Concurrent femoral head reduction and periacetabular osteotomies for the treatment of severe femoral head deformities

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1551-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Clohisy ◽  
C. Pascual-Garrido ◽  
S. Duncan ◽  
G. Pashos ◽  
P. L. Schoenecker
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

AimsThe aims of this study were to review the surgical technique for a combined femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and to report the short-term clinical and radiological results of a combined FHRO/PAO for the treatment of selected severe femoral head deformities.Patients and MethodsBetween 2011 and 2016, six female patients were treated with a combined FHRO and PAO. The mean patient age was 13.6 years (12.6 to 15.7). Clinical data, including patient demographics and patient-reported outcome scores, were collected prospectively. Radiologicalally, hip morphology was assessed evaluating the Tönnis angle, the lateral centre to edge angle, the medial offset distance, the extrusion index, and the alpha angle.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 3.3 years (2 to 4.6). The modified Harris Hip Score improved by 33.0 points from 53.5 preoperatively to 83.4 postoperatively (p = 0.03). The Western Ontario McMasters University Osteoarthritic Index score improved by 30 points from 62 preoperatively to 90 postoperatively (p = 0.029). All radiological parameters showed significant improvement. There were no long-term disabilities and none of the hips required early conversion to total hip arthroplasty.ConclusionFHRO combined with a PAO resulted in clinical and radiological improvement at short-term follow-up, suggesting it may serve as an appropriate salvage treatment option for selected young patients with severe symptomatic hip deformities.

Short-Term Outcomes of Open Hip Preservation Surgery for Symptomatic Extraarticular Femoroacetabular Impingement

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin F. Ricciardi ◽  
Kara G. Fields ◽  
Catherine Wentzel ◽  
Bryan T. Kelly ◽  
Ernest L. Sink
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Open Treatment ◽  
Outcome Tool

Introduction The purposes of this study were to describe: (i) short-term disease-specific patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs); and (ii) factors associated with reoperation or treatment failure in patients undergoing open hip preservation surgery for symptomatic extraarticular FAI. Methods Patients undergoing open hip preservation surgery for symptomatic extraarticular FAI were identified from a prospective, single-centre hip preservation registry (n = 51 patients; median clinical follow-up 24 [range 11-49] months). Hip-specific PROMs were assessed preoperatively, 6 months, and each year subsequently. Patients undergoing reoperation or treatment failure (<10 point improvement in iHOT-33 postoperatively) over the study period were identified. Preoperative associated factors were explored on a univariate basis. Results International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) improved from 33 (standard deviation [SD] 18) to 62 (26) at most recent follow-up and 76% of patients improved by minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Harris Hip Score improved from 53 (15) to 75 (17) at most recent follow-up and 79% of patients improved by MCID. Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sport improved from 45 (26) to 66 (28) at most recent follow-up and 60% of patients improved by MCID. Continued improvements in mean follow-up scores were seen from 1 year to 2 years. Overall, 7 patients underwent reoperation and 9 patients failed to improve by MCID. Preoperative HOS Sport was higher in patients experiencing reoperation or treatment failure (58 [SD 19] vs. 40 [SD 27] respectively; p = 0.03). No other associated demographic, physical examination, or radiographic factors were found. Conclusions Open treatment of extraarticular FAI results in short-term improvements in hip-specific PROMs in most patients. Higher HOS Sport scores were associated with reoperation or treatment failure. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to define maximum improvements in this challenging patient population.

scholarly journals The Early Outcome Of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy For Hip Dysplasia In Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao-Yuan Chang ◽  
Chia-Che Lee ◽  
Sheng-Chieh Lin ◽  
Ken N Kuo ◽  
Kuan-Wen Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Joint Preserving Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Epiphyseal Dysplasia

Abstract Background:Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED) is a rare congenital bone dysplasia. Patients with MED develop secondary hip osteoarthritis as early as third to the fourth decade. Currently, there is no consensus on how to prevent or slow the process of secondary hip osteoarthritis.The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is a joint preserving surgery to reshape acetabulum and extend coverage for the hip, however, there is no established evidence of the effectiveness for the MED hips.Patients and methods:A retrospective series of 6 hips in 3 patients with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia treated with the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy were reviewed. The average age at the time of surgery was 14.3 years (range: 11.4 to 17.2 y). Radiographic parameters were analyzed preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The hip function was evaluated by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) before and after surgery. Results:The mean follow-up time was 1.7 years. The mean LCEA increased from 3.8° to 47.1° (p = .02), ACEA increased from 7.3° to 35.1° (p = .02), and AI decreased from 27.8° to 14.6° (p=.04). The femoral head coverage ratio increased from 66.8% to 100% (p= .02). The procedure achieved femoral head medialization by decreasing central head distance from 86.7mm preoperatively to 82.7mm postoperatively, however, without statistical significance. (p = .699). The improvement of clinical outcomes by mean HHS was significant from 67.3 preoperatively to 86.7 postoperatively (p=0.05).Conclusion:Bernese PAO is a feasible option for treatment of the hip problems in MED patients. It reshapes acetabular and femoral morphology 3-dimensionally. In our study, the short-term follow-up results showed obvious functional and radiographic improvement. A long-term follow-up is necessary in the future.

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 2029-2037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Nakashima ◽  
Manabu Tsukamoto ◽  
Yasuo Ohnishi ◽  
Hajime Utsunomiya ◽  
Shiho Kanezaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Reconstruction Group

Background:The acetabular labrum plays important roles in proprioception, nociception, synovial fluid seal effect, and static and dynamic joint stability and as a shock absorber. Clinical and radiographic risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are not well established.Purpose:To identify predictors of unsalvageable labral tear during initial hip arthroscopic management of FAI.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Patients were included who underwent primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between March 2009 and March 2014. Patients were excluded who had <2-year follow-up, underwent bilateral surgery, or had a history of surgery, osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or 3), and other diagnoses, including lateral center-edge angle <25° diagnosed as developmental hip dysplasia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their labral condition: reconstruction and refixation. Unsalvageable labral tear was defined as any irreparable labral tear, including severe degenerative tear, frayed labrum, labral ossification, flattened labrum, and failed prior repair during surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors for segmental labral reconstruction. Patient-reported outcome scores and postoperative revision rates were also assessed.Results:Twenty-five hips (18 male, 7 female) and 126 hips (65 male, 61 female) were included in the reconstruction and refixation groups, respectively. The mean ± SD ages were 52.6 ± 15.0 and 36.5 ± 16.1 years in the reconstruction and refixation groups, respectively. In the reconstruction group, the mean modified Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 67.3 ± 14.9 preoperatively to 95.0 ± 8.1 at final follow-up ( P < .001), and the mean Nonarthritic Hip Score improved from 63.0 ± 18.3 preoperatively to 89.5 ± 10.1 at final follow-up ( P < .001). In the refixation group, the mean modified Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 69.2 ± 18.6 preoperatively to 93.0 ± 11.2 at final follow-up ( P < .001), and the mean Nonarthritic Hip Score improved from 60.7 ± 18.8 preoperatively to 88.6 ± 15.0 at final follow-up ( P < .001). No significant difference was noted in patient-reported outcome scores and revision hip arthroscopy rates. The rate of conversion of total hip arthroplasty was higher in the reconstruction group than in the refixation group. Risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear were age ≥45 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.83; P < .007), body mass index ≥23.1 kg/m2(OR, 13.05; P < .001), and vertical center anterior angle ≥36° (OR, 19.03; P < .001). Furthermore, in this study, unsalvageable labral tears were present in cases with at least 2 of the 3 risk factors.Conclusion:Age ≥45 years, body mass index ≥23.1 kg/m2, and vertical center anterior angle ≥36° are risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear at initial hip arthroscopic surgery for patients with FAI.

scholarly journals Prospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Hip Anatomic Labral Repair Utilizing Knotless Suture Anchor Technology: The Controlled-Tension Anatomic Technique at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 232596712093507
Author(s):  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
Sarah L. Chen ◽  
Jeffery W. Chen ◽  
Jacob Shapira ◽  
Philip J. Rosinksy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Labral Repair ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Labral Tears ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: Labral tears are the most common abnormalities in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Appropriate management is crucial, as it has been shown that better overall outcomes can be achieved with labral restoration. Purpose: To report the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at minimum 2-year follow-up of patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data were prospectively collected for patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique. Patients were excluded if they had prior hip conditions, prior ipsilateral surgery, Tönnis grade >1, a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25°, or workers’ compensation claims. Preoperative and postoperative scores at minimum 2-year follow-up were recorded for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the mHHS, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12 were also reported. Results: A total of 309 hips were included. The mean patient age was 36.2 years (range, 12.8-75.9 years). The mean preoperative LCEA and alpha angle were 31.9° and 57.1°, respectively. A significant improvement on the mHHS (62.6 ± 15.7 preoperatively vs 86.9 ± 16.2 at 2-year follow-up), NAHS (63.1 ± 16.7 vs 86.1 ± 16.7), and HOS-SSS (39.8 ± 22.0 vs 74.2 ± 27.3) was found ( P < .001 for all). A significant decrease was shown for VAS scores ( P < .001). Also, 78.6% and 82.2% of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for the mHHS, respectively; 60.8% and 69.9% of patients met the MCID and PASS for the HOS-SSS, respectively; and the MCID for the iHOT-12 was met by 77.3% of patients. Conclusion: In the setting of FAIS and labral tears, patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique demonstrated significant improvement in several validated PRO measures, the VAS pain score, and patient satisfaction at a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Based on this evidence, labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique seems to be a safe option.

scholarly journals Hip arthroscopy has good clinical outcomes in the treatment of osteoid osteoma of the acetabulum

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanying Gao ◽  
Ruiqi Wu ◽  
Rongge Liu ◽  
Yingfang Ao ◽  
Jianquan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Osteoid Osteoma ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Outcome Tool

Abstract Background Osteoid osteoma (OO) of the acetabulum is a relatively rare disease. However, the the clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for treatment of OO of the acetabulum are still uncertain. Methods We evaluated consecutive patients who were diagnosed with OO of the acetabulum and who underwent hip arthroscopy at our hospital between January 2013 and March 2020. All patients underwent a preoperative physical examination. Preoperative supine anteroposterior hip radiography, cross-table lateral radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in all patients. The alpha angle and lateral center-edge angle were measured before surgery. Supine anteroposterior hip radiography and CT were performed in all patients postoperatively. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and PROs at final follow-up were evaluated. Results A total of 6 patients (mean age, 18.7 years; age range, 6–31 years; 5 males and 1 females) were included in this study. The average follow-up period after surgery was 28.3 months (range, 6–90 months). Before surgery, the mean mHHS was 45.2 ± 10.5 (range, 33–56), the mean iHOT-12 was 33.3 ± 14.5 (range, 13–49), and mean VAS was 8.2 ± 1.0 (range, 7–9). At one month after surgery, mean mHHS was 78.7 ± 1.9 (range, 77–81), iHOT-12 was 71.0 ± 4.5 (range, 68–80), and mean VAS was 0. At the final post-operative follow-up, mean mHHS was 89.2 ± 2.1 (range, 86–91), iHOT-12 was 93.5 ± 5.0 (range, 88–98), and mean VAS was 0. All results, except VAS between one month after surgery and at final follow-up, demonstrated statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05). One patient underwent revision surgery. Conclusions Hip arthroscopy has good clinical outcomes in the treatment of OO of the acetabulum. Further study on the mechanism of secondary femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) caused by OO of the acetabulum is needed. More cases of arthroscopic excision and longer follow-up are also needed to better prove the clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for OO of the acetabulum.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Adolescents With a Subanalysis on Return to Sport: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1526-1534
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Chen ◽  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
Cammille C. Go ◽  
Cynthia Kyin ◽  
Ajay C. Lall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: There is a plethora of literature on outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in the adult population; however, outcomes in the adolescent population have not been as widely reported. Additionally, as adolescents represent a very active population, it is imperative to understand their athletic activity and return to sport after hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To analyze patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopic surgery in adolescents (aged 10-19 years) and present a return-to-sport analysis in the athletic adolescent subgroup. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify articles that reported PROs after hip arthroscopic surgery in adolescents. The standardized mean difference was calculated to compare the effect size of hip arthroscopic surgery on various PROs. For the athletic subgroup, a return-to-sport summary was also provided. Results: Ten studies, with 618 adolescent hips and a collective study period of December 2004 to February 2015, were included in this systematic review. Across all studies, the mean age was 15.8 years (range, 11.0-19.9 years), and female patients composed approximately 56.7% of the entire cohort. The mean follow-up was 34.5 months (range, 12-120 months). The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was reported in 9 studies, and at latest follow-up, scores were excellent in 4 studies (range, 90-95) and good in the remaining 5 studies (range, 82.1-89.6). All adolescents also showed significant improvement on the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), the HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), the physical component of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12P), a visual analog scale for pain (VAS), and both versions of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12 and iHOT-33) at latest follow-up ( P < .05). Further, mean improvements reported in all studies surpassed reported values of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state for the mHHS, HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-33. Finally, the collective return-to-sport rate among athletic adolescents was 84.9%. Conclusion: In the setting of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement, hip arthroscopic surgery can safely be performed in adolescents and leads to significant functional improvement. Furthermore, athletic adolescents return to sport at high levels after hip arthroscopic surgery.

scholarly journals Short-term serial assessment of electronic patient-reported outcome for depression and anxiety in breast Cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeeyeon Lee ◽  
Jin Hyang Jung ◽  
Wan Wook Kim ◽  
Byeongju Kang ◽  
Jungmin Woo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Health

Abstract Purpose The incidence of depression and anxiety is higher in patients with breast cancer than in the general population. We evaluated the degree of depression and anxiety and investigated the changes in patients with breast cancer during the treatment period and short-term follow-up period. Methods Overall, 137 patients with breast cancer were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The scales were developed as a web-based electronic patient-reported outcome measure, and serial results were assessed before the operation, after the operation, in the post-treatment period, and in the 6-month follow-up period after surgery. Results The degree of depression and anxiety increased during treatment and decreased at 6-month follow-up, even if there were no statistical differences among the four periods (PHQ-9: p = 0.128; GAD-7: p = 0.786). However, daily fatigue (PHQ-9 Q4) and insomnia (PHQ-9 Q3) were the most serious problems encountered during treatment and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. In the GAD-7, worrying too much (Q3) consistently showed the highest scores during the treatment and follow-up periods. Of the patients, 7 (5.11%) and 11 (8.03%) patients had a worsened state of depression and anxiety, respectively, after treatment compared with before treatment. Conclusion Most factors associated with depression and anxiety improved after treatment. However, factors such as insomnia and worrying too much still disturbed patients with breast cancer, even at 6-month follow-up. Therefore, serial assessment of depression and anxiety is necessary for such patients.

Equality in Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes Can Be Achieved Regardless of Patient Socioeconomic Status

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110469
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Saks ◽  
Vivian W. Ouyang ◽  
Elijah S. Domb ◽  
Andrew E. Jimenez ◽  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Access to quality health care and treatment outcomes can be affected by patients’ socioeconomic status (SES). Purpose: To evaluate the effect of patient SES on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after arthroscopic hip surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Demographic, radiographic, and intraoperative data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed on all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear between February 2008 and September 2017 at one institution. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts based on the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) of their zip code. SDI is a composite measure that quantifies the level of disadvantage in certain geographical areas. Patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), International Hip Outcome Tool—12, and visual analog scale (VAS) for both pain and satisfaction. Rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were calculated for the mHHS, NAHS, and VAS pain score. Rates of secondary surgery were also recorded. Results: A total of 680 hips (616 patients) were included. The mean follow-up time for the entire cohort was 30.25 months. Division of the cohort into quartiles based on the SDI national averages yielded 254 hips (37.4%) in group 1, 184 (27.1%) in group 2, 148 (21.8%) in group 3, and 94 (13.8%) in group 4. Group 1 contained the most affluent patients. There were significantly more men in group 4 than in group 2, and the mean body mass index was greater in group 4 than in groups 1 and 2. There were no differences in preoperative radiographic measurements, intraoperative findings, or rates of concomitant procedures performed. All preoperative and postoperative PROMs were similar between the groups, as well as in the rates of achieving the MCID or PASS. No differences in the rate of secondary surgeries were reported. Conclusion: Regardless of SES, patients were able to achieve significant improvements in several PROMs after hip arthroscopy for FAIS and labral tear at the minimum 2-year follow-up. Additionally, patients from all SES groups achieved clinically meaningful improvement at similar rates.

Correction of mildly dysplastic hips with periacetabular osteotomy demonstrates promising outcomes, achievement of correction goals, and excellent five-year survivorship

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (6_Supple_B) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Livermore ◽  
L. A. Anderson ◽  
M. B. Anderson ◽  
J. A. Erickson ◽  
C. L. Peters
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽  
Severe Dysplasia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mild Dysplasia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Radiological Measurements ◽  
The Mean

Aims The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological measurements, and total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survival in patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for mild, moderate, or severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective study involving 336 patients (420 hips) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon at an academic centre. After exclusions, 124 patients (149 hips) were included. The preoperative lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) was used to classify the severity of dysplasia: 18° to 25° was considered mild (n = 20), 10° to 17° moderate (n = 66), and < 10° severe (n = 63). There was no difference in patient characteristics between the groups (all, p > 0.05). Pre- and postoperative radiological measurements were made. The National Institute of Health’s Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcome measures (physical function computerized adaptive test (PF CAT), Global Physical and Mental Health Scores) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to THA or PF CAT scores < 40, and was assessed with Kaplan–Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was five years (2 to 10) ending in either failure or the latest contact with the patient. Results There was no significant difference in PROMs for moderate (p = 0.167) or severe (p = 0.708) groups compared with the mild dysplasia group. The numerical pain scores were between 2 and 3 units in all groups at the final follow-up (all, p > 0.05). There was no significant difference (all, p > 0.05) in the proportion of patients achieving target correction for the LCEA between groups. The mean correction was 12° in the mild, 15° in the moderate (p = 0.135), and 23° in the severe group (p < 0.001). Failure-free survival at five years was 100% for mild, 79% for moderate, and 92% for severely dysplastic hips (p = 0.225). Conclusion Although requiring less correction than hips with moderate or severe dysplasia, we found PAO for mild dysplasia to be associated with promising PROMs, consistent with that of the general United States population, and excellent survivorship at five years. Future studies should compare these results with the outcome after arthroscopy of the hip in patients with mild dysplasia. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):16–22.

Incidence and risk factors for hardware removal following periacetabular osteotomy and its association with clinical outcomes

2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001989085
Author(s):  
Cody C Wyles ◽  
Joseph M Statz ◽  
Mario Hevesi ◽  
Brian P Chalmers ◽  
Rafael J Sierra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Hardware Removal ◽  
Severe Dysplasia ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lateral Centre Edge Angle

Background: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) can be used for joint preservation in symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). 1 of the most common procedures following PAO is hardware removal. The aims of this study were to determine the rate of hardware removal and patient characteristics associated with this outcome following PAO. Methods: Data from a prospectively-collected registry was retrospectively reviewed at one institution managing DDH or FAI patients with PAO from July 2008–December 2015. Patients who completed preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires with minimum 1-year follow-up were evaluated, resulting in 221 patients followed for a mean of 2.8 years (range 1.0–7.7 years). There were 80% women, mean age was 25 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25 kg/m2. Fully-threaded 4.5-mm screws were used for internal fixation. Results: Hardware removal occurred in 30 patients (13.6%) at a mean of 1.0 years after PAO. Patients undergoing hardware removal were younger (mean age 20.4 vs. 26.3 years), thinner (mean BMI 22.2 vs. 25.1), had less severe dysplasia (DDH patients only: mean lateral centre-edge angle 21.0 vs. 16.2, mean Tönnis angle 12.9 vs. 16.8), and were more likely to have PAO for FAI (33% vs. 11%) compared to patients with retained hardware. At final follow-up, multivariable analysis demonstrated a trend toward inferior patient reported outcomes in the hardware removal group. Conclusions: This study defines the incidence and characteristics of patients undergoing hardware removal after PAO and demonstrates similar outcomes to patients who do not require hardware removal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document