A randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11583-TPS11583
Author(s):  
Vanessa Anne Eulo ◽  
Breelyn A. Wilky ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Mia C. Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS11583 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Current standard therapy includes anthracycline based chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase II study of cabozantinib in advanced STS is underway. Cabozantinib in combination with immune checkpoint blockade has shown clinical benefit in several tumor types including HCC, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Since cabozantinib may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T-cells and promote an immune permissive environment, we hypothesize that combining cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibition is a therapeutic strategy that will be more effective than cabozantinib alone. Additionally, the design of the trial will allow assessment of whether pretreatment with cabozantinib will enhance the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial of cabozantinib (60mg orally daily as a single agent, 40mg in combination) with or without combination Ipilimumab (ipi, 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses) and Nivolumab (nivo, 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for four doses, then 480mg IV every 4 weeks) in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to up to two lines of chemotherapy. 105 pts with non-translocation driven sarcomas will be enrolled at three US sites and randomized 2:1 to the combination group. Pts will be stratified by prior pazopanib use and balanced for histologies. Patients who progress on arm A will cross over to combination therapy (arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. 35 patients in Cohort A (cabozantinib alone) and 70 patients in Cohort B (cabozantinib plus ipi/nivo) will be required to detect an increase of the ORR from 10% in cohort A to 30% in cohort B with 81% power with a one-sided alpha level of 10%. Key eligibility criteria include: at least 18 years of age, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, ≤2 prior lines of therapy and measurable disease. Exclusion criteria include: translocation-driven sarcoma except alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), prior immunotherapy, and chronic use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints are safety, overall and progression free survival, disease control rate, and response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab after cabozantinib pretreatment. Mandatory tumor biopsies pre-treatment and at 6 weeks will be obtained. Peripheral blood will be collected for circulating immune phenotyping. Enrollment will occur at 3 participating institutions and is expected to be completed in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04551430.

PD1 inhibition in soft-tissue sarcomas with tertiary lymphoid structures: A multicenter phase II trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11507-11507
Author(s):  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Alban Bessede ◽  
Emmanuelle Bompas ◽  
Sophie Piperno-Neumann ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Lymphoid Structures

11507 Background: PD1 inhibition has shown limited activity in all comers clinical trials including patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). In the PEMBROSARC study, objective response rate, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were respectively 2.1%, 1.4 and 7.1 months respectively (Toulmonde et al. Jama Oncol 2017). We have recently shown that the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) may represent a biomarker to select patients who are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy (PetitPrez et al., Nature 2020). We report here the first clinical trial investigating the efficacy of PD1 inhibition in TLS-positive STS. Methods: PEMBROSARC is an open-label multicenter phase II study of pembrolizumab in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide in pts with STS selected based on the presence of TLS. TLS status has been assessed centrally has previously described (PetitPrez et al., Nature 2020). Eligible patients received pembrolizumab 200mg IV q21 days and cyclophosphamide 50 mg BID 1week on, 1 week off. All patients had confirmed progressive disease at inclusion based on central review of two imaging performed at less than 6 months interval. The primary efficacy endpoint was 6-month non-progression (as per RECIST evaluation criteria v1.1). Based on the following hypotheses: 15% 6-month non-progression rate (H0), 40% acceptable 6-month non-progression rate (H1), 5% type I error rate, 90% power, a total of 29 assessable patients were necessary and 8 patients or more had to be progression-free at 6 months to reach the first endpoint. Results: 240 patients were screened for TLS status between September 2018 and January 2020 in 7 centers of the French Sarcoma Group. Among them, 48 were found to be TLS+ as per central review and 35 were included in the study. The three most frequent histological subtypes were: well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 13); UPS (n = 6), and leiomyosarcoma (n = 4). 30 patients were eligible for efficacy. Of those, as per central imaging review, 13 patients (43.3%) had tumor shrinkage resulting in partial response in 8 patients (26.7%) and stable disease in 5 cases (16.7%). 10 patients had progressive disease. Twelve patients were progression-free at 6 months (40.0% 95%CI = [22.7 – 59.4]).Median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95%CI, 1.4-9.6) and 14.5 months (95%CI, 8.5- 18.3 months), respectively. Conclusions: With an objective response and a 6-month non-progression rates of 26.7% and 40% respectively versus 2.1% and 4.2% in all comers, the PEMBROSARC study confirms that selection based on TLS status is an efficient approach to tailor immunotherapy in STS patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02406781.

Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab in children and young adults with INI1-negative cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10055-TPS10055
Author(s):  
Suzanne J. Forrest ◽  
Joanna Yi ◽  
Cassie Kline ◽  
Thomas Cash ◽  
Alyssa Terry Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Epithelioid Sarcoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Cancer Research

TPS10055 Background: Several aggressive pediatric and young adult cancers are characterized by SMARCB1 inactivation resulting in loss of INI1 expression, including rhabdoid tumors, epithelioid sarcoma and undifferentiated chordoma. These malignancies are associated with a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options for relapsed or refractory disease. Prior studies and emerging data suggest INI1-negative cancers may be uniquely susceptible to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Many INI1-negative pediatric tumors express PD-L1 and are infiltrated by immune cells, and there are reports of patients with advanced INI1-negative cancers with clinical responses to immune checkpoint blockade (Forrest et al. Clinical Cancer Research, 2020). We hypothesize that INI1 loss predicts tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Methods: This is an ongoing multicenter, phase II, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the activity of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients aged 6 months to 30 years with relapsed or refractory INI1-negative cancers (NCT04416568). The study enrolls patients in 2 strata: extracranial solid tumors in Stratum 1 and intracranial solid tumors in Stratum 2. Patients treated with prior ICI are excluded. Patients are treated with intravenous (IV) nivolumab 3mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by nivolumab 3mg/kg (max dose 240mg) IV every 2 weeks for up to 1-year. The primary objective is to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for Stratum 1 and by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for Stratum 2. The trial has a 2-stage design targeting a 25% or greater response rate, with each stratum assessed independently. The analysis for Stage 1 in a given Stratum will be performed after 10 patients are enrolled. If a sufficient number of responders are observed, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled at Stage 2. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease control rate at 12 months. Correlative aims include assessing tissue and blood biomarkers associated with treatment response. Enrollment began 14 Aug 2020 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04416568.

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration Study 002

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2755-2763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Maki ◽  
J. Kyle Wathen ◽  
Shreyaskumar R. Patel ◽  
Dennis A. Priebat ◽  
Scott H. Okuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Number Of Patients

Purpose Gemcitabine as a single agent and the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel have activity in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. To determine if the addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine improved clinical outcome of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, we compared a fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine versus a lower dose of gemcitabine with docetaxel. Patients and Methods In this open-label phase II clinical trial, the primary end point was tumor response, defined as complete or partial response or stable disease lasting at least 24 weeks. A Bayesian adaptive randomization procedure was used to produce an imbalance in the randomization in favor of the superior treatment, accounting for treatment-subgroup interactions. Results One hundred nineteen of 122 randomly assigned patients had assessable outcomes. The adaptive randomization assigned 73 patients (60%) to gemcitabine-docetaxel and 49 patients (40%) to gemcitabine alone, indicating gemcitabine-docetaxel was superior. The objective Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response rates were 16% (gemcitabine-docetaxel) and 8% (gemcitabine). Given the data, the posterior probabilities that gemcitabine-docetaxel was superior for progression-free and overall survival were 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel and 3.0 months for gemcitabine alone; median overall survival was 17.9 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel and 11.5 months for gemcitabine. The posterior probability that patients receiving gemcitabine-docetaxel had a shorter time to discontinuation for toxicity compared with gemcitabine alone was .999. Conclusion Gemcitabine-docetaxel yielded superior progression-free and overall survival to gemcitabine alone, but with increased toxicity. Adaptive randomization is an effective method to reduce the number of patients receiving inferior therapy.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Belinostat (PXD101) in Combination with Doxorubicin in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Sarcoma ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Vitfell-Rasmussen ◽  
Ian Judson ◽  
Akmal Safwat ◽  
Robin L. Jones ◽  
Philip Blach Rossen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Background. Belinostat is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor.Primary Objectives. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of belinostat (Bel) in combination with doxorubicin (Dox) in solid tumours (phase I) and response rate (RR) in soft tissue sarcomas (phase II).Methods. Bel was administered as a 30-minute IV infusion on days 1–5 and on day 5 with Dox. The dose escalation schedule was as follows: cohort 1: Bel 600 mg/m2and 50 mg/m2Dox, cohort 2: Bel 600 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox, cohort 3: Bel 800 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox, and cohort 4: Bel 1000 mg/m2and 75 mg/m2Dox.Results. 41 patients were included (25 in phase I, 16 in phase II). Adverse events were fatigue (95%), nausea (76%), and alopecia (63%). There was one DLT, grade 3 rash/hand and foot syndrome. MTD was Bel 1000 mg/m2/d and Dox 75 mg/m2. Four responses were seen: 2 PR in phase I, RR of 8%; in phase II, 1 PR/1 CR, RR of 13%, and 9 patients (56%) with SD.Conclusion. The combination was well tolerated. Response rate was moderate but median time to progression was 6.0 months (95% CI, 1.6–9.7 months) which is superior to some reports of single-agent Dox.

scholarly journals Improving Immunotherapy Efficacy in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Biomarker Driven and Histotype Tailored Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Roulleaux Dugage ◽  
Elise F. Nassif ◽  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Rastislav Bahleda
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Cellular Therapies ◽  
M1 Macrophage ◽  
Synovial Sarcomas

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapies yield a disappointing response rate of 15% across soft-tissue sarcomas, even if some subtypes benefit more than others. The proportions of TAMs and TILs in their tumor microenvironment are variable, and this heterogeneity correlates to histotype. Tumors with a richer CD8+ T cell, M1 macrophage, and CD20+ cells infiltrate have a better prognosis than those infiltrated by M0/M2 macrophages and a high immune checkpoint protein expression. PD-L1 and CD8+ infiltrate seem correlated to response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but tertiary lymphoid structures have the best predictive value and have been validated prospectively. Trials for combination therapies are ongoing and focus on the association of ICI with chemotherapy, achieving encouraging results especially with pembrolizumab and doxorubicin at an early stage, or ICI with antiangiogenics. A synergy with oncolytic viruses is seen and intratumoral talimogene laherpavec yields an impressive 35% ORR when associated to pembrolizumab. Adoptive cellular therapies are also of great interest in tumors with a high expression of cancer-testis antigens (CTA), such as synovial sarcomas or myxoid round cell liposarcomas with an ORR ranging from 20 to 50%. It seems crucial to adapt the design of clinical trials to histology. Leiomyosarcomas are characterized by complex genomics but are poorly infiltrated by immune cells and do not benefit from ICI. They should be tested with PIK3CA/AKT inhibition, IDO blockade, or treatments aiming at increasing antigenicity (radiotherapy, PARP inhibitors). DDLPS are more infiltrated and have higher PD-L1 expression, but responses to ICI remain variable across clinical studies. Combinations with MDM2 antagonists or CDK4/6 inhibitors may improve responses for DDLPS. UPS harbor the highest copy number alterations (CNA) and mutation rates, with a rich immune infiltrate containing TLS. They have a promising 15-40% ORR to ICI. Trials for ICB should focus on immune-high UPS. Association of ICI with FGFR inhibitors warrants further exploration in the immune-low group of UPS. Finally translocation-related sarcomas are heterogeneous, and although synovial sarcomas a poorly infiltrated and have a poor response rate to ICI, ASPS largely benefit from ICB monotherapy or its association with antiangiogenics agents. Targeting specific neoantigens through vaccine or adoptive cellular therapies is probably the most promising approach in synovial sarcomas.

Dual immune checkpoint blockade in advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, a phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16201-e16201
Author(s):  
Susan Combs Scott ◽  
Ana De Jesus-Acosta ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Benjamin Philip Levy ◽  
Valsamo Anagnostou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Well Differentiated

e16201 Background: Limited systemic treatment options are available for progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET), also called carcinoid tumors. Given emerging evidence for immunotherapy response in high grade NET including small cell lung cancer, we sought to determine the efficacy of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated NET in an open label phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients had well-differentiated, nonfunctional NET of lung, pancreas, or GI origin that had progressed within the past 12 months after at least one line of prior therapy. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Using a Simon’s 2-stage design, the study planned to accrue up to 56 patients. Based on published response rates to everolimus of 5%, we hypothesized that this regimen would be considered promising if the true ORR is > 15%. Results: Nine patients were enrolled prior to study closure due to funding, including 6 patients with NET of lung origin, 2 pancreatic, and 1 small bowel (Table). Median age was 71 years. All patients had distant metastatic disease at enrollment, with an average of 2 prior lines of therapy. Four of 9 patients achieved the primary endpoint of confirmed objective response, all of whom have ongoing response with a median duration of 15.4 months. Five of 9 patients, including all 4 responders, experienced immune-related toxicity requiring treatment modification or discontinuation. The trial did not accrue the target of 56 patients, however, objective response in 4 of 9 patients (ORR 44.4%, 90% CI: 16.9-74.9%) excluded the response rate target (15%). Conclusions: The impressive ORR of 44% with a median duration of response exceeding 15 months in this small clinical trial warrants further study of combination CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in previously treated well-differentiated NET. Our ongoing immunologic and genomic correlative analysis in responders and non-responders will help inform future study of immunotherapy in this patient population in need of new systemic therapy approaches. Clinical trial information: NCT03420521. [Table: see text]

Multi-institutional phase II study of carboplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18179-18179
Author(s):  
J. Sasaki ◽  
H. Uramoto ◽  
K. Kashiwabara ◽  
H. Kishi ◽  
E. Moriyam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3

18179 Background: Because elderly pts may tolerate platinum-based combination chemotherapy poorly, single-agent chemotherapy is selected for the treatment regimen. However, retrospective subgroup analyses have consistently indicated that elderly pts indeed benefit from platinum-based combination chemotherapy as well as their younger counterparts. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of carboplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in elderly pts with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Fifty-four pts aged more than 70 years old (median, 77; range, 70–88) with previously untreated advanced NSCLC were enrolled on this trial. Additional criteria included the presence of measurable lesions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Pts received carboplatin at an area under the curve of 4 mg/ml/min on the first day and gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on the first and eighth day of consecutive 3 week periods. The primary endpoint was to determine the objective response rate of this platinum-doublet regimen. The RECIST criteria were used to measure response. Results: Enrolled pts included 15/39 with stage IIIB/IV diseases. Fifty-one out of enrolled pts were eligible for efficacy and safety analyses. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1–7). Fifteen partial responses (response rate: 29%) were obtained. The median TTP was 118 days. Hematological toxicities of grade 3/4 included leukopenia (46%), neutropenia (72%) and thrombocytopenia (50%). Non-hematological toxicities of grade 3/4 included nausea (6%), appetite loss (7%), fatigue (7%) and infection (9%). Conclusions: The combination carboplatin-gemcitabine at these doses has shown activity with a favorable toxicity profile for fit elderly pts with advanced NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized phase II study of durvalumab and tremelimumab compared to doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (MEDISARC, AIO-STS 0415).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11075-TPS11075
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Sebastian Bauer ◽  
Barbara Hermes ◽  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Lars H Lindner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Curative Intent

TPS11075 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors and exhibit substantial histological diversity. Efficacious targeted 1st line treatment for advanced or metastatic STS is not available, and the standard therapy has been anthracycline-based for decades. This strategy shows poor efficacy, as demonstrated by a median Overall Survival (OS) of 12-20 months. Several STS subtypes, however, have been shown to express PD-L1, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated principle anti-tumor activity in pretreated STS. Our ongoing clinical trial tests the activity and safety of ICI combination therapy in the first-line setting. We hypothesize that the dual checkpoint blockade with Durvalumab (PD-L1) and Tremelimumab (CTLA-4) improves overall survival in STS when compared to the standard of care doxorubicin. Methods: MEDISARC is a multi-center phase II trial that is enrolling adult treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed STS of intermediate or high grade (FNCLCC grade 2 or 3) not amenable to surgery with curative intent and ECOG performance status 0-2. Chemosensitive histologic STS are eligible. 100 patients will be randomized 1:1, stratified by ECOG status (0 vs. 1/2). Patients in the experimental arm are treated with fixed doses of durvalumab (1.5 g Q4W) and tremelimumab (75 mg Q4W for 3 cycles, then Q12W) until Progressive Disease (PD) or for a maximum of 12 months. Doxorubicin treatment in the standard arm is at 75 mg/m2 Q3W and limited to 6 cycles. OS is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include 2-year OS rate, PFS, ORR according to conventional and modified RECIST 1.1, safety and tolerability and health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). OS analysis may be performed when the required number of events (E=70) has been observed. All randomized and treated subjects will be included in the efficacy and safety analysis. The accompanying translational research aims to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers in blood and tumor tissue. Enrollment of patients started in April 2018 and is ongoing. As of February 2019, 32 patients have been enrolled. The study is sponsored by AIO-Studien-gGmbH, Berlin, Germany. Clinical trial information: 2016-004750-15.

scholarly journals Response to immune checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic ROS1-rearranged lung cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9049-9049
Author(s):  
Noura J. Choudhury ◽  
Jaime Laurel Schneider ◽  
Tejas Patil ◽  
Viola Weijia Zhu ◽  
Debra A. Goldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Tumor Expression

9049 Background: ROS1 fusions are oncogenic drivers in various cancers types, including 1-3% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Immunotherapy approvals for NSCLC include ROS1-rearranged carcinomas, but the activity of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy (chemo-ICI) therapy, as well as the immunophenotypic characteristics of these tumors, have not been described in a large data set. Methods: In this multi-institutional study, patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were identified retrospectively. Tumor PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were assessed as part of routine clinical care. In patients who received ICI monotherapy or chemo-ICI in the metastatic setting, time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v. 1.1) were calculated. TTD was assessed with Kaplan-Meier methods; patients remaining on treatment were censored at last follow up. Results: 184 patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were identified. Among 146 PD-L1 evaluable cases, PD-L1 expression was < 1% in 60 (41%), 1-49% in 35 (24%) and ≥50% in 51 (35%) tumors. Ninety-two of 100 (92%) TMB-evaluable tumors had < 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). TMB was significantly lower for ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs (n = 97) vs. ROS1-wild type tumors (n = 5,380) evaluated with next-generation sequencing using MSK-IMPACT (median 2.6 vs. 5.9 mut/Mb, p < 0.001). Twenty-eight patients received ICI monotherapy and 11 patients received chemo-ICI. The median TTD was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.0-4.2; n = 28) for single-agent ICI therapy and 10 months (95% CI: 4.7-14.1; n = 11) for chemo-ICI therapy. The ORR was 13% (2/16 RECIST-evaluable; 95% CI: 2-38%) for ICI monotherapy and 83% (5/6 RECIST-evaluable; 95% CI: 36-100%) for chemo-ICI therapy. There was no difference in PD-L1 tumor expression (p = 0.9) or TMB (p = 0.8) between responders and non-responders and no correlation between PD-L1 tumor expression (rho = 0.16, p = 0.6) or TMB (rho = 0.03, p = 0.9) and maximum change in sum of target lesions. Conclusions: Most ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs have low or no PD-L1 expression and low TMB. The activity of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is disappointing in ROS1-driven NSCLC. In contrast, combination chemoimmunotherapy can achieve clinically meaningful activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document