Electronic Health Record and Personal Health Record Implementation

2010 ◽  
pp. 295-326
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandar Faisal Al-Mifgai ◽  
Joseph Sharit ◽  
Arzu Onar-Thomas ◽  
Shihab Asfour

Objective: This study examined the ability for adults from a developing country to use a personal health record (PHR) to perform health-management tasks. The effects of gender differences as well as differences in attitudes about using the internet to manage health prior to and after exposure to the PHR were also investigated.Methods: A simulation of a PHR based on a well-established U.S. online patient portal was designed and tailored for this particular study population. Two hundred and three adults with a mean age of 40.9 years were recruited from various areas in Saudi Arabia and asked to perform seven common health-management tasks of varying degrees of difficulty. Their electronic health literacy and health numeracy, as well as their attitudes about using online health systems for managing their health prior to and following their interaction with the PHR, were assessed using questionnaires.Results: After controlling for education, perceived health status, and comfort using the internet, electronic health literacy and health numeracy were still found to be significant predictors of participants’ task performance, but only for the more challenging health-management tasks. No important differences based on gender were found. Exposure to the PHR significantly increased the acceptability of using the internet for managing their health.Conclusions: The change in attitudes following interaction with the PHR suggests that many adults in this society could benefit from these electronic health systems, including females who, due to cultural considerations, may desire greater control in managing their health. However, the importance of electronic health literacy and health numeracy suggests the need for designs that minimize the impact of these factors for successful performance of health-management tasks.


Author(s):  
Karl E. Misulis ◽  
Mark E. Frisse

Enabling technologies are products and processes that complement more established techniques based on the electronic health record by broadening and easing the process of data collection. Often, these technologies are used to provide more effective means of communication among patients and providers, collect data from home and body sensors, and store data in more accessible ways, all seeking to improve the process or performance of our healthcare system. These include a host of devices and processes that connect providers, connect patients to providers, and add data outside the healthcare enterprise to the personal health record. This has the promise of further improving healthcare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-30
Author(s):  
Rebecca Yoke Chan Ong ◽  
Sandy Sabapathy

While it is true that the expanded use of health information and electronic health records (eHRs) can help deliver better healthcare, there remains the need to reconcile citizens’ legitimate concerns for privacy protection and confidentiality in the use of their personal health data, and the potential for violation of their privacy. Under the Hong Kong’s Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS), the eHR of the individual patient can be accessed and shared between healthcare providers for healthcare-related purposes. Although the Electronic Health Record Sharing System Ordinance (Cap 625) (the ‘eHRSSO’) and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486) (the ‘PD(P)O’) provide protection for personal data and patients’ privacy, the eHRSS has come under greater scrutiny given the rise in data breaches experienced globally and in Hong Kong. The article’s objective is twofold. It first examines the eHRSS specifically with regard to some of the more pertinent provisions of the eHRSSO and the PD(P)O, to critically evaluate the extent to which these provisions ensure and protect patient privacy. Thence it offers suggestions and recommendations as to how protection for patient privacy can be enhanced and, indeed, altogether better ensured.


2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
Sh M Gimadeev ◽  
A I Latypov ◽  
S V Radchenko ◽  
D F Khaziakhmetov

Aim. Comparative assessment of an automation facilities influence on labor input and business processes’ productivity indicators related to primary functions of healthcare facilities of different types.Methods. We performed medical personnel’s work timing in emergency rooms, as well as medical records timing in clinical departments. The automated electronic health records processing while operating hospital information systems created by authors among different types of healthcare facilities was also performed. Output data included personal health record operation periods values and system events timestamps.Results. The data concerning hospital information systems’ influence on electronic health records operating time changes and hospitalization delays was obtained. A correlation between the initial hospitalization delay and hospital capacity was discovered (r=0.917). The emergency room automation significantly reduces hospitalization delays. Under clinical information system operating conditions, the primary examination time recording increases twice, while the time spent for all other electronic health records decreases in higher order. Considerable difference between primary examination recording time and the time, necessary for other personal health record registrations, has satisfactory interpretation within the heterogeneous medical data sources integration model, but not within usability model. In general, the gained data does not confirm results of previously published researches pointing the increased time doctors spent for data management in automation conditions.Conclusion. Hospital information systems implementation improved the specialist’s labor productivity and main working processes work capacity. The obtained data indicate a greater influence of automation in large healthcare facilities and reject usability hypothesis of hospital information systems efficiency.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chuan Li ◽  
Don E Detmer ◽  
Syed-Abdul Shabbir ◽  
Phung Anh Nguyen ◽  
Wen-Shan Jian ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Karl E. Misulis ◽  
Mark E. Frisse

The cornerstone of clinical informatics is the Electronic Health Record. This is more than an electronic version of the paper medical record. The use of the electronic record is for more than point-of-care healthcare but rather includes analytics, gap analysis, decision support, and related purposes that would be almost impossible in a paper world. The electronic health record is the present preferred term for the digital systems that coordinate healthcare information. The term electronic medical record was used more prominently in the past. The chapter looks at the transition in this terminology and examines the future move to the personal health record. A case scenario is presented regarding use of the electronic health record system. The future of the system is examined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document