Survival outcomes in patients with IDC and ILC breast cancer: A well matched single institution study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13056-e13056
Author(s):  
Michael Grimm ◽  
Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy ◽  
Maryam B. Lustberg ◽  
Robert Wesolowski ◽  
Sagar D. Sardesai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

e13056 Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for only 10-15% of all invasive breast cancers but has distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and genomic profiles. In particular, metastatic lobular cancers (mILC) have unique sites of metastasis and it is unclear if the response to initial endocrine therapy differs from metastatic ductal cancers (mIDC). Therefore we have undertaken a single-institution, retrospective analysis to compare overall outcomes and response to initial endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with metastatic ILC and IDC. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective review of medical records was conducted evaluating pts treated for metastatic IDC and ILC at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2014. Pts diagnosed with mIDC were matched on age, year of diagnosis, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and HER2 status and site of metastasis 2:1 to patients diagnosed with mILC. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from metastasis to death or last known follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from metastasis to progression on first-line ET. Time to chemotherapy (TTC) was defined as time from starting ET for metastasis to initiation of chemotherapy. Kaplan Meier (KM) methods were used to calculate median OS, PFS and TTC. Results: A total of one hundred sixty one pts with metastatic breast cancer were included in this analysis. The demographic features between the two groups were well balanced and included in the table below. The median OS was 2.6 yrs (95% CI: 1.55, 3.22) for mILC and 2.2 yrs (95% CI: 1.95, 2.62) for mIDC. A subset of 111 patients who started on endocrine therapy were used in the PFS and TTC analyses. The median PFS following first-line ET was 2.2 yrs (95% CI: 0.1.0, 2.7) for mILC and 1.4 yrs (95% CI: 0.91, 1.90) for mIDC. Median TTC was 2.1 yrs (95% CI: 1.71, 4.92) for mILC and 2.4 yrs (95% CI: 1.90, 4.77) for mIDC. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: Outcomes in patients with ILC and IDC have been varied, with several studies reporting that patients with ILC have worse outcomes and response to chemotherapy. Our retrospective study examining outcomes in mILC in comparison with mIDC showed no difference in OS. Given the concern of resistance to conventional therapies in patients with lobular cancers, it is reassuring to see that the median PFS on first line ET and TTC was similar to metastatic ductal cancers.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Group (BOOG)

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. 61-79
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
List Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Study

This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Dutch breast cancer trialists' group (BOOG). Clinical trials include:An open label randomized (inter)national multicenter comparative trial of 5 years adjuvant endocrine therapy with an LHRH agonist plus an aromatase inhibitor (goserelin + anastrozole) versus five courses FE90C chemotherapy followed by the same endocrine therapy in pre- or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer (PRemenopausal Optimal Management IS Endocrine therapy). BOOG 2002-01/PROMISE. ISRCTN23561723Open label, comparative, randomized, multicenter, study of trastuzumab (Herceptin) given with docetaxel (Taxotere) versus sequential single agent therapy with trastuzumab followed by docetaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with HER2neu overexpression. BOOG 2002-02/HERTAX ISRCTN13770586Micro-metastases and Isolated tumour cells: Robust and Relevant Or Rubbish? The MIRROR study in BREAST CANCER. BOOG 2003-03/ZonMW 3214Radiation dose intensity study in breast cancer in young women: a randomized phase III trial of additional dose to the tumor bed. BOOG 2004-01/Young Boost SRCTN45066831Microarray analysis in breast cancer to Tailor Adjuvant Drugs Or Regimens, a randomized phase III study. MATADOR, BOOG 2005-02, CKTO 2004-04 ISRCTN61893718A prospective randomised, open, multicentre, phase III study to assess different Durations of Anastrozole therapy after 2–3 years Tamoxifen as Adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. 2006-01/DATAA randomized, open-label phase III study of first line chemotherapy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients, comparing intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with oral capecitabine; and the incorporation of a complete geriatric assessment. 2006-02/OMEGABOOG participation in International studies:. BOOG 2001-01/TEAM trial. BOOG 2001-02/AMAROS (EORTC 10981/22023). BOOG 2002-04/HERA (BIG 1-01/EORTC 10011/BO16348B). BOOG 2003-02 (BIG 1-02/IBCSG 27-02). BOOG 2003-04 (GBG 29). BOOG 2004-02/TBP (GBG 26, BIG 3-05). BOOG 2005-01/CASA (IBCSG 32-05/BIG 1-05). BOOG 2005-03/MINDACT (EORTC 10041, BIG 3-04). BOOG 2006-03/SUPREMO (BIG 2-04). BOOG 2006-04/Adjuvant lapatinib study (BIG 2-06/EGF106708)

Phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination as first-line chemotherapy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19565-19565 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Dufour ◽  
F. Rousseau ◽  
N. Meyer ◽  
T. Delozier ◽  
D. Serin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

19565 Background: Although the majority of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) responds to endocrine therapy, treatment failure is a concern, as well as front-line therapy for pts with ER/PR negative disease.The combination of anthracyclines (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) is active in younger pts, but cardiac toxicity of A in elderly MBC pts has to be considered. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) (Caelyx®) is active in MBC and has much less cardiotoxicity than A, and we present the preliminary data of the PLD/C in elderly MBC pts. Methods: This was a multicentric phase II trial. Inclusion criteria included: pts aged between 65 and 75, histologically proven measurable MBC, ECOG PS 0–1, LVEF = 50%, first-line chemotherapy for MBC. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if stopped for = 6 or 12 months without and with anthracyclines, respectively. Endocrine therapy either in the adjuvant or metastatic setting had to be stopped for = 1 month. All pts gave a written informed consent. The treatment schedule was : PLD 40mg/m2 and C 500mg/m2 d1 every 4 weeks. Efficacy as well as response duration and tolerance were the primary and secondary end-points, respectively. Results: 35 patients were enrolled (Median age 71.3, range 65.6–75.9). A total of 166 cycles have been administered. The median number of cycles was 6 (range 1–9). No toxic death was reported, one patient died of diabetes mellitus decompensation. No congestive heart failure or decrease in LVEF was reported, although 1 pt experience grade 3 dyspnea and stopped treatment. Other (gr3–4) NCI-CTC toxicity included: neutropenia in 7 (gr3) and 3 (gr4) pts; gr3 mucositis (4). No febrile neutropenia was reported. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurred in 1 pt, whereas treatment was stopped due to a generalized rash in 1 pt. An objective response (CR + PR) was achieved in 10 (28,6%) pts (1 CR and 8 PR), and a disease control in 24 (68.6%) with a progression free survival of 8.8 months and a median survival of 20.4 months Conclusions: The LPD-C combination is active in elderly MBC pts, with an acceptable toxicity profile. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Open-label phase III randomized controlled trial comparing taxane-based chemotherapy (Tax) with lapatinib (L) or trastuzumab (T) as first-line therapy for women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: Interim analysis (IA) of NCIC CTG MA.31/GSK EGF 108919.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA671-LBA671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Gelmon ◽  
Frances Boyle ◽  
Bella Kaufman ◽  
David Huntsman ◽  
Alexey Manikhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

LBA671 Background: The relative efficacy of L vs T when combined with Tax chemotherapy in the first-line setting of metastatic breast cancer (BC) is unknown. Methods: MA.31 compares Tax-based therapy, paclitaxel 80mg/m2 wkly or docetaxel 75mg/m2 3 wkly for 24 wks in combination with L or T. The L dose was 1,250 mg po daily with Tax followed by 1,500 mg daily (LTax/L). After a loading dose, the T dose was 2 mg/kg wkly or 6 mg/kg 3 wkly + Tax followed by T 6 mg/kg 3 wkly (TTax/T). Stratification was by prior neo/adjuvant HER2 therapy, prior neo/adjuvant Tax, planned Tax (paclitaxel vs docetaxel), and liver metastases. The primary endpoint is ITT progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from randomization to objective progressive disease based on RECIST criteria or death from any cause. The protocol-specified IA was performed after observing 333 PFS events; the trial was to stop if the 2-sided p-value from the stratified log-rank test was less than 0.03. The NCIC CTG’s independent DSMC reviewed IA results and recommended disclosure because the superiority boundary was crossed. A secondary analysis utilized central laboratory-confirmed HER2 + status. Results: Between July 17 2008 and Dec 1 2011, 652 pts were accrued. Data from 636 pts (525 HER2 centrally confirmed) were included in the IA with clinical cutoff date of Nov 7 2011 and database lock of Apr 13 2012. Median follow-up was 13.6 mos, 12.9 mos for LTax/L pts and 14.0 mos for TTax/T patients. In the ITT analysis, PFS was inferior with LTax/L compared to TTax/T hazard ratio (HR) =1.33; 95% CI 1.06-1.67; p=0.01. LTax/L had median PFS 8.8 mos (95% CI 8.3-10.6) compared to TTax/T 11.4 mos (95% CI 10.8-13.7). PFS in the centrally confirmed HER2+ had HR 1.48 (95%CI 1.15-1.92; p=0.003) (LTax/L to TTax/T). No difference in overall survival was detected (LTax/L to TTax/T) HR= 1.1 (95% CI 0.75-1.61; p=0.62). More grade 3-4 diarrhea and rash was observed with LTax/L (p<0.001). Conclusions: LTax/L therapy is associated with a shorter PFS compared to TTax/T as first line therapy for HER2+ metastatic BC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00667251. CCSRI grant: 021039. Supported by GlaxoSmithKline.

Effect of tumor subtype on overall survival in brain metastatic breast cancer patients treated with cranial irradiation.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 74-74
Author(s):  
Vipin Das Villgran ◽  
Aju Mathew ◽  
Margaret Quinn Rosenzweig ◽  
Shira Abberbock ◽  
Rohan Dilipbhai Naik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Tumor Subtype ◽  
Prognostic Role ◽  
Tumor Subtypes ◽  
Significant Difference

74 Background: Brain metastatic breast cancer (BMBC) is often treated with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or both. Breast cancer tumor subtypes defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status have an important prognostic role in metastatic disease. It is unclear if tumor subtypes have a prognostic role in patients receiving WBRT or SRS. We aimed to investigate the association between breast cancer subtype and overall survival (OS) among BMBC patients treated with WBRT and SRS. Methods: In a single-institution cohort study, BMBC patients treated with WBRT/SRS during 1997-2013 were identified. Clinico-pathological characteristics and survival information were prospectively collected. Tumor subtype category were defined as HR+/HER2-, HER2+/HR+, HER2+/HR- and triple negative (TN). WBRT category patients received that modality and SRS category patients, only SRS for treatment of brain metastases. OS is defined as time from diagnosis of brain metastasis to death or last follow-up. We conducted univariate analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 193 BMBC patients who received WBRT or SRS, 62 received just SRS, and among them, 45% was HR+/HER2-. The distribution of subtypes was similar in WBRT patients. The median OS in SRS group was 15 months (95% CI 11-18) compared to WBRT with 10 months (95% CI 7-14) (p=0.03). Among patients receiving WBRT, median OS in HER2+/HR- tumor was 30 months (95% CI 13-37), HER2+/HR+ tumor - 14 months (95% CI 5-24), HER2-/HR+ tumor - 8 months (95% CI 4-11) and TN - 5 months (95% CI 3-9) (P=0.0003). There was no significant difference in OS between the breast cancer subtypes among SRS patients: median OS among patients with HER2+/HR- tumor was 11 months (95% CI 5–27), HER2+/HR+ tumor - 25 months (95% CI 7-32), HER2-/HR+ tumor - 18 months (95% CI 14-32), and TN - 12 months (95% CI 3-24) (p=0.07). Conclusions: Among patients with BMBC,tumor subtype is a prognostic factor for survival in those who received WBRT. Tumor subtype provided no prognostic information for those who were treated with only SRS.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus epirubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Vinorelbine with or without Trastuzumab in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Single Institution Series

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athina Stravodimou ◽  
Khalil Zaman ◽  
Ioannis A. Voutsadakis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background. We report our experience with vinorelbine, a widely used chemotherapeutic, in unselected metastatic breast cancer patients treated in clinical routine. Patients and Methods. The data of all patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab during a six year period were reviewed. Patients received vinorelbine intravenous 25–30 mg/m2 or 60–80 mg/m2 orally in days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. Results. Eighty-seven women were included. Sixty-two patients received vinorelbine alone and 25 patients received vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab. In 67 patients this was the first line treatment for metastatic disease and in 20 patients it was 2nd or later line of treatment. The median TTP was six months (range: 1–45). The median overall survival was 11.5 months (range: 1–83). Seventy patients were evaluable for response. In patients receiving first line treatment 44.4% had a response while in the second and subsequent lines setting 12.5% of patients responded (P=0.001). Objective response was obtained in 63.6% of patients receiving concomitant trastuzumab and in 25% of patients receiving vinorelbine alone (P=0.0002). Conclusion. This study confirms a high disease control rate. Response rate and TTP were superior in first line treatment compared to subsequent lines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document