Segmental expression of Hoxb2 in r4 requires two separate sites that integrate cooperative interactions between Prep1, Pbx and Hox proteins

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Ferretti ◽  
H. Marshall ◽  
H. Popperl ◽  
M. Maconochie ◽  
R. Krumlauf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Close Proximity

Direct auto- and cross-regulatory interactions between Hox genes serve to establish and maintain segmentally restricted patterns in the developing hindbrain. Rhombomere r4-specific expression of both Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 depends upon bipartite cis Hox response elements for the group 1 paralogous proteins, Hoxal and Hoxbl. The DNA-binding ability and selectivity of these proteins depend upon the formation of specific heterodimeric complexes with members of the PBC homeodomain protein family (Pbx genes). The r4 enhancers from Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 have the same activity, but differ with respect to the number and organisation of bipartite Pbx/Hox (PH) sites required, suggesting the intervention of other components/sequences. We report here that another family of homeodomain proteins (TALE, Three-Amino acids-Loop-Extension: Prep1, Meis, HTH), capable of dimerizing with Pbx/EXD, is involved in the mechanisms of r4-restricted expression. We show that: (1) the r4-specific Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 enhancers are complex elements containing separate PH and Prep/Meis (PM) sites; (2) the PM site of the Hoxb2, but not Hoxb1, enhancer is essential in vivo for r4 expression and also influences other sites of expression; (3) both PM and PH sites are required for in vitro binding of Prepl-Pbx and formation and binding of a ternary Hoxbl-Pbxla (or 1b)-Prepl complex. (4) A similar ternary association forms in nuclear extracts from embryonal P19 cells, but only upon retinoic acid induction. This requires synthesis of Hoxbl and also contains Pbx with either Prepl or Meisl. Together these findings highlight the fact that PM sites are found in close proximity to bipartite PH motifs in several Hox responsive elements shown to be important in vivo and that such sites play an essential role in potentiating regulatory activity in combination with the PH motifs.

scholarly journals Both Pbx1 and E2A-Pbx1 bind the DNA motif ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the products of multiple murine Hox genes, some of which are themselves oncogenes.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3786-3795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q Lu ◽  
P S Knoepfler ◽  
J Scheele ◽  
D D Wright ◽  
M P Kamps
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Structural Development ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Hox Proteins

E2A-PBX1 is the oncogene produced at the t(1;19) chromosomal breakpoint of pediatric pre-B-cell leukemia. Expression of E2A-Pbx1 induces fibroblast transformation and myeloid and T-cell leukemia in mice and arrests differentiation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-dependent myeloblasts in cultured marrow. Recently, the Drosophila melanogaster protein Exd, which is highly related to Pbx1, was shown to bind DNA cooperatively with the Drosophila homeodomain proteins Ubx and Abd-A. Here, we demonstrate that the normal Pbx1 homeodomain protein, as well as its oncogenic derivative, E2A-Pbx1, binds the DNA sequence ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the murine Hox-A5, Hox-B7, Hox-B8, and Hox-C8 homeodomain proteins, which are themselves known oncoproteins, as well as with the Hox-D4 homeodomain protein. Cooperative binding to ATCAATCAA required the homeodomain-dependent DNA-binding activities of both Pbx1 and the Hox partner. In cotransfection assays, Hox-B8 suppressed transactivation by E2A-Pbx1. These results suggest that (i) Pbx1 may participate in the normal regulation of Hox target gene transcription in vivo and therein contribute to aspects of anterior-posterior patterning and structural development in vertebrates, (ii) that E2A-Pbx1 could abrogate normal differentiation by altering the transcriptional regulation of Hox target genes in conjunction with Hox proteins, and (iii) that the oncogenic mechanism of certain Hox proteins may require their physical interaction with Pbx1 as a cooperating, DNA-binding partner.

scholarly journals The HOX Homeodomain Proteins Block CBP Histone Acetyltransferase Activity

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 7509-7522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-fang Shen ◽  
Keerthi Krishnan ◽  
H. J. Lawrence ◽  
Corey Largman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Reporter Assays ◽  
Hox Protein

ABSTRACT Despite the identification of PBC proteins as cofactors that provide DNA affinity and binding specificity for the HOX homeodomain proteins, HOX proteins do not demonstrate robust activity in transient-transcription assays and few authentic downstream targets have been identified for these putative transcription factors. During a search for additional cofactors, we established that each of the 14 HOX proteins tested, from 11 separate paralog groups, binds to CBP or p300. All six isolated homeodomain fragments tested bind to CBP, suggesting that the homeodomain is a common site of interaction. Surprisingly, CBP-p300 does not form DNA binding complexes with the HOX proteins but instead prevents their binding to DNA. The HOX proteins are not substrates for CBP histone acetyltransferase (HAT) but instead inhibit the activity of CBP in both in vitro and in vivo systems. These mutually inhibitory interactions are reflected by the inability of CBP to potentiate the low levels of gene activation induced by HOX proteins in a range of reporter assays. We propose two models for HOX protein function: (i) HOX proteins may function without CBP HAT to regulate transcription as cooperative DNA binding molecules with PBX, MEIS, or other cofactors, and (ii) the HOX proteins may inhibit CBP HAT activity and thus function as repressors of gene transcription.

Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (22) ◽  
pp. 5137-5148 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.D. Ryoo ◽  
T. Marty ◽  
F. Casares ◽  
M. Affolter ◽  
R.S. Mann
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Trimeric Complex ◽  
Binding Residue ◽  
Dominant Negative Form

To regulate their target genes, the Hox proteins of Drosophila often bind to DNA as heterodimers with the homeodomain protein Extradenticle (EXD). For EXD to bind DNA, it must be in the nucleus, and its nuclear localization requires a third homeodomain protein, Homothorax (HTH). Here we show that a conserved N-terminal domain of HTH directly binds to EXD in vitro, and is sufficient to induce the nuclear localization of EXD in vivo. However, mutating a key DNA binding residue in the HTH homeodomain abolishes many of its in vivo functions. HTH binds to DNA as part of a HTH/Hox/EXD trimeric complex, and we show that this complex is essential for the activation of a natural Hox target enhancer. Using a dominant negative form of HTH we provide evidence that similar complexes are important for several Hox- and exd-mediated functions in vivo. These data suggest that Hox proteins often function as part of a multiprotein complex, composed of HTH, Hox, and EXD proteins, bound to DNA.

scholarly journals The pancreatic islet factor STF-1 binds cooperatively with Pbx to a regulatory element in the somatostatin promoter: importance of the FPWMK motif and of the homeodomain.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 7091-7097 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Peers ◽  
S Sharma ◽  
T Johnson ◽  
M Kamps ◽  
M Montminy
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Selection ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cooperative Binding ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Target Sites

A number of homeodomain proteins have been shown to regulate cellular development by stimulating the transcription of specific target genes. In contrast to their distinct activities in vivo, however, most homeodomain proteins bind indiscriminately to potential target sites in vitro, suggesting the involvement of cofactors which specify target site selection. One such cofactor, termed extradenticle, has been shown to influence segmental morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by binding cooperatively with certain homeodomain proteins to target regulatory elements. Here we demonstrate that STF-1, an orphan homeodomain protein required for pancreatic development in mammals, binds cooperatively to DNA with Pbx, the mammalian homolog of extradenticle. Cooperative binding with Pbx requires a pentapeptide motif (FPWMK) which is well conserved among a large subset of homeodomain proteins. The FPMWK motif is not sufficient to confer Pbx cooperativity on other homeodomain proteins, however; the N-terminal arm of the STF-1 homeodomain is also essential. As cooperative binding with Pbx occurs on only a subset of potential STF-1 target sites, our results suggest that Pbx may specify target gene selection in the developing pancreas by forming heterodimeric complexes with STF-1.

scholarly journals Structure of a Polycomb Response Element and In Vitro Binding of Polycomb Group Complexes Containing GAGA Factor

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3187-3197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Béatrice Horard ◽  
Christophe Tatout ◽  
Sylvain Poux ◽  
Vincenzo Pirrotta
Keyword(s):  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Gaga Factor ◽  
Consensus Sequences ◽  
Polycomb Response Element ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
Polycomb Group Complexes

ABSTRACT Polycomb response elements (PREs) are regulatory sites that mediate the silencing of homeotic and other genes. The bxd PRE region from the Drosophila Ultrabithorax gene can be subdivided into subfragments of 100 to 200 bp that retain different degrees of PRE activity in vivo. In vitro, embryonic nuclear extracts form complexes containing Polycomb group (PcG) proteins with these fragments. PcG binding to some fragments is dependent on consensus sequences for the GAGA factor. Other fragments lack GAGA binding sites but can still bind PcG complexes in vitro. We show that the GAGA factor is a component of at least some types of PcG complexes and may participate in the assembly of PcG complexes at PREs.

scholarly journals Elf-1 Contributes to the Function of the Complex Interleukin (IL)-2–responsive Enhancer in the Mouse IL-2 Receptor α Gene

1997 ◽  
Vol 185 (7) ◽  
pp. 1211-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Serdobova ◽  
Maria Pla ◽  
Patrick Reichenbach ◽  
Peter Sperisen ◽  
Jacques Ghysdael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Proximal Region ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Ets Family ◽  
Cd8 Cell ◽  
Promoter Proximal Region

Lymphocytes regulate their responsiveness to IL-2 through the transcriptional control of the IL-2Rα gene, which encodes a component of the high affinity IL-2 receptor. In the mouse IL-2Rα gene this control is exerted via two regulatable elements, a promoter proximal region, and an IL-2–responsive enhancer (IL-2rE) 1.3 kb upstream. In vitro and in vivo functional analysis of the IL-2rE in the rodent thymic lymphoma-derived, CD4−CD8− cell line PC60 demonstrated that three separate elements, sites I, II, and III, were necessary for IL-2 responsiveness; these three sites demonstrate functional cooperation. Site III contains a consensus binding motif for members of the Ets family of transcription factors. Here we demonstrate that Elf-1, an Ets-like protein, binds to site III and participates in IL-2 responsiveness. In vitro site III forms a complex with a protein constitutively present in nuclear extracts from PC60 cells as well as from normal CD4−CD8− thymocytes. We have identified this molecule as Elf-1 according to a number of criteria. The complex possesses an identical electrophoretic mobility to that formed by recombinant Elf-1 protein and is super-shifted by anti–Elf-1 antibodies. Biotinylated IL-2rE probes precipitate Elf-1 from PC60 extracts provided site III is intact and both recombinant and PC60-derived proteins bind with the same relative affinities to different mutants of site III. In addition, by introducing mutations into the core of the site III Ets-like motif and comparing the corresponding effects on the in vitro binding of Elf-1 and the in vivo IL-2rE activity, we provide strong evidence that Elf-1 is directly involved in IL-2 responsiveness. The nature of the functional cooperativity observed between Elf-1 and the factors binding sites I and II remains unresolved; experiments presented here however suggest that this effect may not require direct interactions between the proteins binding these three elements.

The homeodomain protein Nanog and pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1518-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yates ◽  
I. Chambers
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Es Cell ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Morphogenetic Protein

Intrinsic regulators of the pluripotency of mouse ES (embryonic stem) cells include the homeodomain proteins Oct4 and the recently identified Nanog. When overexpressed, Nanog displays the unique attribute of robustly sustaining ES cell self-renewal in the absence of the otherwise requisite extracellular stimulation by LIF (leukaemia inhibitory factor) and BMP (bone morphogenetic protein). Here, we review our current understanding of the function of Nanog in pluripotent stem cells both in vitro and in vivo.

Segmental expression of Hoxa-2 in the hindbrain is directly regulated by Krox-20

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nonchev ◽  
C. Vesque ◽  
M. Maconochie ◽  
T. Seitanidou ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Lacz Reporter ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Selector Genes ◽  
Group 2

The hindbrain is a segmented structure divided into repeating metameric units termed rhombomeres (r). The Hox family, vertebrate homologs of the Drosophila HOM-C homeotic selector genes, are expressed in rhombomere-restricted patterns and are believed to participate in regulating segmental identities. Krox-20, a zinc finger gene, has a highly conserved pattern of expression in r3 and r5 and is functionally required for their maintenance in mouse embryos. Krox-20 has been shown to directly regulate the Hoxb-2 gene and we wanted to determine if it was involved in regulating multiple Hox genes as a part of its functional role. Hoxa-2 is the only known paralog of Hoxb-2, and we examined the patterns of expression of the mouse Hoxa-2 gene with particular focus on r3 and r5 in wild type and Krox-20−/− mutant embryos. There was a clear loss of expression in r3, which indicated that Hoxa-2 was downstream of Krox-20. Using transgenic analysis with E. coli lacZ reporter genes we have identified and mapped an r3/r5 enhancer in the 5′ flanking region of the Hoxa-2 gene. Deletion analysis narrowed this region to an 809 bp Bg/II fragment, and in vitro binding and competition assays with bacterially expressed Krox-20 protein identified two sites within the enhancer. Mutation of these Krox-20 sites in the regulatory region specifically abolished r3/r5 activity, but did not affect neural crest and mesodermal components. This indicated that the two Krox-20 sites are required in vivo for enhancer function. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Krox-20 in r4 was able to transactivate the Hoxa 2/lacZ reporter in this rhombomere. Together our findings suggest that Krox-20 directly participates in the transcriptional regulation of Hoxa-2 during hindbrain segmentation, and is responsible for the upregulation of the r3 and r5 domains of expression of both vertebrate group 2 Hox paralogs. Therefore, the segmental phenotypes in the Krox-20 mutants are likely to reflect the role of Krox-20 in directly regulating multiple Hox genes.

Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 4532-4545
Author(s):  
I Pellerin ◽  
C Schnabel ◽  
K M Catron ◽  
C Abate
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

The Drosophila even-skipped promoter is transcribed in a stage-specific manner in vitro and contains multiple, overlapping factor-binding sites

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 4334-4344
Author(s):  
D Read ◽  
T Nishigaki ◽  
J L Manley
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Gaga Factor ◽  
Regulation Of Expression ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

To investigate the factors contributing to regulation of expression of the Drosophila segmentation gene even-skipped (eve), we have analyzed both the in vitro transcription and eve-promoter-binding proteins in embryo extracts. We show that the eve promoter is accurately and efficiently expressed in nuclear extracts derived from Drosophila embryos and that transcription is more efficient in extracts prepared from embryos at early stages of development than in those from older embryos, broadly reproducing the temporal pattern of expression observed in vivo. This stage-specific expression is dependent on sequences upstream of the eve transcription start site which contain multiple binding sites for at least two distinct proteins present in embryo nuclei. One of these proteins, the binding sites for which correspond to the sequences required for stage-specific expression, appears to be the previously described GAGA factor. Although the binding activity of the GAGA factor remains constant, the level of the binding activity of the other protein, which we have called the TCCT factor, changes during the course of embryogenesis. Activity is first detected 3 to 5 h after fertilization and decreases during later stages of embryogenesis. We discuss the possibility that the TCCT factor plays a role in the maintenance or refinement of the eve expression pattern.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document