well as in a separate multivariate analysis that included SLD change (p < 0.01). Lastly, we explored CNVs and observed emerging resistance mutations in progression samples, including alterations in TP53, AR, FOXA, PTEN, and PI3K/AKT pathway genes. Conclusions: ctDNA analyses may help (i) identify poorer prognosis disease at baseline, (ii) inform on treatment response (CR/PR/SD/PD) and radiological progression free survival (rPFS) in on-treatment (C3D1) samples, and (iii) can elucidate emerging resistance mechanisms at disease progression. Clinical trial information: NCT01485861 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document