Normal limb development in conditional mutants of Fgf4

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 989-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Moon ◽  
A.M. Boulet ◽  
M.R. Capecchi
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Embryonic Lethality ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Recombination Reaction ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Early Embryonic Lethality ◽  
Limb Outgrowth

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) mediate multiple developmental signals in vertebrates. Several of these factors are expressed in limb bud structures that direct patterning of the limb. FGF4 is produced in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) where it is hypothesized to provide mitogenic and morphogenic signals to the underlying mesenchyme that regulate normal limb development. Mutation of this gene in the germline of mice results in early embryonic lethality, preventing subsequent evaluation of Fgf4 function in the AER. A conditional mutant of Fgf4, based on site-specific Cre/loxP-mediated excision of the gene, allowed us to bypass embryonic lethality and directly test the role of FGF4 during limb development in living murine embryos. This conditional mutation was designed so that concomitant with inactivation of the Fgf4 gene by excision of all Fgf4-coding sequences, a reporter gene was activated in Fgf4-expressing cells, allowing assessment of the site-specific recombination reaction. Although a large body of evidence led us to predict that ablation of Fgf4 gene function in the AER of developing mice would result in abnormal limb outgrowth and patterning, we found that Fgf4 conditional mutants had normal limbs. Furthermore, expression patterns of Shh, Bmp2, Fgf8 and Fgf10 were normal in the limb buds of the conditional mutants. These findings indicate that the previously proposed FGF4-SHH feedback loop is not essential for coordination of murine limb outgrowth and patterning. We suggest that some of the roles currently attributed to FGF4 during early vertebrate limb development may be performed by other AER factors in vivo.

The dominant hemimelia mutation uncouples epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and disrupts anterior mesenchyme formation in mouse hindlimbs

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (21) ◽  
pp. 4729-4736
Author(s):  
L. Lettice ◽  
J. Hecksher-Sorensen ◽  
R.E. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Mouse Mutation ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Limb Outgrowth ◽  
Gene Functions ◽  
Regulatory Loop ◽  
Limb Initiation

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are essential for both limb outgrowth and pattern formation in the limb. Molecules capable of communication between these two tissues are known and include the signaling molecules SHH and FGF4, FGF8 and FGF10. Evidence suggests that the pattern and maintenance of expression of these genes are dependent on a number of factors including regulatory loops between genes expressed in the AER and those in the underlying mesenchyme. We show here that the mouse mutation dominant hemimelia (Dh) alters the pattern of gene expression in the AER such that Fgf4, which is normally expressed in a posterior domain, and Fgf8, which is expressed throughout are expressed in anterior patterns. We show that maintenance of Shh expression in the posterior mesenchyme is not dependent on either expression of Fgf4 or normal levels of Fgf8 in the overlying AER. Conversely, AER expression of Fgf4 is not directly dependent on Shh expression. Also the reciprocal regulatory loop proposed for Fgf8 in the AER and Fgf10 in the underlying mesenchyme is also uncoupled by this mutation. Early during the process of limb initiation, Dh is involved in regulating the width of the limb bud, the mutation resulting in selective loss of anterior mesenchyme. The Dh gene functions in the initial stages of limb development and we suggest that these initial roles are linked to mechanisms that pattern gene expression in the AER.

scholarly journals An intrinsic cell cycle timer terminates limb bud outgrowth

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Pickering ◽  
Constance A Rich ◽  
Holly Stainton ◽  
Cristina Aceituno ◽  
Kavitha Chinnaiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Late Stage ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Limb Outgrowth ◽  
Bmp Signalling ◽  
Mesenchyme Cells

The longstanding view of how proliferative outgrowth terminates following the patterning phase of limb development involves the breakdown of reciprocal extrinsic signalling between the distal mesenchyme and the overlying epithelium (e-m signalling). However, by grafting distal mesenchyme cells from late stage chick wing buds to the epithelial environment of younger wing buds, we show that this mechanism is not required. RNA sequencing reveals that distal mesenchyme cells complete proliferative outgrowth by an intrinsic cell cycle timer in the presence of e-m signalling. In this process, e-m signalling is required permissively to allow the intrinsic cell cycle timer to run its course. We provide evidence that a temporal switch from BMP antagonism to BMP signalling controls the intrinsic cell cycle timer during limb outgrowth. Our findings have general implications for other patterning systems in which extrinsic signals and intrinsic timers are integrated.

The role of Alx-4 in the establishment of anteroposterior polarity during vertebrate limb development

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (22) ◽  
pp. 4417-4425 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Takahashi ◽  
K. Tamura ◽  
D. Buscher ◽  
H. Masuya ◽  
S. Yonei-Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Feedback ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Negative Feedback Loop ◽  
Vertebrate Limb ◽  
Limb Outgrowth ◽  
Vertebrate Limb Development

We have determined that Strong's Luxoid (lstJ) [corrected] mice have a 16 bp deletion in the homeobox region of the Alx-4 gene. This deletion, which leads to a frame shift and a truncation of the Alx-4 protein, could cause the polydactyly phenotype observed in lstJ [corrected] mice. We have cloned the chick homologue of Alx-4 and investigated its expression during limb outgrowth. Chick Alx-4 displays an expression pattern complementary to that of shh, a mediator of polarizing activity in the limb bud. Local application of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), in addition to ectodermal apical ridge removal experiments suggest the existence of a negative feedback loop between Alx-4 and Shh during limb outgrowth. Analysis of polydactylous mutants indicate that the interaction between Alx-4 and Shh is independent of Gli3, a negative regulator of Shh in the limb. Our data suggest the existence of a negative feedback loop between Alx-4 and Shh during vertebrate limb outgrowth.

Sonic hedgehog is not required for polarising activity in the Doublefoot mutant mouse limb bud

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hayes ◽  
J.M. Brown ◽  
M.F. Lyon ◽  
G.M. Morriss-Kay
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Mutant Gene ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Active Constituent ◽  
Limb Buds

The mouse mutant Doublefoot (Dbf) shows preaxial polydactyly of all four limbs. We have analysed limb development in this mutant with respect to morphogenesis, gene expression patterns and ectopic polarising activity. The results reveal a gain-of-function mutation at a locus that mediates pattern formation in the developing limb. Shh expression is identical with that of wild-type embryos, i.e. there is no ectopic expression. However, mesenchyme from the anterior aspects of Dbf/+ mutant limb buds, when transplanted to the anterior side of chick wing buds, induces duplication of the distal skeletal elements. Mid-distal mesenchymal transplants from early, but not later, Dbf/+ limb buds are also able to induce duplication. This demonstration of polarising activity in the absence of Shh expression identifies the gene at the Dbf locus as a new genetic component of the Shh signalling pathway, which (at least in its mutated form) is able to activate signal transduction independently of Shh. The mutant gene product is sufficient to fulfil the signalling properties of Shh including upregulation of the direct Shh target genes Ptc and Gli, and induction of the downstream target genes Bmp2, Fgf4 and Hoxd13. The expression domains of all these genes extend from their normal posterior domains into the anterior part of the limb bud without being focused on a discrete ectopic site. These observations dissociate polarising activity from Shh gene expression in the Dbf/+ limb bud. We suggest that the product of the normal Dbf gene is a key active constituent of the polarising region, possibly acting in the extracellular compartment.

scholarly journals The spatiotemporal expression patterns of MSC-associated markers contribute to the identification of progenitor subpopulations in developing limbs

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (10-11-12) ◽  
pp. 499-506
Author(s):  
Argelia S. García-Cervera ◽  
Jesús Chimal-Monroy ◽  
Jessica C. Marín-llera
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Spatiotemporal Expression ◽  
Undifferentiated Cells ◽  
Adult Mscs

During limb development, skeletal tissues differentiate from their progenitor cells in an orchestrated manner. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which are considered to be adult undifferentiated/progenitor cells, have traditionally been identified by the expression of MSC-associated markers (MSC-am) and their differentiation capacities. However, although MSCs have been isolated from bone marrow and a variety of adult tissues, their developmental origin is poorly understood. Remarkably, adult MSCs share similar differentiation characteristics with limb progenitors. Here, we determined the expression patterns of common MSC-am throughout mouse hindlimb development. Our results demonstrate that MSC-am expression is not restricted to undifferentiated cells in vivo. Results from the analysis of MSC-am spatiotemporal expression in the embryonic hindlimb allowed us to propose five subpopulations which represent all limb tissues that potentially correspond to progenitor cells for each lineage. This work contributes to the understanding of MSC-am expression dynamics throughout development and underlines the importance of considering their expression patterns in future MSC studies of the limb.

Why we have (only) five fingers per hand: hox genes and the evolution of paired limbs

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Tabin
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Developmental Constraint ◽  
Limb Morphogenesis ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Embryonic Limb ◽  
Limb Pattern ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Limb development has long been a model system for studying vertebrate pattern formation. The advent of molecular biology has allowed the identification of some of the key genes that regulate limb morphogenesis. One important class of such genes are the homeobox-containing, or Hox genes. Understanding of the roles these genes play in development additionally provides insights into the evolution of limb pattern. Hox gene expression patterns divide the embryonic limb bud into five sectors along the anterior/posterior axis. The expression of specific Hox genes in each domain specifies the developmental fate of that region. Because there are only five distinct Hox-encoded domains across the limb bud there is a developmental constraint prohibiting the evolution of more than five different types of digits. The expression patterns of Hox genes in modern embryonic limb buds also gives clues to the shape of the ancestral fin field from which the limb evolved, hence elucidating the evolution of the tetrapod limb.

Apical ridge dependent and independent mesodermal domains of GHox-7 and GHox-8 expression in chick limb buds

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 811-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Ros ◽  
G. Lyons ◽  
R.A. Kosher ◽  
W.B. Upholt ◽  
C.N. Coelho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Apical Ectodermal Ridge ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Rapid Decline ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Limb Outgrowth ◽  
Removal Experiments ◽  
The Relationship

The homeobox-containing genes GHox-7 and GHox-8 have been proposed to play fundamental roles in limb development. The expression of GHox-8, by the apical ridge cells, and GHox-7, in the subridge mesoderm, suggests the involvement of these two genes in limb outgrowth and proximo-distal pattern formation. A straightforward way to test this is to remove the apical ridge. Here we report the relationship between the mesodermal expression of GHox-7 and GHox-8 and the apical ectodermal ridge in the chick limb bud. The data from ridge removal experiments indicate that there are at least two domains of GHox-7 expression in the apical limb bud mesoderm. The posterior subridge GHox-7 domain in the progress zone requires the influence of the apical ridge for continued expression, while the anterior GHox-7 domain continues expression after ridge removal. Posterior subridge mesoderm is exquisitely sensitive to the loss of the ridge in that GHox-7 expression by these cells is reduced in only two hours and undetectable by three hours after ridge removal. It would appear that one of the ways progress zone cells respond to the apical ridge signal is by expressing GHox-7. The loss of ridge influence whether by growth at the apex or by ridge removal is followed by an unusually rapid decline in detectable GHox-7 transcripts. Maintenance of GHox-8 expression by the anterior mesoderm appears to be independent of the presence of the apical ridge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Limb development in mouse embryos: protection against teratogenic effects of 6-diazo-5 oxo-L-norleucine (DON) in vivo and in vitro

Development ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-370
Author(s):  
R. M. Greene ◽  
D. M. Kochhar
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Phenotypic Expression ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Concurrent Administration ◽  
Median Cleft ◽  
Mouse Limb ◽  
Limb Malformations

The glutamine analogue, 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (DON), has been shown to inhibit biosynthesis of purines and glycosaminoglycans, presumably by blocking the glutaminedependent steps in the biosynthetic pathways. The teratogenic potential of DON on the developing mouse limb-bud in vivo and in vitro was studied in an attempt to discriminate whether DON is exerting its teratogenic effect by interfering with glycosaminoglycan orpurine metabolism. A single intramuscular injection of DON (0·5 mg/kg) to ICR/DUB mice on day 10 of gestation resulted in 76% resorption, while fetuses surviving to day 17 exhibited growth retardation, median cleft lip, and limb malformations. Concurrent administration of Lglutamine (250 mg/kg) provided no protection against resorption or malformations, while 5-aminoimidazolecarboxamide (AIC, 250 mg/kg) decreased the resorption rate to 34% without significantly altering the incidence of malformations. Injection of DON alone on day 11 resulted in 87% of fetuses exhibiting limb malformations, with only 2% resorption. Concurrent injection of AIC decreased the frequency of limb malformations to 32%. L-Glutamine, D-glucosamine, or inosinic acid were without any protective effect in vivo. DON (5 μg/ml medium) added in vitro to organ cultures of day 11 mouse limb-buds caused all limbs to evidence cartilage abnormalities. In this system, either L-glutamine or D-glucosamine (0·5 mg/ml medium) provided protection against DON effects while AIC (0·5 mg/ml medium) offered no protection in vitro. These data suggest that DON exerts its effects in vivo by interfering with purine metabolism while in vitro its teratogenic action may be interruption of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. This may reflect upon the relative importance of growth and differentiation to limb development in vivo and in vitro. These data infer that limb development in vitro relies more on the differentiative process (differentiation of cartilage) than on growth, whereas limb development in vivo is dependent, at this stage, to a greater extent on growth for normal phenotypic expression.

Site-specific recombination in cells and mice

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Dymecki
Keyword(s):  
Gene Targeting ◽  
Genome Engineering ◽  
Divalent Cations ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Recombination Reaction ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Site Specific Recombination ◽  
Bacteriophage P1 ◽  
Living Mouse

The use of site-specific recombinase systems has revolutionized our ability to genetically manipulate embryonic stem (ES) cells and mice. Recent advances using the Cre-loxP and Flp-FRT systems have now made it possible to generate ‘clean’ germline mutations following a single gene targeting event, as well as to (in)activate genes in a conditional manner in the living mouse. Not only can target gene mutations be induced in a spatially and temporally restricted fashion, but lineage tracers can be activated in specific progenitor populations to chart cell fate directly in the wild-type or mutant mouse. This chapter introduces site-specific recombination and details a variety of applications, many of which are extensions of the gene targeting vectors and manipulations presented by Hasty et al. in Chapter 1. Many of the mutagenesis techniques which exploit the Cre-loxP system have been compiled earlier in an excellent book by Torres and Kühn (1). In this chapter, I present the Flp-FRT system in addition to the Cre-loxP system, for individual or combined uses. Together, these surveys and protocols should provide a basis for a wide variety of studies on gene function in vivo. As novel recombinase based applications continue to be developed, the possibilities for genome engineering appear without limit. The simplest site-specific recombination systems are comprised of two elements: the recombinase enzyme and a small stretch of DNA specifically recognized by the particular recombinase. These two elements work together to either delete, insert, invert, or translocate associated DNA. Two such recombinase systems have been established in mice (2-5) providing the basic tools for in vivo genetic engineering: the Cre-loxP system from the bacteriophage P1 and the Flp-FRT system from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both Cre and Flp are members of the λ integrase superfamily of site-specific recombinases (6) that cleave DNA at a distinct target sequence and then ligate it to the cleaved DNA of a second identical site to generate a contiguous strand. This recombination reaction is carried out with absolute fidelity, such that not a single nucleotide is gained or lost overall, and with no other requirements than the recombinase, the specific target DNA sequence, and some mono- or divalent cations (7).

scholarly journals SCA-1/Ly6A Mesodermal Skeletal Progenitor Subpopulations Reveal Differential Commitment of Early Limb Bud Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Cristina Marín-Llera ◽  
Carlos Ignacio Lorda-Diez ◽  
Juan Mario Hurle ◽  
Jesús Chimal-Monroy
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Its Gene ◽  
Undifferentiated Cells ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Cell Subpopulations ◽  
Inductive Signals

At early developmental stages, limb bud mesodermal undifferentiated cells are morphologically indistinguishable. Although the identification of several mesodermal skeletal progenitor cell populations has been recognized, in advanced stages of limb development here we identified and characterized the differentiation hierarchy of two new early limb bud subpopulations of skeletal progenitors defined by the differential expression of the SCA-1 marker. Based on tissue localization of the mesenchymal stromal cell-associated markers (MSC-am) CD29, Sca-1, CD44, CD105, CD90, and CD73, we identified, by multiparametric analysis, the presence of cell subpopulations in the limb bud capable of responding to inductive signals differentially, namely, sSca+ and sSca– cells. In concordance with its gene expression profile, cell cultures of the sSca+ subpopulation showed higher osteogenic but lower chondrogenic capacity than those of sSca–. Interestingly, under high-density conditions, fibroblast-like cells in the sSca+ subpopulation were abundant. Gain-of-function employing micromass cultures and the recombinant limb assay showed that SCA-1 expression promoted tenogenic differentiation, whereas chondrogenesis is delayed. This model represents a system to determine cell differentiation and morphogenesis of different cell subpopulations in similar conditions like in vivo. Our results suggest that the limb bud is composed of a heterogeneous population of progenitors that respond differently to local differentiation inductive signals in the early stages of development, where SCA-1 expression may play a permissive role during cell fate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document