Nitric oxide, an endogenous regulator of Dictyostelium discoideum differentiation

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (18) ◽  
pp. 3587-3595
Author(s):  
Y.P. Tao ◽  
T.P. Misko ◽  
A.C. Howlett ◽  
C. Klein

We have previously demonstrated that nitric oxide (NO)-generating compounds inhibit D. discoideum differentiation by preventing the initiation of cAMP pulses (Tao, Y., Howlett, A. and Klein, C. (1996) Cell. Signal. 8, 37–43). In the present study, we demonstrate that cells produce NO at a relatively constant rate during the initial phase of their developmental cycle. The addition of oxyhemoglobin, an NO scavenger, stimulates cell aggregation, suggesting that NO has a negative effect on the development of aggregation competence. Starvation of cells in the presence of glucose, which has been shown to prevent the initiation of cAMP pulses (Darmon, M. and Klein, C. (1978) Dev. Biol. 63, 377–389), results in an increased production of NO. The inhibition of cell aggregation by glucose treatment can be reversed by oxyhemoglobin. These findings indicate that NO is a signaling molecule for D. discoideum cells and that physiological or environmental conditions that enhance external NO levels will delay the initiation of cAMP pulses, which are essential for cell differentiation.

1970 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Watts ◽  
J. M. Ashworth

1. A simple axenic medium suitable for the growth of the myxamoebae of a strain of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum is described. 2. Procedures suitable for the growth of this strain in liquid and on solid media are described. 3. Conditions suitable for initiating the cell differentiation of myxamoebae grown axenically are described.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Calvo Martín ◽  
Stamatios C. Nicolis ◽  
Isaac Planas-Sitjà ◽  
Jean-Christophe de Biseau ◽  
Jean-Louis Deneubourg

AbstractCockroaches, like most social arthropods, are led to choose collectively among different alternative resting places. These decisions are modulated by different factors, such as environmental conditions (temperature, relative humidity) and sociality (groups size, nature of communications). The aim of this study is to establish the interplay between environmental conditions and the modulation of the interactions between individuals within a group leading to an inversion of preferences. We show that the preferences of isolated cockroaches and groups of 16 individuals, on the selection of the relative humidity of a shelter are inversed and shed light on the mechanisms involved. We suggest that the relative humidity has a multi-level influence on cockroaches, manifested as an attractant effect at the individual level and as a negative effect at the group level, modulating the interactions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (8-9-10) ◽  
pp. 343-357
Author(s):  
Adam Kuspa ◽  
Gad Shaulsky

William Farnsworth Loomis studied the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum for more than fifty years as a professor of biology at the University of California, San Diego, USA. This biographical reflection describes Dr. Loomis’ major scientific contributions to the field within a career arc that spanned the early days of molecular biology up to the present day where the acquisition of high-dimensional datasets drive research. Dr. Loomis explored the genetic control of social amoeba development, delineated mechanisms of cell differentiation, and significantly advanced genetic and genomic technology for the field. The details of Dr. Loomis’ multifaceted career are drawn from his published work, from an autobiographical essay that he wrote near the end of his career and from extensive conversations between him and the two authors, many of which took place on the deck of his beachfront home in Del Mar, California.


FEBS Letters ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 322 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzuru Kubohara ◽  
Koji Okamoto ◽  
Yoshimasa Tanaka ◽  
Ken-ichi Asahi ◽  
Akira Sakurai ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-338
Author(s):  
C. Rossier ◽  
G. Gerisch ◽  
D. Malchow

Adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic phosphorothioate (cAMP-S) is a cyclic AMP (cAMP) analogue which is only slowly hydrolysed by phosphodiesterases of Dictyostelium discoideum. The affinity of cAMP-S to cAMP receptors at the cell surface is only one order of magnitude lower than that of cAMP. cAMP-S can replace cAMP as a stimulant with respect to all receptor-mediated responses tested, including chemotaxis and the induction of cAMP pulses. cAMP-S does not affect growth of D. discoideum but it blocks cell aggregation at a uniform concentration of 5 × 10(−7) M in agar plate cultures of strain NC-4 as well as its axenically growing derivative, Ax-2. Another wild-type strain of D. discoideum, v-12, is able to aggregate on agar plates supplemented with 1 mM cAMP-S. The development of Polysphondylium pallidum and P. violaceum is also highly cAMP-S resistant. In Ax-2 both differentiation from the growth phase to the aggregation-competent stage and chemotaxis are cAMP-S sensitive, whereas in v-12 only chemotaxis is inhibited. v-12 can still form streams of cohering cells and fruiting bodies when chemotaxis is inhibited by cAMP-S. Whereas cAMP induces differentiation into stalk cells at concentrations of 10(−3) or 10(−4) M, cAMP-S has the same effect in strain v-12 at the much lower concentration of 10(−6) M.


Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wang ◽  
P. Schaap

The differentiation-inducing factor, DIF, was induce stalk cell differentiation in Dictyostelium incubated as submerged monolayers. We investigated the regulates the differentiation of stalk cells in the was found that in migrating or submerged slugs DIF cell differentiation, which is most likely due to the antagonist. Cyclic AMP and ammonia were earlier antagonists in vitro. We show here that ammonia, but an antagonist for DIF-induced stalk cell can induce stalk cell differentiation when ammonia are enzymically depleted. However, depletion of cAMP increase the efficacy of DIF. We propose that the cell differentiation during early culmination may be drop in ammonia levels inside the organism.


2022 ◽  
pp. 215-244
Author(s):  
M. Nasir Khan ◽  
Zahid H. Siddiqui ◽  
M. Naeem ◽  
Zahid K. Abbas ◽  
M. Wahid Ansari

Author(s):  
G. Gerisch ◽  
Y. Maeda ◽  
D. Malchow ◽  
W. Roos ◽  
U. Wick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document