Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab in children and young adults with INI1-negative cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10055-TPS10055
Author(s):  
Suzanne J. Forrest ◽  
Joanna Yi ◽  
Cassie Kline ◽  
Thomas Cash ◽  
Alyssa Terry Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Epithelioid Sarcoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Cancer Research

TPS10055 Background: Several aggressive pediatric and young adult cancers are characterized by SMARCB1 inactivation resulting in loss of INI1 expression, including rhabdoid tumors, epithelioid sarcoma and undifferentiated chordoma. These malignancies are associated with a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options for relapsed or refractory disease. Prior studies and emerging data suggest INI1-negative cancers may be uniquely susceptible to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Many INI1-negative pediatric tumors express PD-L1 and are infiltrated by immune cells, and there are reports of patients with advanced INI1-negative cancers with clinical responses to immune checkpoint blockade (Forrest et al. Clinical Cancer Research, 2020). We hypothesize that INI1 loss predicts tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Methods: This is an ongoing multicenter, phase II, open-label clinical trial to evaluate the activity of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients aged 6 months to 30 years with relapsed or refractory INI1-negative cancers (NCT04416568). The study enrolls patients in 2 strata: extracranial solid tumors in Stratum 1 and intracranial solid tumors in Stratum 2. Patients treated with prior ICI are excluded. Patients are treated with intravenous (IV) nivolumab 3mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by nivolumab 3mg/kg (max dose 240mg) IV every 2 weeks for up to 1-year. The primary objective is to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for Stratum 1 and by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for Stratum 2. The trial has a 2-stage design targeting a 25% or greater response rate, with each stratum assessed independently. The analysis for Stage 1 in a given Stratum will be performed after 10 patients are enrolled. If a sufficient number of responders are observed, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled at Stage 2. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease control rate at 12 months. Correlative aims include assessing tissue and blood biomarkers associated with treatment response. Enrollment began 14 Aug 2020 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04416568.

Dual immune checkpoint blockade in advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, a phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16201-e16201
Author(s):  
Susan Combs Scott ◽  
Ana De Jesus-Acosta ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Benjamin Philip Levy ◽  
Valsamo Anagnostou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Well Differentiated

e16201 Background: Limited systemic treatment options are available for progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET), also called carcinoid tumors. Given emerging evidence for immunotherapy response in high grade NET including small cell lung cancer, we sought to determine the efficacy of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated NET in an open label phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients had well-differentiated, nonfunctional NET of lung, pancreas, or GI origin that had progressed within the past 12 months after at least one line of prior therapy. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks for up to 2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Using a Simon’s 2-stage design, the study planned to accrue up to 56 patients. Based on published response rates to everolimus of 5%, we hypothesized that this regimen would be considered promising if the true ORR is > 15%. Results: Nine patients were enrolled prior to study closure due to funding, including 6 patients with NET of lung origin, 2 pancreatic, and 1 small bowel (Table). Median age was 71 years. All patients had distant metastatic disease at enrollment, with an average of 2 prior lines of therapy. Four of 9 patients achieved the primary endpoint of confirmed objective response, all of whom have ongoing response with a median duration of 15.4 months. Five of 9 patients, including all 4 responders, experienced immune-related toxicity requiring treatment modification or discontinuation. The trial did not accrue the target of 56 patients, however, objective response in 4 of 9 patients (ORR 44.4%, 90% CI: 16.9-74.9%) excluded the response rate target (15%). Conclusions: The impressive ORR of 44% with a median duration of response exceeding 15 months in this small clinical trial warrants further study of combination CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in previously treated well-differentiated NET. Our ongoing immunologic and genomic correlative analysis in responders and non-responders will help inform future study of immunotherapy in this patient population in need of new systemic therapy approaches. Clinical trial information: NCT03420521. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of the combination of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-GI18-149.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS461-TPS461
Author(s):  
Nataliya Volodymyrivna Uboha ◽  
Jens C. Eickhoff ◽  
Chandrikha Chandrasekharan ◽  
Shadia Ibrahim Jalal ◽  
Al Bowen Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

TPS461 Background: Metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) has poor prognosis. Overall survival (OS) remains around 12 months (mo) with current therapies. Pembrolizumab is approved for advanced GEA that has progressed on at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. However, the majority of patients progress on this treatment, and less than 15% of patients experience objective response (OR). This study will evaluate efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, abemaciclib, in patients with advanced GEA. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that CDK4/6 inhibitors can increase anti-tumor immunity and can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we hypothesize that abemaciclib will augment response to pembrolizumab in GEA. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, single arm, open label, phase II study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced GEA who have progressed or were intolerant to at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or with microsattelite unstable tumors will be excluded. Treatments will be given on a 21 day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Pembrolizumab, 200 mg intravenously, will be given on day 1, and abemaciclib, 150 mg, will be taken orally twice a day on days 1-21. Primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include PFS rate at 6 mo, disease control rate, OS and OR rate. Correlative endpoints will examine relationship between PDL1 status, genomic signature and treatment response. Saliva samples will be collected for microbiome analysis. Archival tumor tissue and blood samples will be banked for future studies. A total of 31 evaluable subjects will be enrolled to detect an anticipated increase in the median PFS from 2 months (null hypothesis) to 4 months with 80% power at the one-sided 0.05 significance level. The trial is open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03997448.

A phase II open-label study of cabozantinib after first-line treatment including an immune-checkpoint combination in patients with advanced or unresectable renal cell carcinoma: The BREAKPOINT trial (MeetUro trial 03 - EudraCT number 2018-000582-36).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 326-326
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Procopio ◽  
Chiara Pircher ◽  
Melanie Claps ◽  
Valentina Guadalupi ◽  
Alessia Mennitto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label

326 Background: Antiangiogenic therapy has been a milestone in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for years. The positive results with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are changing the frontline standard of care of mRCC patients (pts). To date, prospective data are lacking to determine the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in pts progressed to ICI. The multikinase inhibitor Cabozantinib (cabo) has shown prolonged survival in pre-treated mRCC pts. Moreover, by targeting multiple pathways and crucial kinases involved in microenvironment-driven immune-escape, it may represent an ideal agent to be used sequentially after ICI. Methods: This is the first prospective open label, single arm, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Cabo in pts with mRCC pre-treated with adjuvant or first line PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy (as monotherapy or in combination with an TKI or anti CTLA-4). Cabo 60 mg once daily was administered until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Among 23 patients enrolled, 22 were included in the analysis (one was excluded for screening failure). Median age was 59.5 years (range: 29-74), 69.5% were male. At baseline, Karnofsky performance status was 100 in 59% of pts, 80-90 in 31.8% and 70-80 in 9%. 22.7% of pts had a good Heng score, 50% intermediate and 27.2% poor. Median duration of the previous therapy with anti PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 compounds was 4.3 months. Pts received an average of 4.7 months of Cabo. Among evaluable cases, 6 pts (27.2%) achieved a partial response and 5 pts (22.7%) stable disease. The median follow-up was 7.2 months and the median PFS was 7.2 months. 2 pts discontinued treatment for toxicity, 8 pts for PD, 1 patient discontinued treatment for different reason than PD, 11 pts are still on treatment. Grade (G) 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.7% of pts; the most common AEs were hand and foot syndrome (HFS) (G1 in 36.3% of pts, G2 18.1%, G3 4.5%), diarrhea (G1 31.8%, G2 18.1%), hypothyroidism (G1 9.09 %, G2 22.7 %), mucositis (G1 36.3%, G2 4,5%), and fatigue (G1 18.1%, G2 18.1%). Transitory withholding of cabo was observed in 63.6% of pts (14/22) and it was due to AEs in the 90% of the cases. For 5/22 pts (22.7 %), dose reduction was needed to manage AEs. The most common AEs leading to temporary drug interruption were HFS G1-3 (13.9%), liver disfunction G1-G2 (13.9%), diarrhea G1-G2 (11.6%), nausea and vomiting G2 (11.6 %) and fatigue G2 (9.3%). Conclusions: So far, the treatment with cabo after a I line anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy resulted active and well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT03463681 .

A randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11583-TPS11583
Author(s):  
Vanessa Anne Eulo ◽  
Breelyn A. Wilky ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Mia C. Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS11583 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Current standard therapy includes anthracycline based chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase II study of cabozantinib in advanced STS is underway. Cabozantinib in combination with immune checkpoint blockade has shown clinical benefit in several tumor types including HCC, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Since cabozantinib may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T-cells and promote an immune permissive environment, we hypothesize that combining cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibition is a therapeutic strategy that will be more effective than cabozantinib alone. Additionally, the design of the trial will allow assessment of whether pretreatment with cabozantinib will enhance the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial of cabozantinib (60mg orally daily as a single agent, 40mg in combination) with or without combination Ipilimumab (ipi, 1mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses) and Nivolumab (nivo, 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for four doses, then 480mg IV every 4 weeks) in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to up to two lines of chemotherapy. 105 pts with non-translocation driven sarcomas will be enrolled at three US sites and randomized 2:1 to the combination group. Pts will be stratified by prior pazopanib use and balanced for histologies. Patients who progress on arm A will cross over to combination therapy (arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. 35 patients in Cohort A (cabozantinib alone) and 70 patients in Cohort B (cabozantinib plus ipi/nivo) will be required to detect an increase of the ORR from 10% in cohort A to 30% in cohort B with 81% power with a one-sided alpha level of 10%. Key eligibility criteria include: at least 18 years of age, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, ≤2 prior lines of therapy and measurable disease. Exclusion criteria include: translocation-driven sarcoma except alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), prior immunotherapy, and chronic use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints are safety, overall and progression free survival, disease control rate, and response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab after cabozantinib pretreatment. Mandatory tumor biopsies pre-treatment and at 6 weeks will be obtained. Peripheral blood will be collected for circulating immune phenotyping. Enrollment will occur at 3 participating institutions and is expected to be completed in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04551430.

Phase II study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and panitumumab in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Michael Sangmin Lee ◽  
Patrick J. Loehrer ◽  
Iman Imanirad ◽  
Stacey Cohen ◽  
Kristen Keon Ciombor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Increase Response Rate ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Two Stage

7 Background: Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is a standard therapy in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF WT mCRC. Preclinical data shows that anti-EGFR therapy causes a tumor-specific adaptive immune response and immunogenic apoptosis, with functional adaptive immunity required to mediate efficacy. However, resistance to anti-EGFR antibody therapy inevitably develops and is associated with increased expression of CTLA-4 and PD-L1. We hypothesized that addition of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) to panitumumab will increase response rate in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF WT MSS mCRC. Methods: LCCC1632 was a multicenter, single-arm, Simon’s two stage phase II clinical trial with a pre-specified safety run-in of panitumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF WT, MSS mCRC (NCT03442569). Eligible patients must have received 1-2 prior lines of therapy and no prior anti-EGFR or immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Subjects received ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV q6wk, nivolumab 240 mg IV q2wk, and panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV q2wk until progression, toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary endpoint was response rate at 12 weeks per RECIST 1.1, and key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and duration of response. Results: A total of 56 subjects were enrolled 3/2018-6/2020. This included the 6-subject safety run-in, with 0/6 dose-limiting toxicities in first 12 weeks. The first stage of the Simon’s two-stage clinical trial (n=32) had sufficient response rate to merit full enrollment. There were 7 unevaluable subjects for the primary endpoint of 12-week response rate. Among 49 evaluable subjects, 12-week response rate was 35% (95% CI 21-48; n=17 responses). Twenty subjects had at least an unconfirmed response at any time. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI 5.5-7.9). There was one treatment-related grade 5 adverse event of myocarditis. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 AEs included lipase increased (9%), amylase increased (7%), ALT increased (5%), AST increased (5%), diarrhea (5%), hypophosphatemia (5%), and maculopapular rash (5%). Conclusions: The combination of panitumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab demonstrated evidence of activity and met its prespecified primary endpoint of 12-wk response rate criteria to merit further study. The PFS in this single-arm study compares favorably to expected PFS for anti-EGFR monotherapy in RAS wild-type patients, and results suggest activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-EGFR therapy in MSS mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03442569.

scholarly journals 363 Vactosertib and durvalumab as second or later line treatment for PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: interim result

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A388-A388
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Byoung Yong Shim ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundTargeting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is reported to augment the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) through either enhanced anti-tumor immunity or the correction of tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, the combination of vactosertib, a highly selective TGF-β RI kinase inhibitor, and durvalumab is anticipated to improve anti-tumor activity of the ICI. A phase 1b/2a study was conducted to evaluate the combination of vactosertib and durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients were treated with vactosertib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (five days on and two days off) and durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg every four weeks. Eligible patients were ≥19 years old with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) and have no prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors or other TGF- β R1 kinase inhibitors. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety, antitumor activity including objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR) as well as circulating pharmacodynamic biomarkers related to TGF-β signaling. Response was assessed per RECIST (v1.1).ResultsBy August 4 2020, twenty-six PD-L1 positive (SP263 assay) patients were analyzed. Median age was 61.5 years (range 48–83), 69.2% were male, median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–4), and all patients were PD-L1 positive (15 patients with PD-L1≥25% and 11 patients with PD-L1 1–24%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were itching (38.5%) and skin rash (34.6%), but no Gr≥3 itching and rash were observed. Each case of the following was reported as Grade 3 TRAEs: adrenal insufficiency, anemia, and pneumonitis; Grade 4 TRAE, CPK increase, was observed in one patient. Objective response rate was 30.8% and 40.0% in patients with PD-L1≥1% and ≥25% respectively. Circulating PAI-1 and CTGF evaluated in 15 patients decreased significantly on Cycle 1 day 5. Ongoing biomarker results will be presented.ConclusionsThe combination of vactosertib and durvalumab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity as a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The efficacy outcomes of this combination in a larger number of patients with advanced NSCLC will be followed.Trial RegistrationNCT03732274Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Ethics Board of Severance Hospital (4-2018-0892), National Cancer Center (NCC2019-0057), St. Vincent’s Hospital (VC19MDDF0205), and Chungbuk National University Hospital (2019-08-015).

795 A multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A843-A843
Author(s):  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sandip Patel ◽  
Christopher Ryan ◽  
Ashish Sangal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Light Exposure ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundAngiosarcoma is a rare cancer of endothelial cells that can be aggressive and carries a high mortality. A subset of angiosarcomas are characterized by high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and UV light exposure DNA mutational signature. Isolated case reports have suggested clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in angiosarcoma; no prospective studies of immune checkpoint inhibition in angiosarcoma have been reported. We report efficacy analysis results for patients with advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing phase II study for rare cancers (NCT02834013).MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg IV q6weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg IV q2weeks) for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint is objective response rate as assessed by RECIST v1.1, including measurable cutaneous disease that can be followed by photography. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, stable disease at six months, and toxicity. A two-stage design is used with six patients in the first stage and an additional ten patients in the second stage.ResultsAt data cutoff, 16 patients with angiosarcoma were enrolled. Median age was 68 years (25-81 years). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (0-5). 9 patients had cutaneous primary tumors of any cutaneous site, 7 had non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR for all patients was 25% (4/16, table 1, figure 1). Subgroup analysis revealed that 60% (3/5) of patients with primary cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face had a confirmed objective response. 6-month PFS was 38%. 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE), and 25% experienced a grade 3-4 AE. 68.8% experienced an immune related AE (irAE), and 2 (12.5%) developed grade 3 or 4 irAEs. Grade 3-4 irAEs were ALT and AST increase and diarrhea. There were no grade 5 toxicities.ConclusionsThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab was well tolerated and had an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma regardless of primary site, with 3 of 5 patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.AcknowledgementsFunding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grant awards CA180888, CA180819, CA180868; and in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyTrial RegistrationNCT02834013Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the NCI CIRB.

Phase II study of binimetinib with imatinib in patients with unresectable KIT-mutant melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9594-TPS9594
Author(s):  
Katy K. Tsai ◽  
Iwei Yeh ◽  
Adil Daud ◽  
Ari Oglesby
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Type I ◽  
True Response ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

TPS9594 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed treatment for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, as have BRAF/MEK inhibitors for pts with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. However, pts with acral or mucosal melanomas are in particular need of more options given a lower objective response rate (ORR) to ICI, and lower incidence of BRAF V600 driver mutation. Such BRAF mutations are found in only 5-10% of acral/mucosal melanomas, while KIT mutations/amplifications are found in 10-20%. Even when present, a KIT alteration does not guarantee response to KIT inhibition, with only about one-third responding as previously shown in 3 phase II studies. A significant number of KIT-mutant melanomas have been shown to demonstrate NF1 or SPRED1 loss, with recent preclinical work showing that such alterations are associated with the loss of negative suppression of RAS, resulting in RAS activation and MEK dependence. We hypothesize that NF1 or SPRED1 loss cooperates with KIT mutations to drive melanomagenesis and resistance to KIT inhibition, and propose to target this vulnerability with a combination approach to targeted therapy. This phase II study will be the first to evaluate the efficacy and safety of binimetinib plus imatinib in pts with KIT-mutant melanoma. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated phase II study of binimetinib in combination with imatinib in pts with BRAF V600 WT, KIT-mutant unresectable melanoma who have progressed on or who are ineligible for ICI (NCT04598009). Pts will be ≥18 yo with performance status ECOG 0-2, and have unresectable Stage IIIB/C/D or Stage IV melanoma that is BRAF V600 WT and KIT-mutant by CLIA-certified testing platform. Pts will have progressed on prior ICI or other standard-of-care (SOC) therapies, or be ineligible for or unable to tolerate SOC therapies. Pts with brain metastasis will be eligible if clinically stable and determination made that no CNS-specific treatment is required prior to study start. Pts previously treated with a MEK inhibitor will be excluded. A Simon 2-stage Minimax design will be used; the null hypothesis that the true response rate is 0.1 will be tested against a one-sided alternative. 15 pts will be accrued in the first stage. If there are £1 responses, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 10 additional pts will be accrued for a total of 25. The null hypothesis that the true response rate is 0.1 will be rejected if ≥6 responses are observed. This yields a type I error rate of 0.05 and power of 0.8017 when the true response rate is 0.3.Primary endpoint: ORR (RECIST). Secondary endpoints: duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD ≥16 weeks), safety profile (CTCAE). Exploratory objectives to include investigations of association between clinical response and baseline NF1 and SPRED1 status, and of pathologic correlates of acquired resistance. Study began enrolling pts in December 2020 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04598009.

Cyto-KIK: A phase II trial of cytoreductive surgery in kidney cancer plus immunotherapy (nivolumab) and targeted kinase inhibition (cabozantinib).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4598-TPS4598
Author(s):  
Karie Runcie ◽  
Eric A. Singer ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Christopher B. Anderson ◽  
Matthew Dallos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Orthotopic Mouse Model

TPS4598 Background: Despite recent therapeutic advancements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), only 5-10% of patients will achieve a complete response (CR) to therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy removes a large portion of the tumor which may be a source of immunosuppression driven by tumor cell-intrinsic factors in the tumor microenvironment. A pre-clinical orthotopic mouse model of aggressive metastatic triple negative breast cancer showed that neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition generated enhanced and sustained antitumor immune responses with improved survival compared to adjuvant therapy (Liu J et al. Cancer Discov. 2016:1382). Clinical validation of improved outcomes with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors has been demonstrated in trials for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, advanced melanoma, and recurrent glioblastoma (Forde, P.M., et al. N Engl J Med. 2018:1976; Amaria, R.N., et al Nat Med. 2018:1649; Cloughesy T.F., et al. Nat Med 2019:477). Recent data from a phase III trial in subjects with untreated mRCC, demonstrated the superiority of combination cabozantinib and nivolumab over sunitinib and established a new standard of care for mRCC (Choueiri T.K., et al. Annals of Onc, 2020;31 (suppl; abstr 6960). We hypothesize that if tumor specific immune responses to immunotherapy are greatest prior to nephrectomy, then treatment with nivolumab (nivo) and cabozantinib (cabo) prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy will lead to maximal peripheral and intra-tumoral specific immune responses and higher rates of CR during the course of treatment. Methods: This is an open label phase II, multicenter clinical trial of combination nivo and cabo prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with mRCC (NCT04322955). 48 treatment- naïve subjects with radiological or histological diagnosis of mRCC will be enrolled with the primary endpoint of CR rate according to RECIST version 1.1. Subjects will receive cabo (40mg) daily and nivo (480mg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks prior to nephrectomy and a 3+3 design will be used to evaluate the safety of the interval (21 or 14 days) between the discontinuation of cabo and nephrectomy. Post-operatively, subjects will resume treatment with cabo and nivo until evidence of disease progression. Secondary endpoints include median size reduction of the primary tumor, response rate, PFS, OS, and surgical outcomes using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Tissue based assays will quantify treatment related changes in the renal tumor microenvironment through polychromatic immunofluorescence, single cell RNA sequencing of the biopsy and nephrectomy specimen, and multiplex assessment of circulating serum cytokines. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI will be performed in a subset of subjects to assess radiologic correlates of response. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04322955.

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TITAN-TCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 446-446
Author(s):  
Marc-Oliver Grimm ◽  
Bernd Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
Uwe Zimmermann ◽  
Barbara Grün ◽  
Gustavo Bruno Baretton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Third Line

446 Background: Several PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors including Nivolumab (Nivo) are approved in urothelial cancer. Recently, in the front line setting, improved activity of combined PD-L1 and CTLA4 immune-checkpoint inhibition has been reported and a phase III trial with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) is ongoing. Here we report a response-based tailored approach starting treatment with Nivo monotherapy using Nivo+Ipi as immunotherapeutic “boost”. Methods: Between July 2017 and April 2019 86 patients were enrolled and treated according to protocol version 3 (cohort 1). Patients started with Nivo 240 mg Q2W induction. After 4 dosings and tumor assessment at week 8 (i) responders (PR/CR) to Nivo monotherapy continued with maintenance while (ii) patients with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) received 2 cycles Nivo3+Ipi1 followed by another 2 cycles Nivo1+Ipi3 if not responding. Median follow-up is 8.7 months. The primary endpoint is confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints include activity of Nivo monotherapy at week 8, remission rate with Nivo+Ipi “boosts”, safety, overall survival and quality of life. Results: Of the patients 42, 39 and 5 were first, second and third line, respectively. Median age was 67 years (range 45-84), 61 patients (71 %) were male and 25 female. ORR with Nivo monotherapy at first assessment (week 8) was 29 % and 23 % in first and second/third line, respectively. Of the patients 41 received Nivo+Ipi “boosts” after week 8 while 12 received later “boosts”. Best overall response (BOR) rate with Nivo induction ± Nivo+Ipi “boosts” was 48 % and 27 % in first and second/third line, respectively. In first line 7/17 (41 %) patients receiving Nivo+Ipi after week 8 had an improved response compared to 2/24 (8.3 %) in second/third line. Of the patients who continued with Nivo maintenance after week 8 and received later “boosts” 2/12 (17 %) had a PR and 2/12 (17 %) improved to SD. Treatment-related AEs will be presented. Conclusions: TITAN–TCC explores a response-driven use of Nivo+Ipi as an immunotherapeutic “boost”. In first line, this significantly improved ORR compared to the expected response rate of Nivo monotherapy, providing further evidence to the added value of Ipi in combination with Nivo. Further follow-up is ongoing to characterize duration and depth of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03219775 . Research Sponsor: Bristol-Myers Squibb[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document