First-in-human administration of CEB-01, a novel drug delivery implant matrix, in patients with recurrent or locally advanced retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) after surgery: Preliminary safety and pharmacokinetics report.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11554-11554
Author(s):  
José Antonio Gonzalez ◽  
Ana Sebio ◽  
Paula Cerdà ◽  
Francesc Cano ◽  
José Antonio Tornero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Biodegradable Implant ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Local Surgery ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

11554 Background: RPS local recurrence after radical surgery (SX) is frequent and a major cause of death. Locally delivered CHT by a biocompatible and biodegradable implant matrix (CEB-01) loaded with SN-38 and placed in the surgical bed during SX may increase local control and survival in RPS patients with reduced systemic toxicity. Methods: This is a multicentre, open label, first-in-human phase 1 trial comprising a dose-escalation phase (3 cohorts with total SN-38 doses of 9, 18 and 36 mg respectively), followed by an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Recurrent or locally advanced RPS patients candidates for local surgery, with no option of systemic treatment, ECOG < 2, life expectancy > 6 months, and normal organ function are eligible. Primary objective is to determine RP2D, defined as the dose level at which less than 33% of patients present dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in a minimum of 6 at-risk patients during the first two weeks after SX. DLT is defined as any Grade ≥3 toxicity. Secondary objectives include safety, time to recurrence, biomarkers, pharmacokinetics (PK) and quality of life (QoL). Here we report preliminary safety, efficacy, and PK data for the initial patients enrolled. Results: First cohort of 9 mg SN-38 was completed in february 2021, with the inclusion of three patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, (grade 2-3) Patients were male, age 65 to 74, with ECOG of 0-1. Optimal SX were performed for recurrent/metastatic disease (2 patients) or locally advanced disease (1 patient) with complete (R0) and optimal (R1) outcomes. There were no surgical complications attributed to the SN-38 treatment. One patient suffered from grade 2 (Dindo Clavien classification) intestinal subocclusion due to SX complication resolved with medical treatment at day 5. Frequency and severity of adverse events (AE) was low. All the patients presented transitory abdominal discomfort and seroma. AEs consisted of one catheter infection and one hypomagnesemia, both grade 3. Only one treatment related AE (TRAE) consisting of alopecia grade 1 was reported. There were no DLTs observed during the first administrations of CEB-01 (9 mg SN38). SN38 and its glucuronidated SN-38 systemic levels were low, reaching a peak (Cmax) of 0.60 and 3.3 ng/mL at 2 and 6 hours respectively, and were detectable 27 days after CEB-01 implantation in the surgical bed, at 0.1 and 0.6 ng/mL respectively. Conclusions: CEB-01 biocompatible and resorbable implant matrix loaded with SN38 has proven to be safe upon first human administrations in RPS patients, with scarce low grade AEs and TRAE. Preliminary PK indicates low, prolonged, systemic SN-38 exposure as expected. Currently the second cohort of this trial is open for recruitment. Clinical trial information: NCT04619056.

A multicenter open-label phase 1 study evaluating the safety and tolerability of HMPL-306 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with IDH mutations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3159-TPS3159
Author(s):  
Filip Janku ◽  
John S. Kauh ◽  
Christopher Tucci ◽  
Zhao Yang ◽  
Marek K. Kania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Low Grade Glioma ◽  
Statistical Hypothesis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Idh Mutations

TPS3159 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a rate-limiting tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme with 3 isoforms. Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 result in gain-of-function activity that can cause tumor formation and/or progression and have been associated with various tumor types. Therefore, selective, single mutant IDH (mIDH) isotype inhibitors (mIDH1 or mIDH2) can lead to insufficient efficacy and the potential for tumor resistance. HMPL-306 is an innovative, small-molecule, orally available, highly selective, potent inhibitor of both mIDH1 and mIDH2. Clinical development of a compound that concurrently targets, inhibits, and suppresses multiple mIDHs could lead to significant and durable clinical benefit for patients (pts) with solid tumors harboring IDH mutations. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, dose escalation (Part 1) and dose expansion (Part 2) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of HMPL-306 in pts ≥18 years with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with any IDH mutations. HMPL-306 will be administered orally, once daily in a 28-day continuous dosing treatment cycle. The HMPL-306 dose will be escalated in Part 1 according to the modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design in 4 cohorts in approximately 15-20 pts: 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg. Eligible pts must have locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and PK. Approximately 95 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D in Part 2 to further characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and preliminary anti-tumor activities of HMPL-306. Part 2 will include 5 dose expansion cohorts: cholangiocarcinoma (n = 20), skeletal chondrosarcoma (n = 20), low-grade glioma (n = 20), perioperative low-grade glioma (n = 15), any other solid tumor harboring an IDH1/2 mutation (n = 20). All pts will continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or at the investigator’s discretion. Safety will be assessed based on reports of adverse events including clinical laboratory testing, vital signs, physical examinations, and electrocardiograms. All pts who receive any study treatment will be included in safety and efficacy analyses. Antitumor activity based on investigator-assessed overall response will be evaluated using descriptive analyses. Objective response rate will be calculated with 95% confidence interval using the Clopper-Pearson method. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to summarize the time-to-event data such as progression-free survival and duration of response. No statistical hypothesis testing is planned. Enrollment started February 2021.

Updated efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4525-4525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Terence W. Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Anticancer Therapy ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

4525 Background: Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy shows promising clinical activity in UC. We report a planned update of the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic UC from a multicenter, phase 1/2 open-label study. Methods: Pts received durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to 12 months (mo) or until unacceptable toxicity, progression, or starting another anticancer therapy. Primary endpoints were safety and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (RECIST v1.1). Duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Tumor PD-L1 expression was assessed by Ventana SP263 assay (PD-L1 high = ≥25% PD-L1 expression on tumor or immune cells). Results: As of Oct 24, 2016 (data cutoff [DCO]), 191 pts had received treatment. Median follow-up was 5.78 mo (range, 0.4–25.9). All pts had Stage 4 disease and 99.5% had prior anticancer therapy (95.3% post-platinum). As of DCO, ORR was 17.8% (34/191), including 7 CRs, with responses observed regardless of PD-L1 status (Table). Responses occurred early (median time to response, 1.41 mo) and were durable (median DoR not reached [NR]). Median PFS and OS were 1.5 mo (95% CI, 1.4, 1.9) and 18.2 mo (95% CI, 8.1, not estimable [NE]), respectively; the 1-year OS rate was 55.0% (95% CI, 43.9%, 64.7%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 6.8% of pts; grade 3/4 immune-mediated (im)AEs occurred in 4 pts; 2 pts discontinued due to imAEs (acute kidney injury and autoimmune hepatitis). Conclusions: Durvalumab 10 mg/kg Q2W shows favorable clinical activity and an excellent safety profile in locally advanced/metastatic UC pts. Table. Antitumor activity in UC pts, including second-line or greater (≥2L) post-platinum pts Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

Primary analysis of phase 2 results of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Robert Migden ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Anne Lynn S. Chang ◽  
Danny Rischin ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Grade 3

6015 Background: Cemiplimab (REGN2810) produced substantial antitumor activity with durable responses in Phase 1 CSCC expansion cohorts and Phase 2 metastatic (m) CSCC cohort. We now present the primary analysis of the Phase 2 laCSCC cohort (NCT02760498; data cutoff date: Oct 10, 2018). Methods: Pts with laCSCC received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumor measurements were performed Q8W. The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) according to independent central review (per RECIST 1.1 for scans; modified WHO criteria for photos). Results: 78 pts were enrolled (59 M/ 19 F; median age: 74 years; ECOG PS: 0 in 38 pts, 1 in 40 pts; primary CSCC site: head/neck in 79.5%; prior systemic therapy: 15.4%; prior radiotherapy: 55.1%). Median duration of follow-up was 9.3 months (range: 0.8–27.9). ORR by central review was 43.6% (95% CI: 32.4–55.3; 10 CRs and 24 PRs); investigator-assessed (INV) ORR was 52.6% (95% CI: 40.9–64.0; 13 CRs and 28 PRs). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached. The longest DOR at data cut-off was 24.2 months and was still ongoing. Durable disease control rate (stable disease or response for ≥16 weeks) was 62.8% (95% CI: 51.1–73.5). Median observed time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.8–8.8). Median progression-free and overall survival have not been reached. Tumor PD-L1 status is available for 48/78 pts, tumor mutational burden analysis (from targeted exome panel) is ongoing for ≥40/78 pts; response correlation analyses are planned. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; all grades, Grade ≥3) were fatigue (42.3%, 1.3%), diarrhea and pruritus (both 26.9%, 0%), and nausea (21.8%, 0%). INV grade ≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in 10.3% of pts. One pt died due to an unknown cause that was assessed as treatment-related. Conclusions: Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W showed substantial antitumor activity, durable responses, and acceptable safety profile in pts with laCSCC. These data strongly support the recent FDA approval of cemiplimab-rwlc for pts with mCSCC or laCSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

A phase I, open-label, multicenter, single-dose escalation and multi-dose study of a monoclonal antibody targeting CEACAM1 in subjects with selected advanced or recurrent malignancies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3094-3094
Author(s):  
Roni Shapira ◽  
Jeffrey S. Weber ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Mario Sznol ◽  
Harriet M. Kluger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Trial Testing ◽  
Dose Study ◽  
Cea Gene ◽  
Grade 3

3094 Background: The carcinomembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1, CD66a) is a member of the CEA gene family. CEACAM1 interacts homophilically and heterophilically with CEACAM5, and is involved in various anti-proliferative activities. CEACAM1 is expressed on a variety of epithelial and hematological cells, including multiple types of cancer and activated lymphocytes. High CEACAM1 expression in some tumor types is known to be associated with poor disease prognosis. Recently it was demonstrated CEACAM1 is co-expressed on exhausted lymphocytes with other immune checkpoints such as TIM-3 and may regulate downstream activity. CM24 is a novel humanized α-CEACAM1-specific antibody with nM affinity to the N terminal domain of CEACAM1, which blocks intercellular CEACAM1 interactions. Methods: The primary objective was to test the safety and tolerability of CM24 in adult patients with advanced or recurrent cancer. Secondary objectives included assessment of CM24 PK and PD profiles, anti-tumor response and the recommended Phase 2 dose. Patient received IV infusion of CM24 at 7 dose levels ranging between 0.01 and 10 mg/kg in a cycle of 4 doses administered q2wks followed by a 6-week observation only period and additional 6 cycles. Results: 27 patients (median pretreatment of 4 prior regimens; range 2-8, 11 colorectal, 7 melanoma, 4 ovarian, 3 gastric, 2 NSCLC; 13 males, 14 females, mean age of 60 years), were included. Treatment with CM-24 was overall well-tolerated without DLTs up to 10 mg/kg. The most frequent AE was grade 1-3 increased alanine aminotransferase (7 subjects) and the most severe AE was grade 3/4 increase in gamma-glutamyltransferase (4 subjects). Drug-related AEs were observed in 63% of the subjects with grade 3-5 occurred in 3.7%. Eight subjects (29.6%) had stable disease as the best overall response. Median overall survival was 4 (3.4, 8.0) and 6.2 (2.7, 10.2) months for the 3 and 10 mg/kg doses, suggesting dose response. Cmax, AUC and t1/2 increased with increasing dose with the longest t1/2 of 11.2 days obtained at 10mg/kg. The average target occupancy of CM24 at 3mg/kg and 10mg/kg were 75% and 93%, respectively. Conclusions: PK and target-mediated drug disposition analysis suggest that doses higher than 10mg/kg are needed for target saturation at a q2 week regimen while a q3 week regimen is less optimal. A phase 1/2 clinical trial testing CM24 in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with NSCLC including assessment of CEACAM1 expression is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02346955 .

Safety and clinical activity of durvalumab monotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4071-4071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
Dirk Jaeger ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Pugh Class ◽  
Grade 3

4071 Background: Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 mAb, has shown early and durable clinical activity with manageable safety in an ongoing Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label study in pts with advanced solid tumors. Interim analyses from the HCC cohort in the dose-expansion part of this study are reported here. Methods: Patients with HCC (Child-Pugh class A) received durvalumab 10 mg/kg i.v. q2w for 12 months or until confirmed progressive disease, whichever occurred first. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety profile; secondary objective was to assess the antitumor activity (investigator-assessed RECIST v1.1). Clinical activity was evaluated for the total HCC population and by viral status. Results: As of Oct 24 2016, 40 HCC pts with median 23.9 (range 2.4–34.7) weeks follow-up received durvalumab. 93% had prior sorafenib. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 80.0% of pts, most commonly fatigue (27.5%), pruritus (25.0%) and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (22.5%). Grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were reported in 20.0% of pts, most commonly elevated AST (7.5%) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (5.0%). 7 (17.5%) pts completed the initial 12-month treatment and 7 (17.5%) pts discontinued treatment because of an AE (none related to treatment). There were no deaths due to treatment-related AEs. Clinical activity is presented in the table. 4 pts achieved a PR; 2 were ongoing at data cut-off. Conclusions: Durvalumab had an acceptable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity and OS in pts with HCC, particularly HCV+ pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

Early safety from a phase 1, multicenter, open-label clinical trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injected into liver tumors.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 438-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Miklos Pless ◽  
Antonio Cubillo ◽  
Aitana Calvo ◽  
Steven Raman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

438 Background: T-VEC is a genetically modified HSV-1 oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in tumors, produce GM-CSF, and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses. This study evaluates the safety of intrahepatic injection (inj) of T-VEC in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (mets). Methods: The primary objective is to assess the maximum tolerated dose. Eligible pts were ≥ 18 years (y) old, had progressive HCC or breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), gastroesophageal cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell cancer with liver mets, with measurable liver tumors suitable for inj. This dose escalation study comprised 2 groups: A (non-HCC) and B (HCC). T-VEC was given initially at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by up to 4 mL of 107 PFU/mL (cohort 1) or 108 PFU/mL (cohort 2) every 21 (±3) days (Q21D), or up to 8 mL of the maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) Q21D (cohort 3). Inj volume was based on lesion size. Results: Results from cohorts 1 and 2 of group A are reported. 14 pts were treated; 12 (3 BC, 9 CRC) were DLT-evaluable: Median age was 65.5 y (range: 33, 73); median number of inj was 3; 1 pt received all 12 inj. MTC was 108 PFU/mL. There was 1 DLT, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/grade 2 bilirubin increase (inc), after 1 dose. In all treated pts, 4 (28.6%) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs): anemia and inc gamma-glutamyltransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and AST. There were 2 deaths attributable to disease. Incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) is shown (Table). Conclusions: The MTC was 108 PFU/mL Q21D after initial inj at 106 PFU/mL. Repeated intrahepatic inj of T-VEC at the FDA-approved concentration for intralesional inj of melanoma was deemed tolerable and feasible in pts with liver mets. Additional investigation in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02509507. [Table: see text]

Final report: A phase I trial of BYL719 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Heloisa P. Soares ◽  
Taymeyah E. Al-Toubah ◽  
Richard D. Kim ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Neron K Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Grade 3

398 Background: The PI3K/mTOR pathway has emerged as a potential target for anticancer therapy. Considerable evidence suggests that targeting a single isoform of PI3K (p110α) would have sufficient antitumor activity and improved therapeutic window. Further, PI3KCA mutations, gene encoding isoform p110α, are described in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). BYL719 is an oral class I α-specific PI3K inhibitor that showed preclinical anti-tumor activity. The first in human phase 1 trial of BYL719 defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at 400mg QD. Methods: This was a phase I, single center study (standard 3+3 design). The primary objective was to determine the MTD of BYL719 in combination with gemcitabine (G) and nab-paclitaxel (nabP) as frontline therapy in locally advanced or metastatic PAC. BYL719 was given orally daily (Table). Patients (pts) were restaged q2 cycles. The study was closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled (median age was 58 years). Three pts each participated in cohorts 1 and 2. Nine pts were enrolled in cohort 3, but 4 were replaced (3 pts withdrew consent prior to evaluation and 1 missed > 10 days of treatment). One pt in cohort 3 had DLT related to grade 3 nausea and vomiting. A total of 19 grade 3 and 4 adverse events were records as probably or possibly associated with BYL719. The most common ones were hyperglycemia, anemia, and neutrophil count decreased. One pt developed Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) during cycle 7. Although we could not completely exclude BYL719 as a cause, PRES was attributed to G. One pt had sudden death during cycle 4 that was attributed to progression. Only 8 pts were evaluable for response. Two had stable disease, 5 had partial responses and 1 had progression. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.36 months (1.6 to 10 months) and 8.74 months (3.8 to 21.2 months) respectively. Conclusions: The combination of full doses of G + nabP and BYL719 can be safely administered up to BYL dose of 250 mg/day. Clinical trial information: NCT02155088. [Table: see text]

Early results of TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 2: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in platinum-ineligible patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progressed after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5027-5027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Rohit K. Jain ◽  
Manojkumar Bupathi ◽  
Arjun Vasant Balar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
First Line ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Grade 3

5027 Background: SG is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a humanized monoclonal anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic agent, SN-38, via a unique hydrolyzable linker. The epithelial cell surface antigen, Trop-2, demonstrates greater expression between UC vs normal tissue, and is a promising target. In a phase 1/2 basket study (IMMU-132-01), SG showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 31% and manageable toxicity in 45 pts with mUC who had a median of 2 (range 1–6) prior therapy lines (Tagawa 2019 ASCO GU). Recent interim results for cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study in 35 pts with mUC who progressed on platinum and CPI therapy demonstrated an ORR of 29% in pts with a median of 3 prior treatment lines (range 2–6) (Tagawa 2019 ESMO). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AE (TRAE) was neutropenia. Methods: TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a global, open-label, phase 2 trial evaluating the antitumor activity of SG (10 mg/kg, days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles) in pts with advanced UC with measurable disease and ECOG PS 0 or 1. Cohort 2 includes platinum-ineligible pts who progressed after CPI therapy in the first-line metastatic setting. The primary objective is ORR evaluated with RECISTv1.1 by central review. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, overall survival, and duration of response. Results: 18 pts with baseline tumor assessment (50% male; median age 79 y [range 57–87], 67% visceral metastases; 28% liver metastases) received a median of 2 (range 1–5) prior therapies. At a median follow-up of 6 months, ORR was 28% (5/18) with 4 confirmed PRs, and 1 PR pending confirmation. The majority of pts (61% [11/18]) had target lesion reduction. The safety profile was consistent with prior reports. Key grade ≥3 TRAEs were neutropenia (39%), fatigue (33%), diarrhea (28%), leukopenia (22%), anemia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (11%). No events of interstitial lung disease, ocular toxicities, or grade > 2 neuropathy were reported. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: In cisplatin-ineligible pts, the ORR for currently approved first-line CPI treatments is ~23–29% (Balar 2017 Lancet; Vuky 2018 ASCO). These preliminary data with SG show a manageable safety profile with an encouraging ORR of 28% and support the development of SG in platinum-ineligible pts with mUC who have progressed after CPI therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973 .

A phase 1/2 study of intratumoral INT230-6 alone (IT-01) or in combination with pembrolizumab [KEYNOTE-A10] in adult subjects with locally advanced, unresectable and metastatic solid tumors refractory to therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2592-2592
Author(s):  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Jacob Stephen Thomas ◽  
Anthony J. Olszanski ◽  
Nilofer Saba Azad ◽  
Giles Francis Whalen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Sites

2592 Background: Study IT-01 (KEYNOTE-A10) evaluates INT230-6, a novel formulation of cisplatin (CIS) and vinblastine (VIN) with an amphiphilic cell penetration enhancer designed for intratumoral (IT) administration, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab (PEM), an antibody to PD-1. INT230-6 dosing is set by a tumor’s volume. In preclinical studies, INT230-6 increases drug dispersion throughout the tumor, allows drug diffusion into cancer cells and recruits dendritic, CD4 and CD8 T cells. The addition of PEM has been shown to improve these responses in models. Phase 1 data indicated INT230-6 alone induced tumor regression in both injected and non-injected lesions. Considering the large volume of drug injected and retained in the tumor, coupled with immune infiltration on biopsies, RECIST response methodology may not capture the benefit of INT230-6 treatment. Methods: IT-01 is an open-label phase 1/2 study, currently enrolling adult subjects with solid tumors in phase 2. INT230-6 was administered IT Q2W for 5 doses alone or with PEM 200mg Q3W. The study seeks to assess the safety and efficacy of IT INT230-6 alone and in combination with PEM. Results: 67 subjects have been enrolled (58 mono and 12 INT230-6 + PEM (3 started in mono, then received combo)) having a median of 3 prior therapies (0, 10). Median age was 60 (42, 85). 20+ cancer types were accrued; breast cancer and sarcoma were the most frequent. Over 500 image guided INT230-6 IT injections were given (253 to deep tumors) at doses of 0.3 to 172mL (86 mg CIS, 17.2 mg VIN) in a single session, which are higher amounts than typical IV doses. PK shows that 95% of INT230-6 active agents remain in the tumor. The most common (> 20%) related TEAEs for INT230-6 alone were localized pain (57%), nausea (36%), fatigue (29%) and vomiting (24%); with grade 3 TEAEs (> 1) of localized pain (5%) and anemia (3%). The safety in the combination was similar. There were no related grade 4 or 5 TEAEs. In evaluable monotherapy subjects (n = 43), the disease control rate (DCR) was 65% vs. 100% in PEM subjects (n = 5). Given the range of dose and entering tumor burden, an exploratory analysis of dose relative to tumor burden (TB) showed that subjects receiving a dose of INT230-6 < 50% of their reported TB (n = 30) had a mOS of 3.5 months. While in subjects receiving a dose of INT230-6 to ≥50% of TB (n = 37), mOS has not yet been reached after a median follow up of 9.5 months (HR: 0.26 (0.13,0.51)). Conclusions: INT230-6 is well tolerated when administered IT as monotherapy and combined with PEM. Given the challenge in assessing overall response rate following IT delivery, an exploratory analysis suggests prolonged survival for subjects receiving an INT230-6 dose ≥50% of their tumor burden compares favorably to the < 50% group and to literature accounting for prognostic factors (ECOG, LDH, # of metastatic sites). Clinical trial information: 03058289.

349 Early safety and efficacy of a phase 1/2 open-label, multi-center trial of SNS-301 added to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A375-A375
Author(s):  
Alain Algazi ◽  
William Smith ◽  
Timothy Panella ◽  
Dong Shin ◽  
Marie-Louise Fjaellskog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundEfficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy is attributed to the presence of infiltrating antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells. Despite the success of anti-PD-1 therapy, many patients with SCCHN present with immune desert or immune excluded tumors and only 13–18% of patients achieve tumor reductions. Given this low response rate, it is imperative to combine agents that generate or expand anti-tumor T cells, such as vaccines, with anti-PD-1 therapies. SNS-301 is a first-in-class, bacteriophage-based immune activating agent targeting human aspartate β-hydroxylase (ASPH), a tumor associated antigen overexpressed in multiple tumor types. SNS-301 is a self-adjuvanted vaccine consisting of λ-bacteriophage engineered to express an immunogenic fragment of ASPH fused to the phage gpD coat protein, previously shown to be well tolerated and generate an immune response (Phase 1, NCT03120832). The objectives of this trial are to evaluate safety, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of SNS-301 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients that did not achieve tumor reductions on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy alone.MethodsThe study consists of an initial safety-run-in followed by a two-stage design. SNS-301 is delivered intradermally in addition to pembrolizumab in up to 30 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic/recurrent SCCHN. Patients must have actively received anti-PD-1 therapy for ≥12 weeks, with a best response of stable disease (SD) or unconfirmed progressive disease (PD) per iRECIST. Patients provide pre, on-treatment and biopsies at PD (optional) to characterize the tumor microenvironment using NanostringTM, multiplex immunohistochemistry, and correlate with clinical outcomes. Blood samples are collected to evaluate T cell responses using flow cytometry, ELISA, ELISPOT.ResultsAs of July 23, 2020, 9 patients were enrolled. Median duration of ongoing anti-PD therapy was 37 weeks (range 20–101). The combination was well-tolerated with no DLTs and mostly Grade 1–2 unrelated adverse events. Two Grade 3 events were reported: hypertension (not related) and dehydration (related), the later reported as serious adverse event. Of seven patients eligible for efficacy analysis, one patient with PD-L1 negative disease had a partial response with a reduction of 29% at week 6 with deepening of the response to 43% at week 12 and one patient with progressive disease at study entry had stabilization of disease at week 6 and 12. Another two patients had stable disease for 30+ weeks and three patients had PD. Additional efficacy and immunological analyses are ongoing.ConclusionsEarly data show that the combination of SNS-301 and pembrolizumab has manageable toxicity and capacity to achieve long-term disease stability and objective tumor responses.Trial RegistrationNCT04034225Ethics ApprovalThis study has been approved by WIRB (20190628) as well as several institutional IRBs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document