Gliding Flight of the Andean Condor in Nature

1973 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-237
Author(s):  
JERRY McGAHAN
Keyword(s):  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Induced Drag ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Black Vulture ◽  
Air Speed ◽  
Andean Condor ◽  
Turkey Vultures

1. Derived in a vector analysis with measurements of wind velocity and ground velocity of the bird, the following mean air speeds were obtained for birds crossing a Peruvian beach: 15 m/sec for 15 gliding Andean condors, 14 m/sec for 42 condors that flapped during the crossing, and 10 m/sec for five turkey vultures that flapped. For the 15 gliding condors a mean lift coefficient of 0.7 and a mean induced drag force of 3 N were computed. 2. Implausibly low values derived for parasite drag coefficient of the condor appeared to be due to (a) unmeasured forces of deceleration and (b) an undetected vertical component of the wind at the level of the flight path. Field data, adjusted by introducing a coefficient of parasite drag determined for the black vulture in a windtunnel study provided corrected estimates of drag. I secured an adjusted value of 14 for the L/D ratio of a condor gliding with wings fully extended. 3. A moderate flexion of the wings reducing the span by 20% is estimated to increase the optimum air speed from 13.9 to 15.2 m/sec for an adult male condor and from 12.6 to 13.8 m/sec for an adult female.

AERODYNAMICS OF GLIDING FLIGHT IN A HARRIS' HAWK, PARABUTEO UNICINCTUS

1990 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 469-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
VANCE A. TUCKER ◽  
CARLTON HEINE
Keyword(s):  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Drag Coefficients ◽  
Polar Curve ◽  
Wing Span ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Black Vulture ◽  
Polar Area ◽  
Air Speed ◽  
Parabuteo Unicinctus

1. A Harris' hawk with a mass of 0.702 kg and a maximum wing span of 1.02 m glided freely in a wind tunnel at air speeds between 6.1 and 16.2ms−1. The glide angle varied from 8.5% at the slowest speed to a minimum of 5% at speeds between 8.0 and 14.7 ms−1. The maximum ratio of lift to drag was 10.9 and the minimum sinking speed was 0.81ms−1 2. Wing span decreased when either air speed or glide angle increased. Wing area was a parabolic function of wing span 3. Lift and profile drag coefficients of the wings fell in a polar area similar to that for a laggar falcon (Falco jugger) and a black vulture (Coragyps atratus). A single polar curve relating lift coefficients to minimum profile drag coefficients can predict the maximum gliding performance of all three birds when used with a mathematical model for gliding flight 4. The parasite drag values that have been used with the model are probably too high. Thus, the profile drag coefficients determined from the polar curve mentioned above are too low, and the predicted wing spans for gliding at maximum performance are too large. The predicted curve for maximum gliding performance is relatively unaffected 5. The maximum lift coefficient for the Harris' hawk in the wind tunnel was 1.6. This value is probably less than the maximum attainable, since the hawk's wings never appeared to stall. The best estimate of the minimum profile drag coefficient is 0.026 at a lift coefficient of 0.60.

scholarly journals Gliding Birds: The Effect of Variable Wing Span

1987 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
VANCE A. TUCKER
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Polar Curve ◽  
Wing Span ◽  
Induced Drag ◽  
Black Vulture ◽  
Polar Area ◽  
Air Speed ◽  
Performance Area

The equilibrium gliding performance of a bird is described by the relationship between sinking speed (V8) and air speed (V). When V9 is plotted against V, the points fall in a ‘performance area’ because the wing span is changed during gliding. The lowest V3 for each V in the performance area defines a ‘maximum performance curve’. This curve can be predicted by a mathematical model that changes the wing span, area and profile drag coefficient (CD, pr) of a hypothetical bird to minimize drag. The model can be evaluated for a particular species given (a) a linear function relating wing area to wing span, and (b) a ‘polar curve’ that relates CDpr and the lift coefficient (CL) of the wings. For rigid wings, a single polar curve relates CDpr to CL values at a given Reynolds number. The position and shape of the polar curve depend on the aerofoil section of the wing and the Reynolds number. In contrast, the adjustable wings of a laggar falcon (Falco jugger) and a black vulture (Coragyps atratus) gliding in a wind tunnel have CL, and CD,pr values that fall in a ‘polar area’ rather than on a curve. The minimum values of CD,pr at each CL bound the polar area and define a polar curve that is suitable for evaluating the model. Although the falcon and the vulture have wings that are markedly different in appearance, the data for either bird are enclosed by the same polar area, and fitted by the same polar curve for minimum CD,pr at each CL value. This curve is a composite of the polar curves for rigid wings with aerofoils similar to those found in avian wings. These observations suggest that the polar curves of other gliding birds may be similar to that of the falcon and the vulture. Other polar curves are defined by CL and CD,pr values for the falcon and the vulture gliding at a constant speed but at different glide angles. Each speed has a different polar curve; but for a given speed, the same polar curve fits the data foreither bird. The falcon and the vulture gliding in the wind tunnel at a given speed were found to increase their drag by decreasing their wing span. This change increases induced drag and probably increases CD,pr for the inner parts of the wing because of an unusual property of bird-like aerofoil sections: wings with such sections have minimum values of CDpr at CL values near 1, while conventional wings have minimum values of CD,Pr at CL values near 0.

Gliding Flight of the White-Backed Vulture Gyps Africanus

1971 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. PENNYCUICK
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
The Body ◽  
East African ◽  
Induced Drag ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Vertical Speed ◽  
Statistical Sense ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Comparison Measurements

1. Glide-comparison measurements were made on ten species of East African soaring birds using a Schleicher ASK-14 powered sailplane. Horizontal and vertical speed differences between bird and glider were measured by a photographic method, and used to estimate the bird's horizontal and vertical speeds relative to the air. The analysis refers to the white-backed vulture, since by far the largest number of measurements was obtained on this species. 2. A regression analysis using a two-term approximation to the glide polar yielded an implausibly high estimate of induced drag, which was attributed to a lack of observations at lift coefficients above 0.72. An amended glide polar was constructed assuming elliptical lift distribution and a maximum lift coefficient of 1.6 to define the low-speed end, while the high-speed end was made to pass through the mean horizontal and sinking speeds of all the experimental points. This curve gave a minimum sinking speed of 0.76 m/s at a forward speed of 10 m/s, and a best glide ratio of 15.3:1 at 13 m/s. It did not differ significantly (in the statistical sense) from the original regression curve. 3. In comparing the estimated circling performance, based on the amended glide polar, with that of the ASK-14, it was concluded that the rates of sink of both should be comparable, but that the glider would require thermals with radii about 4.3 times as great as those needed to sustain the birds. The conclusions are consistent with experience of soaring in company with birds. 4. In an attempt to assess the adaptive significance of the low-aspect-ratio wings of birds specializing in thermal soaring, the white-backed vulture's circling performance was compared with that of an ‘albatross-shaped vulture’, an imaginary creature having the same mass as a white-backed vulture, combined with the body proportions of a wandering albatross. It appears that the real white-back would be at an advantage when trying to remain airborne in thermals with radii between 14 and 17 m, but that the albatross-shaped vulture would climb faster in all wider thermals; on account of its much better maximum glide ratio, it should also achieve higher cross-country speeds. It is concluded that the wing shape seen in vultures and storks is not an adaptation to thermal soaring as such, but is more probably a compromise dictated by take-off and landing requirements. 5. The doubts recently expressed by Tucker & Parrott (1970) about the results and conclusions of Raspet (1950a, b; 1960) are re-inforced by the present experience.

Aerodynamics of Gliding Flight of a Black Vulture Coragyps Atratus

1970 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. CHRISTIAN PARROTT
Keyword(s):  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Wing Area ◽  
Drag Coefficients ◽  
Wing Span ◽  
Drag Forces ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Black Vulture ◽  
Air Speed

1. A black vulture (mass = 1.79 kg) gliding freely in a wind tunnel adjusted its wing span and wing area as its air speed and glide angle changed from 9.9 to 16.8 m/s and from 4.8° to 7.9°, respectively. 2. The minimum sinking speed was 1.09 m/s at an air speed of 11.3 m/s. 3. The maximum ratio of lift to drag forces was 11.6 at an air speed of 13.9 m/s. 4. Parasite drag coefficients for the vulture are similar to those for conventional airfoils and do not support the contention that black vultures have unusually low values of parasite drag.

Aerodynamics of Gliding Flight in a Falcon and Other Birds

1970 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
VANCE A. TUCKER ◽  
G. CHRISTIAN PARROTT
Keyword(s):  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Aerodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Wing Span ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Air Speed ◽  
D Values ◽  
D Value

1. A live laggar falcon (Falco jugger) glided in a wind tunnel at speeds between 6.6 and 15.9 m./sec. The bird had a maximum lift to drag ratio (L/D) of 10 at a speed of 12.5 m./sec. As the falcon increased its air speed at a given glide angle, it reduced its wing span, wing area and lift coefficient. 2. A model aircraft with about the same wingspan as the falcon had a maximum L/D value of 10. 3. Published measurements of the aerodynamic characteristics of gliding birds are summarized by presenting them in a diagram showing air speed, sinking speed and L/D values. Data for a high-performance sailplane are included. The soaring birds had maximum L/D values near 10, or about one quarter that of the sailplane. The birds glided more slowly than the sailplane and had about the same sinking speed. 4. The ‘equivalent parasite area’ method used by aircraft designers to estimate parasite drag was modified for use with gliding birds, and empirical data are presented to provide a means of predicting the gliding performance of a bird in the absence of wind-tunnel tests. 5. The birds in this study had conventional values for parasite drag. Technical errors seem responsible for published claims of unusually low parasite drag values in a vulture. 6. The falcon adjusted its wing span in flight to achieve nearly the maximum possible L/D value over its range of gliding speeds. 7. The maximum terminal speed of the falcon in a vertical dive is estimated to be 100 m./sec.

Gliding Flight of the Fulmar Petrel

1960 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. PENNYCUICK
Keyword(s):  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Power Output ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Wing Area ◽  
Drag Coefficients ◽  
Minimum Drag ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Lift And Drag

1. The basis used for estimating lift and drag coefficients is explained. A method of obtaining a photograph of a bird flying at known airspeed and rate of sink is described. 2. 96% of the speed measurements fall between 22 and 65 ft./sec., the average being 40 ft./sec. 3. A maximum lift coefficient of 1.8 can be achieved. Wing area is reduced with increasing speed. 4. The feet are used as airbrakes. 5. A comparison of the minimum drag coefficient (0.06) with the maximum estimated power output of the pectoral muscles leaves only a narrow margin of power available for climbing. 6. The performance diagram gives a minimum gliding angle of 1 in 8½, and a minimum sinking speed of just under 4 ft./sec. 7. The fulmar has apparently sacrificed the ability to soar dynamically over the sea in order to be able to fly slowly and thus utilize light upcurrents at cliff faces.

scholarly journals The Profile Drag of a Hawk'S Wing, Measured by Wake Sampling in a Wind Tunnel

1992 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. PENNYCUICK ◽  
CARLTON E. HEINE ◽  
SEAN J. KIRKPATRICK ◽  
MARK R. FULLER
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Wing Profile ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Air Speed ◽  
University Of Bristol

The distribution of dynamic pressure behind a Harris' hawk's wing was sampled using a wake rake consisting of 15 pitot tubes and one static tube. The hawk was holding on to a perch, but at an air speed and gliding angle at which it was capable of gliding. The perch was instrumented, so that the lift developed by the wing was known and the lift coefficient could be calculated. The mean of 92 estimates of profile drag coefficient was 0.0207, with standard deviation 0.0079. Lift coefficients ranged from 0.51 to 1.08. Reynolds numbers were nearly all in the range 143000–194000. The estimates of profile drag coefficient were reconcilable with previous estimates of the wing profile drag of the same bird, obtained by the subtractive method, and also with values predicted by the ‘Airfoil-ii’ program for designing aerofoils, based on a digitized wing profile from the ulnar region of the wing. The thickness of the wake suggested that the boundary layer was mostly or fully turbulent in most observations and separated in some, possibly as an active means of creating drag for control purposes. It appears that the bird could momentarily either increase or decrease the profile drag of specific parts of the wing, by active changes of shape, and it appeared to use the carpo-metacarpal region especially for such control movements. Further investigation in a low turbulence wind tunnel would help to resolve doubts about the possible influence of airstream turbulence on the behaviour of the boundary layer. Note: Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, England.

Experimental investigations of flow over NACA airfoils 0021 and 4412 of wind turbine blades with and without Tubercles

2021 ◽  
pp. 0309524X2110071
Author(s):  
Usman Butt ◽  
Shafqat Hussain ◽  
Stephan Schacht ◽  
Uwe Ritschel
Keyword(s):  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Wind Turbine ◽  
Critical Region ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Turbine Blades ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Wind Turbine Blades

Experimental investigations of wind turbine blades having NACA airfoils 0021 and 4412 with and without tubercles on the leading edge have been performed in a wind tunnel. It was found that the lift coefficient of the airfoil 0021 with tubercles was higher at Re = 1.2×105 and 1.69×105 in post critical region (at higher angle of attach) than airfoils without tubercles but this difference relatively diminished at higher Reynolds numbers and beyond indicating that there is no effect on the lift coefficients of airfoils with tubercles at higher Reynolds numbers whereas drag coefficient remains unchanged. It is noted that at Re = 1.69×105, the lift coefficient of airfoil without tubercles drops from 0.96 to 0.42 as the angle of attack increases from 15° to 20° which is about 56% and the corresponding values of lift coefficient for airfoil with tubercles are 0.86 and 0.7 at respective angles with18% drop.

Gliding Flight of the Dog-Faced Bat Rousettus Aegyptiacus Observed in a Wind Tunnel

1971 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 833-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. PENNYCUICK
Keyword(s):  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Lift Coefficient ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Number Range ◽  
High Speeds ◽  
Gliding Flight ◽  
Speed Range ◽  
Simple Regression Analysis ◽  
Drag Analysis ◽  
Very High

1. A bat was trained to fly in a tilting wind tunnel. Stereoscopic photographs were taken, both by reflected and by transmitted light, and measurements of best gliding angle were made. 2. Variation of wing span and area at different speeds was much less than in birds. This is attributed to the construction of the wing, which prevents the bat from folding back the manus in flight, because this would lead to collapse of the plagiopatagium. 3. The trailing edge of the wing is normally deflected upwards in flight, at least in the distal parts. This is interpreted as providing longitudinal stability. The plagiopatagialis proprii muscles appear to act as an elevator, by deflecting the trailing edge of the plagiopatagium upwards. 4. The speed range over which the bat could glide was 5·3-11·0 m/s. Its maximum lift coefficient was 1·5, and its best glide ratio 6·8:1. The Reynolds number range, based on mean chord, was 3·26 x 104 to 6·79 x 104. 5. A simple regression analysis of the glide polar indicated a very high span efficiency factor (k) and low wing profile drag coefficient (Cdp). On the other hand, a drag analysis on the assumption that k = 1 leads to an improbably large increase in the estimated Cdp at low speeds. It is suggested that the correct interpretation probably lies between these extremes, with k ≊ 1·5; Cdp would then be about 0·02 at high speeds, rising to somewhat over 0·1 at the minimum speed. 6. It would appear that the bat is not so good as a pigeon at fast gliding, but better at low-speed manoeuvring. On most points of performance, however, the two are remarkably similar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document