scholarly journals The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Evolutionary Paradox: a Genome-Wide Association Studies–Based, in silico, Evolutionary Explanation

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. E2412-E2420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livio Casarini ◽  
Giulia Brigante
Author(s):  
Surankita Sukul ◽  
Pushkal Sinduvadi Ramesh ◽  
Narahari Agasti

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting a significant population of women of reproductive age group worldwide. Due to the complex pathophysiology and overlapping symptoms, this disorder is often difficult to diagnose. Genome-wide association studies have identified several new risk loci and candidate genes for PCOS. However, currently, there are no standard genetic markers for PCOS susceptibility testing owing to the inconsistent findings. Despite the advent of the genomic era, the challenge to identify and pinpoint the heritable genetic basis of PCOS still exists. This mini-review explores the basic definition and phenotypes of PCOS, the different criteria for the diagnosis, the incidence, gestational complications associated with it, the basis of genetic heritability, and the influence of various gene polymorphisms. Also, this review briefly summarises the reports of genome-wide association studies conducted to identify candidate genetic markers to aid in understanding the complex pathophysiology of PCOS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiam ◽  
Moreno-Asso ◽  
Teede ◽  
Laven ◽  
Stepto ◽  
...  

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a complex condition with mechanisms likely to involve the interaction between genetics and lifestyle. Familial clustering of PCOS symptoms is well documented, providing evidence for a genetic contribution to the condition. This overview aims firstly to systematically summarise the current literature surrounding genetics and PCOS, and secondly, to assess the methodological quality of current systematic reviews and identify limitations. Four databases were searched to identify candidate gene systematic reviews, and quality was assessed with the AMSTAR tool. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were identified by a semi structured literature search. Of the candidate gene systematic reviews, 17 were of high to moderate quality and four were of low quality. A total of 19 gene loci have been associated with risk of PCOS in GWAS, and 11 of these have been replicated across two different ancestries. Gene loci were located in the neuroendocrine, metabolic, and reproductive pathways. Overall, the gene loci with the most robust findings were THADA, FSHR, INS-VNTR, and DENND1A, that now require validation. This overview also identified limitations of the current literature and important methodological considerations for future genetic studies. Much work remains to identify causal variants and functional relevance of genes associated with PCOS.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaakko S Tyrmi ◽  
Riikka K Arffman ◽  
Nàtalia Pujol-Gualdo ◽  
Venla Kurra ◽  
Laure Morin-Papunen ◽  
...  

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common, complex disorder, which should be recognized as a prominent health concern also outside the context of fertility. Although PCOS affects up to 18% of women worldwide, its etiology remains poorly understood. It is likely that a combination of genetic and environmental factors contributes to the risk of PCOS development. Whilst previous genome-wide association studies have mapped several loci associated with PCOS, analysis of populations with unique population history and genetic makeup has the potential to uncover new low frequency variants with larger effects. In this study, we leverage genetic information of two neighboring and well-characterized populations in Europe - Finnish and Estonian - to provide a basis for a new understanding of the genetic determinants of PCOS. Methods and Findings: We conducted a three-stage case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS). In the discovery phase, we performed a GWAS comprising of a total of 797 cases and 140,558 controls from the FinnGen study. For validation, we used an independent dataset from the Estonian Biobank, including 2,812 cases and 89,230 controls. Finally, we conducted a joint meta-analysis of 3,609 cases and 229,788 controls from both cohorts. In total, we identified three novel genome-wide significant variants associating with PCOS. Two of these novel variants, rs145598156 (p=3.6 x 10-8, OR=3.01 [2.02-4.50] MAF=0.005) and rs182075939 (p=1.9 x 10-16, OR= 1.69 [1.49-1.91], MAF=0.04), were found to be enriched in the Finnish and Estonian populations and are tightly linked to a deletion c.1100delC (r2= 0.95) and a missense I157T (r2=0.83) in CHEK2. The third novel association is a common variant near MYO10 (rs9312937, p= 1.7 x 10-8, OR=1.16 (1.10-1.23), MAF=0.44). We also replicated four previous reported associations near the genes ERBB4, DENND1A, FSHB and ZBTB16. Conclusions: We identified three novel variants for PCOS in a Finnish-Estonian GWAS. Using isolated populations to perform genetic association studies provides a useful resource to identify rare variants contributing to the genetic landscape of complex diseases such as PCOS.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfei Zhang ◽  
Kevin Ho ◽  
Jacob M. Keaton ◽  
Dustin N. Hartzel ◽  
Felix Day ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. Previous studies have identified genetic variants associated with PCOS identified by different diagnostic criteria. The Rotterdam Criteria is the broadest and able to identify the most PCOS cases.ObjectivesTo identify novel associated genetic variants, we extracted PCOS cases and controls from the electronic health records (EHR) based on the Rotterdam Criteria and performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS).Study DesignWe developed a PCOS phenotyping algorithm based on the Rotterdam criteria and applied it to three EHR-linked biobanks to identify cases and controls for genetic study. In discovery phase, we performed individual GWAS using the Geisinger’s MyCode and the eMERGE cohorts, which were then meta-analyzed. We attempted validation of the significantly association loci (P<1×10−6) in the BioVU cohort. All association analyses used logistic regression, assuming an additive genetic model, and adjusted for principal components to control for population stratification. An inverse-variance fixed effect model was adopted for meta-analyses. Additionally, we examined the top variants to evaluate their associations with each criterion in the phenotyping algorithm. We used STRING to identify protein-protein interaction network.ResultsWe identified 2,995 PCOS cases and 53,599 controls in total (2,742cases and 51,438 controls from the discovery phase; 253 cases and 2,161 controls in the validation phase). GWAS identified one novel genome-wide significant variant rs17186366 (OR=1.37 [1.23,1.54], P=2.8×10−8) located near SOD2. Additionally, two loci with suggestive association were also identified: rs113168128 (OR=1.72 [1.42,2.10], P=5.2 x10−8), an intronic variant of ERBB4 that is independent from the previously published variants, and rs144248326 (OR=2.13 [1.52,2.86], P=8.45×10−7), a novel intronic variant in WWTR1. In the further association tests of the top 3 SNPs with each criterion in the PCOS algorithm, we found that rs17186366 was associated with polycystic and hyperandrogenism, while rs11316812 and rs144248326 were mainly associated with oligomenorrhea or infertility. Besides ERBB4, we also validated the association with DENND1A1.ConclusionThrough a discovery-validation GWAS on PCOS cases and controls identified from EHR using an algorithm based on Rotterdam criteria, we identified and validated a novel association with variants within ERBB4. We also identified novel associations nearby SOD2 and WWTR1. These results suggest the eGFR and Hippo pathways in the disease etiology. With previously identified PCOS-associated loci YAP1, the ERBB4-YAP1-WWTR1 network implicates the epidermal growth factor receptor and the Hippo pathway in the multifactorial etiology of PCOS.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0136609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Unjin Shim ◽  
Han-Na Kim ◽  
Hyejin Lee ◽  
Jee-Young Oh ◽  
Yeon-Ah Sung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document