The College's role in future medical regulation

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-51
Author(s):  
Irving Taylor ◽  
Dave Clark
Keyword(s):  
Medical Profession ◽  
Medical Officer ◽  
Medical Professional ◽  
Chief Medical Officer ◽  
Professional Regulation ◽  
Medical Regulation ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Government

In July 2006 the chief medical officer (CMO) for England, Sir Liam Donaldson, published his report on the future of medical professional regulation, Good doctors, safer patients. In light of this report, 2007 is likely to mark the start of a process of long-expected change in the regulation of the medical profession. A statement from the government is anticipated shortly, which will set out how they plan to act on the recommendations set out in Good doctors, safer patients.

Back to Bedlam? Chelmsford and the Press

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Lupton
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Royal Commission ◽  
The Public ◽  
Medical Regulation ◽  
South Wales ◽  
The Press ◽  
The Government ◽  
Role Of The Government

The Australian press played a vital part in bringing the events at Chelmsford Private Hospital to the attention of the general public, and in pressuring the New South Wales government to institute a Royal Commission into Deep Sleep Therapy. This paper describes the ways in which the press brought Chelmsford events onto the public agenda. It pays particular attention to aspects of the press coverage of the findings of the Royal Commission. The paper identifies the discourses concerning psychiatric care, the doctor-patient relationship and the role of the government in regulating the medical profession which were dominant in press accounts of Chelmsford. It is argued that while pre-existing stereotypes about mad psychiatrists and asylums were used to describe Chelmsford, more confronting ideas concerning the need for medical regulation and patient consumerism received press attention and therefore a public airing. The implications for psychiatric care in Australia are examined.

scholarly journals COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN MEDICAL PROFESSION REGULATION: LESSONS LEARNT FROM INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Medical Graduate ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Medical Regulation ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Common Goals ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Uk

Background: Medical profession regulation are carried out through certification and licensure which can be executed by the government, the organizational profession or the collaboration of both. Having a long standing credibility in professional regulation, medical professions have required every medical graduate to undergo certification and licensure process. The UK system adopts the government-led and the USA system has opted for the professional-led medical regulation. In Indonesia currently there are two laws regulating medical profession, namely Medical Practice Law No.29/2004 and Medical Education Law. No.20/2013. These two Laws have given mandates for medical profession regulation to different stakeholders, resulting in conflicting roles and functions, particularly in certification and licensure. Attempts to overcome these situations have been initiated, by inviting all stakeholders involved to discuss the solution during the period of December 2014-January 2015. This study aims at understanding the decision making process to achieve consensus using the concept of collaborative governance.Method: Qualitative method using a case study is applied and documents analysis is used for data collection. Thematic analysis is employed for data analysis.Results: Six themes are identified to reflect the decision making process in collaborative governance. It starts with distrust, followed by mutual understanding and willingness to listen, then common goals are agreed. Each stakeholder conducts an internal reflection and eventually accepts a consensus.Conclusion: The concept of collaborative governance can be applied in medical profession regulation to achieve consensus in collective decision making process.

scholarly journals How would you define 'a good dentist'?

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Ian Pocock
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Medical Officer ◽  
Chief Medical Officer ◽  
Royal Infirmary ◽  
Paediatric Surgery ◽  
Public Concern ◽  
Medical Regulation ◽  
Healthcare Professions ◽  
Medical Healthcare

Regulation of the healthcare professions has been under scrutiny with the publication of two interrelated reports: Good doctors, safer patients and The Regulation of the Non-Medical Healthcare Professions. The first, a report by the chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, provides a fundamental review of medical regulation in the wake of the Shipman inquiry and other cases which have led to public concern, such as the Bristol Royal Infirmary paediatric surgery case. The second provides a parallel assessment of the regulation of non-medical healthcare professionals.

Een Duits netwerk bij de voorbereiding van de Militärverwaltung in België (1939-1940)

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-305
Author(s):  
Etienne Verhoeyen
Keyword(s):  
Study Groups ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Student Group ◽  
German Army ◽  
The Future ◽  
French Speaking ◽  
The Government ◽  
Set Up ◽  
First World ◽  
Preparatory Work

Nadat Hitler in oktober 1939 beslist had een aanval in het Westen te ondernemen, werden in Keulen twee studiegroepen opgericht, die het toekomstig bezettingsregime van België en Nederland moesten voorbereiden. Er was een studiecommissie die geleid werd door de toekomstige leider van het Duits Militair Bestuur in België, Regierungspräsident Reeder, en daarnaast bestond een geheime studiegroep die de Sondergruppe Student werd genoemd. Deze bijdrage belicht het voorbereidend werk van de leden van deze studiegroep op het gebied van handel, industrie, recht, Volkstum en cultuur in België. De groep legde een grote belangstelling voor de Flamenfrage aan de dag en trok daarbij lessen uit de ervaringen met de bezetting van België tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog. Ofschoon er van diverse zijden in Duitsland werd op aangestuurd, hebben zowel de 'commissie Reeder' als de Sondergruppe de wederinvoering van de bestuurlijke scheiding van het Vlaams en Franstalig landsgedeelte, één van de 'verworvenheden' van het Vlaams activisme uit 1914-18, beslist afgewezen. De bijdrage laat ook de tegenstellingen zien die in Duitsland bestonden op het gebied van de beïnvloeding (ten voordele van Duitsland) in de te bezetten gebieden. ________ A German network in the preparation of the Militärverwaltung (Army administration) in Belgium (1939-1940)After Hitler had decided in October 1939 to carry out an attack on the West, two study groups were set up in Cologne in order to prepare the future occupational regime of Belgium and the Netherlands.  The future leader of the German Army Administration in Belgium, President of the Government Reeder chaired the study group, and in addition there was a secret study group called the Sondergruppe Student (Special Student Group).This contribution illuminates the preparatory work of the members of this study group in the area of trade, industry, law, Volkstum (nationality) and culture in Belgium. The group demonstrated a lot of interest in the Flamenfrage (Flemish question) and in doing so drew lessons from the experience of the occupation of Belgium during the First World War.Although people from various quarters in Germany aimed for the reintroduction of the governmental separation between  the Flemish and French speaking parts of the country, one of the 'achievements' of Flemish activism from the period of 1914-1918, both the 'Reeder committee' and the 'Sondergruppe' definitely dismissed it. This contribution also demonstrates the contradictions present in Germany in the area of influencing the territories to be occupied (in favour of Germany).

THE FUTURE OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

BMJ ◽  
1918 ◽  
Vol 2 (3005) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
A. Z. C. Cressy
Keyword(s):  
Medical Profession ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Knights and Knaves in the English Medical Profession: the Case of Clinical Excellence Awards

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARK EXWORTHY ◽  
PAULA HYDE ◽  
PAMELA MCDONALD-KUHNE
Keyword(s):  
Health Policy ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Clinical Excellence ◽  
Medical Professional ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Written Responses ◽  
Private Interests ◽  
The Uk

AbstractWe elaborate Le Grand's thesis of ‘knights and knaves’ in terms of clinical excellence awards (CEAs), the ‘financial bonuses’ which are paid to over half of all English hospital specialists and which can be as much as £75,000 (€92,000) per year in addition to an NHS (National Health Service) salary. Knights are ‘individuals who are motivated to help others for no private reward’ while knaves are ‘self-interested individuals who are motivated to help others only if by doing so they will serve their private interests.’ Doctors (individually and collectively) exhibit both traits but the work of explanation of the inter-relationship between them has remained neglected. Through a textual analysis of written responses to a recent review of CEAs, we examine the ‘knightly’ and ‘knavish’ arguments used by medical professional stakeholders in defending these CEAs. While doctors promote their knightly claims, they are also knavish in shaping the preferences of, and options for, policy-makers. Policy-makers continue to support CEAs but have introduced revised criteria for CEAs, putting pressure on the medical profession to accept reforms. CEAs illustrate the enduring and flexible power of the medical profession in the UK in colonising reforms to their pay, and also the subtle inter-relationship between knights and knaves in health policy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document