scholarly journals First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0186487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi E. Jones ◽  
Katharine O’Connell White ◽  
Wendy V. Norman ◽  
Edith Guilbert ◽  
E. Steve Lichtenberg ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice F Cartwright ◽  
Mihiri Karunaratne ◽  
Jill Barr-Walker ◽  
Nicole E Johns ◽  
Ushma D Upadhyay

BACKGROUND Abortion is a common medical procedure, yet its availability has become more limited across the United States over the past decade. Women who do not know where to go for abortion care may use the internet to find abortion facility information, and there appears to be more online searches for abortion in states with more restrictive abortion laws. While previous studies have examined the distances women must travel to reach an abortion provider, to our knowledge no studies have used a systematic online search to document the geographic locations and services of abortion facilities. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to describe abortion facilities and services available in the United States from the perspective of a potential patient searching online and to identify US cities where people must travel the farthest to obtain abortion care. METHODS In early 2017, we conducted a systematic online search for abortion facilities in every state and the largest cities in each state. We recorded facility locations, types of abortion services available, and facility gestational limits. We then summarized the frequencies by region and state. If the online information was incomplete or unclear, we called the facility using a mystery shopper method, which simulates the perspective of patients calling for services. We also calculated distance to the closest abortion facility from all US cities with populations of 50,000 or more. RESULTS We identified 780 facilities through our online search, with the fewest in the Midwest and South. Over 30% (236/780, 30.3%) of all facilities advertised the provision of medication abortion services only; this proportion was close to 40% in the Northeast (89/233, 38.2%) and West (104/262, 39.7%). The lowest gestational limit at which services were provided was 12 weeks in Wyoming; the highest was 28 weeks in New Mexico. People in 27 US cities must travel over 100 miles (160 km) to reach an abortion facility; the state with the largest number of such cities is Texas (n=10). CONCLUSIONS Online searches can provide detailed information about the location of abortion facilities and the types of services they provide. However, these facilities are not evenly distributed geographically, and many large US cities do not have an abortion facility. Long distances can push women to seek abortion in later gestations when care is even more limited.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda J Beckman

In the United States, abortion rates have been falling for several decades while attitudes have remained relatively stable. Given this background, this paper examines the current status of the fluid and contentious US abortion debate. Five relevant questions are examined: (1) What is responsible for the new wave of restrictive laws and what are their effects? (2) What is most likely responsible for changes in abortion rates? (3) What are the effects of the addition of medication abortion into the mix of abortion services? (4) What forces continue to fuel economic, geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in access to abortion services? (5) Why have gay rights been embraced by a majority of the US public and supported in legislation and judicial decisions, while during this same time period abortion rights have stagnated or declined? It is crucial for feminists to continue to promote the cause of abortion and other reproductive rights. Most important, however, is a focus on broader social issues for women (e.g., adequate education, affordable day care) and the underlying causes of unequal power in society.


2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 1216-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Bateman ◽  
Sonia Hernandez-Diaz ◽  
James P. Rathmell ◽  
John D. Seeger ◽  
Michael Doherty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There are few data regarding the utilization of opioids during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to define the prevalence and patterns of opioid use in a large cohort of pregnant women who were commercial insurance beneficiaries. Methods: Data for the study were derived from a deidentified research database of women from across the United States who had both medical and prescription benefits. By using diagnostic codes, the authors defined a cohort of 534,500 women with completed pregnancies who were enrolled in a commercial insurance plan from 6 months before pregnancy through delivery. Results: Overall, 76,742 women (14.4%) were dispensed an opioid at some point during pregnancy. There were 30,566 women (5.7%) dispensed an opioid during the first trimester, 30,434 women (5.7%) during the second trimester, and 34,906 women (6.5%) during the third trimester. Of these, 11,747 women (2.2%) were dispensed opioids three or more times during pregnancy. The most commonly dispensed opioids during pregnancy were hydrocodone (6.8%), codeine (6.1%), and oxycodone (2.0%). The prevalence of exposure at anytime during pregnancy decreased slightly during the study period from 14.9% for pregnancies that delivered in 2005 to 12.9% in 2011. The prevalence of exposure varied significantly by region and was lowest in the Northeast and highest in the South. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that opioids are very common exposures during pregnancy. Given the small and inconsistent body of literature on their safety in pregnancy, these findings suggest a need for research in this area.


2021 ◽  
pp. 096914132110316
Author(s):  
Nathalie Lepage ◽  
Philip Wyatt ◽  
Edward R Ashwood ◽  
Robert G Best ◽  
Thomas Long ◽  
...  

Objective To compile current usage of serum-based prenatal screening for Down syndrome in the United States and compare it with results from a similar 2011/2012 survey. Setting The College of American Pathologists maternal screening proficiency testing survey includes a supplemental question on the first of three yearly distributions. Methods Information regarding tests offered and the monthly number of pregnancies tested for US-based laboratories were reviewed. Results were stratified by size of laboratory, tests offered, and pregnancies tested. Findings were compared to an earlier survey. Results Fifty-six laboratories reported they will have screened 1,131,336 pregnancies in 2020. Of these, 36% are screened by stand-alone first trimester testing, 48% by stand-alone second trimester testing, and 16% using tests that integrate results from both trimesters. Eighty percent of all serum screens were provided by the five laboratories that performed the most screens (at least 50,000). These five performed similar proportions of first or second trimester screens (42.2% and 41.8%, respectively). Compared to eight years earlier, there are now 54% fewer laboratories. Pregnancies screened using the first trimester, second trimester, and integrated protocols were lower by 27%, 69%, and 72%, respectively. The serum screening activity in the US showed a 62% decrease from 2012 levels. During 2012–2020, the number of cell-free DNA tests increased from negligible to 1,492,332. Conclusions Maternal serum screening for common aneuploidies has changed significantly in eight years with fewer laboratories, a shift toward larger laboratories and a 2.5-fold reduction in pregnancies tested, likely due to the introduction of cell-free DNA screening.


Contraception ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 368
Author(s):  
K. White ◽  
H. Jones ◽  
E.S. Lichtenberg ◽  
M. Paul

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
pp. 921-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Palomaki ◽  
George J. Knight ◽  
Edward R. Ashwood ◽  
Robert G. Best ◽  
James E. Haddow

Context.—Participants in a College of American Pathologists external proficiency testing program for first and second trimester Down syndrome screening. Objectives.—To determine the number of women screened for Down syndrome in the United States, along with the type of test received and to compare those results to earlier surveys in 1988 and 1992. Design.—Questionnaires regarding the type and number of Down syndrome tests performed per month were completed by participants in early 2011 and again in early 2012. Results.—After accounting for some of the missing responses, data from up to 131 laboratories indicated that 67% (2 764 020 of 4 130 000) to 72% (2012: 2 963 592 of 4 130 000) of US pregnancies received prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Second trimester tests were most common (2012: 60%; 1 770 024 of 2 963 592), followed by integrated (2012: 21%; 627 876 of 2 963 592), and first trimester (2012: 19%; 565 692 of 2 963 592). The 6 largest laboratories tested 61% of screened pregnancies and offered the widest array of tests, while the smallest 32 tested 1% and almost always offered only second trimester tests. Conclusions.—The current population estimate of 72% pregnancies screened annually is higher than estimates from 1988 (25%) and 1992 (50%). Available testing choices are also more varied, and all testing methods perform better than those methods available 10 years ago. Clinicians should ensure that women are offered tests that follow recommended best-practice testing protocols, and screening laboratories should assess whether patient needs are being met.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0131402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon S. Walker ◽  
Richard E. Nelson ◽  
Brian R. Jackson ◽  
David G. Grenache ◽  
Edward R. Ashwood ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail R.A. Aiken ◽  
Kathleen Broussard ◽  
Dana M. Johnson ◽  
Elisa Padron

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Zygmunt

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular parasite that is a worldwide cause of infections in virtually all mammalian species, including humans. Although toxoplasmosis is extremely common in humans, most cases are subclinical and are revealed only by the presence of antibodies to this parasite. Prior to the use of immunosuppresive therapy and the recognition of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), the most devastating consequence of toxoplasmosis was seen in children of women who acquired acute toxoplasmosis in their first trimester of pregnancy.In the past two decades, this pathogen has become increasingly recognized in immunocompromised patients as a common cause of encephalitis. The tragedy of toxoplasmosis is that it is a preventable disease. French investigators, have clearly defined the risk and range of severity of congenital toxoplasmosis, the value of systemic screening and patient education, and the value of treatment of the mother during pregnancy to prevent transmission to the fetus. Prevention of a large portion of cerebral toxoplasmosis cases in immunocompromised patients might be possible if congenital toxoplasmosis was better controlled in the United States. The first step in controlling toxoplasmosis in the United States is a better appreciation of this infection.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Krueger ◽  
Jay Schulkin ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jones

Giardiasis is one of the most common parasitic diseases in the United States with over 15 400 cases reported in 2005. A survey was conducted by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate the knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists regarding the diagnosis and treatment of giardiasis. The questionnaire was distributed to a random sample of 1200 ACOG fellows during February through June of 2006. Five hundred and two (42%) responded to the survey. The respondents showed good general knowledge about diagnosis, transmission, and prevention; however, there was some uncertainty about the treatment of giardiasis and which medications are the safest to administer during the first trimester of pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document