Demographic Variations in HIV Testing History among Emergency Department Patients: Implications for Hiv Screening in US Emergency Departments

Abstract Background Use of antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use) contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Non-prescription use includes obtaining and taking antibiotics without a prescription, taking another person’s antibiotics, or taking one’s own stored antibiotics. We conducted a quantitative survey focusing on the factors that impact patients’ decisions to use non-prescription antibiotics. Methods We surveyed patients visiting public safety net primary care clinics and private emergency departments in a racially/ethnically diverse urban area. Surveys were read aloud to patients in Spanish and English. Survey domains included patients’ perspectives on which syndromes require antibiotic treatment, their perceptions of health care, and their access to antibiotics without a prescription. Results We interviewed 190 patients, 122 from emergency departments (64%), and 68 from primary care clinics (36%). Overall, 44% reported non-prescription antibiotic use within the past 12 months. Non-prescription use was higher among primary care clinic patients (63%) than the emergency department patients (39%, p = 0.002). The majority felt that antibiotics would be needed for bronchitis (78%) while few felt antibiotics would be needed for diarrhea (30%) (Figure 1). The most common situation identified “in which respondents would consider taking antibiotics without contacting a healthcare provider was “got better by taking this antibiotic before” (Figure 2). Primary care patients were more likely to obtain antibiotics without prescription from another country than emergency department patients (27% vs. 13%, P=0.03). Also, primary care patients were more likely to report obstacles to seeking a doctor’s care, such as the inability to take time off from work or transportation difficulties, but these comparisons were not statistically significant. Figure 1. Patients’ agreement that antibiotics would be needed varied by symptom/syndrome. Figure 2. Situations that lead to non-prescription antibiotic use impacted the two clinical populations differently Conclusion Non-prescription antibiotic use is a widespread problem in the two very different healthcare systems we included in this study, although factors underlying this practice differ by patient population. Better understanding of the factors driving non-prescription antibiotic use is essential to designing patient-focused interventions to decrease this unsafe practice. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

1120. Impact of Training Residents to Improve HIV Screening in a Teaching Hospital in Mexico City

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1306 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S590-S590

Author(s):

Lorena Guerrero-Torres ◽

Isaac Núñez-Saavedra ◽

Yanink Caro-Vega ◽

Brenda Crabtree-Ramírez

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Time Series ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Teaching Hospital ◽

Educational Intervention ◽

Temporal Trends ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Hiv Diagnosis ◽

Post Intervention ◽

Hiv Test

Abstract Background Among 230,000 people living with HIV in Mexico, 24% are unaware of their diagnosis, and half of newly diagnosed individuals are diagnosed with advanced disease. Early diagnosis is the goal to mitigate HIV epidemic. Missed opportunities may reflect a lack of clinicians’ consideration of HIV screening as part of routine medical care. We assessed whether an educational intervention on residents was effective to 1) improve the knowledge on HIV screening; 2) increase the rate of HIV tests requested in the hospitalization floor (HF) and the emergency department (ED); and 3) increase HIV diagnosis in HF and ED. Methods Internal Medicine and Surgery residents at a teaching hospital were invited to participate. The intervention occurred in August 2018 and consisted in 2 sessions on HIV screening with an expert. A questionnaire was applied before (BQ) and after (AQ) the intervention, which included HIV screening indications and clinical cases. The Institutional Review Board approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. BQ and AQ scores were compared with a paired t-test. To evaluate the effect on HIV test rate in the HF and ED, an interrupted time series analysis was performed. Daily rates of tests were obtained from September 2016 to August 2019 and plotted along time. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to model temporal trends. HIV diagnosis in HF and ED pre- and post-intervention were compared with a Fisher’s exact test. A p< 0.05 was considered significant. Results Among 104 residents, 57 participated and completed both questionnaires. BQ score was 79/100 (SD±12) and AQ was 85/100 (SD±8), p< .004. Time series of HIV testing had apparent temporal trends (Fig 1). HIV test rate in the HF increased (7.3 vs 11.1 per 100 episodes) and decreased in the ED (2.6 vs 2.3 per 100 episodes). HIV diagnosis increased in the HF, from 0/1079 (0%) pre-intervention to 5/894 (0.6%) post-intervention (p< .018) (Table 1). Fig 1. HIV test rates. Gray area represents post-intervention period. Table 1. Description of episodes, HIV tests and rates pre- and post-intervention in the Emergency Department and Hospitalization Floor. Conclusion A feasible educational intervention improved residents’ knowledge on HIV screening, achieved maintenance of a constant rate of HIV testing in the HF and increased the number of HIV diagnosis in the HF. However, these results were not observed in the ED, where administrative barriers and work overload could hinder HIV screening. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

2: Twenty Years Experience With HIV Testing among Emergency Department Patients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital

Annals of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.06.067 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 52 (4) ◽

pp. S41-S42

Author(s):

C.K. Kraus ◽

J.B. Shahan ◽

R.E. Rothman ◽

Y. Hsieh ◽

O. Laeyendecker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Johns Hopkins Hospital ◽

Emergency Department Patients

Download Full-text

Routine HIV Screening in Cancer Patients in the Emergency Department

Acute Medicine Journal ◽

10.52964/amja.0705 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 91-95

Author(s):

Terry W Rice ◽

◽

Patricia A. Brock ◽

Carmen Gonzalez ◽

Kelly W Merriman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Linkage To Care ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Immunodeficiency Virus ◽

Routine Hiv Screening ◽

Incident Cases

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) in cancer patients improves outcomes and reduces transmission of this oncogenic virus. HIV testing rates of cancer patients are similar to the general population (15-40%), despite the association with cancer. Our aim was to increase HIV screening in the Emergency Department(ED) of a comprehensive cancer center through a quality initiative. Testing increased significantly during the intervention (p<0.001; 0.15/day to 2.69/day). Seropositive HIV rate was 1.4% (12/852), with incidence of 0.3%. All patients were linked to care. Incident cases were between 36 and 55 years of age. Barriers encountered included confusion regarding the need for written consent for HIV testing, failure to consider ordering the test, and concerns regarding linkage to care.

Download Full-text

Payer Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Acceptance of Free Routine Opt-Out Rapid HIV Screening Among Emergency Department Patients

American Journal of Public Health ◽

10.2105/ajph.2011.300508 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 102 (5) ◽

pp. 877-883 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Jeffrey Sankoff ◽

Emily Hopkins ◽

Comilla Sasson ◽

Alia Al-Tayyib ◽

Brooke Bender ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Opt Out ◽

Race Ethnicity ◽

Emergency Department Patients

Download Full-text

1294. Long-Term Impact of an HIV Testing Program on High-Risk HIV Screening in the Emergency Department

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1157 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S466-S466

Author(s):

Jillian T Baron ◽

Alexis Schwartz ◽

Ebony Davis ◽

Julie E Uspal ◽

Brendan Kelly

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

High Risk ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Transmitted Infection ◽

Testing Program ◽

Sti Testing ◽

Hiv Test ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background Emergency Departments (EDs) are important sites for HIV testing. However, there is little guidance on how best to implement HIV testing in the ED. The purpose of this study was to evaluate HIV screening practices of high-risk individuals presenting to an ED in the absence (ED1) and in the presence (ED2) of an established HIV testing program within the same academic hospital. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all individuals 18 years or older presenting to either ED between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. High-risk of HIV infection was determined by receipt of bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis. The primary outcome was receipt of any HIV test in the ED. Overall proportions of patients tested for HIV at the same time of STI testing were compared between sites by chi-square test. Predictors of HIV testing were analyzed by logistic regression. Results During the study period, 7,956 individuals received STI testing at ED1 and 10,815 received STI testing at ED2. The majority of individuals receiving STI testing at both sites were female, 81.2% at ED1 and 66.4% at ED2 (P <0.001). Only 4.0% of individuals received HIV testing at ED1 compared with 47.4% at ED2 (P <0.001). Individuals were significantly more likely to receive HIV testing at the time of STI testing in the ED with an HIV testing program (aOR 19.66, 95% CI 17.28–22.37). In the ED without an HIV testing program, individuals were more likely to receive HIV testing if they were male (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 2.78–4.55) and less likely if they were black (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.97). In the ED with an HIV testing program, individuals were more likely to receive HIV testing if they were male (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.92–2.44) and more likely if they were black (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.37–2.20). Conclusion Overall, the presence of an HIV testing program in the ED significantly increased the probability that individuals would receive an HIV test at the time of bacterial STI testing and mitigated disparities in care. The results of this study will help guide ongoing interventions to improve HIV screening among high-risk individuals in the emergency department. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

An Electronic Alert for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Increases Screening but not the Diagnosis of HIV

Applied Clinical Informatics ◽

10.4338/aci-2013-09-ra-0075 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 05 (01) ◽

pp. 299-312 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

N. Liu ◽

J. Sperling ◽

R. Green ◽

S. Clark ◽

D. Vawdrey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

New York ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Intervention Period ◽

Post Intervention ◽

Hiv Test ◽

The Impact ◽

Post Intervention Group

SummaryObjective: Based on US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, New York State enacted legislation in 2010 requiring healthcare providers to offer non-targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to all patients aged 13–64. Three New York City adult emergency departments implemented an electronic alert that required clinicians to document whether an HIV test was offered before discharging a patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the electronic alert on HIV testing rates and diagnosis of HIV positive individuals.Methods: During the pre-intervention period (2.5–4 months), an electronic “HIV Testing” order set was available for clinicians to order a test or document a reason for not offering the test (e.g., patient is not conscious). An electronic alert was then added to enforce completion of the order set, effectively preventing ED discharge until an HIV test was offered to the patient. We analyzed data from 79,786 visits, measuring HIV testing and detection rates during the pre-intervention period and during the six months following the implementation of the alert.Results: The percentage of visits where an HIV test was performed increased from 5.4% in the pre-intervention period to 8.7% (p<0.001) after the electronic alert. After the implementation of the electronic alert, there was a 61% increase in HIV tests performed per visit. However, the percentage of patients testing positive per total patients-tested was slightly lower in the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group (0.48% vs. 0.55%), but this was not significant. The number of patients-testing positive per total-patient visit was higher in the post-intervention group (0.04% vs. 0.03%).Conclusions: An electronic alert which enforced non-targeted screening was effective at increasing HIV testing rates but did not significantly increase the detection of persons living with HIV. The impact of this electronic alert on healthcare costs and quality of care merits further examination.Citation: Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D. An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 299–312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0075

Download Full-text

1297. Examining the Successes and Challenges of Implementing HIV Testing Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1160 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S467-S468

Author(s):

Mariah Powell ◽

Michael Gierlach ◽

Sandra L Werner ◽

David S Bar-Shain ◽

Ann Avery

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Decision Support ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Clinical Decision Support ◽

Screening Tool ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

The United States ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Implementation Challenges ◽

Start Date

Abstract Background In 2016, MetroHealth System (MHS) launched the FOCUS (Frontlines of Communities in the United States) project to routinize HIV testing in the emergency department (ED). Before 2016, clinical decision support (CDS) for HIV testing was not in place, nor was there a policy to support the importance of opt-out, nontargeted screening. The purpose of this study was to outline the progress of HIV testing after the integration of CDS, as well as describe the implementation challenges, and how certain events impacted HIV testing. Methods HIV testing data from MHS EDs were collected from October 1, 2015 to March 31, 2019 and graphed into a run chart. The dataset was mapped with the following events: project start date, ED testing begins (without CDS), CDS implementation, the staffing of the ED Testing Coordinator (EDTC), and optimization of CDS (Figure 1). To determine whether observed variation in the dataset is due to random or special cause variation, these run chart rules were applied: Run, Shift (Figure 2), and Trend. Results There were 42 data points and 4 runs. With 42 points, the lower limit of runs was 16 and the upper limit of runs was 28. This signals that one or more special cause variations were present. A total of three distinct shifts were observed indicating special cause variation. The run chart did not include any downward or upward trends. Testing increased as much as 3971% (7 tests in October 2015 vs. 285 tests in March 2018). Conclusion HIV testing increased from 7 tests to 86 tests (Shift 1). This coincided with establishment of an ED testing policy in April 2016. Testing increased to 266 tests in October 2016 (Shift 2). This directly related to implementation of CDS in the ED. December 2017 displayed the lowest testing with 117 tests. This was due to lack of policy awareness, and to the rarely-visited location of the HIV screening tool during the triage process. Staff was re-educated and the HIV screening tool was moved to a more visible location. This resulted in 227 tests in February 2018, and was followed by the highest testing month with 285 tests (Shift 3). Continued challenges prohibit sustained upward trends in ED testing. A control chart may be the appropriate next step to identify new control limits Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

The Relationship of Reported HIV Risk and History of HIV Testing among Emergency Department Patients

Postgraduate Medicine ◽

10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2100 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 122 (1) ◽

pp. 61-74 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Roland C. Merchant ◽

Sarah M. Freelove ◽

Thomas J. Langan ◽

Melissa A. Clark ◽

Kenneth H. Mayer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Hiv Risk ◽

History Of ◽

Emergency Department Patients ◽

Relationship Of ◽

The Relationship

Download Full-text

STD Testing and Compliance with CDC and USPSTF HIV Testing Guidelines in a Regional Cohort of Emergency Departments

Online Journal of Public Health Informatics ◽

10.5210/ojphi.v6i1.5169 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Fredric M. Hustey ◽

Michael P. Phelan ◽

Sharon O'keefe ◽

Tracy M. Barbour

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Hiv Testing ◽

Health Care System ◽

Emergency Departments ◽

Hiv Screening ◽

Std Testing ◽

The Usa ◽

Living With Hiv ◽

Care System ◽

Hiv Aids

In 2003, the CDC estimated that 1 million people in the USA were living with HIV/AIDS, and 25% were undiagnosed. For many such patients the ED may be the only contact with the health care system. This study assessed compliance with CDC and USPTF guidelines for HIV testing in patients seeking evaluation for STDs in a regional cohort of emergency departments. 13927 patients patients underwent screening for STDs during the study period. Only 397 (2.85%) also received HIV screening while 107 (0.8%) received both HIV and syphyllis screening as per federal recommendations.

Download Full-text