Amendment of Herbicide Spray Solutions with Adjuvants to Modify Droplet Spreading and Fading Characteristics on Weeds

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 713-721
Author(s):  
Jeng-Liang Lin ◽  
Heping Zhu ◽  
Peter Ling
Keyword(s):  
Nonionic Surfactant ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Droplet Spreading ◽  
Coverage Area ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Control Effectiveness ◽  
Integrated Index ◽  
Environment Control ◽  
Common Purslane ◽  
Fading Time

Abstract.Improving the coverage area and fading time of herbicidal droplets on weeds has the potential to enhance the biological control effectiveness. Droplet spreading and fading behaviors on five different weeds were characterized for spray solutions containing a 1.25% glyphosphate Rodeo herbicide amended with each of three different adjuvants (nonionic surfactant Kinetic, nonionic organosilicone surfactant DyneAmic, and nonionic surfactant and antifoaming agent Preference). The five weeds were ragweed, crabgrass, yellow nutsedge, common purslane, and spurge. Tests were conducted by depositing single 300 and 600 µm herbicidal droplets with different adjuvant concentrations on weed leaves inside an environment control chamber. A droplet at a higher adjuvant concentration had greater coverage area on weed surfaces. Preference-amended herbicidal droplets had the largest coverage area increase for all five weeds, and generally followed by droplets with Kinetic and DyneAmic except for 300 µm droplet on purslane and 600 µm droplet on spurge. In comparison with the herbicidal solution containing Rodeo and water only, with addition of adjuvants the 600 µm droplets increased the coverage area by 2.13 to 5.47, 1.76 to 2.56, 1.84 to 2.07, and 2.40 to 4.49-fold on crabgrass, yellow nutsedge, common purslane, and spurge, respectively, while the 300 µm droplets increased the coverage area on ragweed by 3.88 to 5.86-fold. In contrast, fading times of all 300 µm droplets decreased with the adjuvant addition except for DyneAmic applied on purslane. However, fading times of 600 µm droplets did not have increase or decrease trends with adjuvants, which depended on types of the adjuvant and weed. The overall comparison by integrated index (coverage area × fading time) indicated that a spray droplet at higher adjuvant concentration was likely to have a higher integrated index. In addition, Preference amended droplets had significantly more integrated index increase for crabgrass and nutsedge, while DyneAmic had more increase for purslane. Therefore, appropriate selections of spray adjuvants during herbicide applications could significantly increase droplet deposition effectiveness for controlling specific weeds. Keywords: Spray droplet, Spray additive, Herbicide application, Surfactant, Weed control.

Fading Activities of Herbicidal Droplets Amended with Emulsifiable Spray Adjuvants on Cucurbitaceous Leaves

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1888
Author(s):  
Jeng-Liang Lin ◽  
Heping Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Spray Deposition ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Coverage Area ◽  
Maximum Coverage ◽  
Fading Time ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Spray Adjuvants

Abstract. Understanding reactions of surfactant-amended droplets on difficult-to-wet weed surfaces could help develop application strategies to increase herbicide efficacy. Behaviors of herbicidal droplets containing different emulsifiable anti-evaporation spray adjuvants were investigated by characterizing 250 and 450 µm herbicidal droplet dispersion and fading time on cucurbitaceous leaves placed inside a 20°C chamber at 30% and 60% relative humidity (RH). Droplet maximum coverage area increased with droplet size but not with RH, while droplet fading time increased with both droplet size and RH. Despite 450 µm droplets having greater maximum coverage area than 250 µm droplets, the larger droplets had higher fading rates and lower ratios of maximum coverage area to droplet volume. Droplet maximum coverage area and fading time on leaves were affected by adding spray adjuvants to the herbicide-only solution. The Uptake surfactant was more effective than the other two surfactants (AntiEvap+BS1000 and Enhance) in increasing droplet maximum coverage area and fading time. Compared to the herbicide-only solution, addition of Uptake surfactant to the herbicide solution could increase maximum coverage area by 68% and 52% for 250 and 450 µm droplets, respectively, but addition of AntiEvap+BS1000 or Enhance surfactants did not show significant increase. Similarly, addition of Uptake surfactant to the herbicide-only solution increased droplet fading times by 11.1% and 13.2% at 30% and 60% RH, respectively, for 250 µm droplets and by 34.7% and 2.8% at 30% and 60% RH, respectively, for 450 µm droplets. In contrast, addition of AntiEvap+BS1000 surfactant reduced fading time, and addition of Enhance surfactant did not significantly affect fading time. Therefore, appropriate selection of spray adjuvants for herbicide applications could significantly influence droplet deposit behaviors on cucurbitaceous leaves, leading to improved effectiveness of weed control. Keywords: Herbicide application, Spray deposition, Spray droplet, Surfactant, Weed control.

Influence of AC 263,222 Rate and Application Method on Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore M. Webster ◽  
John W. Wilcut ◽  
Harold D. Coble
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Application Rate ◽  
Purple Nutsedge ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Control Effectiveness ◽  
Application Method ◽  
Rate Controlled ◽  
Ac 263,222 ◽  
Prickly Sida

Experiments were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the weed control effectiveness from several rates of AC 263,222 applied PPI and PRE (36 and 72 g ai/ha), early POST (EPOST) (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), POST (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), and EPOST followed by (fb) POST (27 fb 27 g/ha or 36 fb 36 g/ha). These treatments were compared to the commercial standard of bentazon at 0.28 kg ai/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg ai/ha EPOST fb bentazon at 0.56 kg/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg/ha plus 2,4-DB at 0.28 kg ae/ha. Application method had little effect on weed control with AC 263,222. In contrast, application rate affected control. Purple nutsedge, yellow nutsedge, prickly sida, smallflower morningglory, bristly starbur, common cocklebur, and coffee senna were controlled at least 82% with AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha (one-half the maximum registered use rate) regardless of application method. AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%, Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%, andIpomoeamorningglory species 89 to 99%. A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or more controlled all weeds (with the exception of Florida beggarweed) as well or greater than sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DB. All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control.

Effect of Formulation and Nozzle Type on Droplet Size with Isopropylamine and Trimesium Salts of Glyphosate

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Mueller ◽  
Alvin R. Womac
Keyword(s):  
Nonionic Surfactant ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Droplet Distribution ◽  
Extended Range ◽  
Glyphosate Formulation ◽  
Nozzle Type ◽  
Flat Fan Nozzle

When spray mixtures were examined using a laser spray droplet analyzer, the new isopropylamine glyphosate formulation produced more small droplets than a previous isopropylamine salt of glyphosate formulation or glyphosate–trimesium plus nonionic surfactant. The use of a pre-orifice flat-fan nozzle and an impact type flat-fan nozzle reduced the amount of small droplets produced compared to an existing extended range flat-fan nozzle, while maintaining a spray droplet distribution that could still provide good weed control. The new nozzle technologies could provide a useful management tool to manage potential drift situations.

Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Watermelon Grown in Plasticulture

Weed Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Bertucci ◽  
Katherine M. Jennings ◽  
David W. Monks ◽  
Jonathan R. Schultheis ◽  
Frank J. Louws ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Citrullus Lanatus ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Seedless Watermelon ◽  
Common Purslane ◽  
Weed Removal

AbstractField experiments determined the critical period for weed control (CPWC) in grafted and nongrafted watermelon [Citrullus lanatus(Thumb.) Matsum. & Nakai] grown in plasticulture. Transplant types included ‘Exclamation’ seedless watermelon as the nongrafted control as well as Exclamation grafted onto two interspecific hybrid squash (ISH) rootstocks, ‘Carnivor’ and ‘Kazako’. To simulate weed emergence throughout the season, establishment treatments (EST) consisted of two seedlings each of common purslane (Portulaca oleraceaL.), large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis(L.) Scop.], and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentusL.) transplanted in a 15 by 15 cm square centered on watermelon plants at 0, 2, 3, 4, and 6 wk after watermelon transplanting (WATr) and remained until the final watermelon harvest at 11 WATr. To simulate weed control at different times in the season, removal treatments (REM) consisted of two seedlings of the same weed species transplanted in a 15 by 15 cm square centered on watermelon plants on the same day of watermelon transplanting and allowed to remain until 2, 3, 4, 6, and 11 WATr, at which time they were removed. Season-long weedy and weed-free controls were included for both EST and REM studies in both years. For all transplant types, aboveground biomass of weeds decreased as weed establishment was delayed and increased as weed removal was delayed. The predicted CPWC for nongrafted Exclamation and Carnivor required only a single weed removal between 2.3 and 2.5 WATr and 1.9 and 2.6 WATr, respectively, while predicted CPWC for Kazako rootstock occurred from 0.3 to 2.6 WATr. Our study results suggest that weed control for this mixed population of weeds would be similar between nongrafted Exclamation and Exclamation grafted onto Carnivor. But the observed CPWC of Exclamation grafted onto Kazako suggests that CPWC may vary with specific rootstock–scion combinations.

Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Growth and Tuber Production in Response to Increasing Glyphosate Rates and Selected Adjuvants

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Felix ◽  
Joseph T. Dauer ◽  
Andrew G. Hulting ◽  
Carol Mallory-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Nonionic Surfactant ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Logistic Models ◽  
Field Conditions ◽  
Cyperus Esculentus ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Tuber Production

Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of selected adjuvants on glyphosate efficacy on yellow nutsedge and tuber production. Glyphosate was applied at 0, 0.25, 0.43, 0.87, 1.26 (1× rate), and 1.74 kg ae ha−1at 31 d after yellow nutsedge was planted. Each rate was mixed with one of the following adjuvants: ammonium sulfate (AMS), AMS plus nonionic surfactant (NIS), or AMS plus an experimental adjuvant (W-7995) plus NIS. Plants were evaluated for injury and for the number and size of tubers produced. Dose–response curves based on log-logistic models were used to determine the effective glyphosate rate plus adjuvant that provided both 90% effective dose (ED90) for yellow nutsedge injury and reduced tuber production. Addition of NIS to glyphosate plus AMS resulted in the greatest yellow nutsedge injury at 28 d after treatment (DAT). Addition of the experimental adjuvant plus NIS resulted in injury similar to NIS alone. The ED90for injury at 28 DAT was 2.12 kg ha−1with glyphosate plus AMS and NIS compared with 2.18 kg ha−1for W-7995 plus NIS and 3.06 kg ha−1with AMS alone. The ED90rates with different adjuvants represent 168%, 173%, and 243% of the highest glyphosate rate (1.26 kg ha−1) labeled for application on many glyphosate-resistant crops. However, the estimated ED90to reduce small, medium, large, and total tubers were 1.60, 1.50, 1.63, and 1.66 kg ha−1, respectively. Increases in labeled rates of glyphosate may be required to reduce yellow nutsedge tuber production in field conditions. Use of lower glyphosate rates should be discouraged because it may increase tuber production and exacerbate yellow nutsedge expansion in infested fields.

Effect of Drip-Applied Metam-Sodium andS-Metolachlor on Yellow Nutsedge and Common Purslane in Polyethylene-Mulched Bell Pepper and Tomato

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Dayton ◽  
Sushila Chaudhari ◽  
Katherine M. Jennings ◽  
David W. Monks ◽  
Greg W. Hoyt
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Methyl Bromide ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Bell Pepper ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Metam Sodium ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Tomato Yield ◽  
Common Purslane

Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of metam sodium andS-metolachlor applied through drip irrigation on yellow nutsedge, common purslane, bell pepper, and tomato (injury and yield) in plasticulture. Treatments consisted of weed-free, weedy,S-metolachlor alone at 0.85 kg ha-1, methyl bromide, metam sodium (43, 86, 176, and 358 kg ai ha–1) alone, and metam sodium (43, 86, 176, and 358 kg ai ha–1) followed byS-metolachlor at 0.85 kg ha–1. Metam sodium andS-metolachlor was applied preplant 2 wk before and 2 wk after transplanting (WAT) through drip irrigation, respectively. No injury was observed to bell pepper and tomato from metam sodium alone, or metam sodium fbS-metolachlor treatments. With the exception of yellow nutsedge density 15 WAT in bell pepper, herbicide program did not influence yellow nutsedge and common purslane density at 4 and 6 WAT and bell pepper and tomato yield. At 15 WAT, yellow nutsedge density was lower in treatments that received metam sodium fbS-metolachlor compared to those treatments that only received metam sodium. Drip-applied metam sodium at 176 and 358 kg ha–1in both bell pepper and tomato provided similar control of common purslane, and yellow nutsedge, produced comparable yields, and failed to elicit any negative crop growth responses when compared to MeBr. In conclusion, metam sodium at 176 and 358 kg ha–1fbS-metolachlor 0.85 kg ha–1is an effective MeBr alternative for season long weed control in plasticulture bell pepper and tomato.

Leaf characteristics and surfactants affect primisulfuron droplet spread in three broadleaf weeds

Weed Science ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debanjan Sanyal ◽  
Prasanta C. Bhowmik ◽  
Krishna N. Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Surface ◽  
Epicuticular Wax ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Spray Droplet ◽  
Common Lambsquarters ◽  
Leaf Surfaces ◽  
Droplet Behavior ◽  
Wax Content ◽  
Common Purslane

Laboratory studies were conducted to examine the leaf surface, epicuticular wax content, and spray droplet behavior on common lambsquarters, common purslane, and velvetleaf. Adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy, and leaf wax was extracted and quantified for all three weed species. The spread of 1-μl droplets of distilled water, primisulfuron solution (without surfactant), primisulfuron solution with a nonionic low foam wetter/spreader adjuvant (0.25% v/v), and with an organosilicone wetting agent (0.1% v/v) was determined on the adaxial leaf surfaces of each of the weed species. Glands and trichomes were present on both the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces of velvetleaf. Common purslane had neither glands nor trichomes on either side of the leaf. Common lambsquarters did not have any glands or trichomes, but it had globular bladder hairs on both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces. Stomata were present on both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces in all three weed species. Common purslane had a much lower number of stomata per unit area of leaf as compared with velvetleaf or common lambsquarters. Common lambsquarters had the highest epicuticular wax content on the leaf surface (274.5 μg cm−2), followed by common purslane (153.4 μg cm−2) and velvetleaf (7.4 μg cm−2). There were no significant variations in the spread of the 1-μl droplet of distilled water and primisulfuron (without adjuvant) among the species. Spread of primisulfuron droplets with surfactant was highest on the leaf surface of velvetleaf that had the lowest wax content. Droplet spread was greatest with organosilicone surfactant followed by the nonionic surfactant.

Critical Period for Weed Control in Grafted and Nongrafted Fresh Market Tomato

Weed Science ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushila Chaudhari ◽  
Katherine M. Jennings ◽  
David W. Monks ◽  
David L. Jordan ◽  
Christopher C. Gunter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Tomato Plant ◽  
Critical Period ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Relative Yield ◽  
Fresh Market ◽  
Yield Data ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Common Purslane

Field experiments were conducted to determine the critical period for weed control (CPWC) in nongrafted ‘Amelia’ and Amelia grafted onto ‘Maxifort’ tomato rootstock grown in plasticulture. The establishment treatments (EST) consisted of two seedlings each of common purslane, large crabgrass, and yellow nutsedge transplanted at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 12 wk after tomato transplanting (WAT) and remained until tomato harvest to simulate weeds emerging at different times. The removal treatments (REM) consisted of the same weeds transplanted on the day of tomato transplanting and removed at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12 WAT to simulate weeds controlled at different times. The beginning and end of the CPWC, based on a 5% yield loss of marketable tomato, was determined by fitting log-logistic and Gompertz models to the relative yield data representing REM and EST, respectively. In both grafted and nongrafted tomato, plant aboveground dry biomass increased as establishment of weeds was delayed and tomato plant biomass decreased when removal of weeds was delayed. For a given time of weed removal and establishment, grafted tomato plants produced higher biomass than nongrafted. The delay in establishment and removal of weeds resulted in weed biomass decrease and increase of the same magnitude, respectively, regardless of transplant type. The predicted CPWC was from 2.2 to 4.5 WAT in grafted tomato and from 3.3 to 5.8 WAT in nongrafted tomato. The length (2.3 or 2.5 wk) of the CPWC in fresh market tomato was not affected by grafting; however, the CPWC management began and ended 1 wk earlier in grafted tomato than in nongrafted tomato.

A Soil Probe System to Evaluate Weed Seed Survival in Soil Disinfestation Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 752-760
Author(s):  
Mark Hoffmann ◽  
Steven A. Fennimore
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Seed Viability ◽  
Weed Seed ◽  
Control Efficacy ◽  
Soil Disinfestation ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Weed Seeds ◽  
Probe System ◽  
Different Depths ◽  
Common Purslane

Weed seed viability is an important parameter to assess the efficacy of soil disinfestation methods like fumigation and steam. In field experiments, seed samples are commonly placed in permeable bags and buried at several depths in soil before the application of soil disinfestation treatments. The seed samples are recovered several days to weeks after treatment and then seed viability is determined in the laboratory. The process of sample installation and recovery is time consuming and may expose personnel to hazardous conditions such as heat or fumigants. Described is a custom soil probe system, developed to simplify installation and recovery of weed seeds from soil. Each soil probe is capable of holding weed seed samples at three different depths up to 30 cm. The following hypothesis was tested: viability of weed seeds is similarly affected by soil disinfestation treatments whether the seeds were contained in the soil probe system or seed bag assays. Two different soil disinfestation trials were conducted: (1) a repeated micro-plot study (USDA Salinas, 1 m-2), using steam as a soil disinfestation treatment and (2) a field study in a commercial strawberry field with 1,3-dicloropropene plus chloropicrin (Pic-Clor 60) as soil disinfestation method. In both studies, seed viability of burning nettle, common knotweed, and common purslane (tetrazolium assay) and germination rates of yellow nutsedge tubers were assessed. Results indicate that the soil probe system can be used as an alternative to the seed bag assay to assess weed control efficacy of described soil disinfestation methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document