Effect of infill walls in structural response of RC buildings

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Idrizi
Keyword(s):  
Structural Response ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Infill Walls

scholarly journals Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor of Existing Masonry Infilled RC-Buildings in Pokhara

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Tekkan Pandit ◽  
Hemchandra Chaulagain
Keyword(s):  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Design Standards ◽  
Natural Period ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
R Value

Most of the structural designer do not consider masonry infill walls during design process due to a lack of modeling guidelines in design standards and are treated as non-structural elements. In fact, the interaction effect between bounding frames and infill masonry is a complicated issue in nonlinearity of structures. The current seismic codes indirectly incorporate the nonlinear response of structure through linear elastic approach by considering the response reduction factor ‘R’ without comprising infill. In this context, this study evaluates the response reduction factor of existing engineered designed RC frame structures that are designed based on Indian standard codes. For this, three existing RC buildings were selected and performed non-linear pushover analysis. The structural response was examined in terms of natural period, base shear, strength, stiffness, ductility and response reduction factor. The results specify that the buildings with infill walls significantly influence on ‘R’ value of structures. Additionally, study shows that the variation of ‘R’ value mainly depends on the percentage of infill inclusion.

scholarly journals Irregularity Effects of Masonry Infills on Nonlinear Seismic Behaviour of RC Buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Ferraioli ◽  
Angelo Lavino
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Eurocode 8 ◽  
Seismic Action ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Action Effects ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Shear Demand

Despite extensive research studies, the seismic response of infilled reinforced concrete buildings remains an open problem due to both the complexity of the interaction between the infill and the frame and the large number of parameters involved. Thus, guidelines for both modelling and analysis are still lacking and the infill walls are normally treated as nonstructural components in seismic codes. However, it may be not conservative to neglect the influence of infills. In fact, the infill masonry walls may significantly affect the stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation capacity of RC buildings, even when they are regularly distributed. Recognizing this influence and its importance on the vulnerability of infilled frames, Eurocode 8 requires amplifying seismic action effects due to infills. In this paper, the effectiveness of the Eurocode 8 design provisions for infill irregularity in plan and/or elevation was investigated. To this aim, different in-plan layouts of infill walls were selected as marginal cases for which Eurocode 8 does not require amplification of the action effects due to the presence of infills, or the additional measures to counteract these effects are not mandatory. The seismic vulnerability of the infilled RC buildings was evaluated using nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses. Both cracking and crushing of masonry and stiffness and strength degradation were considered in the analysis. The effect of the layout of the masonry infills on the seismic response in terms of resistance and displacement was evaluated. Results show that in one of the case studies here examined, it is not conservative to neglect the influence of infill panels. In fact, structural failure due to torsion and soft-storey effects may occur even in cases where Eurocode 8 does not require the amplification of the action effects. Finally, the total shear demand on columns may be underestimated, even in cases where the code provisions for infills irregularity are not mandatory, and the additional shear demand in the columns induced by the masonry infill is very low.

Response of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings to the 2017 Puebla Earthquake

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1763-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Arteta ◽  
Julian Carrillo ◽  
Jorge Archbold ◽  
Daniel Gaspar ◽  
Cesar Pajaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Soft Story ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Ductility Capacity

The response of mid-rise reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Mexico City after the 2017 Puebla Earthquake is assessed through combined field and computational investigation. The Mw 7.1 earthquake damaged more than 500 buildings where most of them are classified as mid-rise RC frames with infill walls. A multinational team from Colombia, Mexico, and the United States was rapidly deployed within a week of the occurrence of the event to investigate the structural and nonstructural damage levels of over 60 RC buildings with 2–12 stories. The results of the study confirmed that older mid-rise structures with limited ductility capacity may have been shaken past their capacity. To elucidate the widespread damage in mid-rise RC framed structures, the post-earthquake reconnaissance effort is complemented with inelastic modeling and simulation of several representative RC framing systems with and without masonry infill walls. It was confirmed that the addition of non-isolated masonry infills significantly impacts the ductility capacity and increases the potential for a soft-story mechanism formation in RC frames originally analyzed and designed to be bare systems.

Influence of Clay Tile Brick Infill Walls on Seismic Response of Buildings

2013 ◽  
Vol 747 ◽  
pp. 273-276
Author(s):  
Ahmet Yakut ◽  
Ismail Ozan Demirel
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Concrete Frames ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Wall Area ◽  
Strength And Stiffness ◽  
Seismic Response Of Buildings ◽  
Clay Tile

Majority of buildings in Turkey and in most developing countries are made with reinforced concrete frames infilled with clay tile brick walls. Despite this, influence of these walls is not accounted for in design. Past earthquake observations have shown that the infill walls have great influence on performance of buildings. In this paper, influence of the brick infill walls on strength and stiffness of RC buildings are presented through analytical results obtained for some typical buildings. Comparison of results showed that stiffness of the walls and their capacity is greatly influenced by the infill walls. The change in the strength and stiffness has been based on ratio of the wall area to the total floor area with providing expressions to determine these.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document