Randomised study of the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and low-level laser therapy on muscle activation and pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Mônica de Oliveira Melo ◽  
Klauber Dalcero Pompeo ◽  
Bruno Manfredini Baroni ◽  
Francesca Chaida Sonda ◽  
Marco Aurélio Vaz

Background The combined effects of low-level laser therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on knee osteoarthritis have yet to be analysed. This study aimed to determine the individual and combined effects of laser therapy and electrical stimulation on muscle activation and pain in older people with knee osteoarthritis. Methods A total of 45 women aged 60–75 years with knee osteoarthritis were randomised into three groups to receive stimulation, laser or stimulation plus laser therapy. All three groups underwent a 4-week control period (without intervention) followed by an 8-week intervention period. The effects of the interventions on muscle inhibition, electrical activity and pain were analysed. Findings There was a decrease in muscle inhibition (effect size ≥0.6) and a reduction in pain (effect size >1.2) in all three groups. All therapies generated an increase in electrical activity (effect size 0.1–0.5). Conclusions Laser alone or in combination with electrical stimulation promoted similar increases in muscle activation and pain relief.

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Cieśliński ◽  
Ewa Jówko ◽  
Tomasz Sacewicz ◽  
Igor Cieśliński ◽  
Maciej Płaszewski

Abstract Introduction. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied in muscle atrophy and in muscle strength and endurance training in athletes. Muscle soreness and temporary reduction in muscle strength may occur as adverse effects. Laser therapy has been used as a method of counteracting delayed onset muscle soreness following volitional exercise, but not following electrical stimulation. The aim of the study was to determine whether low-level laser therapy applied prior to electrical stimulation accelerates the recovery of muscle strength and decreases the duration and intensity of muscle soreness at rest after intensive isometric neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Material and methods. A randomised crossover trial was carried out on 24 healthy, recreationally active men aged 22-24 years. Low-level laser therapy or sham laser therapy was applied prior to a single session of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle with typical technical and training-related parameters. Irradiations were performed immediately prior to and shortly after electrical stimulation as well as 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after this procedure. Muscle soreness was examined using the VAS scale in the same time periods. Quadriceps moments of force were recorded with the use of a Biodex 4 Pro device during maximum voluntary static contraction and during electrical stimulation that triggered a tetanic contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle reaching the level of maximum tolerance. Results. No significant differences were noted in the severity of quadriceps soreness and in the magnitude of the decrease in the moments of force of maximum voluntary contractions after stimulation preceded by laser therapy and that preceded by sham irradiations. Conclusions. In the group studied, laser therapy applied before single electrical stimulation with typical parameters did not bring about a faster recovery of muscle strength or a more rapid decrease in soreness than sham laser therapy used prior to electrical stimulation. Further research on larger groups of subjects with the application of various procedures as well as research on training programmes is needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 785-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Rossi Paolillo ◽  
Alessandra Rossi Paolillo ◽  
Jessica Patrícia João ◽  
Daniele Frascá ◽  
Marcelo Duchêne ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Ovanessian Fukuda ◽  
Thiago Yukio Fukuda ◽  
Márcio Guimarães ◽  
Silvia Shiwa ◽  
Bianca Del Cor de Lima ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Doyle ◽  
Christine Lauber ◽  
Kendra Sabine

Clinical Scenario:Tendinopathies plague many active individuals, causing pain and reducing sport activity by decreasing range of motion and strength. There are many modalities that have been used to treat pain associated with chronic inflammation, such as ultrasound, moist heat packs, and electrical stimulation. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is one such modality. Potential benefits of managing pain associated with tendinopathies have been investigated using LLLT. Cellular respiration and metabolism are thought to be increased by LLLT acting on the mitochondrial cytochromes. The effects LLLT may have on cellular activity could increase blood flow to progress the healing process by reducing the pain-spasm cycle. The purpose of this critically appraised topic is to identify the clinical effectiveness of LLLT on pain associated with tendinopathy and to identify the parameters used to achieve statistically and clinically relevant pain outcomes.Focused Clinical Question:What is the effect of LLLT on pain associated with tendinopathy?Clinical Bottom Line:Although LLLT significantly decreases pain from baseline, its use may be no better than placebo or traditional treatments such as ultrasound, moist heat packs, electrical stimulation, or therapeutic exercise to reduce pain associated with tendinopathy. Total accumulated joules across the treatment sessions may need to be taken into account as a parameter.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e44-e44
Author(s):  
Solmaz Fakhari ◽  
Alireza Pishghahi ◽  
Hojjat Pourfathi ◽  
Haleh Farzin ◽  
Eissa Bilehjani

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative joint disease, causing deformity, pain and a limited joint range of motion. Modification of the lifestyle and an exercise training program are the cornerstone of treatment. Alternative therapies such as laser or ozone are commonly used, but there is not any comparative study of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) versus ozone therapy. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the LLLT versus ozone in patients with KOA. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with KOA were assigned to LLLT or ozone groups (n=30). The First basic pain severity, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score and physical function were determined. Then in the LLLT group, the patients were provided with 12 sessions of LLLT. In the ozone group, 6 sessions of intra-articular injection of ozone were organized (in each session a mixture of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with 15 mL of ozone 30 μg/mL). In the middle and at the end of the intervention period, we reassessed the joint pain and physical function and the degree of improvement compared between the two groups. Results: In the middle and at the end of the treatment period in both groups, the joint pain decreased significantly. The same as pain, the self-administrated WOMAC score and the range of joint motion improved significantly in both groups. All of these variables exposed more improvement in the ozone group patients. Conclusion: The study showed that both LLLT and ozone are acceptable non-invasive methods in the non-surgical treatment of KOA. Compared to LLLT, the ozone was more effective. These methods must be considered in any patient who is not suitable for surgical interventions or does not experience enough improvement in symptoms following long periods of common exercise training programs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Firouzi ◽  
Fatemeh Fadaei Fathabadi ◽  
Mohsen Norozian ◽  
Abdollah Amini ◽  
Mohammad-Amin Abdollahifar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document