scholarly journals Forcefulness and the Date of The Enforcement of the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Jordan (Comparative Study)

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 11-53
Author(s):  
Numan Ahmad Sh. Elkhatib
Author(s):  
Sergii Tellis ◽  

The article provides a comparative study of the constitutional powers granted to presidents in Ukraine and Hungary in the context of the political and legal aspect, and also an attempt to appraise the role of subjective factors involved in the exercise of state power and transformation of the presidency institute of the aforementioned states. The aim of the article: to comparative study of the constitutional and legal status of Hungarian and Ukrainian presidents in the political and legal context and performing an appraisal of the personal impact exerted by the head of state on the government of the above-said countries. The research methodology: to observation and generalization; ordering of all basic elements; method of scientific generalization, which made it possible to formulate conclusions. As a result, it is established that the institution of the presidency in Ukraine is the core of the executive branch, which dominates the state system. In Hungary, the executive and legislative branches make up a political bloc (alliance) which is counterbalanced in certain relations by the constitutional court and judicial power. The subjective factor, namely personal qualities of presidents – career path, role perception, interpretation of powers – determines the political heft of the head of state. Subject to sufficient individual traits, a constitutionally “weak” president is able to influence the country’s development concept and the positioning strategy on the global scene.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po Jen Yap ◽  
Chien-Chih Lin

This comparative study of the constitutional jurisprudence of three East Asian jurisdictions investigates how the rulings of the Constitutional Court of Taiwan, the Constitutional Court of Korea and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal have converged. The unique political contexts of all three jurisdictions have led to strong courts using the structured proportionality doctrine and innovative constitutional remedies to address human rights issues. Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea have the only courts in Asia that regularly use a structured four-stage Proportionality Analysis to invalidate laws, and routinely apply innovative constitutional remedies such as Suspension Orders and Remedial Interpretation to rectify constitutionally flawed legislation. This volume explores how judges in these areas are affected by politics within their different constitutional systems. The latest developments in Asian constitutional law are covered, with detailed analysis of key cases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Eva Ditayani Antari

Abstract: The President of Indonesia gets the supervision of the Senate as regulated by the constitution. The Senate has the authority to dismiss the president at the recommendation of the House of Representatives if the president is deemed to have committed treason against the state, corruption or bribery, serious crimes, and misconduct acts or is deemed no longer eligible for president. Misconduct act is a reason for dismissing a president does not have legal certainty because the constitution does not limit the intent of the misconduct act itself. At the same time, the Constitutional Court Act in Indonesia has extended the meaning of this misconduct act. This paper will discuss the meaning of the misconduct act from an ethical perspective and comparative study. Furthermore, it also describes the appropriateness of the limits on misconduct as regulated in the Constitutional Court Act with the intention of constitution drafting for amendment. These legal problems will then be studied using normative methods through historical, comparative, and interpretation approaches then presented on a descriptively-analysis paper. The results of the study indicate that a misconduct act is an act that degrades the dignity of the position as president. Misconduct acts have a broader meaning than criminal acts but can also violate unwritten norms that are determined as law in society.Keywords: dismissal of president; interpretation; misconduct act.Abstrak: Presiden Indonesia mendapat pengawasan dari Senat sebagaimana diatur dalam konstitusi. Senat memiliki kewenangan untuk memberhentikan presiden atas rekomendasi DPR jika presiden dianggap telah melakukan pengkhianatan terhadap negara, korupsi atau penyuapan, kejahatan berat, dan tindakan tidak senonoh atau dianggap tidak lagi memenuhi syarat untuk menjadi presiden. Perbuatan tercela menjadi alasan memberhentikan seorang presiden yang tidak memiliki kepastian hukum, karena konstitusi tidak membatasi maksud dari perbuatan tercelaitu sendiri. Padahal UU MK di Indonesia telah memperluas makna dari maksud perbuatan maksiat ini. Makalah ini akan membahas tentang pengertian perbuatan salah dari sudut pandang etika. Lebih lanjut, juga menggambarkan kesesuaian batasan perbuatan tercela sebagaimana diatur dalam UU MK dengan maksud penyusunan konstitusi untuk diubah. Permasalahan hukum tersebut kemudian akan dikaji dengan menggunakan metode normatif melalui pendekatan historis, komparatif, dan interpretasi, kemudian disajikan dalam makalah analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan tercela merupakan perbuatan yang merendahkan martabat jabatan sebagai presiden. Perbuatan tercela memiliki makna yang lebih  luas dari tindak pidana, namun bisa juga pelanggaran atas norma-norma tak tertulis yang berlaku sebagai hukum di masyarakat.Kata Kunci: Interpretasi, pemberhentian presiden; perbuatan tercela.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-276
Author(s):  
M Beni Kurniawan

Abstract.This article explains how to fill the position of judges of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia by comparing the mechanism of filling the office of judges of the Constitutional Court in several countries in the world. This study also conducted a study on the correlation of filling the position of judges of the Constitutional Court with the independence of judges of the Constitutional Court in carrying out its functions and authority. This article concludes that there are three ways of recruitment of constitutional judges applicable in some countries. First mentioned, the single body mechanism, the appointment mechanism, the executive may determine all members of the Constitutional Court without further supervision by the legislative branch. Second, cooperative appointment mechanisms model; the appointment of this model calls for cooperation between institutions in determining the composition of a court or similar organ. Third is a representative reproduction model, this model involves a number of state institutions. For example, in Italy three of the nine constitutional justices are filed by the President, three by parliament, and three by the Supreme Court.Keywords: Filling the Position of Judge of the Constitutional Court, Independence, Comparison Abstrak. Artikel ini menjelaskan bagaimana pengisian jabatan hakim Mahkamah Konsitutisi di Indonesia dengan melakukan perbandingan terhadap mekanisme pengisian jabatan hakim Mahkamah Konsitutisi di beberapa negara di dunia. Penelitian ini juga melakukan studi terhadap korelasi pengisian jabatan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Independensi hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menjalankan fungsi dan wewenangnya. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa ada tiga cara rekruitmen hakim konstitusi yang berlaku di beberapa negara. Pertama disebut, single body mechanism, mekanisme pengangkatan ini, eksekutif dapat menentukan seluruh anggota Mahkamah Konstitusi tanpa pengawasan lebih lanjut oleh cabang legislatif. Kedua, model cooperative appointment mechanisms; pengangkatan model ini menghendaki kerja sama di antara lembaga-lembaga dalam menentukan komposisi mahkamah atau organ sejenisnya.  Ketiga, adalah model pengankatan representative, model ini melibatkan sejumlah lembaga negara. Sebagai contoh di Italia tiga dari Sembilan hakim konstitusi diajukan oleh Presiden, tiga oleh parlemen, dan tiga oleh Mahkamah Agung.  Kata kunci: Pengisian Jabatan Hakim MK, Independensi, Perbandingan 


Author(s):  
Elena Zaitseva

The article analyzes the debatable aspects of the normative regulation of obtaining samples for a comparative study according to the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Attention is paid to the key problems in the regulation of this action, and to the difficulties that law enforcement employees face due to them. The author examines the questions of defining the legal nature of obtaining samples for a comparative study, and the possibility of using the operative search potential instead of the procedural method to obtain comparative samples. While analyzing the problems of setting the limits of compulsion for this action, the author stresses the incorrectness of some wording in the law (Art. 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). In the light of ensuring the right of criminally prosecuted persons to defense, the author also presents a critical assessment of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation reflected in the Definition of July 23, 2020 № 1856-0, in the part where obtaining samples for a comparative study is recognized as an action of urgent nature.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document