scholarly journals Aerosolized PGE1: A Selective Pulmonary Vasodilator in Neonatal Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Results of a Phase I/II Open Label Clinical Trial

2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beena G Sood ◽  
Virginia Delaney-Black ◽  
Jacob V Aranda ◽  
Seetha Shankaran
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Vasodilator

scholarly journals DIPG-52. PHASE I CLINICAL TRIAL OF ONC201 IN PEDIATRIC H3 K27M-MUTANT GLIOMA OR NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIPG

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii297-iii297
Author(s):  
Sharon Gardner ◽  
Rohinton Tarapore ◽  
Jeffrey Allen ◽  
Wafik Zaky ◽  
Yazmin Odia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Liquid Formulation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract H3 K27M-mutant gliomas often manifest as midline gliomas, have a dismal prognosis, and have no effective treatments. ONC201 efficacy has been shown in high-grade glioma preclinical models and durable responses with single agent ONC201 have been reported in adults with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant gliomas. These observations led to a Phase I pediatric clinical trial of ONC201 dosed by body weight. This multi-center, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation and dose-expansion clinical trial (NCT03416530) for H3 K27M-mutant glioma or non-biopsied DIPG has 6 arms: arms A and E determine the RP2D in pediatric post-radiation (recurrent or not-recurrent) H3 K27M-mutant glioma patients with ONC201 administered as an oral capsule as well as a liquid formulation, respectively. Both arms have completed accrual. The study is currently enrolling newly diagnosed DIPG patients to determine the RP2D for ONC201 in combination with radiation (arm B). Dedicated assessment of intratumoral ONC201 concentrations in midline gliomas patients (arm C) and the effects of ONC201 in H3K27M DNA levels in circulating CSF (arm D) are currently enrolling patients. ONC201 as a single agent in patients with progressive H3K27M mutant tumors following irradiation (excluding DIPG/spinal cord tumors) was recently opened (arm F). Once the RP2D is confirmed, there is a dose-expansion cohort to confirm the safety, radiographic efficacy and survival with ONC201. The primary endpoints of arms A, B, and E have been established with the RP2D of 625mg scaled by body weight as a capsule or liquid formulation administered alone or in combination with radiation without incidence of dose-limiting toxicity.

30. Open-label Phase I/II clinical trial of pyrimethamine for the treatment of chronic GM2 gangliosidosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. S14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Clarke ◽  
Edwin Kolodny ◽  
Don Mahuran ◽  
Maria Fuller ◽  
Michael Tropak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Gm2 Gangliosidosis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

scholarly journals High-flow nasal oxygen reduces endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175346662095645
Author(s):  
Ricardo Andino ◽  
Gema Vega ◽  
Sandra Karina Pacheco ◽  
Nuria Arevalillo ◽  
Ana Leal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Background: The benefits of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as primary intervention in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) are still a matter in debate. Our objective was to compare HFNC therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in the prevention of endotracheal intubation in this group of patients. Methods: An open-label, controlled and single-centre clinical trial was conducted in patients with severe AHRF, defined by a PaO2/FIO2 ratio ⩽200, to compare HFNC with a control group (CG) treated by COT delivered through a face mask, with the need to perform intubation as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included tolerance of the HFNC device and to look for the predictive factors for intubation in these patients. Results: A total of 46 patients were included (22 in the COT group and 24 in the HFNC group) 48% of whom needed intubation: 63% in the COT group and 33% in the HFNC group, with significant differences both in intention to treat [χ2 = 4.2; p = 0.04, relative risk (RR) = 0.5; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0.3–1.0] and also in treatment analysis (χ2 = 4.7; p = 0.03; RR = 0.5; IC 95%: 0.3–0.9) We obtained a number needed to treat (NNT) = 3 patients treated to avoid an intubation. Intubation occurred significantly later in the HFNC group. Estimated PaO2/FIO2, respiratory rate and dyspnea were significantly better in the HFNC group. Patients treated with HFNC who required intubation presented significant worsening after the first 8 h, as compared with non-intubated HFNC group patients. Mortality was 22% with no differences. The HFNC group patients were hospitalized for almost half of the time in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the ward, with significantly less hospital length of stay. A total of 14 patients in the HFNC group (58%) complained of excessive heat and 17% of noise; 3 patients did not tolerate HFNC. Conclusion: Patients with severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who tolerate HFNC present a significantly lower need for endotracheal intubation compared with conventional oxygen therapy. Clinical Trial Register EUDRA CT number: 2012-001671-36 The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

A phase I/II study combining tosedostat with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS471-TPS471
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Teague ◽  
Manik A. Amin ◽  
Kian-Huat Lim ◽  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
Ashiq Masood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Amino Acids ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Cellular Stress Response ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

TPS471 Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. Recent advances with fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) and nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine (AG) have improved survival in patients with PDAC. A fluorouracil-based regimen is recommended for patients who progress after a gemcitabine-based regimen. Tosedostat is an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor shown to have anti-proliferative effects in malignancies. Aminopeptidase inhibitors disrupt the cleavage of amino acids from peptides downstream of proteasomal degradation, preventing the recycling of amino acids needed for new protein synthesis. This leads to intracellular depletion of amino acids, resulting in a cellular stress response known as the amino acid deprivation response, which leads to apoptosis. Because pancreatic cancer cells frequently upregulate expression of these aminopeptidases, aminopeptidases inhibitors hold therapeutic promise. Methods: This is a single institution phase I/II open-label trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of tosedostat plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic PDAC that have progressed after a gemcitabine-based regimen. The phase I part will be conducted in a dose de-escalation fashion, with two planned dose levels of tosedostat (120mg or 60mg) p.o. daily on days 1 to 21 with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 p.o. BID on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. If more than one patient in the tosedostat (120 mg) cohort experiences a dose limiting toxicity (DLT), then 6 more patient will be enrolled to the tosedostat (60 mg) cohort. A total of 36 patients will be enrolled in the phase II portion. Primary objective of the phase I portion is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and DLTs of tosedostat and capecitabine combination therapy. Primary objective of the phase II portion is to determine the progression-free survival at 3 months. Secondary objectives are to determine the overall response rate, time-to-progression, overall survival and CA 19-9 response. Exploratory objectives are to explore the predictive molecular biomarkers for treatment response and to explore the prognostic biomarkers. Clinical trial: NCT02352831. Clinical trial information: NCT02352831.

A phase I dose escalation study of SCB01A, a micro-tubular inhibitor with vascular disrupting activity, in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2531-2531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nai-Jung Chiang ◽  
Her-Shyong Shiah ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
Chia-Jui Yen ◽  
Hui-Jen Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Safety Concern ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Vascular Disrupting

2531 Background: SCB01A is a novel anti-microtubular agent with vascular disrupting activity. The Phase I study aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of SCB01A in patients with advanced solid tumor. Methods: This was an open-label, phase I clinical trial with a rapid titration followed by a 3 x 3 study design. Eligible patients would receive a 3-hr intravenous infusion of SCB01A, every 21 days as one cycle. All adverse events were classified according to the CTCAE V4.0. DLT was defined as the occurrence of grade 3 with complications and grade 4 hematoloigcal, or ≥grade 3 non-hematological toxicities. Results: From June 2011 to November 2015, a total of 33 eligible patients were enrolled to eight dose levels: 2 mg/m2 (n = 1), 3 mg/m2 (n = 1), 4 mg/m2 (n = 6), 6.5 mg/m2 (n = 9, with 3 additional subjects were recruited for safety concern), 10 mg/m2 (n = 3), 16 mg/m2 (n = 3), 24 mg/m2 (n = 6) and 32 mg/m2 (n = 4). Six episodes of DLTs were observed in 5 patients (each one in dose levels of 4/6.5/24 mg/m2 and two in dose level of 32 mg/m2), including grade 4 blood creatine phosphokinase elevation (4 mg/m2), grade 3 gastric hemorrhage (6.5 mg/m2), grade 2 venous thrombosis (24 mg/m2), grade 3 peripheral neuropathy manifested as weakness of lower limbs, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, and grade 3 hypertension (32 mg/m2). The MTD was determined to be 24 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic profiles revealed a linear AUC-dose response with an average elimination half-life (t1/2) of 2.5 hours. Partial response was observed in one subject with buccal cancer. A total of 57.6% (19/33) subjects had stable disease for at least 2 cycles. Conclusions: SCB01A is safe and tolerable in patients with solid tumor. The MTD of SCB01A is 24 mg/m2 every 21 days, which deserves further development. Clinical trial information: NCT011159522.

A phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of glumetinib (SCC244) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21702-e21702
Author(s):  
Hua-Jun Chen ◽  
Jin-Ji Yang ◽  
Xuening Yang ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Minghui Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Once Daily

e21702 Background: Aberrant activation of the MET pathway is associated poor prognosis and poor response to standard therapies in cancer patients. Glumetinib (SCC224) is an oral potent and highly selective MET inhibitor. This is an open label, dose-escalation, phase I clinical study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC regardless of MET status. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC failed standard treatments received glumetinib orally according to one of four dose escalation regimens on a 28-day cycle: 100 mg, 200 mg, 300mg and 400 mg once daily, in a Pharmacologically Guided Dose Escalation (PGDE) design (a variation of the standard 3+3 design). The primary endpoints are the incidence of dose limit toxicity (DLT), maximally tolerated dose (MTD), biologically effective dose (BED). The secondary endpoints are treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), safety and tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and its metabolites. Results: As of Feb 7, 2020, a total of eighteen eligible (18) patients were enrolled into this study: 3 at 100 mg, 3 at 200 mg, 6 at 300 mg and 6 at 400 mg. Only one patient among 6 evaluable patients at 400mg cohort reported one DLT of grade 3 vomiting. Treatment-related adverse events mostly were grade 1 or 2 nausea, vomiting, elevated alkaline phosphatase, elevated conjugated bilirubin, edema, headache, asthenia and decreased appetite. Non-DLT treatment related G3/4 adverse events were peripheral edema (n = 1, 5.5%), hypothyroidism (n = 1, 5.5%). Absorption was rapid after dosing and the median time to reach maximum plasma drug concentration ( Tmax) was 2.0‐6.0 hours. The mean value of half-life(t1/2) in each dose group ranged from 20.43h to 35.36 h. In response to glumetinib, one patient with MET overexpression at 200mg dose level had a best of response of partial response and completed 44 weeks glumetinib treatment, 4 patients (3 with MET amplification) had a best of response of stable disease. Conclusions: Glumetinib was well tolerated at doses up to 400 mg once daily and demonstrated clinical activity in advanced NSCLC with MET alterations. Glumetinib is used in ongoing clinical trials to further explore safety and efficacy in NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03466268.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document