Phase III randomized clinical trials global distribution and funding: Trends and disparities.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18563-e18563
Author(s):  
Karina Pinheiro ◽  
Mauricio Ribeiro ◽  
Luiza Lara Gadotti ◽  
Fabiane Marson ◽  
Carlos Diego Holanda Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
World Region ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Disease Site ◽  
Background Phase

e18563 Background: Phase III clinical trials (PIIICT) constitute the cornerstone of the progress and development of new therapeutic strategies. However, their complexity and costs in a scenario of limited funding sources impose important limitations in their scope and reach. Methods: We searched in clinicaltrials.gov to identify PIIICT evaluating pharmacological interventions in adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic settings between 2010-2020 in breast, cervix, colorectal cancer (CRC), lung, melanoma, prostate and penile cancer. Trials identified were categorized according to disease site, funding source and world region/country (R/C). Case incidence in 2020 was collected from the IARC website. Results: Of 825 clinical trials, 72.7% were industry-sponsored (IS). Trials by R/C, not including multicentric studies (61.8%): (A) USA 76 trials, 53.9% non-industry sponsored (NIS); (B) Europe/UK 112, 59.8% NIS; (C) Asia (excluding China) 62, 27.4% NIS and (D) China 183, 43.7% NIS. There was a statistically significant association between location and funding source (p= 0.0003). NIS source was detected in higher proportion of trials ongoing in regions A and B (59%). IS was statistically less frequent in uterine cervix/penis (42.8%) and CRC (49.6%) IS was significantly higher in lung and prostate trials (both 81%) (p<0.0001). Table summarizes our results by tumor sites. We also found a statistically significant association between the incidence of malignancies in the selected primary sites and the amount of registered clinical trials, overall (p<0.0001) and IS as well (p<0.0001). The database is under expansion to include other disease sites as well as other geographic areas separately (Africa, Russia, South America, India, and Oceania). Cervix and penile results were combined given their biological and epidemiological similarities. Conclusions: There is a significant disparity between the number of clinical trials and tumor prevalences as well as among the distribution of IS trials funding.[Table: see text]

What are the reciprocal influences of randomized clinical trials and the patient–psychiatrist relationship?

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
J. Catteau ◽  
C. Cyran ◽  
R. Bordet ◽  
C.E. Thomas ◽  
B.A. Dupuis
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Antidepressant Drugs ◽  
Antidepressant Medication ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Reciprocal Influences

SummaryThe goal of this prospective investigation was to study the course and the quality of patient-psychiatrist relationships during phase II / phase III clinical trials of antidepressant medication prescribed for depressive disorders. All patients who participated in the clinical trials (and subsequently in this survey) signed written informed consent statements and were subject to random double blind treatment assignment. Retrospective analysis of 118 investigations was carried out, and the patients involved were questioned concerning their experiences and impressions during and after the study. Data show that the outcome of clinical trials of antidepressant drugs are not a function of pre-existing good patient-psychiatrist relationships. On the other hand, no effects on the patient-psychiatrist relationship were found as a result of the experimental procedure, and it can be concluded that no detrimental effects on future patient-psychiatrist relationships were incurred.

Subgroup Analyses in Reporting of Phase III Clinical Trials in Solid Tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15) ◽  
pp. 1697-1702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Fei Liang ◽  
Wenfeng Li ◽  
Xichun Hu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Consort Statement ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
The Consort Statement ◽  
Test Use ◽  
Interaction Test

Purpose Treatment decisions in clinical oncology are guided by results from phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The results of subgroup analyses may be potentially important in individualizing patient care. We investigated the appropriateness of the use and interpretation of subgroup analyses in oncology RCTs on the basis of the CONSORT statement requirements. Methods Phase III RCTs published between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, were reviewed to identify eligible studies of solid tumor treatments. Information related to the subgroup analyses included prespecification, number, subgroup factors, interaction test use, and claim of subgroup difference. Results A total of 221 publications reporting data on 184,500 patients were analyzed. One hundred eighty-eight (85%) RCTs were reported with subgroup analyses. Of those, 146 (78%) trials were reported with at least six subgroups. For the majority of trials with subgroup analyses (173; 92%), the actual number of subgroup analyses conducted cannot be determined. Only 59 (31%) RCTs were reported with fully prespecified subgroups and only 64 (34%) trials were reported with interaction tests. In addition, 102 (54%) RCTs were reported with claims of subgroup differences. Of those, only 18 claims of RCTs (18%) were based on significant interaction test results. Conclusion The reporting of subgroup analyses in contemporary oncology RCTs is neither uniform nor complete; it requires improvement to ensure consistency and to provide critical information for guiding patient care. Major problems include testing of a large number of subgroups, subgroups without prespecifications, and inadequate use of interaction tests.

Bias in reporting of endpoints of efficacy and toxicity in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for women with breast cancer (BC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6043-6043
Author(s):  
Francisco Emilio Vera Badillo ◽  
Roman Shapiro ◽  
Alberto Ocana ◽  
Eitan Amir ◽  
Ian Tannock
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Industry Funding ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Rational Therapy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Background Phase ◽  
Completeness Of Reporting

6043 Background: Phase III RCTs are designed to assess clinically important differences in endpoints that reflect benefit to patients. Accurate and unbiased reporting is essential to guide rational therapy. Here we evaluate the quality of reporting of the primary endpoint (PE) and of toxicity in RCTs for BC. Methods: PUBMED was searched from 1995-2011 to identify RCTs for BC. Scales for assessing bias in reporting of the PE and of toxicity were developed. For the PE, scales assessed whether the concluding statement of the abstract (CSAbs) was (a) based on the PE, (b) described appropriately a statistically positive or negative result for the PE, or (c) was based on secondary endpoints. Bias and completeness of reporting of toxicity was assessed using a hierarchy scale of whether reporting occurred in the CSAbs, elsewhere in the abstract, in the discussion of the article or only in the results. Association of bias with Journal Impact Factor (JIF); changes in the PE compared to protocol information in clinicaltrials.gov and funding source was also evaluated. Results: 164 trials were evaluated; 33% showed bias in reporting of the PE. The PE was more likely to be reported in the CSAbs if statistically significant [OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.9-14.3, p=0.001]. A statistically negative PE was not reported in the CSAbs in 27% of trials. Of the 30 trials where protocol information was available in clinicaltrials.gov, there were non-significant associations for the PE to show a positive result if had been changed, and for greater bias in reporting the PE if it was unchanged. 67% of studies showed bias in reporting of toxicity. Only 14% mentioned toxicity in CSAbs. When the PE was positive, bias in reporting of toxicity was more common [OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0-3.9, p=0.04]. There was no apparent association between bias in reporting of either the PE or toxicity and JIF or funding source, but a non-significant association between change in the PE and industry funding. Conclusions: Bias in reporting of the PE is common especially for studies with a negative PE. Reporting of toxicity is poor especially for studies with a positive PE. Changing of the PE appears to be a strategy to increase the likelihood of observing a statistically significant result.

Rome I versus Rome II; Overlap in patients enrolled in tegaserod phase III clinical trials for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A284-A284
Author(s):  
B NAULT ◽  
S SUE ◽  
J HEGGLAND ◽  
S GOHARI ◽  
G LIGOZIO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Irritable Bowel ◽  
Rome I

Neovastat, a naturally occurring multifunctional antiangiogenic drug, in phase III clinical trials

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 620-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Falardeau ◽  
Pierre Champagne ◽  
Patrick Poyet ◽  
Claude Hariton ◽  
[Eacute]ric Dupont
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Antiangiogenic Drug

scholarly journals Animal and Human Vaccines against West Nile Virus

Pathogens ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1073
Author(s):  
Juan-Carlos Saiz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
West Nile Virus ◽  
Vaccine Development ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
West Nile ◽  
Specific Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Neuroinvasive Disease ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Status

West Nile virus (WNV) is a widely distributed enveloped flavivirus transmitted by mosquitoes, which main hosts are birds. The virus sporadically infects equids and humans with serious economic and health consequences, as infected individuals can develop a severe neuroinvasive disease that can even lead to death. Nowadays, no WNV-specific therapy is available and vaccines are only licensed for use in horses but not for humans. While several methodologies for WNV vaccine development have been successfully applied and have contributed to significantly reducing its incidence in horses in the US, none have progressed to phase III clinical trials in humans. This review addresses the status of WNV vaccines for horses, birds, and humans, summarizing and discussing the challenges they face for their clinical advance and their introduction to the market.

scholarly journals The role of future treatments in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Europe

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110183
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
Carl Joe Mehanna ◽  
Salomon-Yves Cohen ◽  
François Devin ◽  
Sam Razavi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Macular Degeneration ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Injection Frequency ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have transformed the management of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) over the past two decades. However, as more long-term real-world data become available, it is clear that treatment outcomes are inferior to those reported in large, controlled clinical trials. This is largely driven by undertreatment, that is, not maintaining a consistent injection frequency to achieve sustained VEGF suppression, whether due to patient non-compliance, an important injection burden, or non/incomplete anatomical response. Newer therapeutic advances under evaluation hold promise in achieving more, for less. We review the latest drugs currently in or having successfully finished phase III clinical trials, and determine their potential place in the management of patients with nAMD in Europe.

scholarly journals Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642097591
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Scott ◽  
Ray Su ◽  
Kuangnan Xiong ◽  
Arman Altincatal ◽  
Carmen Castrillo-Viguera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials

Background: Peginterferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate (GA) are approved first-line therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their therapeutic efficacy has not been compared directly. Methods: Clinical outcomes at 2 years, including no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or GA 20 mg/ml once daily (QD) were compared by propensity score matching analysis using individual patient data from ADVANCE and CONFIRM phase III clinical trials. In addition, clinical outcomes at 1–3 years for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a Q2W or GA 40 mg/ml three times a week (TIW) were evaluated using a matching-adjusted comparison analysis of individual patient data from ADVANCE and the ADVANCE extension study, ATTAIN, and aggregate patient data from the phase III GALA and the GALA extension studies. Results: Propensity-score-matched peginterferon beta-1a patients ( n = 336) had a significantly lower annualized relapse rate [ARR (0.204 versus 0.282); rate ratio = 0.724; p = 0.045], a significantly lower probability of 12-week confirmed disability worsening (10.0% versus 14.6%; hazard ratio = 0.625; p = 0.048), and a significantly higher rate of NEDA (20.3% versus 11.5%; p = 0.047) compared with GA 20 mg/ml QD patients after 2 years of treatment. Matching-adjusted peginterferon beta-1a patients (effective n = 276) demonstrated a similar ARR at 1 year (0.278 versus 0.318; p = 0.375) and significantly lower ARR at 2 years (0.0901 versus 0.203; p = 0.032) and 3 years (0.109 versus 0.209; p = 0.047) compared with GA 40 mg/ml TIW patients ( n = 834). Conclusion: Results from separate matching comparisons of phase III clinical trials and extension studies suggest that peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg Q2W may provide better clinical outcomes than GA (20 mg/ml QD or 40 mg/ml TIW).

558 Programmed death (PD)-1 and PD-ligand-1 inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of their efficacy and safety

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A592-A592
Author(s):  
Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽  
Chelsea Deitelzweig ◽  
Grace Lin ◽  
Jay Lin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Nsclc Patient ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundTreatment advances have been made in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the development and approval of programmed death (PD)-1 and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors may be used as monotherapies or in combination with other agents and have been shown to improve NSCLC patient outcomes in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic search to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC.MethodsA systematic literature search of PubMed was conducted to identify phase III clinical trials in which the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC was evaluated. PD-1 inhibitors included nivolumab and pembrolizumab; PD-L1 inhibitors included atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab. Patient characteristics and efficacy data were extracted.ResultsSixteen phase III clinical trials were identified (nivolumab=4; pembrolizumab=5; atezolizumab=5; avelumab=1; durvalumab=1). Across the 3 nivolumab monotherapy trials (n=638; median ages: 61–63 years), median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged 2.3–4.2 months; response rates ranged 19%-26%; grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7%-18% of patients. Nivolumab in combination with iplimumab (n=583; median age: 64 years) had a median PFS of 5.1 months and response rate of 33%; grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 33% of patients. Across the 3 pembrolizumab monotherapy trials (n=1,481; median ages: 63–64 years), median PFS ranged 3.9–10.3 months; response rates ranged 18%-45%; grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 13%-27% of patients. In the 2 pembrolizumab combination therapy trials (n=688; median ages: 65 years), median PFS ranged 6.4–8.8 months; response rates ranged 48%-58%; grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 67%-70% of patients. In the 4 atezolizumab combination therapy trials (n=1,486; median ages: 63–64 years), median PFS ranged 6.3–8.3 months; response rates ranged 47%-63.5%; grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 54%-73% of patients. In the 3 monotherapy trials of atezolizumab (n=613; median age: 63 years), avelumab (n=396; median age: 64 years), and durvalumab (n=476; median age: 64 years), the median months of PFS were 2.7, 2.8, and 17.2, respectively; response rates were 14%, 15%, and 30%, respectively; grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 15%, 10%, and 30.5% of patients, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough treatment responses varied, most of the evaluated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a clinical benefit for NSCLC trial patients. Generally, treatment efficacy was greater with combination therapies, but adverse events occurred more frequently. Innovations in the targeting/personalization of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapies will likely lead to improved NSCLC patient outcomes and further research is needed in this regard.

scholarly journals Immunological Backbone of Uveal Melanoma: Is There a Rationale for Immunotherapy?

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Rossi ◽  
Giovanni Schinzari ◽  
Ilaria Grazia Zizzari ◽  
Brigida Anna Maiorano ◽  
Monica Maria Pagliara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials

No standard treatment has been established for metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Immunotherapy is commonly used for this disease even though UM has not been included in phase III clinical trials with checkpoint inhibitors. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients obtain a clinical benefit with immunotherapy. The immunological features of mUM were reviewed in order to understand if immunotherapy could still play a role for this disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document