scholarly journals Investigating the effect of e-cigarette use on quitting smoking in adults aged 25 years or more using the PATH study

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1099
Author(s):  
Peter N. Lee ◽  
John S. Fry

Background: The evidence on harms and benefits of e-cigarettes partly concerns whether their use encourages smokers to quit.  We addressed this using data from the nationally representative PATH study, with detailed accounting for potential confounding variables. Methods: We considered adults aged 25+.  Our original analyses, reported in version 1 of this paper, used data for Waves 1 to 3, separate analyses considering Waves 1 to 2, 2 to 3 and 1 to 3.  These related baseline ever e-cigarette use (or e-product use at Wave 2) to quitting at follow-up, adjusting for confounders derived from 55 candidates.  Sensitivity analyses omitted ever other product users, linked quitting to current e-cigarette use, and used values of some predictors modified using follow-up data.  Additional analyses used data for Waves 1 to 4, separately considering sustained, delayed and temporary quitting during Waves 1 to 3, 2 to 4 and 1 to 4.  Sensitivity analyses considered 30-day quitting, restricted attention to smokers attempting to quit, and considered ever smokeless tobacco or snus use. Results: In the original analyses, unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) of quitting smoking forever e-cigarette use were 1.29 (95% CI 1.01-1.66), 1.52 (1.26-1.83) and 1.47 (1.19-1.82) for the Wave 1 to 2, 2 to 3, and 1 to 3 analyses.  These reduced after adjustment, to 1.23 (0.94-1.61), 1.51 (1.24-1.85) and 1.39 (1.11-1.74).  Quitting rates remained elevated in users in all sensitivity analyses.  The additional analyses found associations of e-cigarette use with sustained, delayed and temporary quitting, associations little affected by considering 30-day quitting, and only slightly reduced restricting attention to quit attempters.  Ever use of smokeless tobacco or snus also predicted increased quitting.   Conclusions: As does most evidence from clinical trials, other analyses of PATH, and other epidemiological studies, our results suggest using e-cigarettes helps adult smokers to quit.

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter N. Lee ◽  
John S. Fry

Background: Part of the evidence on harms and benefits of e-cigarettes concerns whether using e-cigarettes encourages smokers to quit.  With limited results from controlled trials, and weaknesses in much epidemiological data, we addressed this using nationally representative prospective study data, with detailed accounting for factors associated with quitting. Methods: Analyses used data for adults aged 25+ years from Waves 1 to 3 of the US PATH study. Separate analyses concerned follow-up from Waves 1 to 2, 2 to 3 and 1 to 3.  The main analyses related baseline ever e-cigarette use (or e-product use at Wave 2) to having quit at follow-up, adjusting for predictors of quitting derived from 55 candidates.  Sensitivity analyses omitted adults who had never used other products, linked quitting to current rather than ever e-cigarette use, used modified values of some predictors using later recorded data, or (in Wave 1 to 3 analysis only) also adjusted for quitting by Wave 2. Results: In the main analyses, unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) of quitting for ever e-cigarette use were 1.29 (95% CI 1.01-1.66), 1.52 (1.26-1.83) and 1.47 (1.19-1.82) for the Wave 1 to 2, 2 to 3, and 1 to 3 analyses.  These estimates reduced after adjustment, to 1.23 (0.94-1.61), 1.51 (1.24-1.85) and 1.39 (1.11-1.74).  The final models, including between six and nine predictors, always included household income, everyday/someday smoking, wanting to smoke after waking and having tried quitting, with other variables included in specific analyses.  Quitting rates remained elevated in e-cigarette users in all sensitivity analyses. ORs were increased where other product users were omitted.  Adjusted ORs of quitting for current e-cigarette use were 1.41 (1.06-1.89), 1.30 (1.01-1.67) and 1.56 (1.21-2.00). Conclusions: The results suggest e-cigarettes may assist adult smokers to quit, particularly in individuals not using other nicotine products, and who are current e-cigarette users.


Author(s):  
Zongshuan Duan ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Jidong Huang

E-cigarettes are the most-used tobacco products among U.S. adolescents. Emerging evidence suggests that adolescents using e-cigarettes are at elevated risk for initiating cigarette smoking. However, whether this risk may differ by sex remains unknown. This study analyzed data from Wave 1 to 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a nationally representative longitudinal survey. Generalized estimation equations (GEE) were performed to estimate the associations between baseline e-cigarette use and subsequent cigarette smoking, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, mental health conditions, and other tobacco use. Effect modifications by sex were examined. Multivariate analyses showed that, among baseline never cigarette smokers, past-30-day e-cigarette use at baseline waves was significantly associated with past-30-day cigarette smoking at follow-up waves (aOR = 3.90, 95% CI: 2.51–6.08). This association was significantly stronger for boys (aOR = 6.17, 95% CI: 2.43–15.68) than for girls (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.14–8.33). Additionally, using other tobacco products, older age, and having severe externalizing mental health problems at baseline were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of cigarette smoking at follow-up. The prospective association between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking differs by sex among U.S. adolescents. Sex-specific tobacco control interventions may be warranted to curb the youth tobacco use epidemic.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e053096
Author(s):  
Maia Salholz-Hillel ◽  
Peter Grabitz ◽  
Molly Pugh-Jones ◽  
Daniel Strech ◽  
Nicholas J DeVito

ObjectiveTo examine how and when the results of COVID-19 clinical trials are disseminated.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThe COVID-19 clinical trial landscape.Participants285 registered interventional clinical trials for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 completed by 30 June 2020.Main outcome measuresOverall reporting and reporting by dissemination route (ie, by journal article, preprint or results on a registry); time to reporting by dissemination route.ResultsFollowing automated and manual searches of the COVID-19 literature, we located 41 trials (14%) with results spread across 47 individual results publications published by 15 August 2020. The most common dissemination route was preprints (n=25) followed by journal articles (n=18), and results on a registry (n=2). Of these, four trials were available as both a preprint and journal publication. The cumulative incidence of any reporting surpassed 20% at 119 days from completion. Sensitivity analyses using alternate dates and definitions of results did not appreciably change the reporting percentage. Expanding minimum follow-up time to 3 months increased the overall reporting percentage to 19%.ConclusionCOVID-19 trials completed during the first 6 months of the pandemic did not consistently yield rapid results in the literature or on clinical trial registries. Our findings suggest that the COVID-19 response may be seeing quicker results disclosure compared with non-emergency conditions. Issues with the reliability and timeliness of trial registration data may impact our estimates. Ensuring registry data are accurate should be a priority for the research community during a pandemic. Data collection is underway for the next phase of the DIssemination of REgistered COVID-19 Clinical Trials study expanding both our trial population and follow-up time.


2020 ◽  
pp. 106939712096730
Author(s):  
Tariq H. Malik

Anxiety has become ubiquitous in modern life, across countries. Cultural theories suggest that high uncertainty avoidance (UA) increases anxiety, while long-term orientation (LTO) decreases it. We question whether a high UA culture in a region attracts research and development (R&D) projects regarding anxiety management, compared to LTO. Furthermore, do these opposite dimensions moderate each other in attracting a pharmaceutical firm’s response? This article explores this link between the UA culture and the moderation effect of LTO. Using data on clinical trials related to anxiety management projects in 67 countries, we record 10,585 observations, capturing 4% of the global population of clinical trials on the subject. We find that the uncertainty avoidance index (UAI) shows a negative correlation with the intensity of the anxiety management project, while LTO has no significant correlation. The interaction between the two shows positive correlation. The results are found to be significant after controlling for confounding variables and robustness checks. This study makes three contributions. First, it highlights the link between culture and anxiety management projects through the clinical trial movement. Second, it contributes to cultural theory, suggesting that the UAI defines problems and LTO defines innovative solutions. It also highlights the differences and links between the UAI and LTO at the conceptual level. Thirdly, it offers general policy and practical implications.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0257553
Author(s):  
Christian Gunadi ◽  
Tarik Benmarhnia ◽  
Martha White ◽  
John P. Pierce ◽  
Sara B. McMenamin ◽  
...  

Background California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017. Methods Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011–2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a “synthetic” California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Results The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products. Conclusion Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Noordzij ◽  
M.A. Beenackers ◽  
J. Oude Groeniger ◽  
E.J. Timmermans ◽  
I. Motoc ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUNDWith urbanization and aging increasing in coming decades, societies face the challenge of keeping aging populations active. Land use mix (LUM) has been associated with cycling and walking, but whether changes in LUM relate to changes in cycling/walking is less known. OBJECTIVESOur objective was to study the effect of LUM on cycling/walking in two Dutch aging cohorts using data with 10 years of follow-up. METHODSData from 1,114 respondents from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) and 1,561 respondents from the Health and Living Conditions of the Population of Eindhoven and Surroundings (GLOBE) study were linked to LUM in 1000-meter sausage network buffers at three time-points. Cycling/walking outcomes were harmonized to include average minutes spent cycling/walking per week. Data was pooled and limited to respondents that did not relocate between follow-up waves. Associations between LUM and cycling/walking were estimated using a Random Effects Within-Between (REWB) model that allows for the estimation of both within and between effects. Sensitivity analyses were performed on smaller (500-meter) and larger (1600-meter) buffers. RESULTSWe found evidence of between-individual associations of LUM in 1000-meter buffers and walking (β: 11.10, 95% CI: 0.08 ; 21.12), but no evidence of within-associations in 1000-meter buffers. Sensitivity analyses using 500-meter buffers showed similar between-associations, but negative within-associations (β: -35.67, 95% CI: -68.85 ; -2.49). We did not find evidence of between-individual associations of LUM in any buffer size and cycling, but did find evidence of negative within-associations between LUM in 1600-meter buffers and cycling (β: -7.49, 95% CI: -14.31 ; -0.66). DISCUSSIONOur study found evidence of positive associations between LUM and average walking time, but also some evidence of negative associations between a change in LUM and cycling/walking. LUM appears to be related to cycling/walking, but the effect of changes in LUM on cycling/walking is unclear.


2021 ◽  
pp. tobaccocontrol-2021-056907
Author(s):  
Rebecca A Jackson ◽  
Chunfeng Ren ◽  
Blair Coleman ◽  
Hannah R Day ◽  
Cindy M Chang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveExamine patterns of dual use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco and complete switching over time among adult current cigarette smokers using data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 3 (2015–2016), Wave 4 (2016–2018) and Wave 5 (2018–2019).MethodsWe examined four tobacco use states among 6834 exclusive smokers and 372 dual users at Wave 3 with two waves of follow-up data: exclusive cigarette use, exclusive smokeless tobacco use, dual use and use of neither product.ResultsAmong exclusive smokers at Wave 3, only 1.6% (95% CI: 1.3% to 2.1%) transitioned to dual use at Wave 4, and 0.1% (95% CI: 0.07% to 0.2%) switched to exclusive smokeless tobacco use. Among exclusive smokers who switched to dual use, 53.1% (95% CI: 40.9% to 64.9%) returned to exclusive cigarette smoking, 34.3% (95% CI: 23.8% to 46.6%) maintained dual use and 12.6% (95% CI: 7.0% to 21.7%) did not smoke cigarettes after an additional wave of follow-up. Dual users at Wave 3 were likely to maintain their dual use status at Wave 4, 51.2% (95% CI: 46.1% to 56.3%) and Wave 5, 47.9% (95% CI: 40.1% to 55.8%).ConclusionsVery few cigarette smokers transition to smokeless tobacco use, and among those who do, dual use is more common than exclusive smokeless tobacco use. Further, the majority of exclusive cigarette smokers who transition to dual use at Wave 4 continue smoking cigarettes at Wave 5, either as dual users or as exclusive smokers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S433-S434
Author(s):  
D Micic ◽  
J Jiang ◽  
L Chen ◽  
T Fan ◽  
F Mu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Teduglutide (TED) is a glucagon-like peptide 2 analogue approved for the treatment of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) requiring parenteral support (PS). SBS is a rare condition resulting from a reduced absorptive surface area of the small intestine, most commonly due to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with SBS with intestinal failure (SBS-IF) remain dependent on PS to maintain adequate calorie, fluid, electrolyte and micronutrient stability. In phase 3 clinical trials, TED reduced PS requirements in patients with SBS-IF. This study aimed to assess PS use and discontinuation rates among patients with SBS on TED using real-world data. Methods This retrospective cohort study of adults with SBS-IF (≥18 years) with ≥1 TED pharmacy claim(s) used the US-based administrative healthcare claims IBM MarketScan database (2009–2019). The first TED claim was defined as the index date. Patients required ≥6 months of continuous enrolment prior to index date (baseline period) and no history of malignancy. Primary analysis was conducted during the follow-up period (index date to earliest of continuous enrolment end or 2 years post-index). A sensitivity analysis was also conducted among the cohort during the TED utilization period (index date to the earliest of continuous enrolment end or TED discontinuation). Patients required PS use during both baseline and follow-up/TED utilization periods (primary and sensitivity analyses). PS discontinuation was defined as a PS utilization gap of ≥30 days. A generalized estimating equation linear regression model evaluated if PS use (days/week) changed significantly from baseline to selected time points post-index. Results Of 110 identified patients with SBS-IF, mean age was 53.4 (SD 13.2) years and 77 (70%) were women. Included were 51 (46%) patients with Crohn’s disease and 20 (18%) with ulcerative colitis. The main comorbidities were renal disease (23%) and liver disease (15%). PS frequency was 4.6 (2.5), 3.3 (2.9), 2.9 (3.0) and 3.6 (3.0) days/week at baseline and months 6 (p<0.0001), 12 (p<0.0001), and 24 (p=0.0267), respectively. PS discontinuation increased over time to 34.4%, 46.7% and 65.2% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated similar rates of PS use and discontinuation. Conclusion In this real-world study of adults with SBS-IF, including >50% with IBD, TED was associated with PS reductions comparable to those achieved in clinical trials and higher PS discontinuation rates even when using a conservative analysis approach. Future research will be required to determine individual predictive factors of PS discontinuation.


Author(s):  
Karin A. Kasza ◽  
Maciej L. Goniewicz ◽  
Kathryn C. Edwards ◽  
Michael D. Sawdey ◽  
Marushka L. Silveira ◽  
...  

Potential mechanisms by which e-cigarette use may relate to combustible cigarette smoking cessation are not well-understood. We used U.S. nationally representative data to prospectively evaluate the relationship between e-cigarette flavor use and frequency of e-cigarette use among adult cigarette/e-cigarette dual users who attempted to quit smoking cigarettes. Analyses used Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study data from adult dual users (2015/16) who attempted to quit smoking between 2015/16 and 2016/17 (Wave 3-Wave 4, n = 685, including those who did/did not quit by 2016/17). E-cigarette flavor use (usual/last flavor, past 30-day flavor; assessed in 2015/16) was categorized into Only tobacco; Only menthol/mint; Only non-tobacco, non-menthol/mint; and Any combination of tobacco, menthol/mint, other flavor(s). The key outcome, evaluated at follow-up in 2016/17, was frequent e-cigarette use, which was defined as use on 20+ of past 30 days. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between e-cigarette flavor use in 2015/16 and frequent e-cigarette use at follow-up in 2016/17. Dual users who attempted to quit smoking had greater odds of frequent e-cigarette use at follow-up when they used only non-tobacco, non-menthol/mint flavor than when they used only tobacco flavor as their regular/last e-cigarette flavor (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1–3.4); findings were no longer significant when adjusted for factors including e-cigarette device type (AOR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.7–2.8). Past 30-day e-cigarette flavor use results were generally similar, although frequent e-cigarette use at follow-up was highest among those who used any combination of tobacco, menthol/mint, or other flavors. Findings indicate that e-cigarette flavor use among dual users who attempt to quit smoking may be related to e-cigarette use frequency overall, which may indicate a mechanism underlying findings for e-cigarette use and smoking cessation. Further longitudinal research may help to disentangle how e-cigarette characteristics uniquely impact e-cigarette use frequency and smoking cessation/sustained use.


Author(s):  
Adam M Leventhal ◽  
Hongying Dai

Abstract Background Evidence of US adult flavored e-cigarette use prevalence stratified by age, smoking status, and purpose for vaping (ie, quitting smoking, to use when or where smoking is not allowed) can inform policies that reduce the tobacco-related cancer burden. Methods Current flavored e-cigarette use (use 1 or more nontobacco flavors) prevalence estimates were compared across subpopulation groups using 2-sided statistical significance tests in the July 2018 Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplement, a nationally representative cross-sectional adult survey (n = 46 759). Results Current flavored e-cigarette use was reported by 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.47% to 1.69%) of all respondents. Among current vapers, the percentage of those who used flavored e-cigarettes was higher for adults aged 18-24 years (89.6%), 25-34 years (86.7%), and 35-44 years (76.0%) than for adults aged 45 years and older (60.4%, Ps < .001); was higher in never smokers (89.8%) than current (72.9%), long-term former (73.9%), and recent former (80.4%) smokers (Ps ≤ .009); was higher in smokers who reportedly did (78.9%) vs did not (71.1%) use e-cigarettes to vape where or when smoking is not allowed (P = .005); and did not differ between smokers who reportedly did (75.0%) vs did not (73.9%) vape to quit smoking (P = .71). Individuals who vaped to quit smoking and currently used flavored e-cigarettes constituted 0.9% (95% CI = 0.82% to 0.99%) of all adults (weighted N = 2 251 000, 95% CI = 2 046 000 to 2 476 000) and 57.2% of current flavored e-cigarette users. Conclusions Flavored e-cigarette use prevalence was low among US adults overall but common for current vapers. Flavored e-cigarette use was disproportionately prevalent among never smokers and other subpopulations that might experience harm from vaping.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document