Subgroup analysis of rucaparib versus chemotherapy as treatment for BRCA-mutated, advanced, relapsed ovarian carcinoma: Effect of platinum sensitivity in the randomized, phase 3 study ARIEL4.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517
Author(s):  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
Alla Sergeevna Lisyanskaya ◽  
Alexander A. Fedenko ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
Andreia Cristina de Melo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitivity ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

5517 Background: In ARIEL4 (NCT02855944), rucaparib significantly improved the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced, relapsed ovarian carcinoma (OC) harboring a deleterious BRCA1/2 (BRCA) mutation (median PFS 7.4 [95% CI 7.3–9.1] vs 5.7 [5.5–7.3] months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.64 [95% CI 0.49–0.84]; P=0.001). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated the effect of platinum sensitivity on the efficacy of rucaparib vs CT in ARIEL4. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or CT and stratified based on progression-free interval (≥1 to <6 months = platinum resistant; ≥6 to <12 months = partially platinum sensitive; ≥12 months = fully platinum sensitive). In the CT group, patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive disease received weekly paclitaxel 60–80 mg/m2; patients with fully platinum-sensitive disease received investigator’s choice of platinum-based CT (single-agent carboplatin or cisplatin, or platinum doublet). Patients could crossover from CT to rucaparib following radiologic disease progression. Efficacy endpoints were explored in patients with a confirmed BRCA mutation (patients with a reversion mutation were excluded), based on the randomization strata of platinum sensitivity. Results: The visit cutoff date was September 30, 2020. PFS and objective response rates (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 for rucaparib vs CT across subgroups are presented in the Table. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the rucaparib group were anemia/decreased hemoglobin (platinum-resistant patients: rucaparib 47% vs CT 40%; partially platinum-sensitive patients: 63% vs 27%; fully platinum-sensitive patients: 58% vs 20%) and nausea (52% vs 21%; 51% vs 23%; 60% vs 68%). In the intent-to-treat population, 74/116 (64%) patients in the CT group crossed over to receive rucaparib: 39/59 (66%) with platinum-resistant, 25/31 (81%) with partially platinum-sensitive, and 10/26 (38%) with fully platinum-sensitive disease. Conclusions: Results from this exploratory subgroup analysis suggest that rucaparib is a reasonable treatment option for heavily pretreated patients across all platinum sensitivity subgroups. Safety was consistent with prior rucaparib studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02855944. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in elderly patients with heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17552-e17552
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Sanchez-Bayona ◽  
Pablo Tolosa ◽  
Ana Sanchez de Torre ◽  
Alicia Castelo ◽  
Elsa Bernal-Hertfelder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Serous Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

e17552 Background: In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treatment, single-agent paclitaxel can be used alone or in combination with bevacizumab. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of a weekly paclitaxel (WP) scheme in heavily pretreated platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 adult patients with platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma treated with WP at our institution between 2015 and 2020. Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary carcinoma of the peritoneum who had received at least 3 doses of WP (80 mg/m2) alone or in combination with bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity were included in the analysis. Progression-free survival was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Information about toxicity was gathered from medical reports and lab tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test were performed for survival estimates. Results: In our sample, the median age was 68 years (IQR: 60-75) and the median number of previous lines of systemic treatment was 3 (range 1-5). 40% of patients received WP in combination with bevacizumab. The disease control rate was 60.7% (42.9% partial response and 17.8% stable disease). In the overall analysis, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.0-7.1 months). The presence of ascites significantly shortened the mPFS compared to patients without it (1.1 vs 5.1 months, p < 0.001). Even though the addition of bevacizumab to WP improved the mPFS, the difference was not statistically significant compared to WP alone (7.1 vs 4.06 months, p=0.30). Peripheral neuropathy was the most common adverse event (78% all grades, 18% grade 3). No grade 3 hematologic toxicity was registered. Treatment was discontinued in 6 patients (20%) – 4 due to peripheral neuropathy and two because of toxicoderma. Conclusions: In our sample, WP was an active and safe regimen in heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. WP was well tolerated in elderly patients. The presence of ascites was associated to a shorter PFS in patients treated with WP compared to ascites-free patients.

The combination of intravenous bevacizumab and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5039-5039
Author(s):  
Emma L. Barber ◽  
Nikki Lynn Neubauer ◽  
Emese Zsiros ◽  
Julian C. Schink
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant

5039 Background: This study was undertaken to determine the progression free survival and overall survival in heavily pre-treated patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma treated with bevacizumab and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed for all patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinomas treated with intravenous bevacizumab 10mg/kg every 14 days and oral cyclophosphamide 50mg daily between January 2006 and December 2010. Response to treatment was determined by change in disease status according to RECIST criteria and/or CA-125 levels. Results: Sixty-six eligible patients were identified with a median age of 58 years. Fifty-five patients (83%) originally had optimal cytoreduction and all were platinum resistant. Median time from diagnosis to beginning bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide was 36 months. Median number of prior chemotherapy treatments was 7.5 (range 3-16). Eight patients (12.1%) had side effects which required discontinuing bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, most common were hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue. There was one bowel perforation (1.5%). A complete response was noted in 7 patients (10.6%), partial response was seen in 21 patients (31.8%) with an overall response rate of 42.4%. Fifteen patients (22.7%) had stable disease and 23 (34.8%) had disease progression. Median progression free survival (PFS) for responders was 5 months (range 2-14) and 11 months (range 4-14) for those with a complete response. Median overall survival (OS) from start of bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide for responders was 20 months (range 2-56) and 9 months (range 1-51) for nonresponders. Conclusions: Bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide is an effective, well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen in heavily pre-treated patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma which significantly improves PFS and OS in responders. Response rates were significantly better than the rates we have reported in this same group of patients receiving topotecan (22%) or liposomal doxorubicin (25%) and were superior to reported rates for single agent bevacizumab (18%) in patients with only 2-3 prior regimens.

OlympiAD: Phase III trial of olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients (pts) with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4-LBA4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Robson ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Elżbieta Senkus ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Eortc Qlq

LBA4 Background: Olaparib is an oral PARP inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in HER2-negative mBC with a g BRCAm (NCT00494234). OlympiAD (NCT02000622) was a randomized, open-label, phase III study that assessed efficacy and safety of olaparib vs standard single agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in pts with HER2-negative mBC and a g BRCAm. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with HER2-negative mBC (hormone receptor positive or triple negative [TN]) and a g BRCAm, who had received ≤2 chemotherapy lines for mBC, were randomized (2:1) to olaparib tablets (300 mg po bid) or TPC (21-day cycles of either capecitabine [2500 mg/m2 po days 1–14], vinorelbine [30 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8] or eribulin [1.4 mg/m2IV days 1 and 8]). Treatment was continued until objective disease progression (RECIST v1.1) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Results: 302 pts were randomized (median age 44 y; 50% TN; 71% prior chemotherapy for mBC; 28% prior platinum) of whom 205 received olaparib and 91 received TPC (6 TPC pts were not treated). At 77% data maturity, PFS by BICR was significantly longer in pts treated with olaparib vs TPC (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43, 0.80; P=0.0009; 7.0 vs 4.2 months, respectively). Time to second progression (investigator-assessed) was also longer in the olaparib arm (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.40, 0.83). Objective response rate was 59.9 and 28.8% in olaparib and TPC arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) occurred in 36.6 and 50.5% of olaparib and TPC pts, with AEs leading to discontinuation in 4.9 and 7.7% of pts, respectively. Mean change from baseline in global health-related quality of life (HRQoL, EORTC-QLQ-C30) across all timepoints favored olaparib (difference vs TPC 7.5; 95% CI 2.48, 12.44; P=0.0035). Conclusions: Olaparib tablet monotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit to HER2-negative mBC pts with a g BRCAm, compared to standard TPC. The safety profile of olaparib was consistent with prior studies. The efficacy benefit was seen beyond the first progression and HRQoL also improved. Clinical trial information: NCT02000622.

Anlotinib in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6061-6061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boer Shan ◽  
Wenbin Shen ◽  
Huaying Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Gynecologic Tumor ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

6061 Background: Recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian carcinoma is difficult to treat, and how to improve the treatment effect of these patients is still an urgent problem to solve. Anlotinib is a new multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor and its anti-tumor vascular targets include VEGFR, PDGFR and FGFR. Previous researches have shown clinical antitumor activity of anlotinib in various cancers, including the phase I study on gynecologic tumor. This phase II study (ChiCTR2000029654) aims to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian carcinoma. Methods: Patients who have previously received second-line or more chemotherapy, with histopathologically confirmed ovarian high-grade serous gonadal carcinoma (including salpingocarcinoma and peritoneal carcinoma), ECOG 0-2 were considered eligible for enrollment. Anlotinib was administered orally (12 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle) till disease progression, death or intolerant toxicity. Therapeutic effects are evaluated every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and quality of life (QOL). Results: Between 2019 March to 2020 January, 15 patients (female) with FIGO histopathological stage IA(6.7%), IIIA (73.3%), IIIC (6.7%) and IV (13.3%) were enrolled and 14 patients were evaluable with a median age of 59 years (range: 47-69). The mean follow-up period is 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.1-4.8). Therapeutic evaluation showed the incidence of partial response, stable disease and progression disease was 14.3%, 57.1% and 28.6% respectively, yielding the ORR of 14.3% (2/14; 95% CI: 1.8%-42.8%) and the DCR of 71.4% (10/14; 95% CI: 41.9%-91.6%). The median PFS was not reached. Most of the occurring AEs were grade 1, including hypertention (57.1%), fatigue (50.0%), hand-foot syndrome (35.7%), hoarseness (14.3%), diarrhea (7.1%), gum-pain (7.1%), decrease in leukocyte count (6.7%) and urine protein (7.1%). Only cancer pain (7.1%) was grade 2. No high grade AE was observed in these 14 patients. Neither unexpected safety signals nor treatment related death occurred. Conclusions: Anlotinib showed a promising efficacy with a favourable toxicity profile for patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian carcinoma. And we will report more results ahout anlotinib in the future. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000029654.

Olaparib treatment in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) ovarian cancer (OC) by BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status: Phase II LIGHT study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6013-6013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Anne Cadoo ◽  
Fiona Simpkins ◽  
Cara Amanda Mathews ◽  
Nashwa Kabil ◽  
James Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Platinum Chemotherapy

6013 Background: In Study 19 (NCT00753545), olaparib capsules demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in the PSR OC maintenance setting, irrespective of BRCAm status (Ledermann et al. Lancet Oncol 2014). LIGHT is the first prospective study to evaluate olaparib tablet treatment in PSR OC pts by BRCAm and HRD status. Methods: This is an open-label, non-randomized study (NCT02983799) that assessed efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy (300 mg BID) in pts with PSR, high-grade serous/endometrioid epithelial OC and ≥1 prior line of platinum chemotherapy. Pts were assigned to one of four cohorts: germline (g) BRCAm; somatic (s) BRCAm; HRD+ve (non-BRCAm); HRD–ve; by Myriad BRACAnalysis CDx and myChoice tests. HRD+ve was a score ≥42. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included: disease control rate (DCR) and investigator-assessed PFS (RECIST v1.1). Primary analysis was to be ~6 months (mo) after the last pt was enrolled. Results: Data cut off was 8/27/19. Of 271 pts treated (median of 31.7 weeks [2.1–96.0]), 270 had measurable disease at baseline and were included in efficacy analyses (Table). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nausea (66%) and fatigue (62%).Serious AEs and Grade ≥3 AEs were experienced by 25% and 44% of pts, respectively. AEs leading to olaparib dose interruptions, reductions and discontinuations occurred in 33%, 24% and 4% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Olaparib treatment demonstrated activity across all cohorts. As observed in the maintenance setting, similar efficacy was seen in the gBRCAm and sBRCAm cohorts. For non-BRCAm pts, longer median PFS and higher ORR were observed in the HRD+ve cohort. Olaparib treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified and a safety profile consistent with that seen in the PSR and first-line settings. Clinical trial information: NCT02983799. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Bevacizumab in the Management of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Maurie Markman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant

Preclinical investigations have provided strong support for the hypothesis that angiogenesis is a potent driver of epithelial ovarian cancer progression. Phase II data have revealed the activity of single-agent bevacizumab in previously treated and clinically defined platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Several reported phase III randomized trials, involving primary and both ‘platinum-sensitive’ recurrent and platinum-resistant disease, have demonstrated the addition of bevacizumab to a cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen improves progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone. While there continues to be considerable debate regarding the optimal dose, timing, and duration of bevacizumab administration in ovarian cancer, the existing data provide strong support for an important role for this agent in the overall management paradigm for this malignancy.

OCEANS: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5007-LBA5007 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
N. J. Finkler ◽  
T. Rutherford ◽  
D. A. Smith ◽  
J. Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

LBA5007 Background: BEV, a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has shown a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in 2 frontline phase III trials in patients with EOC, PPC and FTC. The therapeutic impact of BEV in combination with carboplatin (C) and gemcitabine (G) followed by single agent BEV to disease progression (PD) was evaluated in this phase III trial in the platinum-sensitive recurrent setting. Methods: Patients had recurrent, platinum-sensitive EOC, PPC or FTC, 1 prior regimen, no prior BEV, ECOG performance status 0-1, measurable disease. Subjects were randomized to: Arm A: [IV C (AUC 4, Day (D) 1) + G (1,000 mg/m2 D1 and 8) + placebo (PL) D1] q21D x 6 cycles (c) → PL q21D until PD or unacceptable toxicity (tox) Arm B: [CG + BEV (15 mg/kg) D1] q21D x 6 c → BEV q21D until PD or tox primary endpoint was investigator assessed PFS (RECIST). Secondary endpoints included objective response (OR), overall survival (OS), duration of response and safety. The design provided 80% power to detect a 27% reduction in the hazard of progression or death in Arm B vs A, limiting the overall type I error of 5%. Results: OCEANS enrolled 484 patients (242 per arm) from 4/07 - 1/10, median follow up of 24 months. BEV plus CG followed by single agent BEV to PD significantly increased PFS compared to CG alone (HR=0.484, p<0.0001). OR increased by 21% (p<0.0001). OS data is immature with only 29% of patients having had an event. The safety profile was consistent with other BEV trials. Conclusions: Results show a statistically significant and clinically relevant benefit when bevacizumab is added to chemotherapy in patients with recurrent, platinum sensitive EOC, PPC, and FTC. This is the first phase III trial of an antiangiogenic to demonstrate a clinical benefit to these patients. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of irinotecan plus bevacizumab for heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5016-5016
Author(s):  
Salvia Sanjay Jain ◽  
Yan G. Makeyev ◽  
Franco Muggia ◽  
James L. Speyer ◽  
John Patrick Curtin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Protocol Amendment ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

5016 Background: Irinotecan and bevacizumab have single agent activity in platinum sensitive (PSen) and resistant (PRes) ovarian cancer patients (pts). We sought to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan plus bevacizumab in these pts. The trial was designed to evaluate whether the progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months is at least 40% and with secondary objectives of estimating response rate (RR), duration of response (DoR), time to progression and toxicity. Methods: No limitation on number of prior regimens was placed, and prior use of study drugs was allowed. Irinotecan 250mg/m2 and bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks were given. Due to treatment-related grade 3 toxicity (diarrhea and neutropenia) experienced by the first 5 pts on the study, the dose of irinotecan was amended to 175mg/m2. Results: 20 pts with recurrent ovarian cancer [PSen 5, PRes 15] of a planned 35 have been recruited thus far. Median age is 59 (45-78). Median number of prior regimens is 5 (3-12) with 9 pts demonstrating progressive disease (PD) on prior topotecan-containing regimens and 7 pts exhibiting PD on prior bevacizumab-containing regimens. 4 pts discontinued treatment before 2 cycles (2 for protocol defined toxicity, 2 by patient/physician choice). Partial response (PR) was observed in 2 PSen pts and 1 PRes pt, while stable disease (SD)was seen in 9 (2 PSen, 7 PRes) out of the 15 pts assessable for response at this time. 3 pts demonstrated PD after 2 cycles of treatment. 12 of 13 pts with PR or SD by RECIST also had response by CA125 criteria. Median DoR thus far (SD plus PR) is 18 weeks (4-37). 6 pts have ongoing response (4-18 weeks). Of 19 pts that received > 2 cycles, 3 had grade 3 diarrhea (2 before protocol amendment and 1 after). 2 pts had grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 before and 1 after protocol amendment). Median PFS is 9.6 months (mts). Median overall survival is 15.5 mts. PFS rate at 6 mts is 61% with 95% confidence interval: (40%, 92%). Conclusions: Results of the trial to date suggest the hypothesis that the PFS at 6 mts is less than 40% can be rejected. Activity of this regimen is encouraging given the heavily pretreated nature of the pts. Dose-limiting diarrhea and neutropenia required protocol amendment. We continue to accrue study subjects at the amended dosing.

TBCRC 048: A phase II study of olaparib monotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients with germline or somatic mutations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathway genes (Olaparib Expanded).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1002-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine M. Tung ◽  
Mark E. Robson ◽  
Steffen Ventz ◽  
Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria ◽  
Paul Kelly Marcom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

1002 Background: Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, is approved for HER2-negative MBC in g BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Olaparib Expanded, an investigator-initiated study, assessed the response to olaparib in MBC patients with sBRCA1/2 mutations or g/s mutations in DDR-pathway genes other than BRCA1/2. Methods: Eligibility included: MBC with measurable disease; progression on < 2 metastatic chemotherapy regimens. Prior PARP inhibitor or progression on platinum was not allowed. Cohort 1 included patients with germline mutations in non- BRCA1/2 DDR-pathway genes. In Cohort 2 were those with somatic mutations in these genes or BRCA1/2; germline testing was required only to exclude a gBRCA mutation if a s BRCA mutation was present. Patients received olaparib 300 mg bid until progression or unacceptable toxicity. For each cohort, a single-arm Simon two-stage design was used with 13 then 14 patients in the 1st and 2nd stages, respectively. The null hypothesis within each cohort [≤ 5% objective response rate (ORR)] would be rejected if > 4 responses were seen at the end of stage 2. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Results: 54 patients enrolled from March 2018 to Jan 2020; 1 ineligible s BRCA2 was excluded. Median age was 59 yrs (range: 30-87). 40 patients had ER+ HER2-, 3 HER2+, and 10 TNBC. 87% had a mutation in PALB2, s BRCA1/2, ATM or CHEK2. ORR was 29.6% (8/27, 90%-CI: 15.6%-47.1%) in Cohort 1 and 38.5% (10/26, 90%-CI: 22.5%-56.4%) in Cohort 2. Responses were gene specific (Table): g PALB2 and s BRCA mutations predicted response; no responses were seen with only a CHEK2 or ATM mutation. To date, responses as long as 16.4 months have been observed. Responses were seen in all subtypes: 5/10 TNBC, 1/3 HER2+, 12/40 ER+ HER2-. 11 responses occurred after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor. In June 2020, final data for confirmed ORR and secondary endpoints will be reported. Conclusion: In this proof-of-principle study, single-agent olaparib successfully met its primary endpoint in both cohorts. Activity was seen largely in patients with MBC and s BRCA1/2 or g PALB2 mutations but not with ATM or CHEK2 mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT03344965 . [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document