Characteristics Of Trunk Rotation Movement During The Throwing Motion In semale Baseball Players

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S118-S119
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Ito ◽  
Koichi Nakazato ◽  
Koji Watarai ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakajima
2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S118???S119
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Ito ◽  
Koichi Nakazato ◽  
Koji Watarai ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakajima

Author(s):  
Wei-Han Chen ◽  
Yu-Cheng Chiu ◽  
Chiang Liu ◽  
Ming-Sheng Chan ◽  
Nicholas J Fiolo ◽  
...  

This study compared the kinematic parameters of swing mechanics under toss batting (TB), motor imagery (MI), video projection (VP), and virtual reality (VR) conditions during baseball batting. Nine college baseball players performed three swings to hit a tossed ball under TB conditions or a virtual ball under MI, VP, and VR conditions. The results revealed that upper trunk backward rotation was smaller in the loading phase under the VP and VR conditions than under the TB and MI conditions and lower under VR than under the VP condition ( p < 0.05) except at the load event. Pelvic backward rotation was smaller under the VR condition than under the TB, MI, and VP conditions ( p < 0.05). In the swing phase, TB demonstrated higher peak velocity at the head of the bat, lead elbow extension, and pelvis and upper trunk rotation than did MI, VP, and VR, whereas VP also demonstrated higher peak velocity in pelvic forward rotation than did VR ( p < 0.05). In summary, VR demonstrates a more realistic response in the loading phase and reduced pelvic backward rotation but lower movement velocities. Coaches should pay attention to movement differences between swing conditions when arranging a swing training plan.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e1429-e1431
Author(s):  
Vincent A. Lizzio ◽  
Austin G. Cross ◽  
Eric W. Guo ◽  
Eric C. Makhni

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110329
Author(s):  
W. Ben Kibler ◽  
Aaron Sciascia ◽  
John Stuart Mattison Pike ◽  
Michael Howell ◽  
Kevin E. Wilk

Background: Alterations in glenohumeral internal rotation (GIR), glenohumeral external rotation (GER), and the total arc of motion (TAM) have been linked with increased injury risk in the shoulder and elbow. These motions have been routinely measured with the forearm in neutral rotation (GIRN, GERN, TAMN). GER capacity appears to be especially important. The throwing motion, however, requires forearm pronation as GER occurs to achieve optimal cocking (GERP). No previous studies have evaluated GERP to determine GER capacity or pronated TAM (TAMP) values. Hypothesis: There would be significant differences between GERN and TAMN and between GERP and TAMP. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Sixty asymptomatic male Minor League Baseball players (32 pitchers, 28 position players) participated in the study and were tested on the first day of spring training. Passive range of motion measurements were recorded using a long-arm bubble goniometer for GIRN, GERN, and GERP on both arms. TAM was calculated separately as the sum of internal and external rotational measurements under neutral and pronated conditions. Results: Within pitchers and position players, all measurements were statistically reduced for the throwing arm ( P ≤ 0.03) except for GERN of the pitchers. GERP measures were significantly less than GERN for both arms of each group ( P < 0.01): pitchers throwing arm +11.8°/nonthrowing arm +4.8°, position players throwing arm = +8.6°/nonthrowing arm +4.0°. Conclusion: The forearm position of pronation, which appears to be mediated by tightness of the biceps, decreases GER capacity and TAM. GER and TAM should be calculated in neutral and pronated positions, considering that 80% of the players have a demonstrated difference between 8° and 12°. Clinical Relevance: Measurement of GERP more accurately reflects the GER required in throwing, allows better quantification of the motion capacity necessary to withstand the loads in throwing, and may suggest interventions for at risk athletes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0043
Author(s):  
Teruhisa Mihata ◽  
Masashi Neo

Objectives: The increased humeral retroversion on the dominant side in throwing athletes is thought to result from repetitive throwing motion. In the previous studies, the degree of increased humeral retroversion was various, suggesting that other factors may affect humeral retroversion. Little Leaguer’s shoulder, which is rotational stress fracture of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate, may change humeral retroversion. The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of Little Leaguer’s shoulder on humeral retroversion. Methods: Ten high-school baseball players (average, 16.6 years; range, 16 to 18 years), who had had Little Leaguer’s shoulder during elementary or junior high schools (average, 12.6 years; range, 11 to 15 years), were enrolled in the study. As a control group, 22 high-school baseball players (average, 16.9 years; range, 16 to 18 years), who have never had shoulder or elbow pain, were included in this study. Humeral retroversion was ultrasonographically measured on the dominant and non-dominant sides. Humeral retroversion was compared between dominant and non-dominant shoulders with paired t-test. Side-to-side difference in humeral retroversion was compared between Little Leaguer’s shoulders and control group with unpaired t-test. Results: Humeral retroversion was significantly greater on the dominant side than on the non-dominant side in both Little Leaguer’s shoulder (Dominant, 104°±8°; Non-dominant, 84°±12°; P < .001) and control groups (Dominant, 91°±13°; Non-dominant, 81°±10°; P < .001). The side-to-side difference in humeral retroversion in Little Leaguer’s shoulder group (20°±10°) was significantly greater than that in control group (10°±10°, P = .02). Conclusion: Humeral retroversion was increased with repetitive throwing motion without any symptom in the shoulder and elbow joint. Additional increase in humeral retroversion was made when the players had had Little Leaguer’s shoulder in elementary or junior high school.


Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsutoshi Nishino ◽  
Noriaki Yamamoto ◽  
Masaei Tanaka ◽  
Taisuke Ohishi ◽  
Yasuo Tanaka ◽  
...  

Long-toss throwing is a baseball exercise that enhances the throwing performance of youth players. However, throwing kinematics and kinetics have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to analyze the effect of throwing kinematics and kinetics on different ranges of long toss in 22 youth players of the same age. The throwing motion was analyzed as the range of long toss was increased by 10 m each time until the ball did not directly reach the target. The twelve subjects who could throw long distances had a significantly larger physique and larger throwing kinematics and kinetics compared to the other 10 subjects who could not. No differences in the proximal force of the shoulder and elbow joints were observed between the two groups. These findings suggest that baseball coaches should set a suitable range of long toss for youth players according to the individual’s physical growth and strength.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin G. Laudner ◽  
Mike Moline ◽  
Keith Meister

Context:Posterior shoulder tightness has been associated with altered shoulder range of motion (ROM) and several pathologic entities in baseball players. This tightness is hypothesized to be the result of the cumulative stress placed on the posterior shoulder during the deceleration phase of the throwing motion. The role of the posterior shoulder static restraints is to absorb this load while the glenohumeral (GH) external rotators eccentrically decelerate the arm after ball release and therefore also help dissipate this force. As such, the authors hypothesized that if the GH external rotators are weak, an excessive amount of this deceleration force is placed on the static restraints, which may lead to subsequent tightness.Objective:To compare the relationship between GH external-rotation strength and posterior shoulder tightness as measured by GH horizontal-adduction and internal-rotation ROM.Design:Descriptive study.Setting:Laboratory.Participants:45 professional baseball players.Main Outcome Measures:GH external-rotation strength and GH horizontal-adduction and internalrotation ROM.Results:GH external-rotation strength showed no relationship with either GH horizontal-adduction ROM (r2 = .02, P = .40) or GH internal-rotation ROM (r2 = .002, P = .77).Conclusion:There is little to no relationship between GH external-rotation strength and posterior shoulder tightness in professional baseball players. The posterior static restraints of the shoulder may absorb a large majority of the deceleration forces during the throwing motion. Although strengthening of the posterior shoulder dynamic restraints should not be overlooked, routine stretching of the static restraints may be more beneficial for decreasing posterior shoulder tightness and the subsequent risks associated with this tightness, although future research is warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0040
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Takenaga ◽  
Satoshi Takeuchi ◽  
Hideki Murakami ◽  
Katsumasa Sugimoto ◽  
Masahito Yoshida

Objectives: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) has been reported as a set of symptoms due to the compression of the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels in the region of the thoracic outlet1. As a type of TOS, scalenus anticus syndrome involves the compression of the brachial nerves as they pass through the interval surrounded by the anterior and middle scalene muscles, and the first rib bone or cervical rib2. Recently, exercise-induced TOS is becoming more common in athletes, especially for those who perform repetitive overhead and hyperabduction maneuvers with upper limbs, such as baseball players. However, the effect of throwing on the stiffness of the scalene muscles is unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to quantitatively measure the stiffness of the scalene muscles using real-time shear wave elastography (SWE). The stiffness of scalene muscles was hypothesized to increase for the throwing side of baseball players. Methods: Thirty college baseball players (age range 19 to 21 years) were included for this study. Ultrasonic SWE with a 2-10 MHz linear array probe transducer (Aixplorer; SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) was used to assess the stiffness of the anterior and middle scalene muscles. Each participant was sited. The measurements were performed in two arm positions; 1) adducted and neutral rotation of the shoulder 2)90 degree of abduction and external rotation of shoulder with elbow flexed to simulate a clinical examination known as Roos test3. In both of the arm positions, the transducer was positioned just superior to the clavicular bone, parallel to its axis. Transducer was moved superiorly and tilted to visualize the superior surfaces of the anterior and middle scalene muscles parallel to the surface of the fifth cervical nerve simultaneously (Figure 1A). In this position, shear wave elastography was performed to measure the elasticity of each scalene muscle as its stiffness. Each muscle was divided into superior and deep areas. In both areas of each muscle, three 3mm-diameter circles were set to measure the elasticities of the scalene muscles and its averaged data in each area was defined as each stiffness (Figure 1B). A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the elasticity of superior and deep areas in anterior and middle scalene muscles in throwing and non-throwing side. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: For the throwing side, higher stiffness was found in the deep part of the middle scalene muscle compared to the superior and deep parts of the anterior scalene muscle with an adducted and neutrally rotated shoulder (p=0.0433). Moreover, the muscle stiffness was significantly higher in the superior and deep part of the middle scalene muscle than in the superior and deep parts of anterior scalene muscle in an abducted and externally rotated position of shoulder (p =0.00187). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in the anterior and middle scalene muscles for the non-throwing side in both arm positions. Conclusion: In professional athletes with TOS who experienced surgical treatment, moderate to severe hypertrophy of the anterior scalenus muscles has been reported to be found4. Meanwhile, although the stiffness of the scalene muscles can be also related to the compression on the brachial plexus and on subclavian vessels in the region of the thoracic outlet, its quantitative measurements in the scalene muscles has not been reported. In this study, at throwing side, the muscle stiffness significantly increased in the superior area of middle scalene muscle in throwing side. While no contribution was identified in the scalene muscles at non-throwing side. As a result, repeat throwing motion can increase the stiffness of the middle scalene muscle. As a result, the brachial plexus and/or the subclavian artery could be compressed at the interscalene triangle. Throwing athletes with TOS should be treated, considering the stiffness of the middle scalene muscle, even conservative or surgical treatment. Our study was the first study to evaluate the effects of throwing on the stiffness of the scalene muscles in throwing athletes. Repetitive throwing motion can affect the stiffness of middle scalene muscle. Reduction of the middle scalene muscle should be considered to treat throwing athlete who has TOS. [Figure: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document