Phase II study of preoperative (PREOP) chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) plus avelumab (AVE) in patients (PTS) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): The AVANA study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3511-3511
Author(s):  
Lisa Salvatore ◽  
Maria Bensi ◽  
Salvatore Corallo ◽  
Francesca Bergamo ◽  
Ilaria Pellegrini ◽  
...  

3511 Background: Preop CTRT is considered the standard of care in the management of LARC. RT can induce antigen release from a low neoantigen-burden tumor (such as a mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer) and activate dendritic cells leading to a CD8+ T lymphocyte-mediated anticancer immune response. In LARC patients, neoadjuvant CTRT increases PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, strongly suggesting a neoadjuvant combinatory strategy with RT and PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade. Based on such considerations, we have designed the AVANA study to investigate the role of Ave in combination with preop CTRT in LARC. Methods: This is an Italian multi-center, phase II study. Pts with resectable LARC, defined by the presence of at least one of the following features: cN+, cT4, high risk cT3, received standard preop CTRT (capecitabine 825 mg/sqm/bid 5 days/week+ 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) plus 6 cycles of Ave 10 mg/Kg every 2 weeks. Surgery with total mesorectal excision was performed at 8-10 weeks after the end of CTRT. The primary end-point was the pCR rate, defined as complete histological regression with no available tumor cells ypT0N0. Secondary end-points were R0 resection rate, tumor downstaging, local recurrence, sphincter preservation rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety profile, and the evaluation of exploratory predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Assuming as null hypothesis p0 a pCR rate of 15%, a significance level of 5% (one-side), and a power of 80%, a sample size of 101 pts was needed to detect an absolute increment of 10% in pCR rate (from 15% to 25%). The experimental regimen is considered for further studies if, in at least 22 pts, we observe a pCR. Results: From April 2019 to November 2020, a total of 101 resectable LARC pts were enrolled in 10 Italian Centers. The median age was 63 years (23-82), 62 (61.4%) pts were male, 93 (92%) had ECOG PS 0. At baseline, 94 (93%) and 16 (16%) pts had cN+ and cT4 LARC, respectively. All pts completed the induction phase. Out of 96 pts evaluable for pathological response, 22 (23%) pts achieved a pCR and 59 (61.5%) pts a major pathological response (a central review is ongoing). At this time, microsatellite status is available only in 39 pts, of which only one was instable. The rate of grade 3-4 non-immune and immune-related adverse events was 8% and 4%, respectively. Avelumab was early interrupted in 9 pts out 101, mainly due to toxicity. Conclusions: The combination of preop CTRT plus Ave showed a promising activity and a feasible safety profile. According to our statistical considerations, the experimental regimen will be considered for further studies. Updated results will be presented during the Congress. Sponsored by GONO and partially supported by Merck. EUDRACT 2017-003582-10. Clinical trial information: NCT03854799.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Martinez Villacampa ◽  
C. Santos ◽  
M. García ◽  
V. Navarro ◽  
A. Teule ◽  
...  

516 Background: Bevacizumab into chemoradiotherapy appears safe and active in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).This study evaluates whether the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in the preoperative treatment of LARC improves pathological complete response rate (pCR). Methods: Open-label, unicentric, phase II study in patients with resectable LARC (stage II or III), with or without nodal involvement and no evidence of distant metastases. Treatment schedule of 4-cycles: bevacizumab administered iv on day 1 (10 mg/kg in the first cycle and 5 mg/kg in the following 3 cycles) and capecitabine (900mg/m2/bid) in the 2nd cycle (5 d/wk) concomitantly with radiotherapy 45Gy (25 fractions of 1.8Gy/day) over 5 weeks. Surgical resection was scheduled 6-8 weeks after therapy completion. Preliminary results from ITT analysis are presented. Results: Of the 43 patients included, 41 comprised ITT population. Baseline characteristics: median age 63 (55-67) years; male 76%; ECOG 0/1 49%/51%; stage T3/N1 80.5%/58.5%; nodal metastases 85%. 39 patients underwent surgery, 9 abdominoperineal and 30 anterior resection. No evidence of metastasis after surgery in 97%. Total mesorectal excision was performed in 69% of patients and 85% underwent R0 resection. Sphincter-preservation was achieved in 79.5%. Downstaging occurred in 82%. Among 39 patients evaluable for pathological response, 7.7% experienced pCR, 69.2% partial response and 20.5% stable disease. Grade 3/4 toxicities: 9.8% lymphopenia (all related to capecitabine and 4.9% to bevacizumab), 2.4% neutropenia (capecitabine-related), 2.4% radiodermatitis (related to RT and capecitabine) and 2.4% vasospastic angina (bevacizumab and capecitabine-related). 13 patients had postoperative complications not treatment-related. The most common were wound infection (6), intra-abdominal collection (3), wound dehiscence (2) and paralytic ileus (2). Conclusions: Preoperative regimen with bevacizumab, capecitabine and RT is active for LARC with promising results of R0 resection, sphincter- preservation and tumour downstaging as well as manageable toxicity. Further studies are ongoing to confirm these data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norifumi Hattori ◽  
Goro Nakayama ◽  
Keisuke Uehara ◽  
Toshisada Aiba ◽  
Kiyoshi Ishigure ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective This multicenter, single-arm phase II study (UMIN000008429) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods Patients with resectable clinical Stage II or III rectal cancer were enrolled to receive eight cycles of CapOX therapy (130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 and 2000 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 1–14, every 3 weeks) after curative surgical resection. The primary endpoint was 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, treatment compliance, and safety. Results A total of 40 patients (Stage II, 21; Stage III, 19) were enrolled between September 2012 and November 2015 from seven institutions. Thirty-nine patients (97%) received R0 resection, and 32 patients (84%) received postoperative CapOX therapy. The completion rate of all eight cycles of CapOX therapy was 66%. Relative dose intensities were 87% for oxaliplatin and 84% for capecitabine. At a median follow-up period of 46 months, disease recurrence was observed in nine patients, including three with local recurrence. Three-year RFS and OS rates were 75% (95% CI 57–86%) and 96% (95% CI 80–99%), respectively. Frequencies of Grade ≥ 3 hematological and non-hematologic adverse events were 19% and 38%, respectively. Conclusion CapOX therapy is feasible as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13507-13507 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Alberti ◽  
F. Tomei ◽  
E. Miele ◽  
N. Pizzardi ◽  
S. Ramponi ◽  
...  

13507 Background: Combined pre-operative RT and CT increase the possibility for conservative surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. Most clinical trials show that responding patients could obtain a reduction of local relapse and an improvement of overall survival, especially when a complete pathological response is obtained (pCR 9–29%). The aim of our study was to determine the activity of RT concomitant to oxaliplatin (OHP) in combination with c.i. 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Methods: Primary endpoint was pCR. Sample size was defined according to Simon Two-Stage phase II design (planned sample size: 29 evaluable patients). From May 2002 to November 2005, 33 patients (15 males, 18 females) were enrolled: median age was 64 years (range 21–74); clinical stage was cT3/cT4 cN0 or cTany cN+ M0. In 24 patients rectal cancer was ≤ 5 cm from anal verge. Weekly OHP 60 mg/m2 was administered in combination with c.i. 5FU 225 mg/ m2 for 5 days per week. Twelve patients received conventional RT (CRT): 25 fractions with 1.8 Gy, total dose 50.4 Gy on the pelvis and a boost on tumor bed with 3 fractions of 1.8 Gy. 21 patients received hyperfractionated RT (HRT): 1.2 Gy b.i.d. for 5 days per week for 4 weeks and a concomitant boost on tumor bed with daily 3 Gy (total dose 54–56 Gy on tumor bed, 48–50 Gy on the pelvis). Patients underwent surgery after 6–8 weeks from the end of treatment. Results: All patients were evaluable for pathological response. Sphincter preservation was obtained in 30 patients (=90.9%), a clinical down-staging in 30 patients (=90.9%). Overall, 12 patients (=36.4%) experienced a pCR: 9 of 21 patients (=42.8%) who received HRT obtained a pCR; 3 of 12 patients (=25%) who received CRT showed a pCR. Treatment was well tolerated. No G3–4 toxicity was observed. Conclusions: The results of our study are promising in terms of sphincter preservation, clinical down-staging and pCR. Moreover in this trial patients who received HRT obtained an encouraging outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4142-TPS4142
Author(s):  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Claudia Pauligk ◽  
Ralf Hofheinz ◽  
Sylvie Lorenzen ◽  
Andreas Wicki ◽  
...  

TPS4142 Background: Perioperative FLOT chemotherapy has become a standard of care for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the GEJ. However, patient outcomes are still unsatisfactory and 5-year survival in T3-4 or nodal positive disease is still around 50%. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has proven active in different cancers, including esophagogastric cancer, and was associated with response rates in the 10-15% range in unselected, heavily pre-treated gastric cancer patients. Atezolizumab is a PD-L1 inhibitor with established efficacy and tolerability profiles. This study evaluates atezolizumab in the perioperative treatment of locally advanced, potentially resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma in combination with FLOT. Methods: This is a large, multinational, prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, open label phase II trial. Patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach and GEJ (≥cT2 and/or N-positive) without distant metastases are enrolled. Eligibility status is centrally evaluated. Patients are randomized 1:1 to 4 pre-operative 2-week cycles (8 weeks) of FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m²; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 200 mg/m²; 5-FU 2600 mg/m²) followed by surgery and 4 additional cycles of FLOT plus atezolizumab at 840 mg every 2 weeks, followed by a total of 8 additional cycles of atezolizumab at 1200 mg every 3 weeks as monotherapy (arm A) or FLOT alone (arm B). Primary endpoint is time to disease progression or relapse after surgery (PFS/DFS) as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier-Method. The statistical design is based on a target HR of 0.68, a power of 0.8, and a significance level of p< 0.05 (1-sided log rank test). A total of 295 patients will be randomized. Main secondary endpoints are rates of centrally assessed pathological regression (rates of complete and nearly complete pathological regression), overall survival, R0 resection, and safety. Recruitment started in Sept 2018; by February 2019, a total of 27 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03421288.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4114-4114
Author(s):  
Sook Ryun Park ◽  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Hyeong-Seok Lim ◽  
Jun Ho Lee ◽  
...  

4114 Background: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative S-1 + docetaxel (DS) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), and to investigate the association between CYP2A6 genotypes and treatment outcomes. Methods: Eligibility criteria included 18-70 yrs, PS 0-1, measurable lesion(s), and LAGC (clinical stage III-IV (M0) by Japanese staging system). Pts were given each 3 cycles of pre- and post-operative chemotherapy (S-1 40 mg/m2 bid on D1-14, docetaxel 35 mg/m2iv on D1, 8 q 3 wks), and underwent surgery (≥D2). Results: From Oct 2006 to June 2008, 44 pts entered into the study, and 43 pts were eligible. Median age=53 yrs (range, 33-69); PS 0/1=2/41; M/F=29/14; and stage IIIA/IIIB/IV (M0)=20/18/5. All 43 eligible pts completed preoperative DS and 40 pts (93%) completed postoperative DS. The most common G3/4 toxicities during pre- and post-operative DS were neutropenia (28% vs. 65%), stomatitis (19% vs. 5%), and abdominal pain (5% vs. 18%). The clinical response rate was 74.4% (95% CI, 61.4-87.4%) with 1 CR (2.3%) and 31 (72.1%) PRs. R0 resection rate was 97.7%, major pathologic response rate was 48.8% with 1 CR, and pathologic stage was 0/1/2/3/4 (%) = 2.3/44.2/20.9/20.9/11.6. With a median follow-up of 66.6 months, 3-yr PFS and 5-yr OS was 62.8% and 69.6%, respectively. Survival differed according to clinical response, clinical downstaging, and CYP2A6 genotypes (Table). Pts with two CYP2A6 variant alleles (V/V) had higher Cmax (27.7±4.6 vs. 20.3±1.2; p=0.045) and AUCinf (220.4±43.1 vs. 172.5±12.5; p=0.187) of tegafur, and lower Cmax (1.4±0.2 vs. 1.8±0.1; p=0.178) and AUCinf (8.4±1.2 vs. 9.7±0.5; p=0.308) of 5-FU than those with no or one variant allele (W/W or W/V). Conclusions: DS is active with a manageable toxicity profile in the perioperative setting in pts with LAGC. CYP2A6 genotype may be predictive of efficacy (S-1 and docetaxel was provided by JEIL Pharm. Co., Ltd. and sanofi-aventis Korea Co., Ltd., respectively). Clinical trial information: NCT00587145. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15164-e15164
Author(s):  
Yoon Ho Ko ◽  
Sook Hee Hong ◽  
Sang Young Roh ◽  
Kyo Young Song ◽  
Eun Sun Jung ◽  
...  

e15164 Background: Unresectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma (AGC) of the stomach is associated with poor prognosis due to the lack of effective treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has drawn more attention to the treatment of locally AGC in the current multidisciplinary treatment model. Paclitaxel and capecitabine (PX) has been used in palliative setting with good response rates but its role in a neoadjuvant setting is not well established. This phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PX chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally AGC. Methods: Patients with AGC, clinically unresectable because of local invasion and/ or conglomerated regional lymph nodes (station 7, 8, and 9) metastasis on based on laparoscopic staging, were enrolled. PX consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and capecitabine 835 mg/m2 twice daily p.o. on days 1–14 every 21 days. After three cycles of NAC, patients with clinically resectable AGC underwent surgical resection. Results: This trial was stopped for poor accrual after 18 patients were enrolled; 50% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach. Seventeen patients finished three cycles of chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 41.2% (7/17 cases), of which 71.4% (10/14 cases) metabolic response. Fourteen (77.8%) of the 18 patients enrolled underwent surgery, and 12 (85.7%) had an R0 resection. Pathological complete response was observed in one (7.1%) of patients. Toxicity was mild to moderate and there were no treatment-related deaths and no major surgical complications. With a median follow-up of 28.6 months (range 6.4-38.4 months), the 2-year survival rate for all patients was 71.1%. Subgroup analysis found R0 resection (35.7 months vs. 20.6 months, P= 0.005) and patients with pathologic N downstaging (P < 0.001) to have improved overall survival. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PX shows promising results in unresectable locally AGC patients without increased morbidity and mortality. Neoadjuvant PX may permit a larger chance of curative resection in unresectable locally AGC patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Fan Yun ◽  
Xinming Zhou ◽  
Youhua Jiang ◽  
Qixun Chen ◽  
Zhiyu Huang ◽  
...  

122 Background: This phase II study was aimed to define the pathological response rate and safety of combining weekly nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pts with locally advanced esophageal SCC. Methods: Pts with resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal SCC staged by EUS, CT and/or PET-CTscan. All pts received nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, d1, d8, d22 and d29) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2, d1 and d22) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by esophagectomy.Postoperation: 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with same regimen was given in 4-6 weeks after the resection.The primary endpoint was pathological response rate. The second endpoints included R0 resection rate,down-staging rate, 3 years overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: From 01/2011 to 10/2012, 35 pts were enrolled. 31 male:4 females; IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IIIC in 3 (8.6%), 5 (14.3%),10 (28.6%), 8 (22.9%) and 9 (25.7%) pts. 30/35 pts went to surgery (85.7%). 30 had R0 resection (100%). Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 4 pts (13.3%). Near pCR (microfoci of tumor cells on the primary tumor without lymph nodal metastases) in 2 pt (6.7%). Down-staging was observed in 19 of 30 patiens (63.3%). 5 pts did not going to surgery: 2 for progressive disease, 3 for refused. 24/30 pts (80.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 7 pts (23.3%) received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Grade 3/4 toxicities in 35 evaluable pts during chemotherapy were as follow: neutropenia (11.4%), anemia (8.6%), thrombocytopenia (5.7%), nausea/vomiting (14.3%), neutropenia fever (8.6%), asthenia (20.0%). Surgical complications: 1 anastomotic leaks (3.3%). No treatment-related death. At a median follow up of 12 months (8~20mos), 29 pts were all disease-free survival. Conclusions: In pts with locally advanced esophageal SCC, weekly nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved a high pathological response rate and R0 resection rate. The toxicity was well tolerated. Evaluation of nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin in randomized trials was warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01258192.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS461-TPS461
Author(s):  
Nataliya Volodymyrivna Uboha ◽  
Jens C. Eickhoff ◽  
Chandrikha Chandrasekharan ◽  
Shadia Ibrahim Jalal ◽  
Al Bowen Benson ◽  
...  

TPS461 Background: Metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has poor prognosis. Overall survival (OS) remains around 12 months (mo) with current therapies. Pembrolizumab is approved for advanced GEA that has progressed on at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. However, the majority of patients progress on this treatment, and less than 15% of patients experience objective response (OR). This study will evaluate efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, abemaciclib, in patients with advanced GEA. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that CDK4/6 inhibitors can increase anti-tumor immunity and can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we hypothesize that abemaciclib will augment response to pembrolizumab in GEA. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, single arm, open label, phase II study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced GEA who have progressed or were intolerant to at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or with microsattelite unstable tumors will be excluded. Treatments will be given on a 21 day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Pembrolizumab, 200 mg intravenously, will be given on day 1, and abemaciclib, 150 mg, will be taken orally twice a day on days 1-21. Primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include PFS rate at 6 mo, disease control rate, OS and OR rate. Correlative endpoints will examine relationship between PDL1 status, genomic signature and treatment response. Saliva samples will be collected for microbiome analysis. Archival tumor tissue and blood samples will be banked for future studies. A total of 31 evaluable subjects will be enrolled to detect an anticipated increase in the median PFS from 2 months (null hypothesis) to 4 months with 80% power at the one-sided 0.05 significance level. The trial is open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03997448.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 3098-3104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Rödel ◽  
Gerhard. G. Grabenbauer ◽  
Thomas Papadopoulos ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX-RT) in patients with rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) or low-lying rectal cancer received preoperative RT (total dose, 50.4 Gy). Capecitabine was administered concurrently at 825 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35, with oxaliplatin starting at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 with planned escalation steps of 10 mg/m2. End points of the phase II study included downstaging, histopathologic tumor regression, resectability of T4 disease, and sphincter preservation in patients with low-lying tumors. Results: Dose-limiting grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in two of six patients treated with 60 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin. Thus, 50 mg/m2 was the recommended dose for the phase II study. Toxicities observed at this dose level were generally mild, with only two cases of short-lived grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression, mainly leukopenia, was restricted to grade 2 in 19% of patients. T-category downstaging was achieved in 17 (55%) of 31 operated patients, and 68% of patients had negative lymph nodes. Pathologic complete response was found in 19% of the resected specimens. Radical surgery with free margins could be performed in 79% of patients with T4 disease, and 36% of patients with tumors ≤ 2 cm from the dentate line had sphincter-saving surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative XELOX-RT is a feasible and well tolerated treatment. This regimen is proposed for phase III evaluation comparing standard fluorouracil-based therapy with XELOX chemoradiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document