scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge on Radiation Treatment: Report From a Multicenter New York Area Institution

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00619
Author(s):  
Sewit Teckie ◽  
Janna Zeola Andrews ◽  
William Chun-Ying Chen ◽  
Anuj Goenka ◽  
Daniel Koffler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Priority Level ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Treatment Intent ◽  
The Impact

PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 surge months of March and April 2020, our New York multicenter health system experienced an influx of cases with COVID-19. We sought to study the impact of the surge period on patients with cancer prescribed radiation treatment (RT). METHODS: We reviewed our secure departmental quality assurance database for all patients who underwent RT planning simulations from March 6, 2020, through April 30, 2020. A priority level between 1 and 3 was prospectively assigned to each case based on faculty consensus to determine which patients required immediate RT. In May 2020, each faculty physician again retrospectively reviewed their patients from the database and provided additional commentary on how the COVID-19 pandemic had affected each patient's care. All statistics are descriptive. RESULTS: A total of 412 RT courses in 406 unique patients were simulated for linear accelerator–based external beam RT. The median age was 66 years. Treatment intent was curative in 70.6% and palliative in 29.4%. Of the 412 cases, 66.7% were priority 1, 25% priority 2, and 7.8% priority 3. Two hundred thirty-nine cases (58%) underwent standard-of-care diagnosis, workup, and treatment plan. Seventeen patients (4.1%) electively canceled their RT, and 17 others (4.1%) electively delayed RT start. Thirty-four (8.3%) were prescribed hypofractionation to shorten their RT course, and 22 (5.3%) had a change in modality. Incomplete or delayed workup was identified in 19 cases (4.6%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic surge resulted in 42% of our patients having a non–standard-of-care pathway. This outcome demonstrates a significant impact of the COVID-19 crisis on routine cancer care.

The impact of multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC) on the treatment of metastatic rectal cancer (MRC) at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre (TOHCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14686-e14686
Author(s):  
Tanya Di Valentin ◽  
Timothy R. Asmis ◽  
Rebecca Ann C. Auer
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Ottawa Hospital ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
The Impact

e14686 Background: There is significant controversy surrounding the management of surgically resectable MRC. The use and timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pelvic radiation, and relative risks and benefits of a combined surgical resection are areas of debate among surgeons, medical, and radiation oncologists. The TOHCC multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences (MCC) provide an opportunity to discuss these cases and propose treatment plans for these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all the cases of MRC which were discussed at MCC at the TOHCC from November 2007 until October 2009. Information collected included patient demographics, site of metastases, the treatment they received prior to their case being discussed at MCC (past surgeries, chemotherapy, radiotherapy), the treatment plan discussed at MCC, treatment actually administered post MCC discussion, and patient outcome at 6 months. Results: Forty-two patients with MRC were reviewed. The most common sites of metastases were liver (45.2%) and lung (31%). Once diagnosed with metastatic disease, prior to the MCC, patients had received the following treatments alone or in combination: chemotherapy (33.3%), radiotherapy (21.4%), surgery (19.0%), no treatment (n=57.1%). After their case was presented, 38 patients (90.5%) received the treatment recommended at the MCC , while 4 (9.5%) did not. Treatment post MCC included: chemotherapy (neoadjuvant: 38.1%; adjuvant: 23.8%; palliative: 28.6%), radiotherapy (neoadjuvant: 14.3%; adjuvant: 7.1%; palliative: 7.1%) and surgery (31.0%). Conclusions: There is no standardized approach to the management of MRC. Given its complexity, many cases are reviewed at MCC, which allow coordination for multidisciplinary care of these patients. The results of this study suggest that in a majority of cases, the recommendations brought forth at MCC are indeed acted upon. Given that these meetings have a significant impact on the treatment plan and outcome of patients with MRC, they should represent the standard of care when treating this disease.

scholarly journals Changes in Cancer Management due to COVID-19 Illness in Patients with Cancer in Northern California

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00790
Author(s):  
Julie Tsu-Yu Wu ◽  
Daniel H. Kwon ◽  
Michael J. Glover ◽  
Solomon Henry ◽  
Douglas Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
San Francisco ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Palliative Intent ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Bay Area ◽  
Treatment Intent ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Active Cancer

PURPOSE: The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management of patients with cancer. In this pooled retrospective analysis, we describe changes in management patterns for patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 in two academic institutions in the San Francisco Bay Area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with a current or historical diagnosis of malignancy were identified from the electronic medical record at the University of California, San Francisco, and Stanford University. The proportion of patients undergoing active cancer management whose care was affected was quantified and analyzed for significant differences with regard to management type, treatment intent, and the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. The duration and characteristics of such changes were compared across subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included, of whom 55 were undergoing active cancer management. Of these, 35 of 55 (64%) had significant changes in management that consisted primarily of delays. An additional three patients not undergoing active cancer management experienced a delay in management after being diagnosed with COVID-19. The decision to change management was correlated with the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, with more delays identified in patients treated with palliative intent earlier in the course of the pandemic (March/April 2020) compared with later (May/June 2020) (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.03 to 17.3; P = .0497). This difference was not seen among patients treated with curative intent during the same timeframe. CONCLUSION: We found significant changes in the management of cancer patients with COVID-19 treated with curative and palliative intent that evolved over time. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of changes in management and treatment on cancer outcomes for patients with cancer and COVID-19.

scholarly journals Image quality of 4D in-treatment CBCT acquired during lung SBRT using FFF beam: a phantom study

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihun Kim ◽  
Ki Chang Keum ◽  
Ho Lee ◽  
Chae-Seon Hong ◽  
Kwangwoo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Flattening Filter Free ◽  
Tube Current ◽  
Cbct Image ◽  
Lung Phantom ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Respiratory Phases

Abstract Background Rotational beam delivery enables concurrent acquisition of cone-beam CT (CBCT), thereby facilitating further geometric verification of patient setup during radiation treatment. However, it is challenging to acquire CBCT during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using flattening-filter free X-ray beams, in which a high radiation dose is delivered. This study presents quantitative evaluation results of the image quality in four-dimensional (4D) in-treatment CBCT acquired during SBRT delivery. Methods The impact of megavoltage (MV) scatter and acquisition parameters on the image quality was evaluated using Catphan 503 and XSight lung tracking phantoms. The in-treatment CBCT images of the phantoms were acquired while delivering 16 SBRT plans. The uniformity, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the in-treatment CBCT images were calculated and compared to those of CBCT images acquired without SBRT delivery. Furthermore, the localizing accuracy of the moving target in the XSight lung phantom was evaluated for 10 respiratory phases. Results The CNR of the 3D-reconstucted Catphan CBCT images was reduced from 6.3 to 2.6 due to the effect of MV treatment scatter. Both for the Catphan and XSight phantoms, the CBCT image quality was affected by the tube current and monitor units (MUs) of the treatment plan. The lung target in the XSight tracking phantom was most visible for extreme phases; the mean CNRs of the lung target in the in-treatment CBCT images (with 40 mA tube current) across the SBRT plans were 3.2 for the end-of-exhalation phase and 3.0 for the end-of-inhalation phase. The lung target was localized with sub-millimeter accuracy for the extreme respiratory phases. Conclusions Full-arc acquisition with an increased tube current (e.g. 40 mA) is recommended to compensate for degradation in the CBCT image quality due to unflattened MV beam scatter. Acquiring in-treatment CBCT with a high-MU treatment beam is also suggested to improve the resulting CBCT image quality.

scholarly journals Care Delivery Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Care

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.01062
Author(s):  
Tejus Satish ◽  
Rohit Raghunathan ◽  
Jake G. Prigoff ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Grace A. Hillyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
New York ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE: COVID-19 has altered healthcare delivery. Previous work has focused on patients with cancer and COVID-19, but little has been reported on healthcare system changes among patients without COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with breast cancer (BC) in New York City between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2020. New patients were included as were patients scheduled to receive intravenous or injectable therapy. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. Demographic and treatment information were obtained by chart review. Delays and/or changes in systemic therapy, surgery, radiation, and radiology related to the pandemic were tracked, along with the reasons for delay and/or change. Univariate and multivariable analysis were used to identify factors associated with delay and/or change. RESULTS: We identified 350 eligible patients, of whom 149 (42.6%) experienced a delay and/or change, and practice reduction (51.0%) was the most common reason. The patients who identified as Black or African American, Asian, or Other races were more likely to experience a delay and/or change compared with White patients (Black, 44.4%; Asian, 47.1%; Other, 55.6%; White, 31.4%; P = .001). In multivariable analysis, Medicaid compared with commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 3.04; 95% CI, 1.32 to 7.27) was associated with increased odds of a delay and/or change, whereas stage II or III BC compared with stage I (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.95; and OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.092, respectively) was associated with decreased odds of a delay and/or change. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients with BC without COVID-19 had a delay and/or change. We found racial and socioeconomic disparities in the likelihood of a delay and/or change. Further studies are needed to determine the impact these care alterations have on BC outcomes.

Functional stereotactic radiosurgery involving a dedicated linear accelerator and gamma unit: a comparison study

2004 ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Solberg ◽  
Steven J. Goetsch ◽  
Michael T. Selch ◽  
William Melega ◽  
Goran Lacan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Submillimeter Range ◽  
Primate Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Stereotactic Frame ◽  
Targeting Ability ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The purpose of this work was to investigate the targeting and dosimetric characteristics of a linear accelerator (LINAC) system dedicated for stereotactic radiosurgery compared with those of a commercial gamma knife (GK) unit. Methods. A phantom was rigidly affixed within a Leksell stereotactic frame and axial computerized tomography scans were obtained using an appropriate stereotactic localization device. Treatment plans were performed, film was inserted into a recessed area, and the phantom was positioned and treated according to each treatment plan. In the case of the LINAC system, four 140° arcs, spanning ± 60° of couch rotation, were used. In the case of the GK unit, all 201 sources were left unplugged. Radiation was delivered using 3- and 8-mm LINAC collimators and 4- and 8-mm collimators of the GK unit. Targeting ability was investigated independently on the dedicated LINAC by using a primate model. Measured 50% spot widths for multisource, single-shot radiation exceeded nominal values in all cases by 38 to 70% for the GK unit and 11 to 33% for the LINAC system. Measured offsets were indicative of submillimeter targeting precision on both devices. In primate studies, the appearance of an magnetic resonance imaging—enhancing lesion coincided with the intended target. Conclusions. Radiosurgery performed using the 3-mm collimator of the dedicated LINAC exhibited characteristics that compared favorably with those of a dedicated GK unit. Overall targeting accuracy in the submillimeter range can be achieved, and dose distributions with sharp falloff can be expected for both devices.

Roundtable Discussion of the Impact of the 4th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
Robyn J. Barst ◽  
Marc Humbert ◽  
Ivan M. Robbins ◽  
Lewis J. Rubin ◽  
Robyn J. Park
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Vascular Diseases ◽  
Assistant Professor ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Columbia University ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Maryland School ◽  
The Impact

A discussion among attendees of the 4th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension took place to share “an insider's look” into the current and future research and treatment implications in pulmonary hypertension. Myung H. Park, MD, guest editor of this issue of Advances in Pulmonary Hypertension, Assistant Professor of Medicine and Director, Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Program, Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, moderated the discussion. Participants included Robyn Barst, MD, Professor Emerita, Columbia University, New York; Marc Humbert, MD, PhD, Universite Paris-Sud, French Referal Center for Pulmonary Hypertension, Hopital Antoine-Beclere, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Clamart, France; Ivan Robbins, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; and Lewis J. Rubin, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego.

COVID-19: Time-Dependent Effective Reproduction Number and Sub-notification Effect Estimation Modeling (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Atem De Carvalho ◽  
Rogerio Atem De Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Reproduction Number ◽  
Moving Average ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Initial Value ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Reproduction Numbers ◽  
Effect Estimation ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers and health authorities have sought to identify the different parameters that govern their infection and death cycles, in order to be able to make better decisions. In particular, a series of reproduction number estimation models have been presented, with different practical results. OBJECTIVE This article aims to present an effective and efficient model for estimating the Reproduction Number and to discuss the impacts of sub-notification on these calculations. METHODS The concept of Moving Average Method with Initial value (MAMI) is used, as well as a model for Rt, the Reproduction Number, is derived from experimental data. The models are applied to real data and their performance is presented. RESULTS Analyses on Rt and sub-notification effects for Germany, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom, South Korea, and the State of New York are presented to show the performance of the methods here introduced. CONCLUSIONS We show that, with relatively simple mathematical tools, it is possible to obtain reliable values for time-dependent, incubation period-independent Reproduction Numbers (Rt). We also demonstrate that the impact of sub-notification is relatively low, after the initial phase of the epidemic cycle has passed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document