scholarly journals Irregularity Effects of Masonry Infills on Nonlinear Seismic Behaviour of RC Buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Ferraioli ◽  
Angelo Lavino
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Eurocode 8 ◽  
Seismic Action ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Action Effects ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Shear Demand

Despite extensive research studies, the seismic response of infilled reinforced concrete buildings remains an open problem due to both the complexity of the interaction between the infill and the frame and the large number of parameters involved. Thus, guidelines for both modelling and analysis are still lacking and the infill walls are normally treated as nonstructural components in seismic codes. However, it may be not conservative to neglect the influence of infills. In fact, the infill masonry walls may significantly affect the stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation capacity of RC buildings, even when they are regularly distributed. Recognizing this influence and its importance on the vulnerability of infilled frames, Eurocode 8 requires amplifying seismic action effects due to infills. In this paper, the effectiveness of the Eurocode 8 design provisions for infill irregularity in plan and/or elevation was investigated. To this aim, different in-plan layouts of infill walls were selected as marginal cases for which Eurocode 8 does not require amplification of the action effects due to the presence of infills, or the additional measures to counteract these effects are not mandatory. The seismic vulnerability of the infilled RC buildings was evaluated using nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses. Both cracking and crushing of masonry and stiffness and strength degradation were considered in the analysis. The effect of the layout of the masonry infills on the seismic response in terms of resistance and displacement was evaluated. Results show that in one of the case studies here examined, it is not conservative to neglect the influence of infill panels. In fact, structural failure due to torsion and soft-storey effects may occur even in cases where Eurocode 8 does not require the amplification of the action effects. Finally, the total shear demand on columns may be underestimated, even in cases where the code provisions for infills irregularity are not mandatory, and the additional shear demand in the columns induced by the masonry infill is very low.

Response of Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings to the 2017 Puebla Earthquake

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1763-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Arteta ◽  
Julian Carrillo ◽  
Jorge Archbold ◽  
Daniel Gaspar ◽  
Cesar Pajaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Soft Story ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Ductility Capacity

The response of mid-rise reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Mexico City after the 2017 Puebla Earthquake is assessed through combined field and computational investigation. The Mw 7.1 earthquake damaged more than 500 buildings where most of them are classified as mid-rise RC frames with infill walls. A multinational team from Colombia, Mexico, and the United States was rapidly deployed within a week of the occurrence of the event to investigate the structural and nonstructural damage levels of over 60 RC buildings with 2–12 stories. The results of the study confirmed that older mid-rise structures with limited ductility capacity may have been shaken past their capacity. To elucidate the widespread damage in mid-rise RC framed structures, the post-earthquake reconnaissance effort is complemented with inelastic modeling and simulation of several representative RC framing systems with and without masonry infill walls. It was confirmed that the addition of non-isolated masonry infills significantly impacts the ductility capacity and increases the potential for a soft-story mechanism formation in RC frames originally analyzed and designed to be bare systems.

Influence of Clay Tile Brick Infill Walls on Seismic Response of Buildings

2013 ◽  
Vol 747 ◽  
pp. 273-276
Author(s):  
Ahmet Yakut ◽  
Ismail Ozan Demirel
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Concrete Frames ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Wall Area ◽  
Strength And Stiffness ◽  
Seismic Response Of Buildings ◽  
Clay Tile

Majority of buildings in Turkey and in most developing countries are made with reinforced concrete frames infilled with clay tile brick walls. Despite this, influence of these walls is not accounted for in design. Past earthquake observations have shown that the infill walls have great influence on performance of buildings. In this paper, influence of the brick infill walls on strength and stiffness of RC buildings are presented through analytical results obtained for some typical buildings. Comparison of results showed that stiffness of the walls and their capacity is greatly influenced by the infill walls. The change in the strength and stiffness has been based on ratio of the wall area to the total floor area with providing expressions to determine these.

scholarly journals Numerical Study of the In-Plane Seismic Response of RC Infilled Frames

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-94
Author(s):  
Matteo Bagnoli ◽  
Ernesto Grande ◽  
Gabriele Milani
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Infilled Frames ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Reliable Model ◽  
The Common

Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings with masonry infills are a very common structural typology worldwide for civil, strategic, or productive use. Damage to infills may cause danger for human lives and strongly affects economic losses, as shown during past earthquakes. In the current literature, different approaches are available for modeling the in-plane response of infilled frames and different constitutive laws generally calibrated on experimental tests. On the contrary, few and recent studies proposed formulas that account for the main properties of infills influencing their in-plane behavior to lateral forces. This paper presents a study finalized to derive a reliable model that is able to predict the monotonic and cyclic response of RC infilled masonry frames. To this end, after a critical analysis of the available literature, the authors combine among them two models, one for the monotonic response and the other for the cyclic one, by showing their reliability with reference to different experimental cases. Then, at the end of the paper, the derived models are employed to assess the seismic vulnerability of infills throughout a proposed procedure based on the common pushover analysis approach.

scholarly journals Seismic Fragility Analysis of Low-Rise RC Buildings with Brick Infills in High Seismic Region with Alluvial Deposits

Buildings ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Rabindra Adhikari ◽  
Rajesh Rupakhety ◽  
Prajwal Giri ◽  
Rewati Baruwal ◽  
Ramesh Subedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Structure ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Interaction Effects ◽  
Vulnerability Analysis ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability Analysis

Most of the reinforced concrete buildings in Nepal are low-rise construction, as this type of construction is the most dominant structural form adopted to construct residential buildings in urban and semi-urban neighborhoods throughout the country. The low-rise residential constructions generally follow the guidelines recommended by the Nepal Building Code, especially the mandatory rules of thumb. Although low-rise buildings have brick infills and are randomly constructed, infill walls and soil–structure interaction effects are generally neglected in the design and assessment of such structures. To this end, bare frame models that are used to represent such structures are questionable, especially when seismic vulnerability analysis is concerned. To fulfil this gap, we performed seismic vulnerability analysis of low-rise residential RC buildings considering infill walls and soil–structure interaction effects. Considering four analysis cases, we outline comparative seismic vulnerability for various analysis cases in terms of fragility functions. The sum of observations highlights that the effects of infills, and soil–structure interaction are damage state sensitive for low-rise RC buildings. Meanwhile, the design considerations will be significantly affected since some performance parameters are more sensitive than the overall fragility. We also observed that the analytical fragility models fundamentally overestimate the actual seismic fragility in the case of low-rise RC buildings.

scholarly journals Near-Fault Seismic Response Analysis of Bridges Considering Girder Impact and Pier Size

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 704
Author(s):  
Wenjun An ◽  
Guquan Song ◽  
Shutong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Bending Moment ◽  
Expansion Method ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Seismic Action ◽  
Transient Wave ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Displacement Response ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Continuous Girder Bridge

Given the influence of near-fault vertical seismic action, we established a girder-spring-damping-rod model of a double-span continuous girder bridge and used the transient wave function expansion method and indirect modal function method to calculate the seismic response of the bridge. We deduced the theoretical solution for the vertical and longitudinal contact force and displacement response of the bridge structure under the action of the near-fault vertical seismic excitation, and we analyzed the influence of the vertical separation of the bridge on the bending failure of the pier. Our results show that under the action of a near-fault vertical earthquake, pier-girder separation will significantly alter the bridge’s longitudinal displacement response, and that neglecting this separation may lead to the underestimation of the pier’s bending damage. Calculations of the bending moment at the bottom of the pier under different pier heights and cross-sectional diameters showed that the separation of the pier and the girder increases the bending moment at the pier’s base. Therefore, the reasonable design of the pier size and tensile support bearing in near-fault areas may help to reduce longitudinal damage to bridges.

scholarly journals Seismic rocking effects on a mine tower under induced and natural earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Adam Bońkowski ◽  
Juliusz Kuś ◽  
Zbigniew Zembaty
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Seismic Action ◽  
Seismic Effects ◽  
Copper Ore ◽  
Rotational Components ◽  
Natural Earthquakes

AbstractRecent research in engineering seismology demonstrated that in addition to three translational seismic excitations along x, y and z axes, one should also consider rotational components about these axes when calculating design seismic loads for structures. The objective of this paper is to present the results of a seismic response numerical analysis of a mine tower (also called in the literature a headframe or a pit frame). These structures are used in deep mining on the ground surface to hoist output (e.g. copper ore or coal). The mine towers belong to the tall, slender structures, for which rocking excitations may be important. In the numerical example, a typical steel headframe 64 m high is analysed under two records of simultaneous rocking and horizontal seismic action of an induced mine shock and a natural earthquake. As a result, a complicated interaction of rocking seismic effects with horizontal excitations is observed. The contribution of the rocking component may sometimes reduce the overall seismic response, but in most cases, it substantially increases the seismic response of the analysed headframe. It is concluded that in the analysed case of the 64 m mining tower, the seismic response, including the rocking ground motion effects, may increase up to 31% (for natural earthquake ground motion) or even up to 135% (for mining-induced, rockburst seismic effects). This means that not only in the case of the design of very tall buildings or industrial chimneys but also for specific yet very common structures like mine towers, including the rotational seismic effects may play an important role.

scholarly journals Fragility assessment of existing low-rise steel moment-resisting frames with masonry infills under mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequences

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 2483-2504
Author(s):  
Luigi Di Sarno ◽  
Jing-Ren Wu
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Steel Frames ◽  
Steel Frame ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Moment Frames ◽  
Damage Level ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Aftershock Sequences ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Multiple Earthquakes

AbstractThis paper presents the fragility assessment of non-seismically designed steel moment frames with masonry infills. The assessment considered the effects of multiple earthquakes on the damage accumulation of steel frames, which is an essential part of modern performance-based earthquake engineering. Effects of aftershocks are particularly important when examining damaged buildings and making post-quake decisions, such as tagging and retrofit strategy. The procedure proposed in the present work includes two phase assessment, which is based on incremental dynamic analyses of two refined numerical models of the case-study steel frame, i.e. with and without masonry infills, and utilises mainshock-aftershock sequences of natural earthquake records. The first phase focuses on the undamaged structure subjected to single and multiple earthquakes; the effects of masonry infills on the seismic vulnerability of the steel frame were also considered. In the second phase, aftershock fragility curves were derived to investigate the seismic vulnerability of infilled steel frames with post-mainshock damage caused by mainshocks. Comparative analyses were conducted among the mainshock-damaged structures considering three post-mainshock damage levels, including no damage. The impact of aftershocks was then discussed for each mainshock-damage level in terms of the breakpoint that marks the onset of exceeding post-mainshock damage level, as well as the probability of exceeding of superior damage level due to more significant aftershocks. The evaluation of the efficiency of commonly used intensity measures of aftershocks was also carried out as part of the second phase of assessment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document