scholarly journals ReCAP: Hospitalizations in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: The Role of Chemotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitriona B. O’Neill ◽  
Coral L. Atoria ◽  
Eileen M. O’Reilly ◽  
Martin C. Henman ◽  
Peter B. Bach ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND QUESTION ASKED: In patients with metastatic cancer, chemotherapy may provide symptom control, prevent complications, prolong life, or improve quality of life. Except in rare cases, however, patients with metastatic disease will not be cured. In older patients with metastatic cancer, hospitalization for treatment toxicity may reduce the quality of an already limited life expectancy. We evaluated the association between chemotherapy for metastatic cancer and risk of hospitalization. MAIN CONCLUSION: Hospitalizations are common in patients with incurable advanced malignancies and are more likely among those who receive chemotherapy. APPROACH: In the linked SEER-Medicare dataset, we identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older with a primary diagnosis of metastatic breast, colorectal, ovarian, bladder, lung, pancreas, esophageal, stomach, or prostate cancer between 2001 and 2009 who died by the end of 2010. Chemotherapy recipients and nonrecipients were pair-matched by age, sex, race, comorbidity, geographic region and survival duration. The primary endpoint was hospital admission, identified in inpatient claims between cancer diagnosis and the first of hospice admission or death. We also identified the subset of admissions associated with a primary or secondary diagnosis code suggestive of an adverse effect of chemotherapy. The association between chemotherapy and hospitalization was estimated in separate multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models for each cancer site, accounting for the matched-pairs design and controlling for unmatched demographic and disease characteristics. RESULTS: Of 18,486 patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic cancer, 92% were hospitalized at least once for any reason, including 51% hospitalized for a likely toxicity. The corresponding rates among matched non-recipients were 83% and 34% (Figure). In nearly all cancers, chemotherapy recipients had a greater risk of hospitalization for a likely toxicity or for any cause. Chemotherapy recipients had substantially higher hospitalization for infection or fever (21% v 15%), hematologic complications (11% v 3%), dehydration (13% v 6%), and PE or DVT (9% v 4%) compared with nonrecepients. Chemotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of likely toxicity-related hospitalization in nearly all cancers, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and other treatment. The association was greatest in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.60) and smallest in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.47). INTERPRETATION: Older patients receiving chemotherapy for incurable advanced cancers are at high risk of hospitalization, of which a non-negligible proportion is likely attributable to adverse effects of treatment. Infection, fever, dehydration, and hematologic complications constitute a large proportion of these events, some of which may be preventable through evidence-based patient management, prophylactic interventions, and effective outpatient care. Our findings might be limited to older patients with advanced cancer who have a generally poor prognosis or limited expected survival. SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Understanding the common reasons for hospital admissions and developing toxicity management programs and educational resources may help patients and their families make informed treatment decisions, minimize adverse effects and reduce hospitalizations in this population with limited life expectancy. [Figure: see text]

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 868-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Lundby ◽  
Trine Graabæk ◽  
Jesper Ryg ◽  
Jens Søndergaard ◽  
Anton Pottegård ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (23) ◽  
pp. 3592-3594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Danzig ◽  
James M. McKiernan

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Amy Little Jones ◽  
Nrupen Anjan Bhavsar ◽  
Amy Pickar Abernethy ◽  
Yousuf Zafar

82 Background: Clinicians have difficulty predicting longitudinal changes in patient symptom burden and quality of life, and then how those changes might affect treatment preference. The primary aim of this pilot study was to investigate how self-reported symptom burden, quality of life, and treatment preference change over time in mCRC patients with limited life expectancy. Methods: Eligible mCRC patients had incurable disease, received chemotherapy at Duke or Duke Raleigh, were > = 18 years old, and spoke English. Patients were surveyed at each clinic visit and followed for up to 3.8 years on study. Measures included FACT-C (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal), PCM (Patient Care Monitor; a validated, 87-item review of systems survey; items measured on a 0-10 scale), and QQQ (Quality-Quantity Questionnaire; a validated, 8-item measure of cancer patient preference for quantity vs. quality of life; items measured on a 1-5 Likert scale). Demographic, disease, and treatment data were abstracted from the medical record. Results: The 56 patients were primarily male (68%) and Caucasian (79%) with a mean age of 55 at diagnosis of metastatic disease. Patients answered surveys a mean of 6.8 times each, with a median 364 days between first and last surveys. Over time, patients reported most symptoms improved or stayed the same (72%, n = 63 symptoms). Mean symptom scores that improved the most from first to last survey were fatigue (3.92 to 3.03) and nausea (2.1 to 1.4), while pain (1.9 to 2.5) and cough (0.4 to 0.7) worsened the most. Decision making about treatment preference also did not change over time, with mean QQQ scores from first survey (22, n = 28) to last survey (22, n = 16) remaining stable. Mean QQQ length and quality scores likewise were unchanged (12.9 to 12.8; 12.4 to 12.2 respectively). Conclusions: In this pilot study of mCRC patients with limited life expectancy, reported symptom burden scores remained stable or modestly improved over time, while preferences for quality vs. quantity of life remained stable. These findings suggest that patients with advanced cancer might perceive symptom burden differently over the course of their treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Lundby ◽  
Trine Graabæk ◽  
Jesper Ryg ◽  
Jens Søndergaard ◽  
Anton Pottegård ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objectives Deprescribing may be particularly relevant in older people with limited life expectancy. In order to effectively carry out deprescribing in this population, it is important to understand the perspectives of the full spectrum of health care professionals (HCPs) involved in the management of these patients’ medication. Thus, we aimed to explore different HCPs’ perspectives on deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy. Research Design and Methods Six qualitative focus group interviews were conducted using a semistructured approach. The groups comprised HCPs from both primary and secondary care, including family physicians (FPs), geriatricians, clinical pharmacologists, clinical pharmacists, nurses, and health care assistants. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Results were analyzed using systematic text condensation. Results A total of 32 HCPs participated in the study (median age of 40.5 years; 22% male). The analysis elicited three main themes related to HCPs’ perspectives on deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy: (a) Approaching deprescribing, (b) Taking responsibility, and (c) Collaboration across professions. Within themes, subthemes were identified and analyzed. Discussion and Implications Our results imply that different groups of HCPs consider deprescribing an essential aspect of providing good care for older people with limited life expectancy and find that all HCPs play a crucial role in the deprescribing process, with FPs having the primary responsibility. In order to facilitate deprescribing among this population, however, the collaboration between different HCPs should be improved.


Author(s):  
Bregje A.A. Huisman ◽  
Eric C.T. Geijteman ◽  
Nathalie Kolf ◽  
Marianne K. Dees ◽  
Lia van Zuylen ◽  
...  

AbstractPatients with a limited life expectancy have an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. Anticoagulants are often continued until death, independent of their original indication. We aimed to identify the opinions of physicians about the use of anticoagulants at the end of life. A mixed-method research design was used. A secondary analysis was performed on data from a vignette study and an interview study. Participants included general practitioners and clinical specialists. Physicians varied in their opinions: some would continue and others would stop anticoagulants at the end of life because of the risk of thromboembolic or bleeding complications. The improvement or preservation of patients' quality of life was a reason for both stopping and continuing anticoagulants. Other factors considered in the decision-making were the types of anticoagulant, the indication for which the anticoagulant was prescribed, underlying diseases, and the condition and life expectancy of the patient. Factors that made decision-making difficult were the lack of evidence on either strategy, uncertainty about patients' life expectancy, and the fear of harming patients. Which decision was eventually made seems largely dependent on the choice of the patient. In conclusion, there is a substantial variation in physicians' opinions regarding the use of anticoagulants in patients with a limited life expectancy. Physicians agree that the primary goal of medical care at end of life is the improvement or preservation of patients' quality of life. An important barrier to decision-making is the lack of evidence about the risks and benefits of stopping anticoagulants.


JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 312 (10) ◽  
pp. 997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Linos ◽  
Steven A. Schroeder ◽  
Mary-Margaret Chren

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayal A. Aizer ◽  
Jonathan J. Paly ◽  
M. Dror Michaelson ◽  
Sandhya K. Rao ◽  
Paul L. Nguyen ◽  
...  

Consultation with a medical oncologist is associated with increased rates of active surveillance, adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and minimization of overtreatment in men with early prostate cancer and limited life expectancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document