Safety of Early Ambulation After Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroendovascular Procedures Without Use of Closure Devices

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Wagenbach ◽  
Andrea Saladino ◽  
Wilson P. Daugherty ◽  
Harry J. Cloft ◽  
David F. Kallmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Therapeutic Procedure ◽  
Manual Compression ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Early Ambulation ◽  
Surgical Evacuation ◽  
Therapeutic Procedures ◽  
Large Hematoma

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of manual compression and early ambulation after diagnostic and therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures. METHODS Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures. Manual compression at the femoral access site was applied. The target for early ambulation was 2 hours after compression. RESULTS Three hundred forty-three patients were enrolled, of whom 295 were eligible for early ambulation. Diagnostic procedures totaled 214 (72.5%); therapeutic procedures, 81 (27.5%). Ambulation occurred at 2 hours for 82 patients who underwent a diagnostic and 11 patients who underwent a therapeutic procedure. Overall, 142 patients (66.4%) after a diagnostic and 21 patients (25.9%) after a therapeutic procedure ambulated within 3 hours; 94% of outpatients ambulated within 2 to 3 hours and were dismissed shortly thereafter. Delayed ambulation was related to nursing staff delays, recovery from general anesthesia, or patient preference. Fourteen patients (4.7%)—9 (4.2%) who had a diagnostic and 5 (6.2%) who had a therapeutic procedure—required delayed ambulation because of local oozing (8 patients), a hematoma of less than 5 cm (3 patients), a pseudoaneurysm (2 patients), or a large hematoma requiring surgical evacuation (1 patient). CONCLUSION Early ambulation is feasible and safe after diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and manual compression. A longer period of bed rest or the routine use of closure devices is often not required; thereby avoiding the costs associated with bed rest and the complications associated with closure devices.

scholarly journals Usefulness of a Nonsuture Closure Device in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Coronary and Peripheral Angiography

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (04) ◽  
pp. 228-233
Author(s):  
John Owens ◽  
Shaun Bhatty ◽  
Robert Donovan ◽  
Andrea Tordini ◽  
Peter Danyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Closure Device ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Manual Compression ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Peripheral Angiography ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
To Receive

AbstractVascular access site complications can follow diagnostic coronary and peripheral angiography. We compared the complication rates of the Catalyst vascular closure device, with the complication rates after manual compression in patients undergoing diagnostic angiographic procedures via femoral access. We studied 1,470 predominantly male patients undergoing diagnostic coronary and peripheral angiography. Catalyst closure devices were used in 436 (29.7%) patients and manual compression was used in 1,034 (70.3%) patients. The former were allowed to ambulate after 2 hours, while the latter were allowed to ambulate after 6 hours. Major complications occurred in 4 (0.9%) patients who had a Catalyst device and in 14 (1.4%) patients who had manual compression (odds ratio [OR]: 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22–2.1, p = 0.49). Any complications occurred in 51 (11.7%) patients who had a Catalyst closure device and in 64 (6.2%) patients who had manual compression (OR: 2, CI: 1.4–3, p < 0.01). After adjustment for other variables and for a propensity score reflecting the probability to receive the closure device, the association of major complications with the use of the closure device remained not significant (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.17–1.7, p = 0.29), while the association of any complications with the use of the Catalyst device remained significant (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9, p < 0.01). The Catalyst device was not associated with an increased risk of major groin complications but was associated with an increased risk of any complications compared with manual compression. Patients receiving the closure device ambulated sooner.

scholarly journals Early Ambulation After Transfemoral Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaid Aljuboori ◽  
Jessica Eaton ◽  
Kate Carroll ◽  
Michael Levitt ◽  
Louis Kim
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cerebral Angiography ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Early Ambulation ◽  
Antiplatelet Medication

Abstract BackgroundA significant proportion of transfemoral cerebral angiography complications are related to the access site, with no clear consensus concerning the optimal closure technique. In this study, we examined the usefulness of a new closure protocol for transfemoral diagnostic cerebral angiography.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent transfemoral (4Fr sheath) diagnostic cerebral angiography procedures at our institution. We included patients >18 years old who underwent the new closure protocol to achieve hemostasis at the access site. The new protocol entailed the use of nonocclusive manual compression for 15 minutes followed by 2 hours of bed rest, with additional 10-15 minutes of compression for new hematoma. We collected and analyzed the patients’ demographics, use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation medications, sheath size, and others.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 119 patients with a mean age was 54 years with (88%) females. Forty-one patients (34%) were on antiplatelet medications, with 12 (10%) on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Four patients (3%) (two on DAPT, one on Aspirin alone, and one was not on any antiplatelet medication) had access site hematoma that required additional compression. Subgroup analysis showed that within the DAPT, Aspirin alone, and no antiplatelet medications groups, (17%), (3%), and (1%) of patients developed access site hematoma, respectively.ConclusionThis pilot study demonstrates that our closure protocol for transfemoral angiograms is safe and effective. There was a trend toward higher access-site complications in patients on DAPT. Further studies are required to expand on and validate our results.

Incorporation of transradial approach in neuroendovascular procedures: defining benchmarks for rates of complications and conversion to femoral access

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1122-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Mithun G Sattur ◽  
Jonathan Lena ◽  
Pascal M Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Procedures ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

BackgroundThe transradial approach (TRA) has gained increasing popularity for neuroendovascular procedures. However, the experience with TRA in neuroangiography is still in early stages in most centers, and the safety and feasibility of this approach have not been well established. The purpose of this study is to report the safety and feasibility of TRA for neuroendovascular procedures.MethodsWe reviewed charts from six institutions in the USA to include consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic or interventional neuroendovascular procedures through TRA from July 2018 to July 2019. Collected data included baseline characteristics, procedural variables, complications, and whether there was a crossover to transfemoral access.ResultsA total of 2203 patients were included in the study (age 56.1±15.2, 60.8% women). Of these, 1697 (77%) patients underwent diagnostic procedures and 506 (23%) underwent interventional procedures. Successfully completed procedures included aneurysm coiling (n=97), flow diversion (n=89), stent-assisted coiling (n=57), balloon-assisted coiling (n=19), and stroke thrombectomy (n=76). Crossover to femoral access was required in 114 (5.2%). There were no major complications related to the radial access site. Minor complications related to access site were seen in 14 (0.6%) patients.ConclusionIn this early stage of transforming to the ‘radial-first’ approach for neuroendovascular procedures, TRA was safe with low complication rates for both diagnostic and interventional procedures. A wide range of procedures were completed successfully using TRA.

Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016728
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Stefan W Koester ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
Jacob F Baranoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Catheter Size ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Procedure Type ◽  
Angiographic Findings

BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions.MethodsElective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access.ResultsOf the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI −$4931 to −$97; p=0.04).ConclusionNeuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.

scholarly journals Cardiogenic shock and radial access in patients with an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Zahn ◽  
M Hochadel ◽  
B Schumacher ◽  
M Pauschinger ◽  
C Stellbrink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Strong Variation ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) in patients (pts) with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the strongest predictor of hospital mortality. Radial in contrast to femoral access in STEMI pts might be associated with a lower mortality. However, little is known on radial access in CS pts. Methods We retrospectively analysed all STEMI pts between 2009 and 2015 who sufferend from CS and who were included into the ALKK PCI registry. Pts treated via a radial access were compared to those treated via a femoral access. Results Between 2009 and 2015 23796 STEMI pts were included in the registry. 1763 (7.4%) of pts were in CS. The proportion of radial access was 6.6%: in 2009 4.0% and in 2015 19.6%, p for trend &lt;0.0001 with a strong variation between the participating centres (0% to 37%). Conclusions Radial access was only used in 6.6% of STEMI pts presenting in CS. However, a significant increase in the use of radial access was observed over time (2009: 4%, 2015 19.6%, p&lt;0.001), with a great variance in its use between the participating hospitals. Despite similar pt characteristics the difference in hospital mortality according to access site has to be interpretated with caution. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Radiation Awareness for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Hybrid Operating Room: An Instant Operator Risk Chart for Daily Practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110074
Author(s):  
Quirina M. B. de Ruiter ◽  
Frans L. Moll ◽  
Constantijn E. V. B. Hazenberg ◽  
Joost A. van Herwaarden
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Radiation Risk ◽  
Dose Limit ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Rate Prediction ◽  
Operator Dose

Introduction: While the operator radiation dose rates are correlated to patient radiation dose rates, discrepancies may exist in the effect size of each individual radiation dose predictors. An operator dose rate prediction model was developed, compared with the patient dose rate prediction model, and converted to an instant operator risk chart. Materials and Methods: The radiation dose rates (DRoperator for the operator and DRpatient for the patient) from 12,865 abdomen X-ray acquisitions were selected from 50 unique patients undergoing standard or complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in the hybrid operating room with a fixed C-arm. The radiation dose rates were analyzed using a log-linear multivariable mixed model (with the patient as the random effect) and incorporated varying (patient and C-arm) radiation dose predictors combined with the vascular access site. The operator dose rate models were used to predict the expected radiation exposure duration until an operator may be at risk to reach the 20 mSv year dose limit. The dose rate prediction models were translated into an instant operator radiation risk chart. Results: In the multivariate patient and operator fluoroscopy dose rate models, lower DRoperator than DRpatient effect size was found for radiation protocol (2.06 for patient vs 1.4 for operator changing from low to medium protocol) and C-arm angulation. Comparable effect sizes for both DRoperator and DRpatient were found for body mass index (1.25 for patient and 1.27 for the operator) and irradiated field. A higher effect size for the DRoperator than DRpatient was found for C-arm rotation (1.24 for the patient vs 1.69 for the operator) and exchanging from femoral access site to brachial access (1.05 for patient vs 2.5 for the operator). Operators may reach their yearly 20 mSv year dose limit after 941 minutes from the femoral access vs 358 minutes of digital subtraction angiography radiation from the brachial access. Conclusion: The operator dose rates were correlated to patient dose rate; however, C-arm angulation and changing from femoral to brachial vascular access site may disproportionally increase the operator radiation risk compared with the patient radiation risk. An instant risk chart may improve operator dose awareness during EVAR.

Abstract 1122‐000067: Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy Following IV tPA Administration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew Ducruet ◽  
Felipe C Albuquerque ◽  
Ashutosh Jadhav
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Iv Tpa

Introduction : The transradial artery (TRA) approach for neuroendovascular procedures has been demonstrated as a safe and effective alternative to the transfemoral artery (TFA) approach. The present study compares the efficiency and periprocedural outcomes of the TRA and TFA approach for acute stroke interventions in patients receiving intravenous alteplase. Methods : The study was designed as a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent acute mechanical thrombectomy at a large cerebrovascular center between January 2014 and March 2021. Intervention cohorts (TRA and TFA) were compared on baseline characteristics, periprocedural efficiency/efficacy, and in‐hospital outcomes. Results : A total of 314 patients underwent acute mechanical thrombectomy following IV tPA via TRA (6.7%, 21/314) or TFA (93.3%, 293/314) approach. The overall complication rate appeared higher in TFA (6.8%, 20/314) compared to TRA (4.8%,1/21) patients. Access site complications were present in 4.1%(12/293) of TFA patients and 0.0%(0/21) of TRA patients. The average length of stay (days ± standard deviation) was significantly greater in TFA (8.8 ± 8.5) vs. TRA (4.8 ± 2.9) patients (P = 0.02). Linear regression analysis found femoral access (p = 0.046), Medicaid (p = 0.004) insurance, and discharge NIHSS >10 (p = 0.045) as predictors of increased length of stay. However, when time to initial physical/occupation session was added to the model, access site was no longer significant. Conclusions : The TRA (vs. TFA) approach for acute stroke interventions following IV tPA administration may potentially reduce periprocedural complications and hospital length of stay. The reduction in length of stay with TRA access appears to be associated with earlier initiation of therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document