scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of preoperative IOP reduction using a preservative-free fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol eye drops versus oral acetazolamide and dexamethasone eye drops and assessment of the clinical outcome of trabeculectomy in glaucoma

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0171636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Lorenz ◽  
Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik ◽  
Katharina Bell ◽  
Giulia Renieri ◽  
Alexander Keicher ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1407-1414
Author(s):  
Bo Kyung Kim ◽  
Si Nae Kim ◽  
Joon Mo Kim

Purpose: To analyze the efficacy and safety of preservative-containing and preservative-free 0.2% brimonidine tartrate and 0.5% timolol maleate fixed combination drug in normal tension glaucoma.Methods: Fifty-one patients (84 eyes) who were diagnosed with normal tension glaucoma and with preservative-containing or preservative-free brimonidine-timolol fixed combinations alone were analyzed retrospectively from January 2017 to February 2020. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured four times a day (9 a.m., 11 a.m., 2 p.m., and 4 p.m.) before and at 6 months after applying eye drops. We analyzed and compared the effect of lowering IOP and the occurrence of intra or extra-ocular adverse effects.Results: A significant mean IOP reduction was shown in both groups: -1.95 ± 2.50 mmHg (-12.26 ± 15.87%) in the preservative-containing group and -1.60 ± 2.06 mmHg (-10.54 ± 13.94%) in the preservative-free group at 6 months after eyedrop instillation. The IOP was lowest in both groups at 11 a.m. There were no significant differences between the two groups in lowering IOP. Serious adverse effects causing discontinuation of the eye drops were not observed.Conclusions: Both preservative-containing and preservative-free brimonidine-timolol fixed combinations are effective in lowering IOP in normal tension glaucoma patients and are considered to be effective as eye drops without serious adverse effects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-06
Author(s):  
Tokko HA ◽  
Al-Awadi A ◽  
Somani S

Purpose: We aim to evaluate the impact of combining a preservative-free drop, cyclosporine 0.05% emulsion, and omega-3 oral supplementation on the signs and symptoms of dry eye in a typical ophthalmic practice.Design: A retrospective case series conducted on patients with dry eye disease.Methods: Patients diagnosed with dry eye in a typical ophthalmology practice were initiated on a fixed combination regimen which included a preservative-free eye drop (I-DROP ® PUR GEL, I-MED pharma), cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion, and oral omega-3 supplement(Dry Eye Omega Benefits®, PRN)for 3 monthsconsecutively. The primary outcome measured was a symptom score using the Canadian Dry Eye Assessment Tool (CDEA). Secondary outcome measure was Non-invasive Keratograph Break-up Time (NIKBUT). Primary and secondary outcomes measured at baseline and 3 months following intervention were compared.Results: Thirty-six patients were included with a female male ratio of 2.6:1 and average age of 64.Patient symptoms improved significantly following the intervention as demonstrated by a lower CDEA score during the second visit compared to the first visit (16.11 vs. 19.50, respectively) (p< .05). NIKBUT scores were also significantly improved as demonstrated by a higher score during the second visit compared to the first in both the right (13.18 vs. 11.44) (p< .05) and left (14.62 vs. 12.78) (p< .01) eyes, respectively.Conclusion: A fixed combination of preservative-free eye drops, cyclosporine 0.05% and omega-3 supplementation may be an effective first line treatment option in alleviating symptoms and improving signs of patients suffering from dry eye.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 498-506
Author(s):  
Florent Aptel ◽  
Norbert Pfeiffer ◽  
Stefanie Schmickler ◽  
Jonathan Clarke ◽  
Cosme Lavín-Dapena ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Renieri ◽  
Katrin Führer ◽  
Karl Scheithe ◽  
Katrin Lorenz ◽  
Norbert Pfeiffer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2019-315623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hedengran ◽  
Alvilda T Steensberg ◽  
Gianni Virgili ◽  
Augusto Azuara-Blanco ◽  
Miriam Kolko

Background/aimsThis systematic review compared the efficacy and safety of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved eye-drops with alternatively preserved (AP) and preservative-free (PF) eye-drops.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for randomised controlled trials in June and October 2019. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were made by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Handbook. Studies on prostaglandin analogue or beta-blocker eye-drops and patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were included. Primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP). Secondary outcomes were safety measures as assessed in original study.ResultsOf 433 articles screened, 16 studies were included. IOP meta-analysis was conducted on 13 studies (4201 patients) ranging from 15 days to 6 months. No significant differences between BAK versus PF and AP were identified (95% CI −0.00 to 0.30 mm Hg, p=0.05). Meta-analyses revealed no differences between BAK versus AP and PF with regards to conjunctival hyperaemia (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.22, 3800 patients, 9 studies), ocular hyperaemia (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.78, 2268 patients, 5 studies), total ocular adverse events (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.20, 1906 patients, 5 studies) or tear break-up time (mean difference 0.89, 95% CI −0.03 to 1.81, 130 patients, 3 studies). Diverse reporting on safety measures made comparison challenging. Risk of bias was assessed as high or unclear in many relevant domains, suggesting potential selective reporting or under-reporting.ConclusionNo clinically significant differences on efficacy or safety could be determined between BAK versus AP and PF. However, there were substantial uncertainties on safety.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019139692


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Maretha Amrayni ◽  
Elsa Gustianty ◽  
Susi Heryati ◽  
Andika Prahasta ◽  
Maula Rifada ◽  
...  

Introduction : The longterm use of topical antiglaucoma might cause ocular surface instability due to active substance or preservative used. Impression cytology examination may reveal superficial epithelial cells on conjunctiva and cornea, including goblet cells. Goblet cell density decrease is the most important parameter on evaluation of ocular surface disorder. Objective : This study was to understand ocular surface remodeling due to active substance of topical antiglaucoma with impression cytology examination among the patient prior and 3 months after therapy. Methods : This was a randomized controlled trial study with single blind masking. A total of 45 eyes from 31 patients were used as subject and distributed onto three groups treatment, which were timolol maleat 0.5%, latanoprost 0.005%, and latanoprost-timolol maleat fixed combination. All topical antiglaucoma in this study were preservative free. Result : There were differences between 3 groups in goblet cells density after 3 months therapy (p=0,030). Goblet cell density in timolol group was lower than latanoprost (p=0,041) and fixed combination (p=0,045). There was no significantly difference between 3 groups in conjunctival epithelial metaplasia degree (p=0,706) and cell to cell contact degree in corneal epithelial cells (p=0.66) after 3 months therapy. Conjunctival epithelial metaplasia degree were increased among group of timolol (p=0,008) and fixed combination (p=0,046). Conclusion : Timolol maleat 0,5% caused lower goblet cell density after 3 months therapy compare with latanoprost and fixed combination. There was no significantly difference in conjunctival epithelial metaplasia and cell to cell contact degree in corneal epithelial cells among these glaucoma treatment groups.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Guldhammer Skov ◽  
Amalie Santaolalla Rives ◽  
Josefine Freiberg ◽  
Gianni Virgili ◽  
Augusto Azuara‐Blanco ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chikako Shirai ◽  
Nobushige Matsuoka ◽  
Toru Nakazawa

Abstract Background Adherence to chronic therapies is crucial to prevent the progression of disease, such as glaucoma. However, only a limited number of studies have investigated them using real-world data in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate Japanese patients’ adherence to fixed- and unfixed-combination eye drops as a second-line therapy for glaucoma in real-world practice. Methods This retrospective, non-interventional cohort study utilized a commercially available Japanese healthcare database (MinaCare database). Medical/pharmacy claims data were collected from 2011 to 2016. The primary endpoint was adherence to medications, assessed by proportion of days covered (PDC) with medication during a 12-month post-index period. Meanwhile, the secondary endpoints included the persistence rate. Results A total of 738 patients were included in this study: 309 and 329 in the fixed- and unfixed-combination cohorts, respectively. Prostaglandin analog (PG)/β-blocker (BB) was most commonly claimed in 241/309 (78.0%) patients in the fixed-combination cohort. In the unfixed-combination cohort, PG and BB were claimed in 130/329 (39.5%) patients, whereas PG and α2-agonist were claimed in 87/329 (26.4%) patients. Patients were more adherent to the fixed-combination than the unfixed-combinations (mean PDCs [SD], 79.1% [32.1] vs. 62.2% [38.0]; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with good adherence (PDC ≥ 80%) was also higher in the fixed-combination cohort (69.6%) than in the unfixed-combination cohort (48.6%) (P < 0.0001). During the 12-month post-index period, the persistence rate was higher in the fixed-combination cohort than in the unfixed-combination cohort (47.6% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 41.9–53.0] vs. 24.9% [95% CI: 20.4–29.7], P < 0.0001). Conclusions Japanese patients with glaucoma preferred the fixed-combination therapies over the unfixed-combination therapies. Hence, fixed-combination therapies would contribute to the improvement of adherence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document