Inter-rater And Test-retest Reliability Of The Y-balance Test In Healthy Women 50-80 Years Old

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Jacob Shepherd ◽  
Autumn Oostindie ◽  
Jared Locke ◽  
Srikant Vallabhajosula ◽  
Deborah Stetts ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Norris ◽  
Elaine Trudelle-Jackson

Context:The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) is often used to train and assess dynamic balance and neuromuscular control. Few studies have examined hip- and thigh-muscle activation during the SEBT.Objective:To quantify hip- and thigh-muscle activity during the SEBT.Design:Repeated measures.Setting:Laboratory.Participants:22 healthy individuals, 11 men and 11 women.Methods:EMG measurements were taken as participants completed 3 trials of the anterior (A), medial (M), and posteromedial (PM) reach directions of the SEBT.Main Outcome Measures:Mean EMG data (% maximal voluntary isometric contraction) from the gluteus medius (Gmed), gluteus maximus (Gmax), and vastus medialis (VM) were measured during the eccentric phase of each SEBT reach direction. Test–retest reliability of EMG data across the 3 trials in each direction was calculated. EMG data from each muscle were compared across the 3 reach directions.Results:Test–retest reliability ranged from ICC3,1 values of .91 to .99. A 2-way repeated-measure ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between muscle activation and reach direction. One-way ANOVAs showed no difference in GMed activity between the A and M directions. GMed activity in the A and M directions was greater than in the PM direction. There was no difference in GMax and VM activity across the 3 directions.Conclusion:GMed was recruited most effectively when reaching was performed in the A and M directions. The A, M, and PM directions elicited similar patterns of muscle recruitment for the GMax and VM. During all 3 SEBT directions, VM activation exceeded the 40–60% threshold suggested for strengthening effects. GMed activity also exceeded the threshold in the M direction. GMax activation, however, was below the 40% threshold for all 3 reach directions, suggesting that performing dynamic lower extremity reaching in the A, M, and PM directions may not elicit strengthening effects for the GMax.


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Calatayud ◽  
Sebastien Borreani ◽  
Juan Carlos Colado ◽  
Fernando Martin ◽  
Jorge Flandez

2006 ◽  
Vol 165 (11) ◽  
pp. 779-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Geldhof ◽  
Greet Cardon ◽  
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij ◽  
Lieven Danneels ◽  
Pascal Coorevits ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-269
Author(s):  
Charlotta Jönsson ◽  
Maria Bjurberg ◽  
Christina Brogårdh ◽  
Karin Johansson

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1817-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanie Mercier ◽  
An Tang ◽  
Mélanie Morin ◽  
Marie-Claude Lemieux ◽  
Samir Khalifé ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim J. Lesch ◽  
Jere Lavikainen ◽  
Vesa Hyrylä ◽  
Paavo Vartiainen ◽  
Mika Venojärvi ◽  
...  

A perturbed postural balance test can be used to investigate balance control under mechanical disturbances. The test is typically performed using purpose-built movable force plates. As instrumented treadmills become increasingly common in biomechanics laboratories and in clinical settings, these devices could be potentially used to assess and train balance control. The purpose of the study was to investigate how an instrumented treadmill applies to perturbed postural balance test. This was investigated by assessing the precision and reliability of the treadmill belt movement and the test-retest reliability of perturbed postural balance test over 5 days. Postural balance variables were calculated from the center of pressure trajectory and included peak displacement, time to peak displacement, and recovery displacement. Additionally, the study investigated short-term learning effects over the 5 days. Eight healthy participants (aged 24–43 years) were assessed for 5 consecutive days with four different perturbation protocols. Center of pressure (COP) data were collected using the force plates of the treadmill while participant and belt movements were measured with an optical motion capture system. The results show that the treadmill can reliably deliver the intended perturbations with <1% deviation in total displacement and with minimal variability between days and participants (typical errors 0.06–2.71%). However, the treadmill was not able to reach the programmed 4 m/s2 acceleration, reaching only about 75% of it. Test–retest reliability of the selected postural balance variables ranged from poor to good (ICC 0.156–0.752) with typical errors between 4.3 and 28.2%. Learning effects were detected based on linear or quadratic trends (p < 0.05) in peak displacement of the slow forward and fast backward protocols and in time to peak displacement in slow and fast backward protocols. The participants altered the initial location of the COP relative to the foot depending on the direction of the perturbation. In conclusion, the precision and accuracy of belt movement were found to be excellent. Test-retest reliability of the balance test utilizing an instrumented treadmill ranged from poor to good which is, in line with previous investigations using purpose-built devices for perturbed postural balance assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document