Fading Activities of Herbicidal Droplets Amended with Emulsifiable Spray Adjuvants on Cucurbitaceous Leaves

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1888
Author(s):  
Jeng-Liang Lin ◽  
Heping Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Coverage Area ◽  
Maximum Coverage ◽  
Fading Time ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Spray Adjuvants

Abstract. Understanding reactions of surfactant-amended droplets on difficult-to-wet weed surfaces could help develop application strategies to increase herbicide efficacy. Behaviors of herbicidal droplets containing different emulsifiable anti-evaporation spray adjuvants were investigated by characterizing 250 and 450 µm herbicidal droplet dispersion and fading time on cucurbitaceous leaves placed inside a 20°C chamber at 30% and 60% relative humidity (RH). Droplet maximum coverage area increased with droplet size but not with RH, while droplet fading time increased with both droplet size and RH. Despite 450 µm droplets having greater maximum coverage area than 250 µm droplets, the larger droplets had higher fading rates and lower ratios of maximum coverage area to droplet volume. Droplet maximum coverage area and fading time on leaves were affected by adding spray adjuvants to the herbicide-only solution. The Uptake surfactant was more effective than the other two surfactants (AntiEvap+BS1000 and Enhance) in increasing droplet maximum coverage area and fading time. Compared to the herbicide-only solution, addition of Uptake surfactant to the herbicide solution could increase maximum coverage area by 68% and 52% for 250 and 450 µm droplets, respectively, but addition of AntiEvap+BS1000 or Enhance surfactants did not show significant increase. Similarly, addition of Uptake surfactant to the herbicide-only solution increased droplet fading times by 11.1% and 13.2% at 30% and 60% RH, respectively, for 250 µm droplets and by 34.7% and 2.8% at 30% and 60% RH, respectively, for 450 µm droplets. In contrast, addition of AntiEvap+BS1000 surfactant reduced fading time, and addition of Enhance surfactant did not significantly affect fading time. Therefore, appropriate selection of spray adjuvants for herbicide applications could significantly influence droplet deposit behaviors on cucurbitaceous leaves, leading to improved effectiveness of weed control. Keywords: Herbicide application, Spray deposition, Spray droplet, Surfactant, Weed control.

scholarly journals Spray Deposition on Weeds (Palmer Amaranth and Morningglory) from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System and Backpack Sprayer

Drones ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Daniel Martin ◽  
Vijay Singh ◽  
Mohamed A. Latheef ◽  
Muthukumar Bagavathiannan
Keyword(s):  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Tap Water ◽  
Application Rate ◽  
Palmer Amaranth ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Aerial Application ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Application System ◽  
Leaf Surfaces

This study was designed to determine whether a remotely piloted aerial application system (RPAAS) could be used in lieu of a backpack sprayer for post-emergence herbicide application. Consequent to this objective, a spray mixture of tap water and fluorescent dye was applied on Palmer amaranth and ivyleaf morningglory using an RPAAS at 18.7 and 37.4 L·ha−1 and a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer at a 140 L·ha−1 spray application rate. Spray efficiency (the proportion of applied spray collected on an artificial sampler) for the RPAAS treatments was comparable to that for the backpack sprayer. Fluorescent spray droplet density was significantly higher on the adaxial surface for the backpack sprayer treatment than that for the RPAAS platforms. The percent of spray droplets on the abaxial surface for the RPAAS aircraft at 37.4 L·ha−1 was 4-fold greater than that for the backpack sprayer at 140 L·ha−1. The increased spray deposition on the abaxial leaf surfaces was likely caused by rotor downwash and wind turbulence generated by the RPAAS which caused leaf fluttering. This improved spray deposition may help increase the efficacy of contact herbicides. Test results indicated that RPAASs may be used for herbicide application in lieu of conventional backpack sprayers.

Effect of Formulation and Nozzle Type on Droplet Size with Isopropylamine and Trimesium Salts of Glyphosate

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Mueller ◽  
Alvin R. Womac
Keyword(s):  
Nonionic Surfactant ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Droplet Distribution ◽  
Extended Range ◽  
Glyphosate Formulation ◽  
Nozzle Type ◽  
Flat Fan Nozzle

When spray mixtures were examined using a laser spray droplet analyzer, the new isopropylamine glyphosate formulation produced more small droplets than a previous isopropylamine salt of glyphosate formulation or glyphosate–trimesium plus nonionic surfactant. The use of a pre-orifice flat-fan nozzle and an impact type flat-fan nozzle reduced the amount of small droplets produced compared to an existing extended range flat-fan nozzle, while maintaining a spray droplet distribution that could still provide good weed control. The new nozzle technologies could provide a useful management tool to manage potential drift situations.

Spray Deposition of Clopyralid on Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa)

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney W. Bovey ◽  
Raymond A. Stermer ◽  
Louis F. Bouse
Keyword(s):  
Gas Chromatography ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Prosopis Glandulosa ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Spray Solution ◽  
Spray Volume ◽  
Spray Deposit ◽  
Honey Mesquite

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of clopyralid formulation, spray droplet size, and spray volume on deposit of clopyralid on greenhouse-grown honey mesquite. The addition of surfactant WK at 0.5% (v/v) of the spray solution caused a twofold increase in deposition of spray of the monoethanolamine salt (MEA) of clopyralid but not the oleylamine salt (OLA). There were no differences in spray deposit between spray droplet size spectrums of 160 or 330 μm Dv.5or spray solution applications of 47 or 187 L ha-1. Dye and gas chromatography measurements of spray deposit of clopyralid compared favorably except where surfactant WK was used with the OLA formulation.

scholarly journals INFLUENCE OF DROPLET SIZE ON SPRAY DEPOSITION AND WEED CONTROL USING GLYPHOSATE

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-457
Author(s):  
Osmar G. T. M. Oliveira ◽  
Paulo R. M. Lopes ◽  
Carlos G. Raetano ◽  
Ronaldo C. Lima ◽  
Evandro P. Prado
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Spray Deposition

Amendment of Herbicide Spray Solutions with Adjuvants to Modify Droplet Spreading and Fading Characteristics on Weeds

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 713-721
Author(s):  
Jeng-Liang Lin ◽  
Heping Zhu ◽  
Peter Ling
Keyword(s):  
Nonionic Surfactant ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Droplet Spreading ◽  
Coverage Area ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Control Effectiveness ◽  
Integrated Index ◽  
Environment Control ◽  
Common Purslane ◽  
Fading Time

Abstract.Improving the coverage area and fading time of herbicidal droplets on weeds has the potential to enhance the biological control effectiveness. Droplet spreading and fading behaviors on five different weeds were characterized for spray solutions containing a 1.25% glyphosphate Rodeo herbicide amended with each of three different adjuvants (nonionic surfactant Kinetic, nonionic organosilicone surfactant DyneAmic, and nonionic surfactant and antifoaming agent Preference). The five weeds were ragweed, crabgrass, yellow nutsedge, common purslane, and spurge. Tests were conducted by depositing single 300 and 600 µm herbicidal droplets with different adjuvant concentrations on weed leaves inside an environment control chamber. A droplet at a higher adjuvant concentration had greater coverage area on weed surfaces. Preference-amended herbicidal droplets had the largest coverage area increase for all five weeds, and generally followed by droplets with Kinetic and DyneAmic except for 300 µm droplet on purslane and 600 µm droplet on spurge. In comparison with the herbicidal solution containing Rodeo and water only, with addition of adjuvants the 600 µm droplets increased the coverage area by 2.13 to 5.47, 1.76 to 2.56, 1.84 to 2.07, and 2.40 to 4.49-fold on crabgrass, yellow nutsedge, common purslane, and spurge, respectively, while the 300 µm droplets increased the coverage area on ragweed by 3.88 to 5.86-fold. In contrast, fading times of all 300 µm droplets decreased with the adjuvant addition except for DyneAmic applied on purslane. However, fading times of 600 µm droplets did not have increase or decrease trends with adjuvants, which depended on types of the adjuvant and weed. The overall comparison by integrated index (coverage area × fading time) indicated that a spray droplet at higher adjuvant concentration was likely to have a higher integrated index. In addition, Preference amended droplets had significantly more integrated index increase for crabgrass and nutsedge, while DyneAmic had more increase for purslane. Therefore, appropriate selections of spray adjuvants during herbicide applications could significantly increase droplet deposition effectiveness for controlling specific weeds. Keywords: Spray droplet, Spray additive, Herbicide application, Surfactant, Weed control.

Evaluation of optimal droplet size for control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with acifluorfen

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-519
Author(s):  
Lucas X. Franca ◽  
Darrin M. Dodds ◽  
Thomas R. Butts ◽  
Greg R. Kruger ◽  
Daniel B. Reynolds ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Additive Model ◽  
Plant Morphology ◽  
Palmer Amaranth ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Geographical Differences ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Drift Field

AbstractAcifluorfen is a nonsystemic PPO-inhibiting herbicide commonly used for POST Palmer amaranth control in soybean, peanut, and rice across the southern United States. Concerns have been raised regarding herbicide selection pressure and particle drift, increasing the need for application practices that optimize herbicide efficacy while mitigating spray drift. Field research was conducted in 2016, 2017, and 2018 in Mississippi and Nebraska to evaluate the influence of a range of spray droplet sizes [150 μm (Fine) to 900 μm (Ultra Coarse)], using acifluorfen to create a novel Palmer amaranth management recommendation using pulse width modulation (PWM) technology. A pooled site-year generalized additive model (GAM) analysis suggested that 150-μm (Fine) droplets should be used to obtain the greatest Palmer amaranth control and dry biomass reduction. Nevertheless, GAM models indicated that only 7.2% of the variability observed in Palmer amaranth control was due to differences in spray droplet size. Therefore, location-specific GAM analyses were performed to account for geographical differences to increase the accuracy of prediction models. GAM models suggested that 250-μm (Medium) droplets optimize acifluorfen efficacy on Palmer amaranth in Dundee, MS, and 310-μm (Medium) droplets could sustain 90% of maximum weed control. Specific models for Beaver City, NE, indicated that 150-μm (Fine) droplets provide maximum Palmer amaranth control, and 340-μm (Medium) droplets could maintain 90% of greatest weed control. For Robinsonville, MS, optimal Palmer amaranth control could be obtained with 370-μm (Coarse) droplets, and 90% maximum control could be sustained with 680 μm (Ultra Coarse) droplets. Differences in optimal droplet size across location could be a result of convoluted interactions between droplet size, weather conditions, population density, plant morphology, and soil fertility levels. Future research should adopt a holistic approach to identify and investigate the influence of environmental and application parameters to optimize droplet size recommendations.

scholarly journals Factors influencing broadcast-herbicide control of huisache (Vachellia farnesiana)

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 773-777
Author(s):  
Megan K. Clayton ◽  
Robert K. Lyons
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
South Texas ◽  
Plant Mortality ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Cumulative Rainfall ◽  
Spray Volume ◽  
Average Plant

AbstractHuisache is a major brush problem on native rangelands and pastures in South Texas. Although herbicide applications to foliage provide very high plant-kill levels, the same herbicides have not proven reliable when applied as broadcast ground or aerial foliar treatments. Aerial and ground broadcast herbicide foliar treatments were applied to 31 huisache sites. Soil temperature and soil moisture were measured at a depth of 30 cm at the time of herbicide application. Cumulative rainfall before herbicide application was recorded. Across all aerial treatments, plant mortality was 69% for plants shorter than 2 m versus 40% for plants taller than 2 m. Across all aerial- and ground-treated sites, plants shorter than 2 m had an average 89% mortality when cumulative 2-wk rainfall was at least 50 mm, versus 72% mortality with cumulative rainfall less than 50 mm. Average plant mortality was 84% when 4-wk cumulative rainfall was at least 76 mm, versus 71% with rainfall less than 76 mm; and 85% when, on a dry-to-wet scale of 0 to 10, soil moisture measured at least 8, versus 71% when soil moisture measured less than 8. In a separate aerial trial, plant-mortality effects of spray droplet size (417, 630, and 800 µm) and spray volume (37.4 L ha−1 and 93.5 L ha−1) were replicated and tested at a single study site in 2014. Plant mortality was lowest for the 93.5 L ha−1 and 800 µm treatment. Plant mortality rates for other treatments were similar, demonstrating a greater importance of droplet size than spray volume. Targeting huisache trees shorter than 2 m, when cumulative rainfall has reached at least 50 mm or at least 76 mm 2 or 4 wk before application, respectively, as well as maintaining spray droplet sizes no larger than 630 µm can increase herbicide efficacy with foliar broadcast applications.

scholarly journals Effect of Deposition Aids Tank-Mixed with Herbicides on Cotton and Soybean Canopy Deposition and Spray Droplet Parameters

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Chase Allen Samples ◽  
Thomas R. Butts ◽  
Bruno C. Vieira ◽  
Jon Trenton Irby ◽  
Daniel B. Reynolds ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Droplet Size ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Target Movement ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Soybean Canopy ◽  
The Impact

The adoption of auxin-tolerant crops has increased awareness regarding herbicide off-target movement. Deposition aids are promoted as a possible solution to off-target movement, although their effect on spray canopy deposition are not well understood. Studies were conducted to determine the impact of deposition aids tank-mixed with herbicides on spray droplet size and canopy deposition. Commonly used herbicides were applied on soybean and cotton in combination with deposition aids (oil, polymer, and guargum). Interactions between herbicide solution and deposition aid influenced droplet size parameters for both cotton and soybean herbicides tested herein (p ≤ 0.0001). Generally, the addition of polymer and guargum deposition aids increased spray droplet size, whereas the addition of oil deposition aid decreased droplet size for some treatments. When herbicides were combined, the inclusion of deposition aids did not influence overall spray deposition on cotton (p = 0.82) and soybean (p = 0.72). When herbicide solutions were evaluated individually, the advent of deposition aids had inconsistent results with cotton and soybean spray deposition being unaffected, increased, or even decreased depending on the herbicide solution tested. For example, the polymer-based deposition aid increased spray deposition on cotton for applications of glyphosate + dicamba + S-metolachlor resulting in 1640.6 RFU (relative fluorescence units). However, the same deposition aid decreased spray deposition on cotton for applications of glyphosate + dicamba + acetochlor (1179.3 RFU). Although deposition aids influenced spray deposition on cotton and soybean for some herbicide combinations, their use should be determined on a case-by-case scenario.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document