scholarly journals 1120. Impact of Training Residents to Improve HIV Screening in a Teaching Hospital in Mexico City

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S590-S590
Author(s):  
Lorena Guerrero-Torres ◽  
Isaac Núñez-Saavedra ◽  
Yanink Caro-Vega ◽  
Brenda Crabtree-Ramírez
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Time Series ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Hiv Diagnosis ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test

Abstract Background Among 230,000 people living with HIV in Mexico, 24% are unaware of their diagnosis, and half of newly diagnosed individuals are diagnosed with advanced disease. Early diagnosis is the goal to mitigate HIV epidemic. Missed opportunities may reflect a lack of clinicians’ consideration of HIV screening as part of routine medical care. We assessed whether an educational intervention on residents was effective to 1) improve the knowledge on HIV screening; 2) increase the rate of HIV tests requested in the hospitalization floor (HF) and the emergency department (ED); and 3) increase HIV diagnosis in HF and ED. Methods Internal Medicine and Surgery residents at a teaching hospital were invited to participate. The intervention occurred in August 2018 and consisted in 2 sessions on HIV screening with an expert. A questionnaire was applied before (BQ) and after (AQ) the intervention, which included HIV screening indications and clinical cases. The Institutional Review Board approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. BQ and AQ scores were compared with a paired t-test. To evaluate the effect on HIV test rate in the HF and ED, an interrupted time series analysis was performed. Daily rates of tests were obtained from September 2016 to August 2019 and plotted along time. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to model temporal trends. HIV diagnosis in HF and ED pre- and post-intervention were compared with a Fisher’s exact test. A p< 0.05 was considered significant. Results Among 104 residents, 57 participated and completed both questionnaires. BQ score was 79/100 (SD±12) and AQ was 85/100 (SD±8), p< .004. Time series of HIV testing had apparent temporal trends (Fig 1). HIV test rate in the HF increased (7.3 vs 11.1 per 100 episodes) and decreased in the ED (2.6 vs 2.3 per 100 episodes). HIV diagnosis increased in the HF, from 0/1079 (0%) pre-intervention to 5/894 (0.6%) post-intervention (p< .018) (Table 1). Fig 1. HIV test rates. Gray area represents post-intervention period. Table 1. Description of episodes, HIV tests and rates pre- and post-intervention in the Emergency Department and Hospitalization Floor. Conclusion A feasible educational intervention improved residents’ knowledge on HIV screening, achieved maintenance of a constant rate of HIV testing in the HF and increased the number of HIV diagnosis in the HF. However, these results were not observed in the ED, where administrative barriers and work overload could hinder HIV screening. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals An Electronic Alert for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Increases Screening but not the Diagnosis of HIV

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 299-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Liu ◽  
J. Sperling ◽  
R. Green ◽  
S. Clark ◽  
D. Vawdrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
New York ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

SummaryObjective: Based on US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, New York State enacted legislation in 2010 requiring healthcare providers to offer non-targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to all patients aged 13–64. Three New York City adult emergency departments implemented an electronic alert that required clinicians to document whether an HIV test was offered before discharging a patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the electronic alert on HIV testing rates and diagnosis of HIV positive individuals.Methods: During the pre-intervention period (2.5–4 months), an electronic “HIV Testing” order set was available for clinicians to order a test or document a reason for not offering the test (e.g., patient is not conscious). An electronic alert was then added to enforce completion of the order set, effectively preventing ED discharge until an HIV test was offered to the patient. We analyzed data from 79,786 visits, measuring HIV testing and detection rates during the pre-intervention period and during the six months following the implementation of the alert.Results: The percentage of visits where an HIV test was performed increased from 5.4% in the pre-intervention period to 8.7% (p<0.001) after the electronic alert. After the implementation of the electronic alert, there was a 61% increase in HIV tests performed per visit. However, the percentage of patients testing positive per total patients-tested was slightly lower in the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group (0.48% vs. 0.55%), but this was not significant. The number of patients-testing positive per total-patient visit was higher in the post-intervention group (0.04% vs. 0.03%).Conclusions: An electronic alert which enforced non-targeted screening was effective at increasing HIV testing rates but did not significantly increase the detection of persons living with HIV. The impact of this electronic alert on healthcare costs and quality of care merits further examination.Citation: Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D. An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 299–312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0075

scholarly journals Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia J. Bogers ◽  
Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff ◽  
Udi Davidovich ◽  
Anders Boyd ◽  
Marc van der Valk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Hiv Diagnosis ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Undiagnosed Hiv

Abstract Background Late presentation remains a key barrier towards controlling the HIV epidemic. Indicator conditions (ICs) are those that are AIDS-defining, associated with a prevalence of undiagnosed HIV > 0.1%, or whose clinical management would be impeded if an HIV infection were undiagnosed. IC-guided HIV testing is an effective strategy in identifying undiagnosed HIV, but opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis through IC-guided testing are being missed. We present a protocol for an interventional study to improve awareness of IC-guided testing and increase HIV testing in patients presenting with ICs in a hospital setting. Methods We designed a multicentre interventional study to be implemented at five hospitals in the region of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Seven ICs were selected for which HIV test ratios (proportion of patients with an IC tested for HIV) will be measured: tuberculosis, cervical/vulvar cancer or high-grade cervical/vulvar dysplasia, malignant lymphoma, hepatitis B and C, and peripheral neuropathy. Prior to the intervention, a baseline assessment of HIV test ratios across ICs will be performed in eligible patients (IC diagnosed January 2015 through May 2020, ≥18 years, not known HIV positive) and an assessment of barriers and facilitators for HIV testing amongst relevant specialties will be conducted using qualitative (interviews) and quantitative methods (questionnaires). The intervention phase will consist of an educational intervention, including presentation of baseline results as competitive graphical audit and feedback combined with discussion on implementation and opportunities for improvement. The effect of the intervention will be assessed by comparing HIV test ratios of the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. The primary endpoint is the HIV test ratio within ±3 months of IC diagnosis. Secondary endpoints are the HIV test ratio within ±6 months of diagnosis, ratio ever tested for HIV, HIV positivity percentage, proportion of late presenters and proportion with known HIV status prior to initiating treatment for their IC. Discussion This protocol presents a strategy aimed at increasing awareness of the benefits of IC-guided testing and increasing HIV testing in patients presenting with ICs in hospital settings to identify undiagnosed HIV in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Trial registration Dutch trial registry: NL7521. Registered 14 February 2019.

scholarly journals 1294. Long-Term Impact of an HIV Testing Program on High-Risk HIV Screening in the Emergency Department

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S466-S466
Author(s):  
Jillian T Baron ◽  
Alexis Schwartz ◽  
Ebony Davis ◽  
Julie E Uspal ◽  
Brendan Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Testing Program ◽  
Sti Testing ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Emergency Departments (EDs) are important sites for HIV testing. However, there is little guidance on how best to implement HIV testing in the ED. The purpose of this study was to evaluate HIV screening practices of high-risk individuals presenting to an ED in the absence (ED1) and in the presence (ED2) of an established HIV testing program within the same academic hospital. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all individuals 18 years or older presenting to either ED between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. High-risk of HIV infection was determined by receipt of bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis. The primary outcome was receipt of any HIV test in the ED. Overall proportions of patients tested for HIV at the same time of STI testing were compared between sites by chi-square test. Predictors of HIV testing were analyzed by logistic regression. Results During the study period, 7,956 individuals received STI testing at ED1 and 10,815 received STI testing at ED2. The majority of individuals receiving STI testing at both sites were female, 81.2% at ED1 and 66.4% at ED2 (P <0.001). Only 4.0% of individuals received HIV testing at ED1 compared with 47.4% at ED2 (P <0.001). Individuals were significantly more likely to receive HIV testing at the time of STI testing in the ED with an HIV testing program (aOR 19.66, 95% CI 17.28–22.37). In the ED without an HIV testing program, individuals were more likely to receive HIV testing if they were male (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 2.78–4.55) and less likely if they were black (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.97). In the ED with an HIV testing program, individuals were more likely to receive HIV testing if they were male (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.92–2.44) and more likely if they were black (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.37–2.20). Conclusion Overall, the presence of an HIV testing program in the ED significantly increased the probability that individuals would receive an HIV test at the time of bacterial STI testing and mitigated disparities in care. The results of this study will help guide ongoing interventions to improve HIV screening among high-risk individuals in the emergency department. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S508-S509
Author(s):  
Amanda Hirsch ◽  
Christopher F Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Transmission Rate ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Hiv Diagnosis ◽  
Missed Opportunities ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Diagnosis Rate

Abstract Background There are 1.14 million people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the United States, and only about 86% are diagnosed. HIV diagnosis is the first step to care and expanded testing is essential to reduce transmission. Individuals with undiagnosed HIV have a transmission rate 3.5 times higher than those aware of their infection. Individuals seeking testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a higher risk population for HIV infection. Despite revised Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations to expand HIV testing in healthcare settings, testing remains low. A significant obstacle to expanded testing, especially in emergency departments (EDs), is concern about ensuring appropriate HIV test tracking and follow-up. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with symptoms of an STI between January 1, 2015 and July 8, 2019 at eight Beaumont Health EDs in Southeast Michigan. De-identified data was collected from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients aged 10 and older who had testing for one or more STIs including gonorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. Patients were evaluated for concurrent HIV testing during the encounter, and patients known to be HIV infected were excluded. Results Of 32,640 encounters during which patients not known to be HIV infected were tested for STIs, only 68 (0.21%) included HIV antibody/antigen screening. Of those tested, only one (1.47%) returned reactive. The remaining 67 screenings returned non-reactive. Applying only 10% of this diagnosis rate to the total number of STI encounters suggests an opportunity to diagnose 47 additional individuals; applying 50% of this rate and the corresponding value is 239 individuals. Conclusion These results highlight the need for expanded HIV screening in EDs. Systematic HIV test tracking and follow-up removes this burden from ED providers and enables expanded HIV testing in these settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Patient Perceptions and Acceptance of Routine Emergency Department HIV Testing

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Brown ◽  
Irene Kuo ◽  
Jennifer Bellows ◽  
Ryan Barry ◽  
Peter Bui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
African American ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
High Prevalence

Objectives. We report on the rates of patient acceptance and their perceptions of routine emergency department (ED) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in a high-prevalence area. Methods. We analyzed the race/ethnicity of patients who either accepted or declined a routine HIV test that was offered to all patients in the ED of a large academic center. We also distributed a patient perception survey about ED HIV testing. Results. During the study period, an HIV screening test was offered to 9,826 patients. Of these, 5,232 patients (53%) accepted the test. The acceptance rate of HIV testing was highest among African American patients (55%), followed by 52% for white, 50% for Hispanic, and 42% for Asian patients. A total of 1,519 completed surveys were returned for analysis. The most common reasons for declining a test were that patients did not perceive themselves to be at risk for HIV (49%) or they had recently been tested for HIV (18%). Overall, 84% of patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test in the ED. When analyzed by ethnicity, 89% of African American patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test if the friend went to the ED, but only 74% of white patients would do so. Conclusions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2006 recommendations on HIV screening are well accepted by the target populations. Further work at explaining the risk of HIV infection to ED patients should be undertaken and may boost the acceptance rate of ED HIV screening.

scholarly journals 1299. Cluster of False-Positive “Fifth-Generation” HIV Test Results During Implementation of a Routine HIV Screening Program in an Emergency Department

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S468-S468
Author(s):  
Andrew B Trotter ◽  
Anjana Maheswaran ◽  
Mary Kate Mannion ◽  
Sara Baghikar ◽  
Janet Lin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
False Positives ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Hiv Antigen ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background In November 2014, the University of Illinois Hospital (UI Health) introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-driven HIV screening program in the emergency department (ED). In October 2016, our hospital laboratory introduced “Fifth-generation” HIV testing using the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 HIV Antigen/Antibody diagnostic assay. Fifth-generation HIV testing has the advantage of separately detecting and reporting HIV antibody and HIV-1 p24 antigen. Although the literature and manufacturer report high sensitivity and specificity of this test, we encountered higher than expected rates of false-positive tests during the introduction of this test. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the results of our ED HIV screening program from October 2016 to March 2019 to describe the outcomes of HIV testing, determine the rates of false-positive HIV tests and determine if false-positive rates were temporally clustered. We also investigated various potential causes of higher than expected false positives including pre-analytical and analytical error. We defined a false-positive test as a repeatedly reactive initial HIV antigen and/or HIV-1 antibody result with a subsequent negative or indeterminate HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay and negative HIV-1 nucleic amplification test. Results During the review period, out of a total of 17,385 HIV tests which were performed, 85 tests were confirmed positive and 27 were false positives. This represents an HIV prevalence of 0.5%. Eighteen of the 27 false positives occurred during an 8 month period between October 2016 and April 2017 (see Figure 1). During our investigation of potential causes of the false-positive tests, we discovered that a reagent lot for the test was changed in June 2017 which resulted in a significant decrease in the false-positive rate (0.33% to 0.07%). Conclusion We provide data which suggests that a reagent lot may have been the cause of higher than expected false-positive tests for HIV testing. Monitoring of testing outcomes during implementation of a routine HIV testing program can help identify potential root causes of false-positive tests. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 47. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on an Emergency Department Opt-out HIV Screening Program: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S33-S34
Author(s):  
Jianli Niu ◽  
Paula Eckardt
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Time Series ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
South Florida ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Opt Out ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed tremendous challenges to health care systems, including emergency department (ED) priorities and visits. We describe the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ED-based “Opt-out” HIV testing at a public healthcare system in South Florida. Methods The programmatic data of ED-based HIV testing from July 2018 to March 2021 at the Memorial Regional Hospital, Hollywood, Florida was retrospectively analyzed. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis models were developed to evaluate the immediate and gradual effects of the pandemic on the monthly number of HIV tests over time, with an interruption point at March 2020. Results 45,185 HIV tests were recorded between July 2018 and March 2021. A mean of 1,745 (SD, 266) HIV tests per month before the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2018 to Feb 2020) and a mean of 791 (SD, 187) HIV tests per month during the pandemic period (March 2020 to March 2021) was seen (p&lt; 0.0001). As shown in Table 1, there was a slight decline trend in the number of monthly HIV test before the pandemic (estimate -10.29, p=0.541). We estimated a significant decrease in monthly HIV tests (estimate -678.48, p = 0.008), whereas the slope change after the pandemic was non-significant (estimate 4.84, p = 0.891). The number of monthly HIV tests declined significantly during the early phase of the pandemic, particularly between March 2020 and September 2020 (all p&lt; 0.05), with an estimated 48.0% decrease in the March 2020 (estimate -678.48, p = 0.007), 43% in the April 2020 (estimate -673.65, p=0.007), and 50.7% in the May 2020 (estimate -668.83, p=0.009), compared with the same month of the pre-pandemic period (Figure 1). This decline in number of monthly HIV tests is consistent with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Florida. Number of decreased monthly HIV tests from October 2020 through March 2021 was less pronounced (all p &gt;0.05) and returned to pre-pandemic levels. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant and immediate decline in monthly number of ED-based HIV tests. Disruption of basic health services by the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health concern. Strategies to develop an infrastructure to meet the demands of HIV testing should be implemented to ensure the current HIV prevention during the COVID-19 period. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Routine HIV Screening in Cancer Patients in the Emergency Department

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Terry W Rice ◽  
◽  
Patricia A. Brock ◽  
Carmen Gonzalez ◽  
Kelly W Merriman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Linkage To Care ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Routine Hiv Screening ◽  
Incident Cases

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) in cancer patients improves outcomes and reduces transmission of this oncogenic virus. HIV testing rates of cancer patients are similar to the general population (15-40%), despite the association with cancer. Our aim was to increase HIV screening in the Emergency Department(ED) of a comprehensive cancer center through a quality initiative. Testing increased significantly during the intervention (p<0.001; 0.15/day to 2.69/day). Seropositive HIV rate was 1.4% (12/852), with incidence of 0.3%. All patients were linked to care. Incident cases were between 36 and 55 years of age. Barriers encountered included confusion regarding the need for written consent for HIV testing, failure to consider ordering the test, and concerns regarding linkage to care.

scholarly journals Demographic Variations in HIV Testing History among Emergency Department Patients: Implications for Hiv Screening in US Emergency Departments

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland C Merchant ◽  
Bethany M Catanzaro ◽  
George R Seage ◽  
Kenneth H Mayer ◽  
Melissa A Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

scholarly journals Missed Opportunities for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Testing During Injection Drug Use–Related Healthcare Encounters Among a Cohort of Persons Who Inject Drugs With HIV Diagnosed During an Outbreak—Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky, 2017–2018

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan W Furukawa ◽  
Erin F Blau ◽  
Zach Reau ◽  
David Carlson ◽  
Zachary D Raney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Injection Drug Use ◽  
Injection Drug ◽  
Hiv Diagnosis ◽  
Persons Who Inject Drugs ◽  
Missed Opportunities ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus

Abstract Background Persons who inject drugs (PWID) have frequent healthcare encounters related to their injection drug use (IDU) but are often not tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We sought to quantify missed opportunities for HIV testing during an HIV outbreak among PWID. Methods PWID with HIV diagnosed in 5 Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky counties during January 2017–September 2018 who had ≥1 encounter 12 months prior to HIV diagnosis in 1 of 2 Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky area healthcare systems were included in the analysis. HIV testing and encounter data were abstracted from electronic health records. A missed opportunity for HIV testing was defined as an encounter for an IDU-related condition where an HIV test was not performed and had not been performed in the prior 12 months. Results Among 109 PWID with HIV diagnosed who had ≥1 healthcare encounter, 75 (68.8%) had ≥1 IDU-related encounters in the 12 months before HIV diagnosis. These 75 PWID had 169 IDU-related encounters of which 86 (50.9%) were missed opportunities for HIV testing and occurred among 46 (42.2%) PWID. Most IDU-related encounters occurred in the emergency department (118/169; 69.8%). Using multivariable generalized estimating equations, HIV testing was more likely in inpatient compared with emergency department encounters (adjusted relative risk [RR], 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70–4.33) and at the healthcare system receiving funding for emergency department HIV testing (adjusted RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10–2.82). Conclusions PWID have frequent IDU-related encounters in emergency departments. Enhanced HIV screening of PWID in these settings can facilitate earlier diagnosis and improve outbreak response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document