Zanidatamab (ZW25) in HER2-expressing gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA): Results from a phase I study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
Muralidhar Beeram ◽  
Diana L. Hanna ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

164 Background: For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing GEA, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is the only approved HER2-targeted therapy, and they have limited treatment options after progression. Zanidatamab, a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody, has shown durable anti-tumor activity with good tolerability in a range of HER2-expressing cancers. Methods: In this 3-part Phase 1 study (NCT02892123), zanidatamab (10 mg/kg QW, 20 mg/kg Q2W, or 30 mg/kg Q3W) is administered as a single agent (Parts 1 & 2; QW or Q2W) or in combination with chemotherapy (Part 3; Q2W or Q3W). Eligibility criteria includes GEA with HER2 expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or IHC 2+, progression after standard of care therapy, and measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 (Part 2 requirement only). Results: In Parts 1 and 2, 36 GEA patients have been treated with zanidatamab (QW [n = 5]; Q2W [n = 31]). In Part 3, 26 GEA patients have been treated (zanidatamab Q2W + (paclitaxel [n = 11] or capecitabine [n = 6]); zanidatamab Q3W + capecitabine [n = 9]). Conclusions: Zanidatamab, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy, is well tolerated with promising and durable anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated GEA patients (including prior HER2-targeted therapy). These data support further investigation of zanidatamab as a novel therapeutic for patients with HER2-expressing GEA. Clinical trial information: NCT02892123. [Table: see text]

Phase 1 study of glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor CB-839 combined with either everolimus (E) or cabozantinib (Cabo) in patients (pts) with clear cell (cc) and papillary (pap) metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 603-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
Alice C. Fan ◽  
Richard J. Lee ◽  
Bradley Curtis Carthon ◽  
Othon Iliopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

603 Background: CB-839 is a first-in-class inhibitor of GLS that targets tumor glutamine utilization, a pathway upregulated in kidney cancer. CB-839 combines with E or Cabo in pre-clinical RCC models to inhibit metabolic pathways resulting in enhanced anti-tumor activity. The CX-839-001 study includes cohorts evaluating the safety, efficacy and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CB-839 in combination with E (CBE) or Cabo (CB-Cabo) in pts with mRCC. Here we report results from the CBE and CB-Cabo cohorts. Methods: Eligibility criteria included mRCC with cc or pap histology, ECOG 0-1, RECIST measurable disease and, for cc pts, treatment with at least 1 prior anti-VEGF therapy. Pts received escalating doses of CB-839 (PO BID) in a 3+3 design, either 400-800 mg with E (10 mg PO QD) or 600-800 mg with Cabo (60 mg PO QD). Tumor response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed every 8 wks. Results: 27 pts (22 cc, 3 pap, 2 other) were enrolled in CB-E escalation (n = 17) and expansion (n = 10) cohorts (7 at 400 mg, 13 at 600 mg, 7 at 800 mg) and 11 pts (9 cc, 2 pap) in CB-Cabo escalation cohorts (6 at 600 mg, 5 at 800 mg). Median prior lines of therapy was 2 for CBE (including 64% of cc pts with ≥2 prior anti-VEGF therapies) and 3 for CB-Cabo (range 0-6). A maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 800 mg was selected as the RP2D for CB-839. The most common treatment-related Gr≥3 AEs were fatigue (11%), anemia, hyperglycemia, and neutropenia (7% each) for CBE (N = 27) and diarrhea (14%) and platelet count decreased (14% including 1 DLT at 600 mg) for CB-Cabo (N = 7). Of 24 evaluable CBE pts there was 1 PR and 21 SD for a disease control rate (DCR = CR + PR + SD) of 92% with a median PFS of 7.1 mo (95% CI 4 - 11). For 9 evaluable CB-Cabo pts the ORR and DCR were 44% (4 PR) and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: The tumor metabolism inhibitor CB-839 combines with full dose of RCC targeted therapies, E and Cabo, with good tolerability and encouraging clinical activity in heavily-pretreated mRCC pts. CB-Cabo ORR and DCR of 44% and 100% are promising, and CBE DCR of 92% and PFS of 7.1 mo compare favorably to historical E monotherapy. Randomized Phase 2 studies have been initiated (CBE) or are planned (CB-Cabo). Clinical trial information: NCT02071862.

ECOG-ACRIN EAA172: Phase 1/2 study of daratumumab, bortezomib, dexamethasone (DVd) with or without venetoclax in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with assessment for t(11;14) status.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8052-TPS8052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Thompson ◽  
Susanna J. Jacobus ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Murali Janakiram ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Decision Algorithm ◽  
Acceptable Safety Profile ◽  
Multi Agent

TPS8052 Background: The most common translocation in multiple myeloma (MM) is t(11;14)(q13;q32), present in approximately 20% of cases. MM cells with t(11;14) usually have a favorable high BCL-2 level and inferior outcomes compared to standard risk MM. Venetoclax (VEN) is a potent, selective, orally available small-molecule BCL-2 inhibitor that induces cell death in MM cell lines and primary samples. VEN has single agent activity in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) with an acceptable safety profile, especially in t(11;14) MM; however, non- t(11;14) MM patients may benefit from single agent VEN and VEN incorporated in multi-agent RRMM regimens. Dexamethasone (d) promotes Bcl-2 dependence in MM resulting in sensitivity to VEN and this combination with bortezomib (Vd-VEN) has an acceptable safety profile with high response rates in heavily pre-treated MM. Combination therapy with daratumumab and bortezomib (DVd) has become a standard of care in RRMM. Our hypotheses are that the addition of VEN will improve upon this standard and be most effective in the t(11;14) positive subset. Methods: Eligibility criteria include RRMM with measurable disease, not bortezomib refractory, platelet count > 100K. t(11;14) is an integral biomarker with status (positive or negative) established at registration. After a Ph1 study to determine the recommended phase 2 VEN dose, patients are randomized to DVd +/- VEN [stratified by prior lines of therapy and R-ISS]. The primary Ph2 objectives are to compare 8-cycle minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate and to inform the role of t(11;14) as a biomarker. The Ph2 design proposed by Freidlin et al. follows a decision algorithm as outlined in the table below. Simulations were run to establish an optimal sample size given various parameters including biomarker prevalence and power to make appropriate decisions for a Ph3 design. Target Ph2 accrual is 240 patients with a 1/3 positive:2/3 negative t(11;14) split. Clinical trial information: NCT03701321. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Characteristics and Treatment Challenges of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3807
Author(s):  
Pierangela Sepe ◽  
Arianna Ottini ◽  
Chiara Carlotta Pircher ◽  
Andrea Franza ◽  
Melanie Claps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) comprise several rare and poorly described diseases, often characterized by bad prognosis and with no standard treatments available. The gap in their clinical management is linked to the poor molecular characterization in handling the treatment of non clear-cell RCC with untailored therapies. Due to their rarity, non-clear RCC are in fact under-represented in prospective randomized trials. Thus, treatment choices are based on extrapolating results from clear cell RCC trials, retrospective data, or case reports. Over the last two decades, various options have been considered as the mainstay for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), including angiogenesis inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as well as MET inhibitors and mammalian targeting of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. More recently, the therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with immunotherapy, alone or in combination with targeted agents that have been shown to significantly improve outcomes of mRCC patients, if compared to TKI single-agent. It has been widely proven that non-clear cell RCC is a morphologically and clinically distinct entity from its clear cell counterpart but more knowledge about its biology is certainly needed. Histology-specific collaborative trials are in fact now emerging to investigate different treatments for non-clear cell RCC. This review summarizes pathogenetic mechanisms of non-clear cell RCC, the evolution of treatment paradigms over the last few decades, with a focus on immunotherapy-based trials, and future potential treatment options.

scholarly journals Co-Clinical Trials: An Innovative Drug Development Platform for Cholangiocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Brinda Balasubramanian ◽  
Simran Venkatraman ◽  
Kyaw Zwar Myint ◽  
Tavan Janvilisri ◽  
Kanokpan Wongprasert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Innovative Drug ◽  
Curative Intent

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a group of malignancies that originate from the biliary tract, is associated with a high mortality rate and a concerning increase in worldwide incidence. In Thailand, where the incidence of CCA is the highest, the socioeconomic burden is severe. Yet, treatment options are limited, with surgical resection being the only form of treatment with curative intent. The current standard-of-care remains adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy which is ineffective in most patients. The overall survival rate is dismal, even after surgical resection and the tumor heterogeneity further complicates treatment. Together, this makes CCA a significant burden in Southeast Asia. For effective management of CCA, treatment must be tailored to each patient, individually, for which an assortment of targeted therapies must be available. Despite the increasing numbers of clinical studies in CCA, targeted therapy drugs rarely get approved for clinical use. In this review, we discuss the shortcomings of the conventional clinical trial process and propose the implementation of a novel concept, co-clinical trials to expedite drug development for CCA patients. In co-clinical trials, the preclinical studies and clinical trials are conducted simultaneously, thus enabling real-time data integration to accurately stratify and customize treatment for patients, individually. Hence, co-clinical trials are expected to improve the outcomes of clinical trials and consequently, encourage the approval of targeted therapy drugs. The increased availability of targeted therapy drugs for treatment is expected to facilitate the application of precision medicine in CCA.

Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who have progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Results from the phase 3 COSMIC-311 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6001-6001
Author(s):  
Marcia S. Brose ◽  
Bruce Robinson ◽  
Steven I. Sherman ◽  
Barbara Jarzab ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 3

6001 Background: Cabozantinib (C), an inhibitor of VEGFR2, MET, AXL, and RET, showed clinical activity in patients (pts) with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in phase 1/2 studies (Cabanillas 2017; Brose 2018). This phase 3 study (NCT03690388) evaluated the efficacy and safety of C vs placebo (P) in pts with RAI-refractory DTC who had progressed during/after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy for whom there is no standard of care. Methods: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, pts were randomized 2:1 to receive C (60 mg QD) or P, stratified by prior lenvatinib treatment (L; yes, no) and age (≤65, > 65 yr). Pts with RAI-refractory DTC must have received L or sorafenib for DTC and progressed during or following treatment with ≤ 2 prior VEGFR inhibitors. Pts randomized to P could cross over to open-label C upon disease progression per blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) in the first 100 randomized pts and progression-free survival (PFS) in all randomized pts. PFS and ORR were assessed by BIRC per RECIST v1.1. The study was designed to detect an ORR for C vs P (2-sided α = 0.01) and a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of 0.61 (90% power, 2-sided α = 0.04). A prespecified interim PFS analysis was planned for the ITT population at the time of the primary ORR analysis. Results: As of 19 Aug 2020,125 vs 62 pts had been randomized to the C and P arms, respectively; median age was 66 yr, 55% were female and 63% received prior L. Median (m) follow-up was 6.2 months (mo). At the planned interim analysis, the trial met the primary endpoint of PFS with C demonstrating significant improvement over P (HR 0.22, 96% CI 0.13–0.36; p < 0.0001). mPFS was not reached for C vs 1.9 mo for P; PFS benefit was observed in all prespecified subgroups including prior L (yes, HR 0.26; no, HR 0.11) and age (≤65 yr, HR 0.16; > 65 yr, HR 0.31). ORR was 15% for C vs 0% for P (p = 0.0281) but did not meet the prespecified criteria for statistical significance (p < 0.01). A favorable OS trend was observed for C vs P (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.27–1.11). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade with higher occurrences in the C vs P arm included diarrhea (51% vs 3%), hand-foot skin reaction (46% vs 0%), hypertension (28% vs 5%), fatigue (27% vs 8%), and nausea (24% vs 2%); grade 3/4 AEs were experienced by 57% of pts with C vs 26% with P. Dose reductions due to any grade AEs occurred in 57% of pts with C vs 5% with P. Treatment discontinuations due to AEs not related to disease progression occurred in 5% of pts with C vs 0% with P. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either arm. Conclusions: C showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in PFS over P in pts with RAI-refractory DTC after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy with no unexpected toxicities. C may represent a new standard of care in pts with previously treated DTC. Clinical trial information: NCT03690388.

HER-2-Amplified Breast Cancer

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahraa Al-Hilli ◽  
Judy C Boughey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Aggressive Disease ◽  
Node Positive Disease ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor–2 (HER-2) gene is found in approximately 15 to 30% of breast cancers. Historically, HER-2 overexpression has been associated with aggressive disease and a poor prognosis. However, the use of targeted anti-HER2 therapy has revolutionized the treatment of HER-2-positive disease, and the use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is now standard of care for tumors greater than 1 cm in size and in node-positive disease. More recently, the value of dual-agent anti-HER-2 therapy has been demonstrated in large clinical trials. This review provides an overview of HER-2-positive breast cancer, its molecular basis, methods of identification, and treatment options and strategies. This review contains 2 figures and 70 references Key words: anti-HER-2 therapy, breast cancer, HER-2-positive breast cancer, HER-2 resistance, lapatinib, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pertuzumab, small HER-2-positive breast cancer, trastuzumab

scholarly journals Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 944-957
Author(s):  
Changqing Xie ◽  
Nicole A. McGrath ◽  
Cecilia Monge Bonilla ◽  
Jianyang Fu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Molecular Landscape ◽  
Line Setting

Abstract Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as FGFR2 gene fusions, mutations of IDH1/2, HER2, BRAC1/2 and BRAF. Pembigatinib has become the first approved targeted therapy for BTC with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Recent immunotherapy has opened new therapy avenues in BTC with pembrolizumab approved for either microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors, including BTC. The combination of immunotherapy with other modalities is currently being evaluated in different clinical trials, since single agent immunotherapy appears to provide modest benefits in advanced BTC. In this review, we summarize the current status of treatment options, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations in advanced BTC.

Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Hematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Ongoing Work ◽  
The Many

Abstract Advances in treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma have made a significant impact on the overall survival of patients and have helped achieve levels of response and duration of remission previously not achievable with standard chemotherapy-based approaches. These improvements are due, in large part, to the development of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, each of which has substantial single-agent activity. In addition, a large number of second-generation agents are also in clinical development, such that the repertoire of available treatment options continues to expand. To better interpret clinical trials performed in the relapsed setting, it is important that definitions of relapse categories are used to help better pinpoint the specific benefit for a given therapy, especially in the combination therapy setting as it aids in determining if ongoing work should be continued or abandoned for a given new agent. Insights from preclinical modeling and in vitro work have identified several new combinations, new targets and second- or third-generation versions of existing targets that hold great promise in the setting of relapsed myeloma. Combinations of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide with conventional agents or among each other have resulted in enhanced response rates and efficacy. Clinical trials of agents such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide, vorinostat, panobinostat, and elotuzomab are just a few of the many exciting new compounds that are being tested in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials for relapsed patients. Further clinical and translational testing are critical to better understanding how best to combine these new agents, as well as identifying patient populations that may best benefit from treatment with these developing new agents.

scholarly journals Biliary Tract Cancers: Molecular Heterogeneity and New Treatment Options

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3370
Author(s):  
Nicola Personeni ◽  
Ana Lleo ◽  
Tiziana Pressiani ◽  
Francesca Colapietro ◽  
Mark Robert Openshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Molecular Heterogeneity ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Tract Cancer

Most patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) are diagnosed with advanced disease, relapse rates are high in those undergoing surgery and prognosis remains poor, while the incidence is increasing. Treatment options are limited, and chemotherapy is still the standard of care in both adjuvant and advanced disease setting. In recent years, different subtypes of BTC have been defined depending on the anatomical location and genetic and/or epigenetic aberrations. Especially for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) novel therapeutic targets have been identified, including fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene fusions and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations, with molecularly targeted agents having shown evidence of activity in this subgroup of patients. Additionally, other pathways are being evaluated in both iCCA and other subtypes of BTC, alongside targeting of the immune microenvironment. The growing knowledge of BTC biology and molecular heterogeneity has paved the way for the development of new therapeutic approaches that will completely change the treatment paradigm for this disease in the near future. This review provides an overview of the molecular heterogeneity of BTC and summarizes new targets and emerging therapies in development. We also discuss resistance mechanisms, open issues, and future perspectives in the management of BTC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document