scholarly journals Using nominal group technique to compare patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on symptoms in multiple myeloma to inform the development of a self management tool for patients with relapsed myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Orlaith Cormican ◽  
Maura Dowling
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Staff Nurse ◽  
Relapsed Myeloma ◽  
Group Technique

Background: The nominal group technique (NGT) allows stakeholders to directly generate items for needs assessment. The objective was to demonstrate the use of NGT to inform the development of a healthcare app in patients with relapsed myeloma. Healthcare professionals with experience in the care of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma were invited to participate. Methods: One NGT group was conducted. In the group, health care professionals working in haematology were asked to vote anonymously in order of highest priority, on symptoms previously highlighted by relapsed/refractory myeloma patients in four focus groups. Results: A total of 18 healthcare professionals working in the area of haematology participated in the NGT discussion; consultants (n=6), haematology registrars (n=2), specialist nurses [Advanced Nurse Practitioner/Clinical Nurse Specialist] (haematology) (n=3), staff nurse (n=1), and “other” health care professionals (n=6). Participants ranged in experience of working with myeloma patients from 2 years to over 27 years. The symptoms voted in highest priority were: Pain, Fatigue, Peripheral Neuropathy, Infection Risk and Steroid Induced Side Effects. Conclusions: The NGT was an efficient method for obtaining information to inform a healthcare app.

scholarly journals Using nominal group technique to inform the development of a self-management app for patients with relapsed myeloma

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Orlaith Cormican ◽  
Maura Dowling
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Staff Nurse ◽  
Specialist Nurses ◽  
Relapsed Myeloma ◽  
Group Technique

Background: The nominal group technique (NGT) allows stakeholders to directly generate items for needs assessment. The objective was to demonstrate the use of NGT to inform the development of a healthcare app in patients with relapsed myeloma. Healthcare professionals with experience in the care of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma were invited to participate. Methods: One NGT group was conducted. In the group, health care professionals working in haematology were asked to vote anonymously in order of highest priority, on symptoms previously highlighted by relapsed/refractory myeloma patients in four focus groups. Results: A total of 18 healthcare professionals working in the area of haematology participated in the NGT discussion; consultants (n=6), haematology registrars (n=2), specialist nurses [Advanced Nurse Practitioner/Clinical Nurse Specialist] (haematology) (n=3), staff nurse (n=1), and “other” health care professionals (n=6). Participants ranged in experience of working with myeloma patients from 2 years to over 27 years. The symptoms voted in highest priority were: Pain, Fatigue, Peripheral Neuropathy, Infection Risk and Steroid Induced Side Effects. Conclusions: The NGT was an efficient method for obtaining information to inform a healthcare app.

EP.TH.602Exploring decision-making of healthcare professionals in patients with benign large non-pedunculated colonic polyps (BLNPCP) virtually using combined focus group and nominal group technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Wheldon ◽  
J Morgan ◽  
MJ Lee ◽  
S Riley ◽  
SR Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Professional ◽  
Patient Preference ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Colonic Polyps ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Group Technique

Abstract Aim We aimed to elicit key factors that influence healthcare professional decision-making when deciding treatment for BLNPCP. Background Benign large non-pedunculated colonic polyps (BLNPCP) may harbour covert malignancy and opinions differ about the optimal treatment modality. There are several options available, including endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal resection, combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery and surgical resection. Despite widespread availability of endoscopic resection techniques, there are high rates of surgery in the UK. Methods Three focus groups of healthcare professionals, comprised of either consultant colorectal surgeons, nurse endoscopists and consultant gastroenterologists, were conducted virtually utilising the Nominal Group Technique. Meetings were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Themes were devolved using the framework approach for qualitative analysis. A priority-ranked list of factors influencing healthcare professional decision-making in this setting was generated. Results Five main themes were identified as influencing decision-making: Shared decision making (patient preference, informed consent); Patient factors (co-morbidity, age, life-expectancy); Polyp factors (Location, size, morphology, risk of cancer); Healthcare professionals (skill-set, personal preference); System factors (techniques availability locally, regional referral networks). Nominal Group Technique generated 55 items across the three focus groups. Nurses and gastroentologists ranked patient factors (particularly drug history and tolerance of procedure) and shared decision making (patient preference) more highly then surgeons. Surgeons placed greater emphasis on polyp factors particularly location and the risk of submucosal invasive carcinoma. Conclusion Decision making is complex and multifactorial. These results support the benefits of complex polyp MDTs and patient involvement in the decision-making. The complexity of decision-making may underpin wide variation in practice.

scholarly journals Eliciting the Social Determinants of Cancer Prevention and Control in the Catchment of an Urban Cancer Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Katerina Jou ◽  
Madeline R. Sterling ◽  
Rosio Ramos ◽  
Francesse Antoine ◽  
David M. Nanus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Social Context ◽  
Health Knowledge ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Social Determinant ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Economic Stability ◽  
Social Risks ◽  
Group Technique

Objective: The objectives of this study were two-fold: 1) to engage community stake­holders in identifying the top three social determinant of health (SDOH) barriers to the early detection and treatment of cancer in their respective communities; and 2) to develop a tailored plan responsive to the potential social risks identified within the catchment of an urban academic cancer center.Methods: Stakeholders from four neighbor­hoods in Brooklyn, New York with dispro­portionate cancer burden were recruited; the nominal group technique, a semi-quantitative research method, was used to elicit the SDOH barriers. Responses were consolidated into categories and ranked by points received.Results: 112 stakeholders participated in four community-based meetings. The SDOH categories of economic stability, education, and community and social context were identified as the top barriers. The themes of lost wages/employment, competing priorities, and the inability to afford care embodied the responses about economic stability. The domain of education was best described by the themes of low health literacy, targeted health topics to fill gaps in knowledge, and recommendations on the best modalities for improving health knowledge. Lastly, within the category of community and social context, the themes of stigma, bias, and discrimination, eroding support systems, and cultural misconcep­tions were described.Conclusion: The implications of our study are three-fold. First, they highlight the strengths of the nominal group technique as a methodology for engaging community stakeholders. Second, our analysis led to identifying a smaller set of social priorities for which tailored screening and practical solutions could be implemented within our health care system. Third, the results provide insight into the actual types of interventions and resources that commu­nities expect from the health care sector.Ethn Dis. 2021;31(1):23-30; doi:10.18865/ ed.31.1.23

scholarly journals Multistakeholder Experiences of Providing, Receiving, and Setting Priorities for Lung Cancer Care in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Khumbulani Hlongwana ◽  
Buhle Lubuzo ◽  
Phindile Mlaba ◽  
Sinenhlanhla Zondo ◽  
Themba Ginindza
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
South Africa ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Limited Access ◽  
Kwazulu Natal

PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to explore the key stakeholders’—health care professionals, patients, and family caregivers—experiences of providing, receiving, and setting priorities for lung cancer care in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, with a view to propose potentially effective interventions for improved care. METHODS This was a qualitative study conducted in 5 communities and 3 hospitals offering oncology services in KwaZulu-Natal Province. Data were generated using in-depth interviews and the nominal group technique. Nineteen patients with lung cancer, 20 family caregivers (FCs) and 18 health care professionals (HCPs) were interviewed, with an additional subsample of 7 HCPs participating in the nominal group technique. Results were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Similar to patients with lung cancer and FCs, HCPs were concerned about the limited access to oncology services and poor lung cancer diagnostic facilities, as these also ranked high in HCPs’ priority settings. Limited access was attributed to a lack of lung cancer awareness and low lung cancer suspicion index among different stakeholders, a shortage of health care specialists, poor diagnostic equipment and general resource constraints, unavailability of diagnostic services at the lowest levels of health care (for example, primary health care), geographic location of specialized services, and poor multidisciplinary collaboration. Patients’ perceptions of the quality of care in public health facilities also affected their treatment-seeking behavior. Challenges experienced at the health care worker-patient level also affected the FCs. For example, FCs were psychosocially and economically affected by the caring responsibilities, which, in turn, was an important determinant of a patient’s care pathways. CONCLUSION As a result of this study, new approaches to lung cancer care are being explored, including increased community awareness, the introduction of well-equipped community mobile screening services, patient navigation to track patients, and building cadres for providing and integrating palliative care services into the mainstream health systems.

VP01 A Disinvestment Toolkit: The Prioritization Of Technologies Of No Or Low Added Value

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 159-159
Author(s):  
Julie Polisena ◽  
Leonor Varela-Lema ◽  
Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea ◽  
Brian Godman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Potential Health ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Prioritization Process

Introduction:Candidate health technologies identified for disinvestment will require prioritization depending on the system's capacity for dealing with the assessments or for further considerations. Compilations of low value lists, such as the National Institutes for Health and Clinical Excellence's, “Do not do recommendations”, can serve as databases for prioritization topics. Prioritization processes can also be triggered by experience or event-based regional requests and decisions; new evidence on safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, variations in clinical practice, patient or consumer voicing, discrepancies between practice and guidelines; and or time-based mechanisms, such as approval of new health technologies and reassessment five years after introduction.Methods:A search of the published and grey literature was conducted to identify the current methods or tools used to prioritize potential health technologies and services for disinvestment. The description of the methods and tools identified, the prioritization criteria, and the stakeholders involved in the process were reviewed and summarized.Results:The methods and tools used for prioritization that were identified in the literature include the PriTec Prioritization tool, nominal group technique, Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis, consensus building, and online surveys. Further, common criteria for prioritization centered on the disease burden, possible risks and benefits, costs and cost-effectiveness, utilization, and time-based criteria. Prioritization can be conducted by health care professionals, decision makers, patients or patient groups and representative community members.Conclusions:The prioritization process for disinvestment candidates should be transparent and guided largely by evidence. It is highly recommended that the list of predefined criteria be developed with input from all relevant stakeholders to meet the objectives of the specific health care setting. The commonly cited basic requirements include clinical parameters, economic measures, and social, ethical or legal considerations.

The Preschool Stuttering Screen for Health Care Professionals

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Joseph Donaher ◽  
Christina Deery ◽  
Sarah Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Preschool Children ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Developmental Profile

Healthcare professionals require a thorough understanding of stuttering since they frequently play an important role in the identification and differential diagnosis of stuttering for preschool children. This paper introduces The Preschool Stuttering Screen for Healthcare Professionals (PSSHP) which highlights risk factors identified in the literature as being associated with persistent stuttering. By integrating the results of the checklist with a child’s developmental profile, healthcare professionals can make better-informed, evidence-based decisions for their patients.

scholarly journals Prioritization Of Research Under National Aids Control Programme In India Using Nominal Group Technique

1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
R Sogarwal ◽  
D Bachani
Keyword(s):  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
Research Priorities ◽  
Control Programme ◽  
Pediatric Hiv ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Group Technique

Introduction: During the fi rst 2 years of the fi ve year plan of India’s National AIDS Control Programme Phase-III (NACP-III; 2007-12), various interactive consultative workshops were organized in collaboration with development partners with the objective of identifying priority areas for operational research and further development of research protocols adopting mentorship approach. Methodology: This article is an attempt to present the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) which was used to identify a set of fundable and practically feasible research priorities under NACP-III specifi cally focusing on Prevention of Parent to Child Transmission (PPTCT) and Pediatric HIV Care in India. The activity was undertaken with support of UNICEF in the year 2010. A total of 110 persons participated in the consultation clustering into 37, 36 and 37 members in Group A, B and C, respectively. The participants refl ected the mix of policy makers / decision makers (8), programme managers (12), implementers (36), subject experts / researchers (28), other stakeholders (16). Results: A total of nine highest priority research questions were identifi ed by all the groups in the assigned themes. The value of Kendall’s W coeffi cient of concordance was 0.68, which shows signifi cant agreement among raters on priority research questions (chi-square=16.35; p=0.03). Conclusion: Based on our experience, we can conclude that NGT was found to be an important tool for setting research priorities that is more democratic and transparent than the traditional methods. By applying various stages of the group sessions, participants can experience the rethinking process with reference information to enhance their judgment. The results of our experience may help programme managers / policy makers to plan similar and more improved method in other element of NACP as well as other health programmes. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/saarctb.v8i1.5888 SAARCTB 2011; 8(1): 20-30

Psychographic segmentation of the self-employed: An exploratory study

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Kenney ◽  
Art Weinstein
Keyword(s):  
Small Business ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Nominal Group Technique ◽  
The Self ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Self Employment ◽  
Group Technique

Although it is well established in the academic literature that entrepreneurs share common traits, there has been limited research dedicated to evaluating psychographic profiles of the self-employed. Using the Nominal Group Technique, the authors gleaned insight from a panel of experts in an effort to segment the self-employed based on personality traits and the benefits they receive from an entrepreneurial career. The findings show that self-employed individuals can be classified into four distinct segments: Exemplars, Generals, Moms and Dads, and Altruists. Each group derives different benefits from self-employment. Understanding these benefits can greatly assist entrepreneurship educators and marketers of small business oriented products and services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document