Teaching reform and experience of the project-driven teaching and diversified assessment methods for the mechanical engineering materials course based on CDIO

2021 ◽  
pp. 584-589
Author(s):  
C.S. Liu ◽  
Z.W. Li ◽  
J.J. Yang
Author(s):  
Michael D. Nowak

We have developed a course combining a Mechanical Engineering Materials Laboratory with a Materials Science lecture for a small combined population of undergraduate Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering students. By judicious selection of topic order, we have been able to utilize one lecture and one laboratory for both Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering students (with limited splitting of groups). The primary reasons for combining the Mechanical and Biomedical students are to reduce faculty load and required resources in a small university. For schools with medium or small Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering programs, class sizes could be improved if they could include other populations. The heterogeneous populations also aid in teaching students that the same engineering techniques are useful in more than a single engineering realm. The laboratory sections begin with the issues common to designing and evaluating mechanical testing, followed by tensile, shear, and torsion evaluation of metals. To introduce composite materials, wood and cement are evaluated. While the Mechanical Engineering students are evaluating impact and strain gauges, the Biomedical Engineering students are performing tensile studies of soft tissues, and compression of long bones. The basic materials lectures (beginning at the atomic level) are in common with both Mechanical and Biomedical student populations, until specific topics such as human body materials are discussed. Three quarters of the term is thus taught on a joint basis, and three or four lectures are split. Basic metal, plastic and wood behavior is common to both groups.


2014 ◽  
Vol 678 ◽  
pp. 627-631
Author(s):  
Yang Fang Wu

Theory of Machines and Mechanism as a major technology foundation course of mechanical engineering plays an important role in connecting professional education. From the perspective of inspiring mechanical design thinking, put forward the idea of classroom teaching reform for the curriculum. The knowledge of the curriculum is combed; the target ability of the curriculum is specified; the teaching plans are designed to inspire design thinking; the teaching mode is reformed, and the extracurricular learning mode is enhanced. This paper provides a reference for the classroom teaching reform in the other mechanical course.


2012 ◽  
Vol 229-231 ◽  
pp. 2779-2783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Sun ◽  
Qi Xiao

How to boost the manufacturing and innovation ability of university students majored in mechanical engineering is explored by vast number of teachers. With the deep-going of teaching reform, most teachers have made some positive explorations in practice teaching. The paper introduces some explorations in practice teaching, ranged from refining teaching contents in class to, elaborating practice teaching links and designing projects for innovation and the objective of those exploration is to boost the manufacturing and innovation ability of students. Practice proves those explorations are effective for educating students’ manufacturing and innovation ability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
Yuliana Firmanda ◽  
Widiarini Widiarini ◽  
Siti Rofi’ah ◽  
Istina Atul Makrifah

This paper aims to develop ESP Supplementary book for mechanical engineering students in high level education. This is a Borg & Gall Research and Development (R&D) by using questionnaire and unstructured interview instrument. The research subject is 20 fourth semester students of mechanical engineering major in UNU Blitar. The limitation of this study is developing ESP supplementary book based PBL with engineering materials as the topic of the book. The process development of Engineering Materials Supplementary Book Based on ESP and PBL consists of some steps those are (1) Need analysis; (2) Product arrangement; (3) Product testing; and (4) Product revision if it is necessary. This research finds that the supplementary book is valid in three aspects of media (77.5%), content (83.3%) and language (83.3%) and feasible to use as supplement material for the mechanical engineering students. Based on the satisfaction questionnaire this product is appropriate for the mechanical engineering students to learn about English for Specific Purposes in form of Project Based Learning model implementation in percentage about 80% agree and 15% very agree.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zou ◽  
Jiayin Zou ◽  
Caihong Zhang ◽  
Kai Zheng

With the popularization and deepening of quality education in China, colleges and universities pay more and more attention to cultivating students’ thinking ability and innovation ability when carrying out education and teaching work. The course "Materials for Mechanical Engineering" is a traditional course in colleges and universities. In the traditional teaching mode, teachers often pay more attention to teaching students’ professional knowledge and ignore the training of students; thinking ability. In the new era of education reform, to better cultivate students’ engineering thinking ability in the teaching of the Materials for Mechanical Engineering course has become a question worth pondering. This article starts from the analysis of the teaching status of the Mechanical Engineering Materials course, focusing on the training strategies of students’ engineering thinking ability in the Mechanical Engineering Materials course teaching, hoping to further improve the teaching quality of the Mechanical Engineering Materials course in Chinese universities, to bring more comprehensive quality talents that meet the needs of social development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document